From the moment C. Joseph Vijay assumed power in Tamil Nadu, a well-oiled machinery of disinformation has been in overdrive. What distinguishes this particular misinformation wave from routine political spin is its structural character— it is not merely spontaneous enthusiasm from supporters, but an organised, multi-layered ecosystem comprising TVK-aligned influencer pages, meme networks, WhatsApp forwards, and, most alarmingly, mainstream commercial media houses that appear to have abdicated their basic editorial responsibility.

This is not simply a first-time entrant indulging in political cheerleading. This is a calculated attempt and systematic erasure of the DMK government’s policy legacy and its reattribution to a new administration that has, in many cases, not issued a single order, notification, or Government Order to justify the credit it is claiming. Interestingly, when the Modi 1.0 government came to power, a similar tool-kit was used by the Union government to appropriate previous government schemes through re-naming!

Case 1: The Phantom Government Order — Chairs in Revenue Offices

On May 16, 2026, a story swept across Tamil Nadu’s commercial media landscape: the Vijay-led TVK government had, in an act of compassionate governance, directed revenue department offices across the state to place chairs for citizens — so that the public would be made to sit before being attended to by officials. The story was framed as a landmark humanising reform, a signal of a “people’s government” in action.

TVK’s social media network amplified this with characteristic efficiency. Influencer pages shared it. Meme pages celebrated it. The news channels carried it.

There was one problem. The Government Order (GO) cited carried a date of May 15, 2025 — a full year before the TVK government came to power. It was a GO passed by the MK Stalin-led DMK government.

No correction was issued by most outlets. No clarification trended. The narrative had already done its work — lodging itself in public memory as a Vijay government initiative. The commercial media, which holds fact-checking as its foundational professional obligation, did not merely fail in that duty — it actively participated in the misattribution. Whether by editorial negligence or deliberate complicity, the outcome is the same: the public was deceived.

This is a textbook case of policy laundering — taking a prior government’s documented action, stripping it of its original context and authorship, and presenting it as fresh governance by a new regime.

Case 2: The TNPSC/SSC/IBPS Coaching Claim — Erasing the Naan Mudhalvan Legacy

The second case follows an identical pattern, and is arguably more egregious given the scale of the scheme being misappropriated.

Within days of the new government’s formation, news began circulating — again across both commercial channels and TVK’s social media architecture — that CM C. Joseph Vijay had directed the government to provide free coaching and training for competitive examinations including TNPSC, SSC, IBPS, and related government job entrance tests. The story was framed as a bold initiative to support Tamil Nadu’s youth in their aspirations for public sector employment.

The truth, however, is not merely different — it is extensively documented.

Naan Mudhalvan, launched under former Chief Minister MK Stalin, is one of the most significant skilling and career development schemes in Tamil Nadu’s recent history. Under this flagship programme, students have been receiving structured coaching for UPSC Civil Services, TNPSC, SSC, IBPS, and other competitive examinations for over three years. The results are not anecdotal — students trained under the Naan Mudhalvan Scheme have successfully cleared Civil Services examinations, with selections to the IAS, IPS, and allied services standing as verifiable testimony to the programme’s reach and effectiveness.

Naan Mudhalvan, a flagship skill development and competitive examination coaching scheme, was launched by Chief Minister M.K. Stalin on March 1, 2022, implemented jointly by the Department of School Education and the Tamil Nadu Skill Development Corporation (TNSDC), with the goal of skilling 10 lakh students annually by bridging the gap between academic learning and industry requirements. The scheme is not a vague or symbolic initiative — it has a dedicated institutional vertical for civil services aspirants. Under the Naan Mudhalvan Competitive Exams Vertical, 1,000 candidates are shortlisted every year through a screening test, receiving ₹7,500 per month for 10 months, along with access to full-time residential coaching at the All India Civil Services Coaching Center in Chennai and the Anna Centenary Civil Services Coaching Academies in Coimbatore and Madurai. The scheme also supports candidates beyond the preliminary stage: those who clear the UPSC Mains receive a financial assistance of ₹25,000, and those who advance to the Interview stage receive ₹50,000.

