SabrangIndia https://sabrangindia.in/ News Related to Human Rights Fri, 30 Oct 2026 12:46:08 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2.2 https://sabrangindia.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Favicon_0.png SabrangIndia https://sabrangindia.in/ 32 32 Nearly two decades without elections, Jamia students’ agitation forces administration to set deadline for union revival https://sabrangindia.in/nearly-two-decades-without-elections-jamia-students-agitation-forces-administration-to-set-deadline-for-union-revival/ Fri, 30 Oct 2026 12:35:16 +0000 https://sabrangindia.in/?p=49898 The university has agreed to implement the students’ union constitution by May 15, 2027, and conduct elections under Lyngdoh Committee guidelines

The post Nearly two decades without elections, Jamia students’ agitation forces administration to set deadline for union revival appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]> After 18 days of sustained protests and an indefinite hunger strike, students of Jamia Millia Islamia (JMI) have called off their agitation after the university administration agreed to a time-bound process for restoring the Jamia Millia Islamia Students’ Union (JMISU). The breakthrough came on October 29, when the university issued a formal order committing to approve and implement the students’ union constitution by May 15, 2027, and conduct elections within six weeks of the commencement of the next academic session.

 

 

 

The agreement marks a significant development in a struggle for democratic representation that has continued for years at the university, where the students’ union has remained dissolved since March 2006. The administration has also agreed to withdraw all disciplinary action initiated against students in connection with the agitation, including show-cause notices, disciplinary proceedings, rustication and suspension orders, as well as campus bans.

According to the university’s October 29 order, once the constitution is approved, the election notification will be issued in accordance with the recommendations and guidelines of the Lyngdoh Committee. The elections are expected to take place within six weeks of the next academic session, scheduled to commence around July 16, 2027.

The administration’s commitment to a specific deadline addresses one of the central objections raised by the protesting students. Earlier, students had rejected a communication from the university that promised elections after the constitution was approved but failed to establish a concrete timeline for completing the approval process. Without a deadline, students argued, the promise of restoring the union risked becoming another indefinite assurance.

The latest agreement emerged following negotiations between a four-member student delegation and university authorities. Registrar Professor Md Mahtab Alam Rizvi confirmed to ANI that the administration had accepted all three major demands raised by the students.

According to Deccan Herald, the administration has also outlined the proposed process for drafting and approving the constitution. Student representatives, alongside professors and legal experts, will participate in the exercise, with representation from different faculties. The draft constitution will be circulated among stakeholders for suggestions before undergoing legal scrutiny. It will subsequently be placed before the Academic Council and Executive Council before being forwarded to the Visitor’s nominee for final approval. This process will be crucial in determining whether the promised restoration translates into a genuinely representative and democratically functioning students’ union.

The Lyngdoh Committee recommendations and the road to elections

The university’s decision to conduct elections under the Lyngdoh Committee recommendations is particularly significant given the prolonged absence of elected student representation at Jamia. The Lyngdoh Committee was constituted following a Supreme Court directive on December 12, 2005, to examine concerns surrounding campus elections, including the growing influence of money and muscle power, political interference and violence in student politics. As reported by The Hindu, the committee was tasked with recommending a framework to ensure free, fair and transparent student elections.

Among its principal recommendations was that universities and colleges should ordinarily have elected student representatives, with nominations permitted only as a temporary arrangement where circumstances made elections impracticable. Institutions relying on nominated representatives were expected to establish an election-based system within five years. The committee also recommended that student elections be held annually, preferably within six to eight weeks of the commencement of the academic session. The entire electoral process, including nominations, campaigning and the declaration of results, was to be completed within 10 days.

The recommendations permit direct, indirect and hybrid election systems, depending on the size and structure of the institution. Direct elections were favoured for smaller, single-campus universities, while indirect elections were suggested for larger universities with multiple campuses.

For Jamia, the commitment to follow these recommendations is an important step towards restoring an institutional mechanism through which students can participate in university affairs and hold the administration accountable.

Nearly two decades without student representation

The JMISU was dissolved in March 2006, following repeated incidents of violence, clashes between student groups, attacks on teachers and disruptions to academic activities. The university administration had also raised concerns about student representatives allegedly interfering in administrative matters.

However, the dissolution of the union effectively left generations of students without an elected representative body. The absence of an institutional platform for collective student representation became the backdrop to the current agitation, with students demanding not merely an assurance of elections but a definite commitment to restoring democratic participation on campus.

The latest protest began on October 12 and gradually escalated into an indefinite hunger strike. Despite the university announcing that elections would be held within 15 days of the constitution’s approval, students continued their agitation, pointing out that the administration had not specified when the constitution itself would be approved.

The standoff also unfolded amid increasingly restrictive measures on campus. The university shifted academic activities to the online mode, citing security concerns and disruptions arising from the protests. The decision to move classes online, while subsequent announcements extended the online arrangement and shifted examinations away from the physical mode.

Detailed pieces may be read here, here and here.

Congress hails students’ victory

Congress general secretary (organisation) K. C. Venugopal described the outcome as a victory for student power. In a post on X, he said, “The students of Jamia Millia Islamia Central University have won!” Venugopal alleged that the BJP-controlled administration had attempted to divide and discredit the protesting students, and claimed that NSUI leaders had been sent to Tihar Jail for participating in the agitation. “In the end, the fascists had to bend before student power. Democracy was hard-fought but was won eventually!” he wrote, saluting the students for their non-violent struggle.

The agreement came on the occasion of Jamia’s 106th Foundation Day, lending particular significance to a development centred on the restoration of democratic participation within the university. While the students have called off their agitation, the agreement is only the beginning of a longer process. 

 

 

Related:

Books Under Siege: Bengal’s Left bookstalls, the Calcutta High Court’s intervention and the warning from Hitler’s Germany

Seeking justice for Ankita Bhandari, parents detained in pre-dawn crackdown at India Gate

Mumbai Police detain Ambedkarite leaders demanding justice for Sahil Wakode; IIT Bombay refuses to hear delegation

Calcutta High Court says political dissent must not be stifled, directs police to protect CPI(M) bookstall near Durga Puja Pandal

The post Nearly two decades without elections, Jamia students’ agitation forces administration to set deadline for union revival appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]> Arunachal’s anti-dam protests intensify as arrests, militarisation and threats to press freedom fail to silence resistance https://sabrangindia.in/arunachals-anti-dam-protests-intensify-as-arrests-militarisation-and-threats-to-press-freedom-fail-to-silence-resistance/ Fri, 30 Oct 2026 11:30:48 +0000 https://sabrangindia.in/?p=49893 Communities resisting the proposed 11,200 MW project fear the loss of ancestral land, livelihoods and cultural heritage, with activists detained under the APUAPA

The post Arunachal’s anti-dam protests intensify as arrests, militarisation and threats to press freedom fail to silence resistance appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]> The resistance against the proposed Siang Upper Multipurpose Project (SUMP) in Arunachal Pradesh is no longer confined to villages along the Siang River. What began as a sustained movement by indigenous communities opposing a mega-dam has expanded into a wider mobilisation across the state, drawing students, youth organisations, farmers, civil society groups and journalists into a confrontation with the government. And as the protests gather momentum, the state’s response has become increasingly coercive: arrests of protesters, detention of activists under anti-terror legislation, the deployment of hundreds of paramilitary personnel, restrictions on movement and an alarming attempt to bring journalists within the ambit of criminal investigations.

Yet, despite the expanding security presence and the threat of criminal prosecution, the protests have not subsided. Instead, resistance has spread beyond the directly affected villages, with solidarity demonstrations in Itanagar and renewed opposition to other proposed hydropower projects. The message from the protesters is increasingly clear: the threat of arrest, intimidation and state action will not persuade communities to surrender their land, rivers and ancestral identities without being heard.

The crackdown has also extended to journalists, lawyers and those associated with the anti-dam movement. In a move that has raised serious concerns over press freedom and the right to legal representation, Arunachal Pradesh Police has sought search warrants against four people, including Tongam Rina, Deputy Editor of The Arunachal Times, advocate Sunny Tayeng, and activists Otul Jerang and Tajong Talom. In an application submitted before the Chief Judicial Magistrate of East Siang on October 27, the investigating officer sought permission to search their residences and seize mobile phones, digital devices, photographs, video recordings and clothing allegedly connected to the violence in Pasighat. The application was filed under Section 96 of the BNSS, 2023, and the court’s decision was not immediately available.

The inclusion of Rina’s name has triggered strong objections from the Arunachal Pradesh Union of Working Journalists, the Arunachal Press Club and the Arunachal Publishers and Broadcasters Guild. The press bodies have warned that investigative powers must not become instruments to intimidate journalists reporting on contentious public issues. Meanwhile, Tayeng has expressed concerns about alleged surveillance and the implications for the confidentiality of lawyer-client communications. As Scroll.in reported, Rina has said that the alleged intimidation would not stop her from writing or pursuing her activism.

The immediate flashpoint was the violence that erupted in Pasighat on October 23, following a 12-hour bandh called by organisations opposing the proposed project. An NHPC office and a police station were allegedly set on fire, while the residences of political leaders, including two MLAs and the state BJP president, were vandalised. However, the events in Pasighat cannot be understood in isolation from the prolonged conflict over the project, the government’s attempts to facilitate preliminary surveys despite local opposition, and the growing resentment over the militarisation of affected villages. More importantly, alleged violence cannot become a justification for indiscriminate arrests, the criminalisation of an entire movement or the suppression of legitimate political and journalistic expression.

What are the protests about?

At the centre of the agitation is the proposed 11,200-megawatt Siang Upper Multipurpose Project, a massive hydropower and water-storage project on the Siang River, which flows into Arunachal Pradesh from Tibet and eventually becomes the Brahmaputra in Assam. The project, proposed by the Union government’s policy think tank NITI Aayog in 2017, is being advanced by the Centre as a strategic necessity in response to China’s proposed 60,000-MW hydropower project on the Yarlung Tsangpo, the river that enters India as the Siang. The government argues that the proposed dam would strengthen India’s water security, provide flood moderation and help counter the potential consequences of China’s upstream infrastructure.

However, for communities living along the Siang, the project represents a threat that cannot be reduced to questions of hydropower generation or national security. Residents of more than 27 villages have raised concerns about the possible submergence of ancestral settlements, agricultural land, forests and culturally significant sites. The Siang Indigenous Farmers’ Forum (SIFF) has warned that the project could affect approximately 1–1.5 lakh people. The potential consequences extend beyond displacement in its conventional understanding. For the Adi community, the river, known as Ane Siang or Mother Siang, is deeply connected to its cultural identity, spiritual beliefs, agricultural practices and collective memory.

The river is not merely a resource to be harnessed for electricity or strategic advantage. It is central to a way of life sustained across generations. The possibility of losing ancestral land, burial grounds, terraced paddy fields, forests and religious sites therefore raises questions about the survival of indigenous culture itself.

In an interview with Frontline, residents and activists described the project as a threat to their relationship with the land and river. One young protester emphasised that the community’s identity was inseparable from the Siang, while Tadak Nalo of the Arunachal Frontier Tribal Front questioned the government’s approach to obtaining consent from affected residents.

Environmental concerns compound these anxieties. The proposed project is located in a highly seismic region of the Himalayas, with the Siang Valley falling in Seismic Zone V. Environmentalists and dam experts have warned that large infrastructure projects in ecologically fragile and earthquake-prone regions require independent and comprehensive assessments of their environmental and social consequences.

