‘Chalo Delhi’: Thousands march to Supreme court against ‘Vote Chori’, demand Gyanesh Kumar’s removal

Led by the INDIA bloc, the October 12 march brought opposition parties, lawyers, student organisations and civil society onto Delhi’s streets, demanding a halt to the SIR process and accountability for alleged electoral manipulation
Image: https://globalbihari.com

Thousands of people poured onto the streets of central Delhi on Monday, October 12, as opposition parties, lawyers, students and civil society groups joined the INDIA bloc’s ‘Chalo Delhi – March for Democracy’, demanding the removal of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, an immediate halt to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls, and an end to police repression against democratic dissent.

 

The march, led by Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi and other INDIA bloc leaders, headed towards the Supreme Court from Barakhamba Road, with crowds stretching between Mandi House and Connaught Place. The protesters’ central demand was that allegations of large-scale voter deletions and irregularities in the revision of electoral rolls must be addressed, and that the institution responsible for conducting elections must be held accountable.

 

The mobilisation was not confined to the Congress or the larger opposition parties. The Communist Party of India (Marxist), Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) Liberation, CPI, student organisations and civil society groups also joined the march.

 

CPI(ML) Liberation and the All India Students’ Association (AISA) called for Kumar’s removal, the scrapping of the SIR process and an end to police repression against democratic voices. Their representatives, including CPI(ML) Liberation General Secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya, arrived to participate in the march. The CPI, the All India Students’ Federation (AISF) and the All India Youth Federation (AIYF) likewise joined the mobilisation, declaring that barricades and the deployment of security personnel could not silence demands for accountability.

 

The presence of student and youth organisations was particularly significant in the context of the police action reported during the October 10 protests. The CPI(M) General Secretary M. A. Baby and Brinda Karat also addressed the media at A. K. Gopalan Bhawan alongside student and youth protesters who alleged police brutality.

 

The gathering also drew people beyond the established party structures. As the march moved through central Delhi, the participation of lawyers, students, activists and citizens underscored the breadth of concern over the SIR exercise and the treatment of those opposing it.

 

The scale of the mobilisation was striking. The Indian Express reported that thousands had gathered for the march, while The Wire reported that Congress sources estimated the turnout at around 50,000. Participants had arrived from neighbouring states, including Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan and Haryana, as well as Mumbai, according to The Wire. Left parties, the Samajwadi Party, civil society organisations and the Campaign for Judicial and Public Accountability (CJP) were among those participating in the mobilisation.

A march for electoral accountability

The march followed days of mounting anger over the SIR exercise and the treatment of protesters who had taken to Delhi’s streets on October 10. The opposition has alleged that the revision process risks disenfranchising legitimate voters, while demanding accountability from the Election Commission of India (ECI) and its chief, Gyanesh Kumar.

 

The INDIA bloc announced that it would approach the Supreme Court over the allegations. Bar and Bench reported that Rahul Gandhi filed a petition before the apex court concerning alleged large-scale voter deletions and irregularities in the SIR process. The opposition has demanded that the exercise be halted and that Kumar resign over the allegations of ‘vote chori’.

The march was therefore not merely a show of opposition unity. It sought to take a dispute over electoral rolls and the functioning of the Election Commission directly to the country’s highest constitutional court, placing the question of electoral integrity at the centre of a mass political mobilisation.

The alliance’s message was forceful. In a statement posted by the Indian National Congress, the party declared that the march was intended to protect democracy and the Constitution and ensure accountability for those accused of stealing votes.

At the Constitution Club of India, opposition MPs raised slogans against Kumar. Leaders and representatives of the alliance, including Samajwadi Party president Akhilesh Yadav, Trinamool Congress chairperson Mamata Banerjee, Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut and Congress leader Sachin Pilot, joined the mobilisation. Communist Party of India (Marxist) leader Brinda Karat also criticised the government, telling the Press Trust of India (PTI), “What is happening in Delhi is unprecedented. We want this government to stop its dictatorship. We will not stop now.”

 

Barricades, restrictions and a city turned into a security zone

As protesters converged on Barakhamba Road and prepared to move towards the Supreme Court, the police response was conspicuous. Roads were crowded with security personnel, and multiple layers of barricades were erected along the route.