The results of this sustained, three-year institutional investment are not anecdotal. They are on public record. In the UPSC Civil Services Examination 2024, three Tamil Nadu candidates figured in the national top 50 ranks — B. Sivachandran at AIR 23, S. Subash Karthik at AIR 29, and R. Monica at AIR 39 — all three of whom were trained under the Naan Mudhalvan Competitive Exams Vertical. In total, 50 aspirants cleared the UPSC that year through the scheme, of whom 18 underwent full-time residential coaching and two cleared the examination in Tamil medium. Monica, who secured AIR 39, spoke directly about the scheme’s role in her success: “I first got trained in the Naan Mudhalvan scheme. They gave me an incentive, which was very useful. They also promised me financial assistance for attending the interview.” Sivachandran, who became Tamil Nadu’s state topper, was one of 19 candidates from the scheme to clear UPSC CSE 2024, with his success under the initiative making him a role model for future aspirants in the state. As per a report in DT Next.

The Naan Mudhalvan scheme, managed by the Tamil Nadu Skill Development Corporation under IAS officer Innocent Divya, has so far impacted over 28 lakh students across the state. The scheme’s official portal — naanmudhalvan.tn.gov.in — carries all selection lists, scholarship notifications, and programme documentation publicly, with official PDFs dated and verifiable going back to 2023. As per a report in OneIndia.

None of this infrastructure, institutional memory, financial commitment, or track record was created after May 2026. It belongs, in its entirety, to the MK Stalin government’s tenure. To attribute it to a new administration that has yet to issue a single Government Order or policy notification on the matter is not a compliment to the new government — it is a theft of credit from the old one, executed in broad daylight, with the media as a willing accomplice.

CM C. Joseph Vijay has issued no Government Order, no Executive Directive, no administrative notification, and no new policy framework for any such initiative. The infrastructure, the funding, the institutional arrangements, and the track record all belong to the DMK government’s tenure.

Yet the story was spread — relentlessly, as the pattern demands — without a single outlet pausing to ask: Where is the GO? What is the budget allocation? Which new institutions have been created? What is the implementation timeline?

These are not difficult questions. They are the minimum threshold of journalism. Their absence reveals something important about the current media environment in Tamil Nadu.

Case 3: The Bus Driver Mobile Ban — 2022 Law, 2026 Headlines

On May 19, 2026, established commercial media outlets ran a breaking news graphic announcing that the Tamil Nadu government had ordered a ban on government bus drivers using mobile phones while on duty. Drivers keeping phones in their uniform pockets was prohibited. Violations would attract strict disciplinary action. It was presented as a fresh government directive.

The order is real. The government that passed it is not the current one.

This is a law that came into force in February 2022 — under Chief Minister MK Stalin’s government. Asianet News Tamil reported it in full on 7 February 2022, with identical content: a ban on government bus drivers using mobile phones while on duty, strict action for violations, issued by the Transport Department. The order is over four years old.

Established media outlets broadcast it on 19 May 2026 as current news — without a date check, without source verification, without the basic editorial step of asking whether this directive already existed. Whether this was careless journalism or deliberate reattribution is a question these outlets owe their audiences an answer to. Either way, the effect is the same: a four-year-old Stalin-era public safety order is laundered into the TVK government’s early governance record.

This is not an isolated lapse. It is the third documented instance — within the first two weeks of the TVK government — of existing policy being stripped of its origin and recycled as new. The chairs in revenue offices. The Naan Mudhalvan coaching scheme. And now, a bus driver mobile ban from 2022.

When media outlets with state-wide reach operate this way, are they making errors or making choices?

A Note on Responsible Journalism: The Hindu’s Intervention

When most regional commercial channels were either actively spreading or uncritically amplifying this misinformation flood, The Hindu chose a different path. Their video analysis titled “Vijay, TVK and the rise of fake political narratives | Focus Tamil Nadu” — presented by D. Suresh Kumar, Deputy Resident Editor, Tamil Nadu — directly examined the surge of viral claims, AI-generated images, recycled government schemes, and fake “historic firsts” being attributed to the new administration. Within 19 hours it had crossed 55,000 views and 3,745 likes — proof that a substantial audience in Tamil Nadu is actively hungry for honest journalism. They simply cannot find it when the overwhelming weight of commercial media is pointed in the opposite direction. Responsible journalism in this environment is a choice. The outlets that did not make that choice made a different one.