Himanshu Thakkar, coordinator of the South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers and People, told Frontline that the adverse consequences of large dams have become increasingly evident and called for an impartial assessment of the proposed project. Supreme Court senior advocate and transboundary water law expert Mohan Katarki also cautioned against treating a counter-dam as an automatic solution to the risks posed by China’s upstream project, emphasising the need for bilateral engagement and a joint environmental impact assessment.

The government’s national security argument, therefore, does not resolve the questions being raised by affected communities. Nor does invoking China’s hydropower ambitions establish that the proposed project is environmentally sustainable, socially just or acceptable to the people whose lives would be directly affected.

The resistance has also been fuelled by the manner in which preliminary survey activities have been pursued. The government maintains that the pre-feasibility report (PFR) is only an initial exercise to assess the technical, geological and hydrological viability of the project and does not constitute final approval for construction. Residents, however, fear that allowing drilling and survey machinery onto their ancestral land would effectively pave the way for the project.

ThePrint reported from Komkar that villagers had erected barricades to prevent drilling equipment from reaching the proposed sites. For residents, the issue is not simply whether a dam has received final approval. It is whether the state can proceed with activities that could fundamentally alter their land before their objections have been meaningfully addressed.

The controversy has deepened further over allegations that villagers were misled into signing documents connected to the proposed project. Some residents have alleged that they were asked to provide Aadhaar cards and bank account details and sign documents under the impression that they were enrolling in a government livelihood scheme. They subsequently suspected that their signatures had been used in connection with memorandums of understanding relating to the PFR. These allegations have not been independently verified.

ThePrint also reported that Upper Siang Deputy Commissioner Ashok Tajo acknowledged that the administration had failed to adequately explain the livelihood scheme and the associated documents to residents. The Rs 350-crore Special Development and Livelihood Programme, announced by the Centre and the state government, had not resulted in any disbursement when he spoke to the publication. Tajo admitted that the administration’s approach to communicating the scheme had contributed to the present situation, telling ThePrint: “If the approach was right, then this situation would not have come.”

Such an admission raises serious questions about the government’s insistence that the opposition is primarily the result of misinformation. When residents do not understand what they are being asked to sign, when promised assistance remains undisbursed and when survey activities proceed amid sustained objections, the resulting mistrust cannot simply be dismissed as an information deficit.

The protesters have repeatedly maintained that they are not opposed to development. Their demands include better roads, schools, hospitals and access to essential services. What they reject is a model of development that requires them to sacrifice their land, livelihoods and cultural existence while having little control over decisions that directly affect them. As one young protester told Frontline, the government repeatedly invokes national interest, but the interests of the people living in the region must also count.

Arrests, hunger strikes and the use of anti-terror legislation

Rather than resolving the underlying conflict through sustained consultation, the government’s response has increasingly relied on policing and criminal proceedings. Following the allaged October 23 violence, the East Siang police initially reported the arrest of 26 people, including five juveniles, and the detention of six others for questioning. Eight cases had been registered in connection with the incidents, according to a statement issued by East Siang Superintendent of Police Pankaj Lamba on October 26.

The scale of the crackdown subsequently appeared to widen considerably. As Scroll.in reported, Inspector General of Police Hibu Tamang stated that 69 people had been arrested and four detained in connection with the violence. Police had registered 55 cases across Upper Siang, Siang and East Siang districts. The arrests and detentions were being pursued under the Arunachal Pradesh Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 2014 (APUAPA).

The distinction between those arrested in connection with specific incidents of violence and those detained for their participation in the wider anti-dam movement is crucial. The existence of criminal offences warrants investigation, but it cannot provide the state with an unrestricted mandate to treat opposition to a development project as a threat to national security.

The use of the APUAPA is particularly alarming. Four activists from Geku, Adum Tayom, Omak Paron, Okut Paloh and Oson Paron, were detained under the state law on October 9 for opposing the pre-feasibility studies. The detention of activists under anti-terror legislation in connection with opposition to preliminary survey activities raises fundamental questions about the threshold being applied by the authorities and the distinction between dissent and criminal conduct. ThePrint reported that the administration had confirmed the government’s approval of detention orders against four people under the APUAPA, with their cases scheduled for review by an advisory board headed by a retired judge.

Invoking a law carrying the language and implications of unlawful activities against people resisting a proposed dam is not an ordinary policing measure. It risks transforming a dispute over land, consent, displacement and environmental protection into a question of security and public order, where the people raising objections are increasingly treated as potential threats rather than citizens exercising their democratic rights.

The allegations emerging from Geku are especially disturbing. Young protesters have told ThePrint that they fear being picked up from their homes or detained while going about their everyday activities. Some have alleged that they face multiple FIRs, with certain individuals claiming to have as many as 25 cases registered against them. Others have reportedly started staying in surrounding forests to avoid arrest.

Residents have also described frequent security checks, restrictions on movement and the questioning of people travelling to their agricultural fields. One resident told ThePrint that villagers could not even carry their traditional dao, a farming tool routinely used to clear vegetation and harvest crops, without attracting suspicion.

The security presence has fundamentally altered everyday life in these villages. The deployment of forces is no longer experienced merely as an arrangement to prevent violence. For many residents, it has become an intrusive presence in spaces that have historically been their homes, fields and community lands. The scale of deployment is significant. According to police accounts reported by Scroll.in, 30 companies of Central Armed Police Forces, alongside three companies of the Assam Police and Arunachal Pradesh Police personnel, were deployed across the affected districts. ThePrint also reported the deployment of additional Rapid Action Force personnel following the violence.

The Centre further rushed two RAF companies to Arunachal Pradesh on October 24. As reported by PTI, approximately 250 personnel were flown out of Navi Mumbai in an Indian Air Force aircraft. For residents who have spent years opposing the project, the sight of such a substantial security deployment has reinforced the perception that the government is attempting to facilitate the survey through force rather than consent.

The situation has also taken a deeply troubling turn with the arrests of activist and lawyer Ebo Mili and youth leader Otul Jerang. Both surrendered at Pasighat police station on October 24, reportedly to condemn the violence and appeal for restraint among young protesters. They subsequently began hunger strikes while in police custody. According to Down To Earth, Mili continued his hunger strike in custody, while Jerang ended his fast after his health deteriorated. Jerang, who has pre-existing health conditions and requires prescribed medication, had reportedly been fasting since October 25.

Their detention and the hunger strikes underline the extent to which the confrontation has moved beyond the immediate question of the dam. The release of detainees, withdrawal of police cases and removal of additional security personnel have become central demands of the movement. The protesters are not simply demanding that the government abandon the project. They are also demanding that the state stop treating opposition to it as a law-and-order problem.

Journalist Tongam Rina brought into police investigation

The crackdown has also raised serious concerns about the independence of the press and the ability of journalists to report on a movement that has become politically sensitive. The inclusion of senior journalist Tongam Rina in a police application seeking search warrants is particularly disturbing. Rina, Deputy Editor of The Arunachal Times, was among four people named in an application submitted by the investigating officer of Pasighat Police Station before the Chief Judicial Magistrate of East Siang on October 27. The application, filed under Section 96 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, sought permission to search the residences of Rina, advocate Sunny Tayeng, activist Otul Jerang and Tajong Talom.

The police sought permission to seize clothing allegedly worn during the violence, mobile phones, digital devices containing photographs or videos and other materials considered relevant to the investigation. According to the application, these materials could help establish individual roles, reconstruct the sequence of events and corroborate witness statements. The court’s decision on the application was not immediately available. The question, however, is why a journalist known for reporting on governance, indigenous rights and environmental issues has been included in an investigation into the violence.

There has been no publicly established evidence in the material available linking Rina’s journalistic work to the alleged offences. The inclusion of her name in a search-warrant application therefore warrants immediate scrutiny, particularly when the investigation concerns protests on an issue of significant public interest.

The Arunachal Pradesh Union of Working Journalists (APUWJ) and the Arunachal Press Club (APC) strongly condemned the move, warning that it could amount to an attempt to intimidate the press and misuse investigative powers. The organisations made it clear that reporting on protests cannot itself be treated as criminal conduct. While condemning the violence and destruction in Pasighat, they insisted that investigations must remain evidence-based and must not become instruments to suppress critical reporting.

The complete statement may be read here.

The Arunachal Publishers and Broadcasters Guild (APBG) also expressed serious concern, calling upon the police and state government to ensure that any investigation involving a journalist is conducted with transparency and appropriate safeguards. The Guild emphasised that a journalist’s professional responsibilities cannot, by themselves, become grounds for suspicion or punitive action. It also raised concerns about the protection of confidential sources, unpublished reporting and journalistic material during searches.

 The complete statement may be read here.

The implications extend beyond Rina. If journalists reporting on an agitation can be drawn into criminal investigations without clearly established grounds being made public, the message to the rest of the media is unmistakable: reporting on state action, questioning official narratives or documenting the experiences of protesters may expose journalists to investigative scrutiny.

Frontline also reported allegations by young protesters and local journalists that social media accounts had been restricted or suspended while they were sharing information about the agitation. Some young people claimed that their content remained visible outside India but was inaccessible within the country. These allegations require independent verification, but they add to the concerns about the shrinking space available for reporting and communication.

In a conflict where residents allege intimidation, arbitrary detention and restrictions on movement, independent journalism becomes especially important. It is journalists who document the ground situation, question official accounts and ensure that the experiences of affected communities do not disappear behind government statements and police briefings. Targeting or intimidating journalists at such a moment risk depriving the public of precisely the information it needs to assess the government’s actions.

From Siang to Itanagar, resistance refuses to retreat

The government’s increasingly coercive response has not contained the movement. Instead, the agitation has acquired a wider political and social character. On October 29, members of several youth and social organisations gathered at Indira Gandhi Park in Itanagar for a solidarity rally in support of the Adi community and those opposing the proposed SUMP.

As reported by The Hindu, the demonstrators demanded the release of detained protesters, withdrawal of security personnel from the affected region and scrapping of the proposed project. They raised concerns about the protection of ancestral land, rivers, indigenous identity and fundamental rights.

The mobilisation was significant because the opposition was no longer limited to villages directly affected by the proposed reservoir. The movement had travelled to the state capital, drawing support from organisations and citizens who view the government’s response as a broader question of democratic rights. Protesters insisted that they were not opposed to development but rejected the idea that the government could impose a project with potentially devastating consequences on indigenous communities without their meaningful participation.

One representative of the affected communities told The Hindu that they were fighting for their land, culture, fundamental rights and existence, but were being treated like second-class citizens. The solidarity rally also demanded the withdrawal of security personnel deployed to facilitate the PFR surveys. The protesters argued that the state was attempting to conduct preliminary studies by militarising the region.

The Arunachal Christian Forum has also appealed to Chief Minister Pema Khandu to initiate meaningful dialogue with the Siang Indigenous Farmers Forum and other concerned stakeholders. Along with the Arunachal Indigenous Tribes Forum, it has offered to facilitate discussions between the government and the protesting organisations.

The spread of the movement is also evident in the opposition to the proposed 1,605-MW Subansiri Upper Hydroelectric Project, popularly known as the Menga Dam, in Upper Subansiri district. On October 26, a 12-hour shutdown called by student and community organisations led to the cancellation of a public hearing. Violence was also reported from Daporijo and other areas, according to The Hindu.

The widening protests suggest that the conflict is no longer being viewed solely as a dispute over one hydropower project. It is increasingly about how decisions concerning land, natural resources and indigenous communities are being made, and whether those communities can meaningfully challenge the state without facing the threat of criminalisation.

