Email: sabrangind@gmail.com
Resignation in Protest: MP woman judge quits over elevation of senior she accused of harassment and discrimination
In a powerful act of protest, Judge Aditi Gajendra Sharma resigns after the elevation of a senior she accused of caste-based harassment, calling out the judiciary’s silence, systemic bias, and betrayal of its own ideals
In Dera Sacha Sauda, the Burden of History
"The fulcrum of the dera is a history of...
Mob attacks Christian school and girls hostel situated in front of Lt. Governor’s house in Delhi
In yet another case of an attack on minorities,...
11 brave persons who brought down the a mighty godman
Sabrang -
Usually, I am not into writing long posts on...
Free Hadiya – An apeal to the Chief Justice of India from Pinjra Tod
Sabrang -
Guest post by PINJRA TOD, a Delhi-based collective of...
“People Like Mahmood Madani Bring Shame to the Muslim Community”
People like him are also responsible for making the...
The Triple Talaq Case: The Unjust Muslim Men and Their Unjust Leaders
When a people and their leadership become iniquitous (Zalim),...
Tunisian Ulema March ‘Ahead’ of the Qu’ran: Endorse Muslim Women’s Right to Equal Inheritance, Marrying non-Muslims
To stay relevant “God’s ruling on earthly matters” could...
Why home, even when there’s war, is the most dangerous place for women
After decades of advocacy, a global summit was finally...
“It’s tragic that there were no women in the SC Bench that delivered the Triple Talaq Judgement”
Sabrang -
Shivangi Misra from the Lawyers Collective talks to senior...
Kolkata women welcome Triple Talaq judgment
Women organizations in Kolkata on Friday welcomed the Supreme Court decision...
Trending
Related VIDEOS
ALL STORIES
ALL STORIES
Farm and Forest
A test for the Forest Rights Act in Assam
Eviction notices issued to four Taungya villages in Nagaon district have reignited questions about historical injustice, forest governance and the state's obligation to recognise forest rights before displacement
Culture
Delhi: Between Protection & Prayer: Stories of revered sites now under the protection of ASI
In Delhi, some monuments are not just remnants of the past. They continue to function as places of prayer, remain part of neighbourhood life, and exist within an ongoing struggle over who owns them, who maintains them, and who decides how they may be used. The authors examine the layered complexities involved
Dalit Bahujan Adivasi
Three decades after the PoA Act, justice remains elusive
A comprehensive 30-year review of the SC/ST Atrocities Act reveals a persistent gap between the law's transformative promise and the lived realities of Dalits and Adivasis confronting violence, discrimination, and impunity
Rule of Law
The Supreme Court in 2025: Deference, technicality and the retreat from rights
From citizenship and reservation to encounter accountability, privacy, environmental protection and minority rights, the Court's most contentious judgments of 2025 reveal an increasing preference for institutional deference and procedural compliance over substantive constitutional justice
Rights
Who owns Mumbai’s streets? The Bombay High Court, street vendors and a decade of regulatory failure
What began as a case about encroachments has become a searching inquiry into the State's failure to implement the Street Vendors Act, the rights of pedestrians and informal workers, and the growing role of identification and verification in urban governance
India
Defectors & Democracy: A critique of the Tenth Schedule of the Indian Constitution
The right of voters to recall representatives who defect—as seen in West Bengal, Maharashtra, Goa and Arunachal Pradesh—and the requirement of intra-party democracy could form part of a broader institutional redesign. Such measures would deepen democratic values and, above all, signal a refusal by citizens to accept the corruption of their mandate. These may be among the reforms that India's Parliament and democracy most urgently need
Gender and Sexuality
A regressive 2026 amendment to rights of Trans persons is under legal challenge even as pride month is celebrated
Unable to stay the statute, High Courts have charted a middle path—protecting petitioners already undergoing hormone therapy while the broader constitutional challenge awaits adjudication by the Supreme Court