The PhD MLAs Claim

A statistic went viral claiming that the TVK legislature party includes 6 PhD holders and numerous engineers — presented as proof of an exceptionally educated, meritocratic legislature. The claim was shared widely and celebrated across TVK’s online network.

The nomination affidavit data filed with the Election Commission tells a completely different story. Of TVK’s 108 total winners, these are the official figures from their own affidavits:

In other words, 33% – 35% of TVK’s elected MLAs — more than one in three — have HSC or below as their educational qualification. This is not a criticism of those MLAs. Educational qualification is not the sole measure of a legislator’s worth, and many capable public representatives have risen from humble educational backgrounds. The criticism here is directed entirely at the TVK online network that fabricated a flattering but false picture — inflating PhD holders six-fold, and claiming 126 MLAs when the actual number is 108.

The affidavits are public documents. The data is freely available. The viral claim required only a basic check to disprove. Nobody in the TVK ecosystem bothered — or wanted — to make that check.

SC Candidates in General Constituencies

It was widely claimed that TVK fielded as many as 28 SC candidates in general constituencies — presented as a historic gesture of social justice. Election Commission data tells a different story. Only one SC candidate was fielded in a general constituency — in Shankarapuram — and that candidate did not win. The gap between 28 and 1 is not a rounding error. It is a fabrication.

Tamil Nadu’s “First Woman Minister”

Among the most brazenly false claims circulating is that the Vijay government has given Tamil Nadu its first woman minister. Tamil Nadu has had two women Chief Ministers — J. Jayalalithaa and Janaki Ramachandran. Women ministers have served in Tamil Nadu’s cabinet since before Independence — including Rukmani Lakshmipathi and Jothi Venkatachalam. Sathiyavani Muthu aka Annai Sathiyavani Muthu have been in the cabinets of Arignar Anna and Kalaignar Karunanidhi. Even in the 16th LA led by MK Stalin, had Geetha Jeevan, Kayalvizhi Selvaraj in the cabinet. To claim a “first” here is not ignorance. It is an erasure of women who actually broke those barriers, decades before the TVK government existed.

SC Ministers and the “First” Portfolio Claim

It has been claimed that for the first time, a key portfolio like Education has been assigned to a Dalit Minister under Vijay’s government. This erases an entire history. Kakkan held the Home Ministry under Karmaveer Kamaraj’s cabinet. Parithi Ilamvazhuthi served as Deputy Speaker in Kalignar Karuanidhi’s regime. Dhanabal served as Speaker in J Jayalalitha’s regime. Kovi Chezhian, Madhivendhan held Higher Education and Forest & Tourism in MK Stalin’s government. Dalit leaders have held some of Tamil Nadu’s most consequential portfolios across multiple governments. Presenting this as a TVK first is not a celebration of Dalit representation — it is a falsification of the very history that Dalit political leaders fought to create.

The Chief Minister’s Grievance Portal — 25 Years Old

The CM’s helpline and online grievance portal has been presented as a Vijay government innovation. In reality, the Chief Minister’s Special Cell portal has been operational for over 25 years — serving citizens through DMK, AIADMK, and DMK governments alike. It predates TVK as a political organisation.

The Panic Button in Buses

The installation of panic buttons in buses for women’s safety has been projected as the fulfilment of a Vijay election promise — a new initiative, a new protection. Chennai’s Metropolitan Transport Corporation (MTC) buses already have this facility operational. It was not invented by this government. It was inherited by it.

Still there are many more cases of such misinformation flooding, these are just examples.

The Structural Problem: When Media Becomes a Propaganda Relay

What we are witnessing is not a series of isolated errors. It is the normalisation of a post-verification media culture — one in which the virality of a claim, and its alignment with a dominant political mood, substitutes for the basic act of checking.

Several dynamics are at work here:

The Influencer-to-Mainstream Pipeline: Stories originate or are seeded — often without sourcing, often without documents — published by commercial media outlets looking for content that will generate engagement. By the time a GO is checked (if it ever is), the story has already circulated widely.

The Asymmetry of Correction: Misinformation spreads at the speed of sharing. Corrections, when they come, travel far slower and reach far fewer people. Media organisations that run false stories without correction are effectively choosing which version of reality reaches the public.