The politics of fear is meeting its limits

Perhaps the most significant development in the Siang movement is that the growing threat of state action has not produced the silence that the security-heavy response might have been expected to create. There is no denying that the crackdown has generated fear. Young protesters have reportedly changed their phone numbers, become reluctant to appear on camera, restricted their online activity and avoided returning home because they fear arrest. Some have allegedly faced repeated FIRs, while others have questioned whether they can continue their daily lives without being monitored.

Yet the protests continue.

From road blockades in Komkar and Geku to solidarity demonstrations in Itanagar, the movement has continued to find new forms of expression. The arrest of activists has not ended the mobilisation. The detention of young people has not extinguished opposition. The deployment of additional security forces has not convinced residents to abandon their demands.

This resistance is particularly significant in a region where the relationship between land, identity and community is inseparable. For the people opposing the dam, the threat is not limited to the loss of individual homes or agricultural holdings. It is the possible destruction of an entire cultural and ecological landscape.

The message emerging from the villages is that the fear of illegal or arbitrary state action cannot be allowed to become a substitute for consent. The possibility of arrest cannot determine whether people are entitled to question a government project. Nor can the invocation of national security automatically render every objection suspect.

A democratic government cannot demand that citizens demonstrate their patriotism by remaining silent about decisions that threaten their homes and livelihoods. Indigenous communities do not cease to be citizens when their concerns conflict with the state’s infrastructure or strategic priorities. Their rights cannot become conditional upon their willingness to accept a project.

The government has repeatedly invoked the importance of the SUMP in countering China’s upstream hydropower ambitions. But national security cannot be understood exclusively through infrastructure and strategic competition. It must also account for the security of people living in border regions, their livelihoods, their cultural continuity and their confidence that the state will protect rather than intimidate them. A government that seeks to strengthen India’s position along its international borders cannot afford to alienate the very communities whose lives and lands sustain those regions.

Chief Minister Pema Khandu has expressed concern over the violence and offered to hold discussions with protesting groups. He has also stated that the project would proceed only with public consent. Such assurances, however, must translate into a credible process in which affected communities can question the project, access independent information, examine its environmental and social consequences and participate in decisions without coercion.

Dialogue cannot be meaningful when one side is negotiating under the threat of detention, criminal cases and a heavy security presence. Nor can consent be considered genuine when villagers remain uncertain about the documents they have signed, the purpose of the surveys or the implications of the project.

Related:

Protest Denied, Dissent Policed: India’s crackdown on those challenging the Election Commission

Police detain Adivasi students for second day, force them out of Mumbai

From Nashik to Mumbai: Adivasi students’ protest meets police detentions

The post Arunachal’s anti-dam protests intensify as arrests, militarisation and threats to press freedom fail to silence resistance appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]> Food Security during the Covid-19 Pandemic: Need for a shift from food security to nutrition justice. https://sabrangindia.in/food-security-during-the-covid-19-pandemic-need-for-a-shift-from-food-security-to-nutrition-justice/ Fri, 30 Oct 2026 11:15:15 +0000 https://sabrangindia.in/?p=49890 In Karnataka, during the pandemic and lockdown, mid-day meals in government schools and anganwadis under the National Food Security Act (2013) [1], shut down indefinitely [2,3] amidst growing concerns about how this would affect vulnerable communities. In spite of demands, the state government has not yet undertaken a detailed post pandemic and lockdown survey to identify the immediate and long-term interventions to address and prevent malnutrition.
Several visits have been made by civil society organisations, students, nutritionists and academics to different districts of Karnataka, during and after the Covid-19 pandemic and this commentary gives a broad overview of the observations made. There is a need for an in-depth quantitative and qualitative study.

The post Food Security during the Covid-19 Pandemic: Need for a shift from food security to nutrition justice. appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]> The National Food Security Act, 2013 (NFSA) was a landmark commitment by the government to food security as a Constitutional right. With the Covid-19 pandemic, gaps have been laid bare within the entitlements under the NFSA as also their implementation, specifically in the state of Karnataka. This commentary draws on field observations to critique the narrow focus on the law on a bare minimum cereal security rather than nutrition security that is diverse and sensitive to local cultures.

There were already several issues in implementation which were aggravated by the lockdown. This paper hopes to influence policy decision on the scope as well as the implementation of the Act to facilitate improvement of crucial nutritional indicators.

Constitutional and Jurisprudential Foundations

The National Food Security Act (NFSA -2013) [4] was the outcome of the landmark case of People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) vs Union of India [5] and others, when the Supreme court recognised that Right to food is not a charity, but deeply linked with the Right to life.  In an interim order (2003), States were advised to regard the raising of level of nutrition, standard of living and improvement of public health as a primary duty, with commitments to the Public Distribution System (PDS), the Mid-day meal Scheme (MDMS) and the Integrated Child Development Scheme (ICDS) [6]. Food security largely meant food grains, a hot meal, or take-home rations (THR) as prescribed by the Central government.

The PUCL litigation represents one of the most significant examples of judicial activism in socio-economic rights jurisprudence. In the case the Court has expanded the interpretation of the right to life to include the right to live with human dignity created constitutional obligations enforceable against the state. The food security law was intended to codify these judicial directives and create statutory remedies beyond constitutional litigation.[7]

Food security is a necessary but not sufficient condition for nutrition security especially if adequate individual household nutrition needs are to be ensured. In making this distinction, the Food and Agriculture Organisation has referred to India’s focus on grains, compared to Northern Laos where education, social status of women and efforts to mitigate negative effects of food insecurity, poverty, remoteness of household, access to markets/social services, water and sanitation are all addressed as part of a multi-factorial approach to addressing malnutrition [8,9].

The Enforcement Gap: Law in Text vs Law in Practice

A central concern emerging from field observations is the persistent “enforcement gap.” While the NFSA provides for grievance redressal mechanisms, including District Grievance Redressal Officers and State Food Commissions, these institutions remain largely ineffective and literally shut down during the pandemic. The inaction of State Food Commissions, particularly their failure to exercise suo motu powers in the face of systemic violations, reflects deeper institutional weaknesses. The result is a legal framework that appears robust on paper but lacks meaningful accountability.

Beneficiaries rarely access formal complaint mechanisms, and compensatory provisions such as the food security allowance under Section 8 are virtually non-existent in practice. This failure undermines the justiciability of rights under the Act and renders statutory guarantees illusory.

Scheme-Level Failures and Legal Implications

Public Distribution System (PDS)

As prescribed by the Act, PDS shops are to remain open on all days of the week except one, which would be decided based on the area or district. In most of the areas visited in Vijayapura, the shops were open only for 2-3 days a month and even this was not a fixed day. Once the supplies arrive, the PDS owner opens the shop and people inform each other -“The day we are unable to get rations, we just survive with water and whatever rations are left.” said a woman, who had faced shortage of dry rations in her house. Another woman in Vijayapura said – “We prefer wheat because the rice is of poor quality and we also don’t want to change what we traditionally eat.”

The community in general believes that corruption amongst ration shop owners existed earlier but this has drastically reduced. In Rambapur village, women complained about spending a huge amount of their income in buying rations other than rice, wheat or maize and on fuel. They should be provided with spices, oil, mustard seeds, ghee, milk, vegetables, jaggery, salt, sugar and salt in the PDS or at subsidised costs – “if ghee, butter, eggs and milk or milk powder and dairy products like curd cost less, we will definitely buy them and this would help us improve the quality of food we eat’.

The irregular functioning of PDS outlets, limited availability of food grains, and exclusion of essential non-cereal items highlight a fundamental limitation of the NFSA framework. The Act’s focus on cereals neglects dietary diversity, thereby failing to meet nutritional needs. From a legal standpoint, this raises questions about whether the State is meeting its constitutional obligation to ensure not merely survival, but a dignified standard of living.

Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS)

As per the Act, pregnant women and lactating mothers are entitled to meals, free of charge, which should meet the nutritional standards specified under Schedule II as well as maternity benefits of not less than Rs. 6000 in instalments as prescribed by the Central Government to compensate for wage loss. Children between 6 months and 6 years must be provided with an appropriate meal, free of charge, through the local anganwadis as per nutritional standards under Schedule II. Malnourished children are entitled to additional supplement and if this is not possible, food security allowance has to be paid. Safe drinking water, cooking facilities and sanitation in anganwadis should also be ensured.

It was observed that the food received by pregnant and lactating women was not nutritious or sufficient –

“Food should be provided for at least one year after delivery instead of six months so that we get back our strength, then we will be able to take better care of our children. This food does not fill our stomachs. The same amount given to children in anganwadis is given to us also. There is no variety in the food and the same food is given every day.” Pregnant woman, Bengaluru. Another pregnant woman said that no vegetables are added to the sambar and that even cows won’t eat the food given. During the lockdown, dry rations were supplied in many places to children as well as the enrolled women instead of cooked food. Pregnant and lactating women are supposed to receive eggs every day from the anganwadi. A few women have complained that they receive eggs only 2-3 times a week.

Anganwadi workers have complained that they neither receive funds nor salaries on time and that this is the reason they cannot have variety in the food – “We spend out of our own pockets and we don’t even know if we will get reimbursed. Why can’t this be done properly?”

The key points arising after speaking with mothers about the four anganwadis in the village Sanjay Gandhinagar were the lack of facilities – “We don’t have any extra expectations from the government. We just want them to give us what they are supposed to. If they have to give food, let them give proper food.”

The ICDS scheme illustrates a breakdown in statutory compliance. Nutritional standards prescribed under Schedule II are frequently unmet, and beneficiaries—particularly pregnant and lactating women—receive inadequate and monotonous food. Delays in honoraria for anganwadi workers further impair service delivery, suggesting a systemic failure to operationalise statutory entitlements. The absence of accountability mechanisms exacerbates these deficiencies.

Mid-Day Meal Scheme (MDMS)

As per the Act, all schools should have facilities for cooking meals with some exceptions for urban schools. 40% of the schools visited received food from a centralised kitchen, while the rest cooked at the school premises. In all the schools visited, only the bare minimum was being provided and there was hardly any attention on giving the children diverse or nutrient dense foods. What was surprising was that there was no expectation other than the bare minimum by the parents and children alike. –“My son is provided with rice and sambar every day, this is more than enough. He will adjust with whatever is given. I do not have anything more to demand as long as my child is fed” At the time of visits, eggs were to be provided on two days of the week, but this was not being implemented in schools at Bangalore and Anekal which received MDM from Akshaya Patra foundation. The foundation does not provide eggs nor does it include onions and garlic in its meal [11,12,13,14]

When prompted, there were suggestions to add foods, more for variety than nutrition – fruits, vegetables, idli, chapathis, dosa, poori, chicken, ragi mudde, meat etc. A majority felt that inclusion of eggs was a good idea, but did not feel that meat should be included, more out of concern for the sentiments of the vegetarians rather than their own preferences.

Students complained that the food was not prepared in a hygienic manner and this was also observed during the school visits, with stones, hair, dirt etc. being visible.

Two of the school principals felt that the food was not of good quality and that more effort should be put into improving the nutrition, while three others felt that food was nutritious because vegetables were being used. Some felt that the addition of eggs in the MDM would improve the nutrition content.

One of the schools visited in Bangalore was an Urdu school where most of the students were all from the Muslim community. The MDM was provided by a centralised kitchen, Akshaya patra about which several concerns had already been raised by activists, the Joint director, MDMS and the State Food Commission [15].

