Email: sabrangind@gmail.com
Resignation in Protest: MP woman judge quits over elevation of senior she accused of harassment and discrimination
In a powerful act of protest, Judge Aditi Gajendra Sharma resigns after the elevation of a senior she accused of caste-based harassment, calling out the judiciary’s silence, systemic bias, and betrayal of its own ideals
CAG report demolishes claim of Chouhan government, exposes major lapses in healthcare, Vyapam
The report has ignited a political storm in Madhya...
Turkish Artist Zehra Doğan Sentenced to Prison for Painting of Kurdish Town Attack
Doğan has been given a sentence of 2 years...
Forbidden love? Fearing ‘trouble’ for their families if they lived together, a young Hindu-Muslim couple chose to die together
They were in love and had been together for...
Suhana, Nahid and the Curse of Muslim Intolerance
It is up to the Mullahs and overtly sensitive...
Freedom of religion under threat across Europe after EU court rules employers can ban headscarves
Employers across Europe have been given the green light...
One million Indian Muslims have signed petition against triple talaq: Rashtriya Muslim Manch
The Muslim Rashtriya Manch (MRM), an organization floated by...
RPF personnel arrested in Kota for trying to rape woman in front of her children
Sabrang -
A Railway Protection Force (RPF) personnel was today arrested...
EU court allows companies to ban headscarves. What will be the impact on Muslim women?
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)...
Congress MP Shashi Tharoor now proposes what the UPA government never did: A Bill to end discrimination, promote equality
Congress MP Shashi Tharoor is set to introduce a...
Sexual Violence As Tool of State-Repression: Chhatisgarh’s Unending Tale of Injustice
Sabrang -
Bastar Solidarity Network, Mumbai organised the book release of...
Trending
Related VIDEOS
ALL STORIES
ALL STORIES
Caste
Thirty years on, justice remains elusive for Dalits in Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Haryana
A chapter in a major 30-year review of the PoA Act argues that institutional failures, rather than legislative gaps, remain the biggest obstacle to justice
Politics
The telegram NEET case and the expansion of platform-level censorship in India
The Court's judgment marks a significant shift in Indian digital rights jurisprudence by accepting that the very design and architecture of a platform may justify extraordinary restrictions affecting millions of lawful users
India
From a daughter to her mother Indiramma, Kavitha Lankesh writes, “I will miss you. Everyday.”
By the morning of Monday, June 15, 2026, Indira Lankesh (Indiramma as we all knew her), mother of Kavitha and Gauri Lankesh, wife and partner of Parvathi Lankesh and grandmother to her beloved Esha, left peacefully in her sleep. She was 83 years old. Today, on the afternoon of Saturday June 20, about 1/1.30 p.m. her beautiful and loyal daughter, Kavitha Lankesh wrote this tribute to her on Meta/Facebook.
Farm and Forest
A test for the Forest Rights Act in Assam
Eviction notices issued to four Taungya villages in Nagaon district have reignited questions about historical injustice, forest governance and the state's obligation to recognise forest rights before displacement
Culture
Delhi: Between Protection & Prayer: Stories of revered sites now under the protection of ASI
In Delhi, some monuments are not just remnants of the past. They continue to function as places of prayer, remain part of neighbourhood life, and exist within an ongoing struggle over who owns them, who maintains them, and who decides how they may be used. The authors examine the layered complexities involved
Dalit Bahujan Adivasi
Three decades after the PoA Act, justice remains elusive
A comprehensive 30-year review of the SC/ST Atrocities Act reveals a persistent gap between the law's transformative promise and the lived realities of Dalits and Adivasis confronting violence, discrimination, and impunity
Rule of Law
The Supreme Court in 2025: Deference, technicality and the retreat from rights
From citizenship and reservation to encounter accountability, privacy, environmental protection and minority rights, the Court's most contentious judgments of 2025 reveal an increasing preference for institutional deference and procedural compliance over substantive constitutional justice