The Erasure of the DMK Record: Taken together, these stories form a coherent — if dishonest — narrative project: the systematic de-legitimisation of MK Stalin’s governance legacy and its absorption into the political identity of his successor. This is not incidental. Tamil Nadu has real, substantive policy achievements from the DMK years — in health, education, skilling, and social welfare — that deserve accurate attribution, both as a matter of historical record and democratic accountability.

A Note on Methodology

The cases documented here are not drawn from partisan counter-claims. They are verifiable through publicly available Government Orders on the Tamil Nadu government’s official portal, scheme documentation for Naan Mudhalvan, and the dates on the documents that the media itself published without reading carefully enough to notice the year.

Fact-checking in this context requires nothing more than reading the date on a document before broadcasting its contents. That this basic step was skipped — repeatedly, across multiple outlets — tells us everything we need to know about the current state of accountability journalism in Tamil Nadu.

Conclusion: The Chaos

The cases documented in this article are not exhaustive. They are representative. In the first two weeks of the TVK government alone, the recycled orders, misattributed schemes, unverified claims, and prematurely declared victories flooding Tamil Nadu’s media and social media landscape has been relentless. For every case fact-checked here, dozens more circulated unchallenged. So the question must be asked: is this a pattern? And if it is a pattern, who benefits from it?

In the digital era, misinformation is no longer merely a by-product of poor journalism. When a four-year-old GO becomes today’s headline, when a circular becomes a solved problem, when an announcement becomes a delivered promise — is that carelessness? Or is it architecture? When the same type of misattribution repeats itself across multiple issues, across multiple platforms, within the same two-week window, can we still call it coincidence?

The chaos that this kind of information flooding creates is worth examining carefully. When citizens cannot reliably distinguish what is real from what is recycled, what is new from what is four years old, what is promised from what is delivered — what happens to their ability to hold a government accountable? If the information environment is engineered to confuse rather than clarify, is democratic accountability even possible? Can you demand delivery on a promise if you have already been told, by a thousand voices simultaneously, that it has been delivered?

And here is the question that must be asked without flinching: have we not seen this playbook before? The systematic flooding of the information space with noise, the weaponisation of digital networks to manufacture consent, the deliberate blurring of the real and the fabricated — is this not precisely the strategy that the RSS-BJP machinery has deployed at the national level? Is this not how a government presiding over real failures continues to project an image of historic achievement? Is this not how legitimate criticism gets drowned, how democratic accountability gets quietly suffocated while the forms of democracy are preserved?

If the answer is yes — and the evidence increasingly points that way — then the next question is perhaps the most uncomfortable of all. A party that carries the intellectual and moral inheritance of Periyar and Ambedkar: is this the tradition it intends to honour? Periyar’s foundational demand was simple — think for yourself. Question authority. Refuse to be deceived. Ambedkar’s constitutional vision rested entirely on an informed, critically conscious citizenry as the only real safeguard of democracy. A political culture that actively works to prevent people from thinking clearly — is that carrying their legacy forward? Or is it dismantling it from within?

Democracy requires an informed public. When the distance between citizens and truth is deliberately widened, when people are kept away from what their government has actually done and not done — how can we expect any government to remain ideologically moral and accountable? And if we cannot expect accountability, what exactly are we left with?

The people of Tamil Nadu — and the democratic forces that wish to raise real issues, real failures, real demands — deserve an information environment in which truth has room to stand. The question is: who is responsible for ensuring that it does? And are they doing their job?

(The author is an independent Tamil journalist with YouTube channels, Peralai, AranSei)

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are the author’s personal views, and do not necessarily represent the views of Sabrangindia.

Related:

Delimitation: A false solution driven by centralised power

PM Narendra Modi’s frequent visits to Tamil Nadu, his “love” for Tamil culture exposed

The post Flood of Fake Narratives & Misinformation: How TVK’s propaganda machine is attempting a re-write of TN’s governance history appeared first on SabrangIndia.

More MPs, Less Debate

India’s Constitution distributes legislative sovereignty between Parliament and State Assemblies, defining powers through the 7th Schedule of the constitution – Union, State, and Concurrent Lists. Under this system, Parliament legislates on Union subjects. Bills are introduced, debated, and passed by the required majority.

But in practice:

Even in the current Lok Sabha of 543 members, the speaking time is allocated based on ‘party strength’. Individual MPs — especially those outside dominant parties — are given little to no space. Often, they are not allowed to speak for more than a minute, as repeatedly pointed out by Thol. Thirumavalavan MP. This goes against the grain of representative and inclusive democracy that should give every voice, regardless of party or political strength, the space and time to express views, even dissent.