The principal of a government Urdu school in Bengaluru urban was unhappy with the food provided by Akshaya patra as she felt it was neither nutritious nor what children were culturally used to eating at home. She was constantly interrupted by a non-Muslim teacher – “The food is good. Eggs should not be provided in Mid-day meals. Children should eat whatever is provided and it is difficult for schools to prepare meals. We don’t want any change and we are happy with the food that is being provided by Akshaya patra”

In the absence of established standards of what a good MDM is, it was difficult to elicit responses from the school, parents and children about what they would want, and this is partly because the expectation itself is so low. Further, teachers see the MDM as an added burden – “Having school kitchens is difficult because we find it difficult to find cooks. If they take leave, we struggle to find replacements. Also, the budget is not released on time sometimes, then we have to pay from our own pocket, but overall children eat better when food is prepared in the school and not by a centralised kitchen. Even teachers eat the food if it is cooked in the school.”

Under the State sponsored Ksheera Bhagya scheme, powdered milk is supposed to be reconstituted at the school at 10 am and given to children immediately. This was being done in school-based kitchens, but not by centralised kitchens in spite of being instructed to do so [16]. Already reconstituted milk was delivered by Akshaya patra at 7 am, and children could consume this only at 10 am.

The NFSA also prescribes safe drinking water and sanitation. In the schools visited, most often the drinking water did not meet the standards. In rural schools, the primary water sources were mini tanks and these were not maintained properly. A few mini tanks had worms, leaves and mud.

In one school, the water was cloudy and had particles in it but was being used to wash plates and for cooking. In 20% of the schools visited, there was no provision at all for drinking water. Some children went home to drink water, some carried water and some didn’t drink water while they were in school.

Most often, the school management said that there were no issues with the toilets, but about 30 % had no toilets and those schools which had toilets did not have running water. Several schools had poorly maintained toilets – “We go back home whenever we want to use the toilets,” said Ramya, a student of class 5. Very often the toilets are not fully closed making privacy difficult. This is of concern for the girl students who struggle during periods.

The positive features of the MDM in Karnataka are the provision of milk as part of the Ksheera bhagya scheme, which increases food diversity although reconstitution of the powder should be done just before serving children. Karnataka has included children of Class IX and X in the MDM through state budget. MDM has also been provided since 2016 in drought prone areas even during the summer holidays. The government is also providing region specific grains to suit the palatability of the local area.

Issues faced by Intra-State migrant community Kacherganahalli

Around 300 families that migrated from Bellary to Bengaluru urban live in Kacharakanahalli which is an urban deprived area. Six mothers and two pregnant women were interviewed in depth. All the families had Below Poverty Line (BPL) cards, but could not avail benefits under the NFSA because their elderly families and children depended on the rations from the PDS. When they visited their villages, they sometimes brought back rations. Most of them were daily wage workers and had been really hit during the Covid pandemic.

One of the pregnant women said that she had not received any financial or health support, had not heard of the mathrupoorna scheme[1] and had not been asked to go and eat a meal at the anganwadi during her pregnancy. Another woman who had delivered 6 months said the same. During her pregnancy, she was unsure of where she was registered and what facilities she was eligible for. She had another three-year-old child and neither children had been enrolled in the anganwadi. She had received Take Home Rations (THR) on a few occasions and this was usually rice and some dal. Her children had not been weighed and eggs had not been given even to those eligible to receive – “I am not sure where my name is registered. One lady came and took down my details but when I asked for the money that was due for us, she said that I have to go to my village. In my village, they said that I am living in the city so I cannot expect all those things. I go to a small clinic nearby for my checkup. I pay for my medicines. I am not sure where to go for my delivery. They make us run around for each and everything and I don’t get proper information of where I should go.”

Nutrition Security as a Constitutional Imperative

The NFSA represents a significant legal milestone in recognising food as a right. However, its current implementation reflects a regression from a rights-based framework to a minimal survival model. A shift towards a legally enforceable right to nutrition is not merely desirable—it is constitutionally imperative.

Empirical indicators from Karnataka, including high levels of anaemia, child malnutrition, and dietary deficiencies, demonstrate that the NFSA has not achieved its intended outcomes. This failure necessitates a reorientation of the legal framework from calorie-based entitlements to nutrition-sensitive interventions.

To fulfil its constitutional promise, the Act must evolve to address nutritional adequacy, institutional accountability, and social inclusion. Without such reforms, the right to food risks being reduced to a hollow entitlement, disconnected from the lived realities of those it seeks to protect.

The distinction between food security and nutrition security is not merely semantic—it has constitutional significance. The right to life under Article 21 encompasses the right to health and dignity, which necessarily includes access to adequate nutrition.

Interventions required in Karnataka 

The architects of the NFSA included a layered grievance redressal mechanism District Grievance Redressal Officers [17], State Food Commissions empowered as civil courts [18], and a compensatory food security allowance [19] to ensure accountability. Formal complaint systems are mostly unavailable.  This chasm between the letter of the law and its realization on the ground constitutes a classic “enforcement gap.” The State Food Commission’s failure to exercise its suo moto jurisdiction to address the widespread irregularities suggests that the institutional safeguards enshrined in the Act are not merely underperforming but are structurally ineffective in their current form.

The NFSA in spite of being implemented over the last several years, has not been able to adequately improve nutritional indicators. Going by data from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5) [12] and Comprehensive National Nutrition Survey (CNNS 2018-19) [20], the population of Karnataka below age 15 years is 23%.

The infant mortality rate (IMR) [2]  is 26% and Under-five mortality rate (U5MR) [3] is 30% in Karnataka. 40% each of boys and girls age 2-4 years attend preschool and this would have dropped even further, thus missing educational and nutritional support. [20, 21] The reason for poor attendance has to be explored and addressed as children start off life with a disadvantage.

Poorly nourished mothers are also likely to have poorly nourished babies.  The prevalence of anaemia is 66% in children age 6- 59 months, 48% in non-pregnant women and 46% in pregnant women, particularly high among rural women and scheduled caste women.

Only 4% of children in the age group 6-23 months in Karnataka have received a minimum acceptable diet, 18% children have minimum dietary diversity, 32% have minimum meal frequency and only 9% children consume iron rich foods. Among children aged 2-4 years in Karnataka, only 22% children aged 2-4 years had consumed flesh foods in the previous 24 hours compared to 69% in Kerala. 57% children had consumed dairy and 19% had consumed eggs.  Among children in the age group 5-9 years, 96% had consumed cereal and 84% had consumed milk or curd in Karnataka and that is probably because of the ksheera Bhagya scheme.  Among children aged 10 – 19 years, 46% have Vitamin B12 deficiency and 70% have folate deficiency, more in Schedule caste, Scheduled tribe and Other Backward Class (OBC). Children < 5 who are stunted is 35% underweight   is 33%…and all this even prior to the pandemic!!

The NFSA has served an important purpose of ensuring food security and was expected to mark a paradigm shift in the approach to food security from welfare to a rights-based approach. Given the current situation, the scope of the Act has to move beyond a sustenance mode to improving nutritional indicators. Unfortunately, the law has been reduced to right to survival (with the cheapest minimum) rather than to a life free of nutritional deficiencies and ill-health. The Right to good quality and quantity of nutrition should be the premise of interventions and policy decisions and not just the right to food. Providing primarily cereals and millets under the Act is inadequate and diversity is crucial.

There is a need for inclusion of nutrient dense foods of animal origin like dairy, meat, poultry and eggs in the regular diet through social security schemes and subsidised costs. The introduction of the ksheera bhagya scheme in the government anganwadis and mid-day meals is a huge step forward in the right direction. Many of the women also suggested that subsidised fresh or powdered milk and eggs should be part of the PDS.

It is important to track beneficiaries who have not been given monetary compensation under various schemes under the Act.  Women who deliver, need financial, nutritional and health support. The amount given may require revision and the system should be strengthened to ensure that all women receive the financial support needed during the period of pregnancy and post-delivery. The targeted approach by the NFSA can potentially leave the most vulnerable out of the social safety net. The introduction of the Aadhar and biometric systems further excluded vulnerable communities. The Act should be universally applicable rather than targeted.

The exceptional provision for centralized kitchens in urban areas has become a norm and is even being pushed in the rural areas. The law has to be implemented in spirit and mechanisms introduced to ensure that the law is not manipulated to suit corporate or commercial interests.        Children, parents and teachers have said that the food provided under the NFSA particularly the MDM by NGOs was often limited in variety and that this reduced the consumption of food. It is important that children enjoy their foods and get to taste different varieties rather than one homogenous menu. There is a need to actively engage parents and older students in planning the menu. This also needs to have a cultural context. – There should be diversity with food from different food groups – pulses/legumes, cereals/millets, fats and oils, vegetables, dairy and milk, meat/fish/eggs.

The School Development and Management Committee (SDMC) should be actively involved in managing the food supplies, monitoring the hygiene, provision of safe water, taste and quality of the food. They should also actively involve older children in ensuring quality of the MDM. Hygiene has to be maintained in preparation of food in the MDM and ICDS by allocating resources for someone to clean the rice, dal and vegetables; storage facilities have to be improved so that the ingredients are protected from moisture, rodents, flies, cockroaches etc.; preparation and serving the food should be done in hygienic manner; staff need regular training in how to hygienically handle food. This includes thorough washing of hands in soap and water before handling or serving food and after using the toilets; food testing should be done to check for biological and chemical contamination; toxic substances should not be stored near the food items; adequate supply of clean and safe drinking water is important to ensure that there is no compromise of hygiene while preparing the MDM.

UNICEF’s recommendations of diverse foods have to be implemented urgently and made available as part of the right to nutrition which is closely linked to the Right to Life as enshrined in the Constitution. Many of the nutritional indicators in Karnataka are of concern and most of these can be improved by strengthening the NFSA to move beyond cereals to subsidized foods from a variety of food groups.

From a legislative standpoint, targeted amendments to the National Food Security Act26, are imperative to address the structural deficiencies identified in this study. First, Section 4(2) of the Act should be amended to expand the scope of statutory entitlements beyond cereals to explicitly include diverse food groups such as pulses, edible oils, vegetables, and protein-rich sources like eggs and milk. Such an amendment would affect a crucial paradigm shift from a narrow “food security” model, focused primarily on caloric adequacy, to a more comprehensive “nutrition security” framework aligned with both contemporary nutritional science and the constitutional mandate of a dignified existence under Article 21. Second, the enforcement architecture of the Act requires substantial fortification. Section 16 should be strengthened to empower State Food Commissions with the explicit authority to impose administrative penalties for non-compliance. Additionally, to render the grievance redressal mechanism efficacious, the Act should mandate that complaints be resolved within a stipulated period of thirty days, with the failure to do so resulting in the automatic accrual of the right to a food security allowance under Section 830, thereby eliminating procedural delays that currently render the remedy illusory.

 

Further legal reforms must address the evolving landscape of service delivery and the rights of marginalized populations. Given the increasing delegation of statutory functions to private entities, particularly in the operation of centralized kitchens under the Mid-Day Meal Scheme, the Act should be amended to introduce specific accountability mechanisms. These include mandatory public disclosure of nutritional audits, independent third-party evaluations, and codified standards ensuring that meals are culturally appropriate for the communities they serve. Equally critical is the need to amend the Act to provide for the legal portability of entitlements for inter-state migrant workers, a vulnerable demographic systematically excluded from the social safety net. Drawing upon the principles affirmed by the Supreme Court in National Campaign for Dignity and Rights of Sewerage and Allied Workers case held that such an amendment would mandate a centralized, interoperable system to ensure that migrant families can access their entitled rations at their place of work.