Journalist Raunaq Bali reported at least four layers of barricades and police personnel on Bhagwan Das Road, towards the Supreme Court. Loudspeaker announcements repeatedly informed people that restrictions under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) were in force and asked them to leave the area peacefully.

 

The security arrangements stood in sharp contrast to the crowds gathering to assert their right to democratic participation. As the bus carrying opposition leaders moved slowly through the packed streets, protesters continued to assemble, raise slogans and press their demands. PTI also reported protesters climbing barricades near Barakhamba Road during the ‘Dilli Chalo’ march.

 

The restrictions also come against the backdrop of the reported denotification of Jantar Mantar as a protest site. PTI reported that the Congress criticised Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah over the decision, accusing them of treating democracy as a matter of political convenience.

The question confronting the authorities is not simply how to manage a large gathering. It is whether restrictions on public spaces and the deployment of extensive security arrangements are being used in ways that make the exercise of the right to protest increasingly difficult. Section 163 BNSS permits preventive orders in specified circumstances; its invocation does not, by itself, settle the constitutional question of whether restrictions on peaceful assembly are necessary and proportionate.

Lawyers take to the streets and the courtroom corridors

The mobilisation also brought lawyers into the protest, following reports of detentions and alleged police violence against lawyers during the October 10 demonstrations. In a striking show of dissent, lawyers at the Delhi High Court gathered to recite the Preamble to the Constitution. Bar and Bench reported that the demonstration came days after lawyers were detained and allegedly attacked during the earlier protests. The Indian Express separately reported that lawyers wore black ribbons and read the Constitution to protest police action against their colleagues.

 

Senior advocates also joined the mobilisation outside the court. Senior Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi led a group of lawyers walking from the Supreme Court towards Modern School in protest against Kumar and the alleged police brutality against lawyers, according to a post by advocate Paras Nath Singh.

 

Senior Advocate Rebecca John articulated the constitutional stakes of participating in the demonstration. Speaking to The Wire, she asserted, “We have the right to our roads, and we have the right to protest.”

 

Yogendra Yadav, who also joined the mobilisation, stressed that the march was not intended to pressure the judiciary but to strengthen its role as the guardian of the Constitution. The distinction matters: the opposition’s stated objective was to bring allegations concerning the electoral process before the court, while asserting that democratic accountability cannot be reduced to a matter of political disagreement.

 

From October 10 to October 12: The streets remain a site of resistance

Monday’s march unfolded two days after Delhi witnessed a sweeping police crackdown on people attempting to march to Jantar Mantar to demand Kumar’s removal. Reports of detentions and alleged assaults on protesters and lawyers have since prompted further demonstrations, including the recitation of the Preamble by lawyers at the Delhi High Court.

The protests on October 12 thus carried a demand that extended beyond the immediate question of the SIR. They also challenged the growing use of police restrictions and preventive measures against those seeking to demonstrate in public spaces.

The crowds moving from Mandi House and Connaught Place towards Barakhamba Road, the lawyers reading the Constitution, and the student and youth organisations joining opposition leaders all formed part of the same wider assertion: that electoral integrity and the right to dissent are questions of democratic accountability, not simply matters of law and order.

For the INDIA bloc, the march was an attempt to bring the allegations of electoral manipulation before the Supreme Court while demanding consequences for the Election Commission’s leadership. For the lawyers and civil society participants, it was also a protest against the alleged use of police power to suppress democratic voices.

Detailed reports may be read here, here and here.

 

Related:

Caged in Police Vans, Beaten in Custody, Journalists Attacked: Delhi’s crackdown on anti-CEC protests draws UN condemnation

Vote for Democracy seeks answers from ECI and TCS on ECI’s electoral database access and security

Barricades and detentions fail to stop Delhi protesters marching against CEC

Protest Denied, Dissent Policed: India’s crackdown on those challenging the Election Commission

Bihar adds 14 lakh voters after SIR, questions remain over those excluded from 2025 assembly polls

Why Majoritarianism today is the single most acute threat to democracy

 

 

 

Trending

IN FOCUS

Related Articles

ALL STORIES

ALL STORIES