So:

• Will increasing MPs improve deliberation?
• Will it strengthen representation?

It will only further compress individual voices.

The Real Problem: Centralisation

Why is there no time for debate? Because Parliament is overloaded.

Why is it overloaded? Because it interferes in too many subjects — especially in the name of Centrally Sponsored Schemes (CSS).

One Example is the Union Government’s Jal Jeevan Mission – A centrally sponsored scheme.

On April 16, 2026, DMK Member of Parliament (MP), senior advocate, P. Wilson raised a question in Rajya Sabha. He pointed, ‘Tamil Nadu has been one of the best performing states in the country providing functional household tap connection to 1.12 crore out of 1.25 crore households achieving nearly 90% but, only Rs 5914 crores have been released for funds under this scheme leaving Rs 3112 crores pending. For 2024 – 2025, while Rs 2434 crores was allotted but only Rs 732 crores have been released. Due to this unreasonable fiscal control by the regime at the centre, the Tamil Nadu government itself has to advance Rs 2550 crores. He went on to explain, how, for the Hogenakkal combined water supply scheme phase – III, the project was approved at the cost of Rs 8428 crores with the union government share of Rs 2283 crores under the Jal Jeevan mission framework but today (early 2026), the union government (unilaterally) says the project stands cancelled and suddenly informs that the assistance cannot be extended! Besides the MP exposed how, ten additional multi village drinking water schemes worth about Rs. 7590 crores proposed by Tamil Nadu for full rural coverage are also pending for approval.  MP Wilson demanded an answer to this state of affairs which he has not, to date, received.

Parliament is not a one way traffic. The Union Government is answerable to states. West Bengal has raised similar concerns. However this regime steamrolls through with its undemocratic methods.

Encroaching on Schedule VII of the Constitution, Items under the State List: Entry 17 under the List II (State List) of Seventh Schedule in Constitution of India clearly marks that the ‘Water’ is a State Subject. Also the Minister of State for Jal Shakti, V. Somanna, in a written reply presented in the Rajya Sabha stated, ‘Drinking Water is a state subject, and hence, the responsibility of planning, approval, implementation, operation, and maintenance of drinking water supply schemes, including those under the Jal Jeevan Mission, lies with State/UT Governments. The Government of India supports the States by providing technical and financial assistance.’

Do the facts suggest that the Centre is really providing assistance? NO. They are promising to support and cut the rope while the state attempts to climb a mountain!

Another encroachment on State Subjects: Similarly Entry 14 of the List II states that ‘Agriculture’ is a state subject. However, we all are well aware that three farm laws favouring corporates were brought in by the Union Government, inviting months’ long protests and finally their withdrawal! The Centre has also interfered in the procurement, with the tag of price control and food safety. Due to that the paddy procurement was affected in the past month. Tamil Nadu’s request is not a dilution of procurement norms but a legitimate invocation of flexibility already embedded in the Union’s framework.

Under the Fair Average Quality (FAQ) standards administered by the Food Corporation of India and the Department of Food and Public Distribution, paddy moisture is capped at 17%, but relaxations are permitted in exceptional conditions with prior approval. Citing unseasonal rains, the state has formally sought permission to procure paddy with slightly higher moisture (18–20%), even agreeing to value cuts as per official norms. The core issue is fiscal and federal: unless such procurement is accepted into the Central Pool, the burden falls on the state, effectively penalizing farmers for climatic factors—making this a case for cooperative federalism, not regulatory compromise.

The solution is clear:

• Do not interfere in the State List
• Share Union List powers with states and local bodies
• Retain only essential subjects like foreign affairs, defence, and currency at the Union level

With this, a limited number of MPs can still have meaningful discussions. However, the Union government is doing the opposite — it is centralising power further. This is not governance. This is authoritarian centralisation — fascism in practice.

What Can an MP actually do?

In reality, MPs are reduced to:

• Asking questions, mostly written — a power even citizens have through RTI
• Raising basic constituency issues like drinking water and bridges crossing railways. But should such issues even reach Parliament?

This is not governance efficiency. It is an enforced dependency.