(The author, a lawyer is also Director, St Joseph’s College of Law (SJCL), Bengaluru;the article is based on a study conducted by students of St Joseph’s Law College)

Note:

Acknowledgements to Dr. Sylvia Karpagam for supporting the design and analysis of the study, the Principal of SJCL Pauline Priya, students of law college Vimala Mary, Reethu Anthony and Kritika Jain, staff of Centre for Non-Formal Education (CNFE), Vijayapura, Ananya Children’s Trust, Lingarajpuram, Bengaluru and Centre for Integral Rural Welfare (CIRF), Anekal.

References

[1] The National Food Security Act, 2013 No. 20 of 2013

[2] Thankachan P, Selvam S, Narendra AR, Mishra HN, Sachdev HS, Thomas T, et al. There should always be a free lunch: the impact of COVID-19 lockdown suspension of the mid-day meal on nutriture of primary school children in Karnataka, India. BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health. 2022;:e000358. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjnph-2021-000358

[3] Pinglay-Plumber P. Preschools, daycares disappear into COVID gap; Govt indifferent. Citizen matters. 2021 September 31. https://citizenmatters.in/bengalurus-preschools-daycares-disappear-covid-gap-government-uncaring/

[3] People’s Union for Civil Liberties v. Union of India & Ors, In the Supreme Court of India, Civil Original Jurisdiction, Writ Petition (Civil) No.196 of 2001 https://www.escr-net.org/caselaw/2006/peoples-union-civil-liberties-v-union-india-ors-supreme-court-india-civil-original/

[4] Supra note 1

[4] Food security and nutrition security – what is the problem and what is the difference, Summary of the FSN Forum discussion, No. 34, Food and Agriculture Organisation http://km.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/fsn/docs/PROCEEDINGS_FoodSecurity_NutritionSecurity.doc

[5] The nutrition situation in Northern Laos – determinants of malnutrition and changes after four years of intensive interventions (S. Kaufmann). http://geb.uni-giessen.de/geb/volltexte/2009/6904/pdf/KaufmannSilvia-2009-03-03.pdf).

[6] Midday meal: External agencies to supply eggs at schools in Karnataka. The Hindu. 2022 July 20. https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/bangalore/akshaya-patra-mid-day-meals-external-agencies-to-supply-eggs-at-schools-in-karnataka/article65658754.ece

[7] Supra note 5

[8] Food security and nutrition security – what is the problem and what is the difference, Summary of the FSN Forum discussion, No. 34, Food and Agriculture Organisation http://km.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/fsn/docs/PROCEEDINGS_FoodSecurity_NutritionSecurity.doc

[9] The nutrition situation in Northern Laos – determinants of malnutrition and changes after four years of intensive interventions (S. Kaufmann). http://geb.uni-giessen.de/geb/volltexte/2009/6904/pdf/KaufmannSilvia-2009-03-03.pdf).

[10] Supra note 1

[11] Midday meal: External agencies to supply eggs at schools in Karnataka. The Hindu. 2022 July 20. https://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/bangalore/akshaya-patra-mid-day-meals-external-agencies-to-supply-eggs-at-schools-in-karnataka/article65658754.ece

[12]  Barman, S.R. (2022) Karnataka study shows eggs in mid-day meals help children’s growth, The Indian Express. Available at: https://indianexpress.com/article/education/karnataka-study-shows-eggs-in- mid-day-meals-help-childrens-growth-8078892/ (Accessed: November 28, 2022).

[13] Impact Assessment study on providing supplementary nutrition under mid-day meal scheme in Yadgir (Intervention) and Gadag (Control) district. Department of Public Instruction, Government of Karnataka, 2021-22, Karnataka State Rural development and Panchayat Raj University, Gadag.

[14] Azim Premji Foundation signs MoU with Karnataka government to provide eggs to students on all days of the week in mid-day meal. The Hindu. 2024 July 20. https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/karnataka/azim-premji-foundation-signs-mou-with-karnataka-government-to-provide-eggs-to-students-on-all-days-of-the-week-in-mid-day-meal/article68425633.ece

[15] Vikhar Ahmed Sayeed. Akshaya Patra Foundation under the scanner. Frontline. 2020 December 11. https://frontline.thehindu.com/the-nation/independent-trustees-of-akshaya-patra-foundation-submit-resignations-amid-allegations/article33229907.ece

[16] Jayachandran N and Ram T. Akshaya Patra mid-day meal controversy: Will Food Commission meeting iron out issues? The Newsminute. 2019 December 18. https://www.thenewsminute.com/karnataka/akshaya-patra-mid-day-meal-controversy-will-food-commission-meeting-iron-out-issues-93616

[17] Section 14, The National Food Security Act, 2013 No. 20 of 2013

[18] Section 16, The National Food Security Act, 2013 No. 20 of 2013

[19] Section 8 , The National Food Security Act, 2013 No. 20 of 2013

[20] Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW), Government of India, UNICEF and the Population Council. 2019. Comprehensive National Nutrition Survey (CNNS) Karnataka Report. New Delhi.

[21] Chamois S, Singh A, Anand S, Shivika. Advocacy for Healthy Diets: Nutrition Brief Series Nutrition Brief 5 of 6 – Nutrition Matters: Diet Diversity. UNICEF India. 2025 September. https://www.unicef.org/india/media/17476/file/UNICEF%20(nutrition)-%20reports-2025%2009%20Brief%20Nutrition%20Diversity.pdf.pdf

 

[1] The mathrupoorna Scheme is a Karnataka government initiative launched on October 2, 2017, to improve the nutritional status of pregnant and lactating mothers by providing one full hot cooked meal daily for 25 days a month at Anganwadi centers

[2] Infant mortality rate (IMR) is the probability of a child born in a specific year dying before reaching the age of one and expressed as a rate per 1000 live births

[3] Under-five mortality rate is the probability of a child dying between birth and five years of age, expressed per 1000 live births.

The post Food Security during the Covid-19 Pandemic: Need for a shift from food security to nutrition justice. appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]> Delhi SIR: Public audit finds 416 of 1,236 deleted voters still at their registered addresses https://sabrangindia.in/delhi-sir-public-audit-finds-416-of-1236-deleted-voters-still-at-their-registered-addresses/ Fri, 30 Oct 2026 11:00:43 +0000 https://sabrangindia.in/?p=49887 A four-day door-to-door audit in Trilokpuri found voters marked absent, shifted or dead who were still living at their registered addresses, with 47.57 lakh names missing from Delhi’s draft roll, affected voters have until October 30 to file claims

The post Delhi SIR: Public audit finds 416 of 1,236 deleted voters still at their registered addresses appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]> Delhi’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls has come under fresh scrutiny after a public audit in East Delhi’s Trilokpuri found that 416 of 1,236 voters whose names were removed from the draft electoral roll had allegedly been wrongly classified as absent, shifted, dead or duplicate. The findings were presented at a Jan Sunwai, or public hearing, on October 27, where residents described discovering that their names had disappeared despite living at the same addresses or submitting enumeration forms.

The audit, reported by The Hindu examined voters across four polling booths in Trilokpuri. It offers a ground-level account of how the revision has affected residents and why independent verification of deleted names matters, particularly when the deadline for filing claims and objections is October 30.

47.57 lakh voters missing from Delhi’s draft roll

Delhi had 1, 45, 10, 299 registered electors when the SIR began on June 30, 2026. The draft electoral roll, published on August 31, retained the names of 97, 53, 577 electors whose enumeration forms had been received and digitised.

The remaining 47, 56, 722 electors were left out of the draft roll after their enumeration forms were not received during the exercise. They were classified under categories including Absent, Shifted, Dead and Duplicate (ASDD), along with other reasons.

The enumeration exercise involved Booth Level Officers (BLOs) visiting households, distributing forms and assisting voters with their details. The large number of names excluded at the draft stage has since raised questions about whether all those classified as unavailable or ineligible were properly verified.

The exclusion of a name from the draft roll does not, by itself, establish that the person is ineligible to vote. Those whose names are missing can seek inclusion through the claims and objections process, but they must act within the prescribed period and follow the procedure laid down by the election authorities.

The public hearing was organised by Jan Sarokar, Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS), the National Federation of Independent Women (NFIW) and Voter Adhikar Manch. Civil society groups involved in the Trilokpuri hearing have called for the claims deadline to be extended by a month, arguing that voters need sufficient time to identify their exclusion and seek correction.

According to The Indian Express, the draft roll retained about 97.5 lakh voters, while approximately 47.5 lakh were classified as uncollectible. The scale of the exclusions makes it important to examine not only how many names were removed, but also the reasons recorded for each removal and whether those reasons reflect the voter’s actual circumstances.

Jan Sunwai (Public Hearing) in Trilokpuri: what the Trilokpuri public audit found

At a Jan Sunwai (Public Hearing), the four-day audit covered 1,236 voters across 700 households in polling booths 42, 43, 79 and 80 in Trilokpuri, including Indira Camp and nearby residential areas. Volunteers went door to door to check the circumstances of people whose names had been marked for removal.

According to the organisers, 416 of the 1,236 voters verified were wrongly classified under the deletion categories. That amounts to approximately one-third of those surveyed.

The findings also showed that 55% of voters marked absent were still living at their registered addresses. Three people recorded as dead were found alive.

These findings relate to the voters examined in the four polling booths. They cannot be treated as a citywide error rate or used to conclude that one-third of all 47.57 lakh excluded voters were wrongly removed. Their significance lies in documenting specific cases where the recorded reason for exclusion did not match the circumstances found during the audit.

The organisers presented these findings at the Jan Sunwai on October 27, which brought residents together to discuss the deletions, question the verification process and seek assistance with restoring their names.

Residents say their names disappeared despite submitting forms

The Jan Sunwai brought forward accounts of residents who said they had submitted enumeration forms but were nevertheless excluded from the draft roll. Others said no Booth Level Officer had visited their homes or that they had not received the forms needed to complete the exercise.

One of them was 29-year-old Suresh Kumar Patel, a JCB driver whose family has lived in Indira Camp for decades. He told The Indian Express that he had filled in his enumeration form in front of the BLO, including details from the 2002 electoral roll.

Yet, when the draft roll was published, his name was missing while his father’s name remained on the list. He said he was unaware of the deletion until volunteers conducting the audit visited his home.

His case illustrates the problem faced by voters who believe they have completed the required procedure but discover only later that their names have not been retained.

Other residents described similar difficulties. Some said their family members had been marked absent despite continuing to live at the same address. Others said they had repeatedly approached election officials but had not been able to resolve the problem.

The accounts raise questions about how enumeration forms were collected, uploaded and checked, and whether voters were informed when their names were not included in the draft roll.

Voters marked dead, absent or shifted

Among the cases highlighted in the audit was that of 67-year-old Vijender, who had been classified as dead despite being alive. His wife, Kamlesh, said she had submitted her form along with his, but only her name appeared in the draft roll.

Questioning the circumstances in which the entry had been made, she said, “I haven’t caught hold of the Booth Level Officer (BLO) after that, I want to ask him what rush he was in to declare him dead already?”

Another resident, Pinki, said at least five members of her family had lost their names, including her mother-in-law Anita, who had reportedly voted for 50 years.

“Look at this, at least five people from our family, including my mother-in-law, Anita, who has been voting for 50 years, have had their names cut. How are they cutting votes like this?” she asked, according to The Hindu.

Aniket, a relative who had come to register as a first-time voter, said the family had submitted forms for six members three times after errors in their first two submissions. Despite these efforts, four members were marked absent.