Fiscal Centralisation

Why should states depend on Parliament for funds? If taxation powers are devolved properly, states can govern independently. Why should drinking water schemes or farmer incentives require Union approval? This is a systemic flaw — not something delimitation can fix.

Collapse of Institutional Mechanisms

MPs can also work through Parliamentary Standing Committees.

But from 2014 to 2026:

• How many committee reports have been discussed?
• How many have been implemented?

These committees have been reduced to symbolic bodies. Their reports are ignored. Without them, transparency collapses.

The solution lies in reform of the working of the constitution, Not in Delimitation:

• Redefine Union, State, and Concurrent Lists
• Except for foreign affairs, defence, and currency, powers should lie with states & local bodies.

Democracy being suffocated

What we see today:

• MPs are prevented from functioning meaningfully
• Constitutional structures are weakened
• Parliamentary democracy is being suffocated

This is not accidental. It is a deliberate project of a supremacist and fascist Union BJP government — bending institutions to concentrate power.

Unfair Delimitation and the Betrayal of Federal Justice

Delimitation, in theory, is about determining the number of representatives based on population. That is the legal argument.

The policy of population control in India was not accidental; it was a conscious national direction shaped through constitutional design and public policy. The Constitution of India (1950) distributed legislative powers through the Seventh Schedule, placing subjects across the Union, State, and Concurrent Lists. While public health and population-related matters were initially within the domain of states, a decisive shift occurred during the 42nd Constitutional Amendment of 1976, when “family planning and population control” were placed in the Concurrent List (Entry 20A), enabling both the Union and states to legislate and act.

This was followed by clear policy articulation at the national level. The National Population Policy of 1976, framed during the Emergency, and later the National Population Policy of 2000, set explicit demographic goals, including achieving replacement-level fertility. These were not symbolic declarations; they were calls for coordinated national action.

It was the South Indian states that responded with seriousness and administrative discipline. From the 1980s through the 2000s, states like Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka, and undivided Andhra Pradesh implemented population control measures effectively, bringing down fertility rates early and stabilising population growth. This was not merely a demographic achievement — it translated into better allocation of resources, improved public health systems, and higher human development outcomes.

In contrast, several North Indian states failed to implement these policies with the same urgency or effectiveness. Population growth continued at high levels well into the 2000s and even the 2010s, creating a widening demographic imbalance within the Union.

The Constitution itself recognised the risk of penalising states that performed well.

Under Article 81 of the Constitution of India, representation in the Lok Sabha is linked to population. However, to ensure that states which successfully controlled their populations were not politically disadvantaged, Parliament intervened. Through the 42nd Amendment (1976), the allocation of seats was frozen based on the 1971 Census. This freeze was later extended by the 84th Constitutional Amendment (2001) until 2026, with the 87th Amendment (2003) allowing adjustments based on the 2001 Census without altering the total number of seats.

The principle was clear: demographic responsibility should not lead to political punishment.

Today, that principle stands on the verge of being reversed.

With delimitation expected after 2026, the Union government is preparing to re-link parliamentary representation strictly to population. The implications are profound. States that adhered to national policy, controlled population growth, and managed their resources responsibly will see their political weight reduced. States that failed to do so will gain greater representation and influence in Parliament.

This inversion of justice is not a technical correction — it is a structural distortion.

States that cooperated with Union policy in the national interest are now being “rewarded” with a loss of rights and voice. States that disregarded the same policy are being “rewarded” with expanded political power. One is forced to ask: is this justice? And more importantly, who is being asked this question — a government that increasingly exhibits fascist tendencies in its centralisation of power?

When this contradiction is placed before constitutional forums, the deeper tensions within this approach will become evident.

At the same time, the Union government continues to repeatedly invoke the Constitution to justify delimitation. But this raises a more fundamental question: why is delimitation being pushed with such urgency, while far more pressing structural issues remain unaddressed?

The real crisis in Indian governance today is not a shortage of representatives; it is the over-centralisation of power. Parliament is burdened with subjects that rightfully belong to states. Fiscal powers remain concentrated at the Union level, forcing states to depend on central allocations even for basic welfare and infrastructure. A town should not have to wait for Union schemes for drinking water, nor should farmers depend on central approvals for incentives. These are failures of federal design — not problems that delimitation can solve.