“I have gone and submitted the forms for six members not once but thrice, after there were a few errors the first two times, and four of them have been marked absent,” he said.

Another resident, Rahis, was marked absent despite reportedly submitting his enumeration form. His wife visited the voter centre and the Sub-Divisional Magistrate’s office to find out why his name had been removed. His wife and four children remained on the draft roll.

The hearing also highlighted the cases of elderly residents Chandrawati, 72, and Ramji Lal, 78, who said their names had been removed despite voting from the same address for more than 50 years.

“We live alone and all we survive on is my 2,000 rupees pension. No BLO came to our house, nor did we fill any form,” Chandrawati said, as reported by The Hindu.

These accounts do not establish that every disputed deletion was incorrect. They do, however, show why a recorded classification must be open to verification, especially when a person has been marked dead or absent without the circumstances being properly established.

From finding a deletion to getting a name restored

For voters whose names are missing, discovering an error is only the first step. They must also understand the procedure for seeking inclusion, gather the required documents and submit their applications to the appropriate election officials.

At the Trilokpuri hearing, a voter facilitation camp helped 280 families fill out more than 500 forms. Applicants still had to submit the forms individually to their BLOs or the election office.

The need for such assistance points to a gap between making a correction procedure formally available and ensuring that affected voters can actually use it. Residents who are unaware of their exclusion, unfamiliar with the forms or unable to visit election offices may struggle to complete the process within the prescribed period.

The distinction between different reasons for deletion also matters. A person marked dead, a voter who has temporarily travelled for work and someone who has moved to another address may require different kinds of verification. Treating these circumstances as interchangeable risks making the correction process more difficult for people whose eligibility has not actually changed.

The audit also found that only 87 of the 416 voters identified as wrongly classified had filled Form 6 to seek inclusion in the electoral roll. The figure highlights the distance between identifying a possible error and completing the process to get a name restored.

Form 6 is ordinarily used to apply for inclusion in the electoral roll. For voters who were already registered, however, the circumstances in which they were removed and the procedure they must follow to return to the list have become important points of dispute.

Why public audits matter in electoral roll revision

A public audit allows residents and civil society groups to check electoral records independently rather than relying exclusively on the classifications recorded during the official revision. By visiting homes, speaking to voters and comparing their accounts with the reasons recorded for deletion, volunteers can identify cases that require further examination.

The Trilokpuri exercise also demonstrates how a public hearing can bring individual cases together. Residents who may otherwise have approached election offices separately were able to describe their experiences, seek assistance and question how the revision had been carried out.

Public audits cannot replace the statutory responsibilities of election officials. Nor can the findings from a limited number of polling booths establish the overall accuracy of an electoral roll. Their role is to identify discrepancies, make the process more transparent and provide information that can be checked by the authorities.

For a wider audit to be meaningful, voters need access to deletion lists and the reasons recorded against their names. They also need a clear procedure for checking those details, raising objections and obtaining a decision within a reasonable period. Where an entry is disputed, election officials should explain how the claim was verified and whether any correction was made.

This is particularly important when a voter has been marked dead, absent or shifted. Such classifications can have direct consequences for a person’s ability to participate in an election, and errors should not be left for voters to discover only when they check the draft roll or attempt to vote.

The issue extends beyond Trilokpuri. Wherever intensive revision exercises are conducted, independent checks can help identify gaps between the official record and the circumstances of people whose names have been removed.

October 30 deadline puts pressure on excluded voters

The timing of the audit is significant because the deadline for filing claims and objections in Delhi’s SIR process is October 30. The Election Commission of India extended the deadline from September 30, while the final electoral roll is now scheduled to be published on December 4.

The Delhi Chief Electoral Officer’s office said more than 31.26 lakh of the 33.14 lakh notices issued during the revision had been disposed of, with the cases concerned set aside for consideration in the final roll. These notices relate to voters whose details could not be matched with the 2002 electoral roll or whose enumeration forms were flagged for logical discrepancies.

The notice process is separate from the exclusion of approximately 47.57 lakh voters whose enumeration forms were not received during the exercise. The figures should therefore not be conflated: a person missing from the draft roll and a person whose details have attracted a notice are not necessarily in the same procedural position.

The CEO’s office has also said that special enrolment camps have been conducted across polling stations to help voters check their names and submit applications. However, the existence of camps does not by itself establish how many excluded voters have successfully secured inclusion.

For those who believe they have been wrongly removed, the immediate concern is whether they can submit their claims before the deadline and whether those claims will be properly examined before the final roll is published.

The public audit has put individual cases on record, but the larger question remains whether the election authorities can verify disputed entries, make the correction process accessible and ensure that eligible voters are not left out because of errors in the revision. With the claims deadline approaching, the focus must remain on the people whose names are missing and on whether they can obtain an effective remedy in time.

Related:

SIR Karnataka: Six major ‘conspiracies’ exposed in the final electoral roll

EXCLUSIVE – SIR: The total disenfranchisement of the Indian Voter is 16 crores, not 13.60 Crores?

ECI affidavit says SIR decisions were unanimous, but questions over two commissioners’ objections remain

UP CEO orders voter roll audit after SIR glitches exposed: Can the 2027 election be fair without public scrutiny?

The post Delhi SIR: Public audit finds 416 of 1,236 deleted voters still at their registered addresses appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]> SIR’s elusive illegal immigrants: Bogey Busted but will the injustices heaped be corrected? https://sabrangindia.in/sirs-elusive-illegal-immigrants-bogey-busted-but-will-the-injustices-heaped-be-corrected/ Thu, 29 Oct 2026 14:19:36 +0000 https://sabrangindia.in/?p=49877 Barely 771 “foreign nationals” identified in Karnataka and a miniscule 1,600 in six other Indian states; yet the hysterical bogey of the “ghuspetiya” (illegal immigrant) has been used to render 130 million plus Indian without the right to vote?

The post SIR’s elusive illegal immigrants: Bogey Busted but will the injustices heaped be corrected? appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]> Much like the infamous National Register of Citizens (NRC) process in Assam that has not just rendered a staggering 19, 00, 000 “potentially excluded” from citizenship but worse, kept in limbo resolution of their grievance by an absence of adjudication for seven years (August 31, 2019), the utterly discredited Special Intensive Revision (SIR): both were launched on the back of the political bogey of “illegal immigrants!”

Twelve years ago it was the challenger to the post of Prime Minister who hysterically raised this bogey in the imminent general elections (2014) and now, in the past two years or so it is him again and his grizzly lieutenant, the country’s home minister who warningly raised the bogey even as their regime drove the country’s Election Commission (a hitherto independent and constitutional body) to conduct a hastily constructed, even unlawful and unconstitutional Special Intensive Revision of India’s Electoral Rolls. Beginning with Bihar in June 2025 and thereafter now completed in 20 states while 16 others reel under its process, the exercise has cost the country dear. Not only do we not know what the democratic basis for conducting this process has been (transparency activists have revealed no due process in the decisions taken) but cost estimates are a staggering Rs. 1500-3,000 crores of the Indian tax payer’s money. Worse school functioning, teaching in classrooms and even examinations have been de-railed as teachers have been drawn into an exercise they are ill-trained for.

There is worse. Latest news reveals, and we need to thank the local newspapers in Karnataka (Prajawani among others) for this, as also the Hindustan Times for revealing that the “bogey” used by the two most powerful Indians to justify this exercise, has been busted.

Sabrangindia reported on October 28, yesterday, how this baseless propaganda has been exposed as a rank falsehood post SIR in Karnataka and elsewhere. BJP and the Sangh Parivar leaders in Karnataka had claimed that the state, particularly Bengaluru, had 10-25 lakh Bangladeshi infiltrators[1] and that SIR was necessary to identify them; on October 27, the day the final SIR list was released, the CEO, Karnataka (CEO) Anbu Kumar, responding orally to a question, categorically stated that the number of foreign nationals detected was fewer than one thousand. According to the front-page report in Prajavani, a total of 771 foreign nationals were identified in Karnataka, of whom 685 were Nepalis! In Bengaluru North district alone, 580 foreign nationals were identified, of whom 542 were Nepalis. Apart from Nepalis, the other foreign nationals detected were primarily citizens of the United States, Canada, Australia and other Western countries. The argument meant to foster hysteria and hatred stands busted. Read the final categorisation here.[2]

Besides, according to documents obtained from informed sources, only one Bangladeshi national and one Pakistani national were detected, both in Uttara Kannada district. This makes two things abundantly clear. First, the malicious propaganda of the Sangh Parivar was false. Second the motive behind the SIR was not “national security” and identification of “illegal immigrants” but disenfranchising millions of Indians!

Significantly, there are two more important reasons for arriving at this conclusion. In its judgment on SIR delivered on May 27, the Supreme Court directed states where the SIR process had been completed to submit lists of suspected foreign nationals identified during the exercise to the “Competent Authority” under the Ministry of Home Affairs within four weeks. Not merely four weeks, but five months have now passed since that judgment. Even before the Supreme Court delivered its judgment, SIR had already been completed in 13 states. The same transparency activists (Venkatesh Nayak and Anjali Bharadwaj), in August 2026, used the Right to Information Act (RTI) to understand both from the Ministry of Home Affairs and the Election Commission, how many such foreign nationals had been identified. Significantly, in the MHA reply in October, the Ministry of Home Affairs stated that it had neither information about the “Competent Authority” nor any list of suspected foreign nationals. The Election Commission, on its part, replied that it had no report showing how many suspected foreign nationals had been identified through SIR in different states.[3]

Then comes today, October 29, 2026, the icing on the cake.

The Hindustan Times reports that a relevantly insignificant 1,600 foreigners had been identified on the voter’s list of six states. Not lakhs or millions, one thousand six hundred!  The size of the electorate in the six states, reports Himanshi Dahiya of the newspaper is 98.6 million. This ratio shows how miniscule is the number as compared to the electorate here. In all, HT spoke to the CEOs of 26states and Union territories where SIR was completed or draft rolls published. Officials from 11 states responded. Six gave a count of suspected foreigners. Four said they didn’t maintain the data. Odisha said it found such cases but did not record a figure. While Karnataka as the CEO states had an overwhelming number of Nepalis, Jharkand had three persons on the rolls from Afghanistan. Two men of Nepalese origin were identified in Meghalaya, both married to Indian women! In Goa, authorities detected 419 suspected foreign passport holders, said it’s CEO Sanjay Goel while Punjab, Delhi, Uttarakhand and Telengana did not record data.

So what does this mean? A staggering 13.60 crores Indians (at least!) are disenfranchised today, though Vote for Democracy’s independent calculation suggests that the number may be above 16 crores! In December 2025, India’s Home Minister[4]  defended the SIR as a means to “detect, delete, deport” alleged “infiltrators”,[5] a claim unfounded.

Among the large number of genuine voters from Bihar and West Bengal disenfranchised through this ad hic and arbitrary process (SIR), several thousand have –even while adjudication is under way– been deprived of other citizenship related benefits like access to government. schemes, even passports and the omnipresent Aadhaar car. While the apex court has underlined that the SIR cannot be an exercise in citizenship, the “deletion” from the electoral roll has had a ripple effect of such denials. Even scarier is the witch-hunt launched in the states of West Bengal and Assam –both states ruled by the majoritarian Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)—to launch coercive deportation and expulsion drives (May 2025 in Assam and post May 2026 in West Bengal. This has resulted in, as reported by the Reporters Collective, The Wire, Human Rights Watch and Citizens for Justice and Peace, expulsions of ethnic Bengali Muslims, forcibly, without following the central government’s own deportation policy across the border to No Man’s Land and even Bangladesh![6] After the SIR process was completed, the BJP state government in West Bengal set up detention camps[7] in May 2026 under the “detect, delete, deport” policy and continued arbitrary detentions.