Instead of correcting these imbalances by strengthening states and local bodies, the Union government is pursuing a path that further concentrates power. This is not administrative reform. It is authoritarian consolidation — fascism expressed through institutional control.

The consequences extend beyond federal structure into economic reality. The government that has failed to significantly improve development outcomes or quality of life in lagging regions is now attempting to extract from the more productive states. The burden of demographic imbalance is being shifted onto the South — not to uplift the North in any meaningful way, but to redistribute power and resources.

Will this extraction benefit the ordinary people of North India? There is little evidence to suggest so. Instead, the pattern increasingly points toward concentration of economic gains in the hands of a few corporate entities — most notably a select coterie.

Thus, delimitation is not merely a constitutional exercise. It is a political project — one that seeks to reconfigure representation, alter federal balance, and entrench a particular ideological dominance.

The question, therefore, is not whether delimitation is constitutionally permissible. The question is whether it is just. And in its current form, it is not.

Why Delimitation Now?

If delimitation does not solve governance issues, why push it? Because the objective is political. Southern states have identified and are exposing the fascist tendencies of the Union government. They are taking this message across India. This creates a threat to the Fascist Propaganda.

So BJP is trying to,

• Increase MPs from northern states where the BJP has stronger control
• Reduce the relative political strength of southern states
• Entrench RSS ideology structurally

Delimitation becomes a tool of political domination.

A Pattern of Imposition

This fits into a larger pattern:

• Hindi imposition through the three-language policy
• Sanskrit cultural imposition through the New Education Policy
• Sanatana imposition through schemes like Vishwakarma
• Minority property targeting through Waqf amendments
• Citizenship insecurity through CAA-type laws
• Public sector, transport, and infrastructure assets being handed over to private corporate entities

States like Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Karnataka, and Telangana have resisted all of this. Unable to handle these states politically, the Union government is attempting to weaken them structurally.

The Federal Resistance

As Telangana Chief Minister Revanth Reddy pointed out, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K. Stalin was among the first to bring these issues to light. He has also pushed for unity among states. This is critical. Because this is not just policy — it is a battle over India’s federal structure.

Conclusion: What India Actually Needs

India does not need more MPs.

It needs:

• Stronger states
• Empowered local governance
• Fiscal autonomy
• Respect for federalism

Delimitation offers none of this.

Instead, it risks:

• Weakening federal balance
• Reducing real representation
• Expanding centralised, fascist control

This is not democratic reform. It is democratic distortion in the service of power.

Tamil Nadu will fight — Tamil Nadu will win. And along this path, states across India will unite and speak the truth.

(The author is an independent Tamil journalist with YouTube channels, Peralai, AranSei)

Related:

Will delimitation have severe, undemocratic consequences following the SIR?

PM Narendra Modi’s frequent visits to Tamil Nadu, his “love” for Tamil culture exposed

The post Delimitation: A false solution driven by centralised power appeared first on SabrangIndia.

Holding road shows, rallies, public meetings etc., what has been the response from the ground?

Narendra Modi, Prime Minister, recently held a road show in Chennai. The place at which the road show is Pondy Bazar (Soundarapandian Bazar), Thiyagaraya Nagar, one of the busiest bazars of Chennai and this area is crowded at all times. Modi planned his road show on the April 9, to suit and fit the Telugu New Year – Ugadi.

Due to the protocol around the PM visit, the area’s parking areas were blocked on the previous day and the shops were closed on the day of road show. Modi named his road show – Jan Dharshan Yatra. But since the shops were closed, the crowd brought in from various other parts of Chennai were the only ones present. So it was not Jan Dharsahan Yatra, it was a usual Modi show! The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) was observed struggling to pull off a decent crowd for the road show and we could spot many empty spots and places covered with white blankets. If there is so much of “josh” for Modi as is being projected in Godi Media, even those among the people who are supporting BJP should have been seen crowding the rally bazar. But this did not happen.

When a gang shouted, Aap ki baar, Charsau baar (This time, Cross 400!), the internet trolled the slogan with a response, Aap ki baar, Choco bar! Also, as always during a visit of Modi to Tamil Nadu, the trending hashtags on X, were #ModiDownDown along with #GobackModi.