All these steps without due process, proof or accountability. By a government that has increasingly been functioning more and more undemocratically, feeding its supporters on hysteria and propaganda not reality or fact. And while the political Opposition has in the past months been rigorously opposing the ill-conceived SIR, the detrimental impact of this process on the lives of disenfranchised citizens is still a blur, concealed from the public gaze.

Who are these hapless Indians, a staggering 160 million of them who live today under the grave and potential shadow of statelessness? The answer should haunt us all, institution, individual and society, alike. And, until this grave wrong is corrected –person by person, voter by voter–India will remain a fractured and damaged democracy.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQnSBVGZy-k;

[2]https://ceo.karnataka.gov.in/uploads/PDF%20FINAL%20AC%20WISE%2027_1793094730.pdf

[3] https://thewire.in/rights/rti-reveals-in-sir-purging-of-ineligibles-from-the-voter-lists-might-be-a-bogey

[4] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HowI1PVIwyE

[5] https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/patna/bihar-ration-card-list-trimmed-by-3-percent-using-sir-data-and-income-flags-10716206/

[6] https://indianexpress.com/article/india/election-commission-sir-draft-rolls-13-crore-deletions-delhi-leads-10857760/

[7] https://theprint.in/india/bengals-bjp-govt-tells-districts-to-set-up-detention-camps-for-illegal-bangladeshi-rohingya-migrants/2940338/

Related:

EXCLUSIVE – SIR: The total disenfranchisement of the Indian Voter is 16 crores, not 13.60 Crores?

SIR Karnataka: Six major ‘conspiracies’ exposed in the final electoral roll

Assam NRC: Seven years after 19 lakh people were excluded, rejection slips remain a non-starter

The post SIR’s elusive illegal immigrants: Bogey Busted but will the injustices heaped be corrected? appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]> 2020 Delhi Riots: Delhi High Court upholds seven-year sentence for five men in 22-year old Muslim migrant worker’s death https://sabrangindia.in/2020-delhi-riots-delhi-high-court-upholds-seven-year-sentence-for-five-men-in-22-year-old-muslim-migrant-workers-death/ Thu, 29 Oct 2026 13:20:12 +0000 https://sabrangindia.in/?p=49873 The Court holds that failure to identify who inflicted the fatal injuries does not absolve the accused under Section 149 IPC, relying on evidence of their participation in an armed mob that assaulted the victim, Monish

The post 2020 Delhi Riots: Delhi High Court upholds seven-year sentence for five men in 22-year old Muslim migrant worker’s death appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]> The Delhi High Court has upheld the conviction of five men for culpable homicide not amounting to murder in connection with the killing of 22-year-old Monish during the February 2020 North-East Delhi riots, affirming their seven-year rigorous imprisonment sentence.

Justice Madhu Jain dismissed the appeals filed by Aman Kashyap, Devinder Kumar, Pradeep Rai, Ashish alias Goli and Arun Kumar, upholding their conviction under Sections 148 and 304 Part I read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The Court held that the prosecution evidence established more than the appellants’ mere presence in a crowd: it placed them at the forefront of an armed mob that pursued and assaulted the deceased.

The central question before the Court was whether the appellants could be held collectively liable for the death when the prosecution had not established which individual had inflicted the fatal head injuries. Affirming the trial court’s findings, the High Court held that the absence of proof identifying the individual assailant was not, by itself, sufficient to absolve the appellants of liability under Section 149 IPC. The Court held that the weapons carried by the mob, the exhortations attributed to the appellants and the continued assault provided the factual basis for finding that the assembly shared the unlawful common object of assaulting the deceased and causing bodily harm.

“In the present case, the evidence establishes more than the mere presence of the appellants in a crowd. PW-10 identified all five appellants at the forefront of the armed mob, exhorting others to assault the deceased. The deceased was pursued, surrounded and assaulted even after he had fallen near the police barricades. The conduct attributed to the appellants, the weapons carried by members of the mob and the continued assault upon the deceased provide the factual basis for concluding that the assembly had an unlawful common object of assaulting the deceased and causing bodily harm to him.” (Para 67)

Prosecution evidence and the appellants’ challenge

The case arose from an incident on February 25, 2020, when Monish was allegedly chased and assaulted by a mob near Gali No. 3, Brijpuri, in the vicinity of Peer Baba Mazar, Chand Bagh. He was subsequently taken to Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, where he died from his injuries. The post-mortem report attributed his death to shock resulting from ante-mortem brain injuries caused by blunt-force impact.

The trial court, by its judgment dated November 30, 2024, convicted the five appellants under Sections 148 and 304 Part I read with Section 149 IPC. By its order dated January 13, 2025, it sentenced them to one year of simple imprisonment for rioting while armed with a deadly weapon and seven years of rigorous imprisonment, along with a fine of ₹30,000, for culpable homicide not amounting to murder. The substantive sentences were directed to run concurrently.

Challenging the conviction, the appellants questioned the credibility of the eyewitnesses, the delay in recording the police witnesses’ statements, the absence of a test identification parade (TIP) and alleged deficiencies in the investigation. They also disputed the identification evidence and argued that the prosecution had failed to establish their participation in the assault or the common object necessary to attract constructive liability under Section 149 IPC.

The defence particularly relied on the changing testimony of Shashi Kant, who initially attributed the assault to the accused but subsequently clarified that he had seen the five appellants in the mob without personally witnessing them strike the deceased. Manoj Kaniyal, another prosecution witness, did not identify the appellants before the trial court and denied the prosecution’s suggestions concerning their identification.

High Court assesses identification evidence and police testimony

Rejecting the challenge to the identification evidence, the High Court placed primary reliance on the testimony of Constable Piyush, the beat constable of the locality, who stated that he knew the appellants before the incident through his official duties.

Piyush identified the five men as being at the forefront of the mob, carrying weapons and shouting “maaro maaro”. According to his testimony, the deceased was chased, assaulted near the police barricades and repeatedly beaten even after falling. The police personnel subsequently intervened, dispersed the mob and arranged for the injured man to be taken to hospital.

Head Constable Deepak and Constable Vineet substantially corroborated the account of the pursuit, assault and police intervention. The Court acknowledged, however, that these witnesses had obtained the appellants’ names from Piyush, and that their identification was not independent of his insofar as the names were concerned. Their evidence nevertheless supported the occurrence and the contemporaneous pointing out of the persons allegedly involved.

The Court also rejected the contention that the police witnesses’ testimony should be discarded merely because they were public officials. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Girja Prasad v. State of Madhya Pradesh, it reiterated that police testimony must be assessed on its own merits rather than rejected on the basis of the witness’s official status. The Court noted that duty records supported the witnesses’ presence at the police picket and that their accounts substantially corresponded on the pursuit, assault and rescue of the deceased.

“In the present case, the presence of the said witnesses at the police picket is supported by the duty records, and their accounts substantially correspond regarding the manner in which the deceased was pursued, assaulted and subsequently rescued. Their official status, therefore, cannot constitute an independent ground for rejecting their testimonies.” (Para 53)

On the absence of a TIP, the Court relied on Malkhansingh v. State of Madhya Pradesh, reiterating that identification in court constitutes substantive evidence, while a TIP ordinarily tests a witness’s ability to identify a suspect during investigation. The absence of a TIP does not automatically render identification inadmissible, although its evidentiary value must be assessed with due caution. The Court considered Piyush’s prior familiarity with the appellants particularly relevant to this question.

Delay in recording statements and investigative lapses

The High Court acknowledged that the statements of the three police eyewitnesses were recorded on April 1, 2020, more than a month after the incident. It also noted the investigating officer’s admission that the witnesses had not approached him on their own and had instead been called for examination during the investigation.

The Court cautioned that the delay could not be accepted mechanically merely because the incident occurred during the riots. Nevertheless, after considering the explanation that several riot-related cases were being investigated simultaneously, along with the evidence of the police witnesses, it held that the delay did not, by itself, discredit the occurrence or establish false implication.

The judgment also addressed discrepancies concerning the precise place of the assault, the PCR call and the use of electronic evidence. It clarified that the hospital CCTV footage had been relied upon to identify the injured person, not to establish visually that the appellants had participated in the assault. Similarly, call-detail records could indicate the approximate location of a mobile device but could not conclusively establish the user’s precise physical location at a particular moment.

Acknowledging the investigative deficiencies raised by the defence, the Court held that such lapses did not automatically displace otherwise reliable eyewitness evidence. The relevant inquiry, it said, was whether an omission undermined the credibility of the evidence or prejudiced the assessment of guilt.

Section 149 IPC: Liability without proof of the individual fatal blow

The principal legal issue concerned the application of Section 149 IPC, which attributes liability to members of an unlawful assembly for offences committed in prosecution of its common object, or offences that its members knew were likely to be committed in prosecution of that object.

The Court relied on Masalti v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Lalji v. State of Uttar Pradesh to reiterate that the prosecution need not invariably establish an individual overt act by every member of an unlawful assembly. However, it also invoked Kuldip Yadav v. State of Bihar to emphasise that mere presence in an assembly, or possession of a weapon, is insufficient without establishing the unlawful common object or the requisite knowledge.

Applying these principles, the Court found that the prosecution evidence went beyond establishing the appellants’ presence in a crowd. Piyush had identified them as being at the forefront of an armed mob and exhorting others to assault Monish. The deceased was pursued, surrounded and assaulted even after he fell near the police barricades.

Taken together, the conduct attributed to the appellants, the weapons carried by members of the mob and the continued assault supported the finding that the assembly shared the unlawful common object of assaulting the deceased and causing bodily harm.

The Court therefore held that the prosecution’s inability to identify the particular person who inflicted the fatal head injuries did not, by itself, absolve the appellants of liability. The decisive consideration was whether the offence was committed in prosecution of the assembly’s common object or was one its members knew was likely to be committed in pursuit of that object.

Why the conviction under Section 304 Part I IPC was upheld

The High Court separately examined the nature of the offence, emphasising that the fact of death alone could not determine whether the case fell under Section 304 Part I or Part II IPC. Part I applies where the act causing death is accompanied by the intention to cause death or such bodily injury as is likely to cause death. Part II applies where the accused has the requisite knowledge that death is likely but lacks the intention contemplated under Part I.

Relying on the evidence concerning the weapons carried by the mob, the exhortations attributed to the appellants and the manner in which Monish was assaulted, the Court held that these circumstances had to be considered together in determining the requisite mental element. It noted that the deceased was pursued by an armed mob, repeatedly assaulted after falling and sustained head injuries that proved fatal.

The Court thus upheld the finding that the offence involved the requisite intention under Section 304 Part I IPC and was committed in prosecution of the unlawful assembly’s common object, or was an offence its members knew was likely to be committed in pursuit of that object. Accordingly, the High Court dismissed all five appeals and affirmed the trial court’s judgment of conviction dated November 30, 2024, and order on sentence dated January 13, 2025.