We visited the Pondy Bazar area, the day after the road show, people in the shops expressed anger due to protocols around the road show. They raised serious complaints against the road show and the protocol formalities. A shop keeper said, “Yesterday was Ugadhi, upcoming days are Ramzan and Tamil Chitirai Festival. These are days of potential high sales. The rally ruined everything”. This is the reality of the area in which Modi held the road show.

Is Modi really fond of Tamil and Tamil Nadu?

During his recent visits to Tamil Nadu, Modi declared he ‘wanted to learn Tamil; he wished he had been born in the Tamil Community; he wanted/wants to raise Tamil Nadu on par with the National average.’ Is this true? 

The stats shows otherwise.

The Tamil Language has received step motherly treatment from the Modi regime, The allocation of funds for classical Tamil is very low as compared to Sanskrit and Hindi. Not only Tamil, other classical languages such as Telugu, and Kannada have also received a very low funding compared to Sanskrit. The union government released a grant of Rs 1,074 crore for the promotion of Sanskrit between 2017-2022, according to reply obtained under RTI from the Central Sanskrit University (CSU) in New Delhi. Other classical languages such as Tamil, Telugu and Kannada have been getting significantly lower allocations. In response to unstarred questions by five Members of Parliament (MPs), the Ministry of Culture in 2020 stated that only Rs 22.94 crore was allocated for Tamil while Telugu and Kannada received Rs 3 crore each during 2017-20. The New Indian Express had filed 13 queries with the Central Public Information Officers (CPIOs) on the fund allocation for the promotion of all classical languages on March 16, out of which only two were answered.

“One of the main objectives of the CSU is to promote and propagate Sanskrit learning, teaching, and research. The Ministry of Education releases 100% grants to CSU. The university was provided with Rs 1,074 crore for the five years, out of which Rs 407.41 crore was released during the Covid-hit years (2020-21 and 2021-22),” said CSU CPIO Dr RG Murali Krishnan, in an answer to the RTI.

For Tamil Heritage and Civilisation, Modi’s Union government is not at all interested to showcase one of the enduring and ancient civilisations of the World.

Keezhadi, a site near Madurai was excavated and many ancient artefacts and a deep civilisational remains have been found. The excavation was led by Archealogist Amarnath Ramakrishnan of ASI in the period between 2013 and 2016. This site is estimated to be from the period between 5th century BCE and 3rd century CE. Samples were sent to Carbon dating from this site and confirmed that the samples date back to 2200 years! But when the first two phases of excavation were at the finishing stage, in 2017, Amarnath Ramakrishnan was transferred and the Report of the two-phased excavation was never released. Even after the Madurai bench of Madras High Court direction to a PLI filed, Tamil Nadu is still waiting for the Union Government to release the report. Tamil Nadu government allocates Rs 5 Crore every year for the excavation alone and 10^th phase of excavation is soon to start at Keezhadi. Tamil Nadu chief minister M.K. Stalin inaugurated the Keeladi museum with 15,000 unique artefacts unearthed, built at a cost of ₹18 crore, this March (2024).

In the last budget Tamil Nadu allocated Rs. 40 Crore for development of Tamil language and culture. Where is Modi and his Union Government here?

Donning a Dhoti and eating Dosa-Vada will never make someone a Tamilian. In fact Tamil people have loved many who were not born in Tamil Nadu, but contributed for their upliftment. We celebrate ‘Veera Maamuni’ who came here as a missionary with a name ‘Constantine Joseph Beschi’ during the early 18^th century, but has written wonderful, profound, poetry titled ‘Thembavani’. We celebrate G.U.Pope for translating ‘Thirukural’ to English. Modi, being PM for a decade has never made any substantial contribution to Tamil heritage, history, culture and the Tamil language despite his massive and brute majority in Parliament.

There was a Prime Minister who is still celebrated by Tamil Nadu, who paved the way for implementing the Mandal Commission for OBC reservation, who even lost his Prime Ministership for doing so – Thiru V.P.Singh! When he was hospitalised, hundreds of Tamil people had written letters offering to be a donor for his kidney transplant. Thousands of Tamil people wrote in, wishing him good health. Modi in his decade in government has argued in Courts against the Reservations. Modi can never be a part of Tamil culture.

(The author is an independent Tamil journalist with YouTube channels , Peralai, AranSei)

The post PM Narendra Modi’s frequent visits to Tamil Nadu, his “love” for Tamil culture exposed appeared first on SabrangIndia.