The complete judgment may be read below:

Download PDF

 

Related:

Delhi HC grants bail to Rashid, a rickshaw-puller accused in Delhi Riots

The Word is the World: How the Delhi riots conspiracy case ritualises silence

“This Means FIR”: Delhi Court orders further investigation, FIR against BJP leader Kapil Mishra five years after Delhi riots

5 Years of Delhi Riots: Some Punished, Some Rewarded!

Delhi Police on Trial: Three court orders reveal collusion, cover-ups, and custodial torture by police officers during 2020 Delhi riots

Brinda Karat on the Third Anniversary of Delhi Riots- “Cannot Abandon Struggle for Justice”

Hate speeches amplified by television, incited targeted violence against Muslims: CCR Report, Feb ‘20 Delhi riots

The post 2020 Delhi Riots: Delhi High Court upholds seven-year sentence for five men in 22-year old Muslim migrant worker’s death appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]> Jamia’s Answer to Student Protest: Online exams, hostel closures and police detentions https://sabrangindia.in/jamias-answer-to-student-protest-online-exams-hostel-closures-and-police-detentions/ Thu, 29 Oct 2026 09:06:02 +0000 https://sabrangindia.in/?p=49857 As the hunger strike enters its third week, students allege that the administration is using disciplinary action and restrictions on campus life to weaken a movement demanding elected representation

The post Jamia’s Answer to Student Protest: Online exams, hostel closures and police detentions appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]> Jamia Millia Islamia’s administration has responded to a student movement demanding democratic representation by extending the suspension of physical academic activities, shifting examinations online and preparing to close hostels, intensifying a confrontation that has continued since October 12. As students remain on hunger strike over the restoration of the university’s elected students’ union, the administration’s latest measures have placed the burden of the standoff on the very students whose demand for representation remains unresolved.

On Wednesday, October 28, the university announced that online teaching for the current semester would continue until November 24, with practical examinations, fieldwork and project vivas scheduled online from November 25 to 30, followed by online theory examinations from December 1 to 24. Winter vacation will run from December 25 to January 12, with physical classes for the even semester scheduled to resume on January 13, 2027.

 

The announcement came as girls residing in Jamia’s BHM hostel marched inside Gate No. 8 on the night of October 28. The hostel provost reportedly warned them of disciplinary action if they did not end the march. Hostel residents were also asked to vacate all hostels by November 1, with the administration citing the shift to online classes.

 

The order means students will remain away from physical classrooms for the rest of the current semester and throughout the examination period, with no scheduled return to campus before January. The university has justified the decision on security grounds, but the timing and scale of the restrictions raise serious questions about whether the administration is responding to the concerns of its students or attempting to contain a protest it has been unable to resolve through a credible, time-bound commitment to elections.

 

 

 

 

In its order, the university said a meeting of deans, heads of departments, directors and other officials had concluded that the campus situation was “not conducive for academic environment”. It said the decision had been taken to ensure the safety and security of students.

 

 

Yet the administration has offered no electoral timeline that resolves the principal objection raised by the protesters. Instead, physical academic life has been suspended, access to campus facilities has been restricted, hostel residents face eviction and police action against protesters has continued. Students have argued that these measures punish the wider university community for a dispute that the administration could address by committing to a transparent and enforceable election schedule.

Twenty years without a union, and still no firm election date

At the centre of the agitation is a demand that should not require weeks of hunger strikes and escalating confrontation to secure: the restoration of the Jamia Millia Islamia Students’ Union (JMI-SU), which has remained defunct since 2006. The last elected union was dissolved amid allegations of campus violence and disruption. Two decades later, students continue to be denied a university-wide elected body through which they can represent their interests, raise grievances collectively and hold the administration accountable.

The current agitation began on October 12, when students launched an indefinite hunger strike demanding the revival of the union. The movement grew as students from different departments joined sit-in demonstrations around the Mirza Ghalib statue lawns. Five students were still on hunger strike on Wednesday, according to reports, despite the physical strain of prolonged fasting and the growing restrictions around the protest.

Students have repeatedly said that they exhausted conventional channels, including memorandums and representations to the university, before resorting to a hunger strike. Their grievances extend beyond the election schedule to include alleged administrative retaliation against students who protest, the withdrawal of disciplinary penalties and accountability for the conduct of campus security personnel.

In an account of the agitation, Indian Express reported, one hunger-striking student described the absence of an elected union as a structural problem that leaves students without an effective mechanism to challenge decisions affecting their education and campus life. The student cited previous protests over alleged irregularities in sports admissions and complaints about food quality at the Jammu and Kashmir hostel, claiming that students who raised concerns had faced campus bans or eviction.

 

The account points to a broader concern: when the administration controls the channels through which grievances are heard, while students lack an elected body to represent them, dissent can become an individual act of risk rather than an institutional process of accountability.

 

An election assurance tied to an approval process with no deadline

The administration announced on October 26 that student union elections would be held 15 days after the union constitution was approved. It also stated that suspension and show-cause notices issued during the agitation would be revoked and that a committee would investigate the conduct of security personnel during the protest. The announcement was presented as a step towards resolving the impasse. Students, however, rejected it as inadequate because the university did not specify when the constitution would be completed and approved.

An assurance that elections will take place 15 days after approval is not a definite election schedule when the date of approval itself remains uncertain. Without a binding deadline for the constitutional process, the administration retains control over when the condition for holding elections will be met.

Students have warned that this arrangement leaves room for further delay, allowing the university to claim that it has agreed to elections while postponing the process needed to make them possible. They have demanded that the constitution be drafted and approved within a short, fixed period and that the election dates be formally notified within 15 days of approval.

Students have also questioned why the administration needs an extended period to prepare a constitution when the university previously had an elected union. They have suggested that the existing constitutional framework could be reviewed and amended rather than used as a reason for prolonged uncertainty.

The administration’s announcement also failed to address the full range of disciplinary penalties imposed during the protest. While it referred to the withdrawal of suspension and show-cause notices, students pointed out that this did not explicitly cover rustication and campus bans. Ebin Basil was rusticated for one academic year, while Jasim Ali Khan was barred from entering the campus for six months, according to reports.

The detailed piece may be read here and here.

From campus restrictions to an extended academic shutdown

The latest order follows a series of measures that have progressively disrupted ordinary university life since the agitation began. On October 17, students alleged that university security personnel, accompanied by police, moved against protesters in the early morning, dragging and assaulting students and dismantling parts of the protest site. Videos circulated on social media showed confrontations and students being pulled away. Ebin Basil also alleged that he had been assaulted.

The administration has disputed aspects of the protesters’ account and accused students of obstructing university activities. On October 18, it condemned slogans painted on campus walls, including “Restore JMISU”, “Reclaim Jamia”, “Free Palestine”, “Free Sharjeel Imam” and “RSS Se Azaadi”, describing them as detrimental to national integrity, security and sovereignty. It also directed that the walls be repainted and called on protesters to vacate the demonstration site.

The university subsequently shifted classes online, citing disruption and security concerns. On October 24, it further restricted physical academic activity, closed gates and limited access to facilities, including the Central Library and canteen services. Students alleged that electricity and water supplies around the protest area were also cut off.

According to accounts published by Alt News and The Wire, protesters said their sit-in site had been dismantled, students had been manhandled and access to basic amenities had been restricted. Some students alleged that they were left with inadequate access to washrooms during the protest.

 

Students also reported that gates connecting parts of the campus and the boys’ hostels had been sealed. They said the restrictions affected not only those participating in the agitation but also students attempting to use university facilities and members of the public accessing services such as the health centre, dental hospital, bank, Aadhaar centre and post office.

 

Police deployment and detentions deepen the confrontation

The university’s restrictions have coincided with an intensified police presence around the campus. Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) has been invoked to prohibit public gatherings in the area, and warning signs outside the campus have threatened the use of force and legal action to disperse unlawful assemblies.

On Wednesday, Delhi Police detained two members of the National Students’ Union of India (NSUI), Faizan and Zishan, outside Gate No. 4. According to The Hindu, the two were taken to Fatehpur Beri before being brought to Jamia Nagar police station. NSUI condemned the detentions, which came as the students’ hunger strike entered its 17th day.

 

Students have alleged that more than 70 protesters have been detained since October 12. Earlier, Niranjan KS, Arbaaj Khan and Munna Qureshi were arrested under provisions of the BNSS and sent to judicial custody, according to media reports.

 

The police restrictions have also made the campus an increasingly difficult place for students to access and organise within. Protesters have described barricades, heavy deployment outside the gates and difficulties entering or leaving the university. Some have alleged that deliveries of drinking water and other essentials were stopped at the gates.

 

The situation also carries painful memories of the December 2019 police crackdown on Jamia students protesting the Citizenship (Amendment) Act. The circumstances of the current agitation are different, but the renewed presence of police around a university campus, alongside allegations of force against students, has revived concerns about the treatment of dissent at an institution that has previously been at the centre of national debates over civil liberties.

Administration alleges vandalism; students accuse it of discrediting the protest

The latest escalation followed allegations of vandalism on the night of October 27. In a statement reported by the media, the university said groups of protesting students and local residents had damaged gates and boundary walls, brought down Gate No. 4C, pelted stones and damaged the CCTV control room, cameras and their connections. It also alleged that masked protesters had attempted to mobilise support from the boys’ hostels and that female wardens and faculty members had been threatened.

Students have denied the university’s account and accused the administration of attempting to frame the agitation. One protester, Neville Thomas, alleged that the administration had erected aluminium sheets around parts of the campus and subsequently blamed students when the structures were damaged. Students have also alleged harassment by proctorial staff in the hostels, including the confiscation of identity cards and orders to close mess facilities from November 1.

Hostels face closure as students continue their protest

The reported decision to ask hostel residents to vacate by November 1 marks another escalation. The university has argued that keeping hostels open serves little practical purpose when classes have moved online and teachers are not attending campus. An official also alleged that a large proportion of protesters supporting vandalism were hostel residents.

For students from outside Delhi, hostel accommodation is not simply an extension of classroom attendance. It is their place of residence, and abrupt closure can create serious logistical and financial difficulties. The reported march by women residents of the BHM hostel on October 28, followed by a warning of disciplinary action from the provost, underscores the growing strain between students and the administration.

Union Education Minister Pralhad Joshi has said that negotiations are continuing and appealed to students not to create a law-and-order situation. He stated that the concerns raised by students were being examined by a body constituted for the purpose. But an appeal for order does not answer the question at the heart of the protest. Students are asking when their elected union will be restored, what timeline will govern the drafting and approval of its constitution, and whether the administration will withdraw the disciplinary measures imposed during the agitation.

 

Related:

Books Under Siege: Bengal’s Left bookstalls, the Calcutta High Court’s intervention and the warning from Hitler’s Germany

Seeking justice for Ankita Bhandari, parents detained in pre-dawn crackdown at India Gate

Mumbai Police detain Ambedkarite leaders demanding justice for Sahil Wakode; IIT Bombay refuses to hear delegation

Calcutta High Court says political dissent must not be stifled, directs police to protect CPI(M) bookstall near Durga Puja Pandal

 

The post Jamia’s Answer to Student Protest: Online exams, hostel closures and police detentions appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]> Assam NRC: Seven years after 19 lakh people were excluded, rejection slips remain a non-starter https://sabrangindia.in/assam-nrc-seven-years-after-19-lakh-people-were-excluded-rejection-slips-remain-a-non-starter/ Wed, 28 Oct 2026 12:39:04 +0000 https://sabrangindia.in/?p=49853 Separate Supreme Court proceedings concern the failure to issue rejection slips to nearly 19.07 lakh excluded people and identity cards to more than 3.11 crore people included in the final register

The post Assam NRC: Seven years after 19 lakh people were excluded, rejection slips remain a non-starter appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]> Seven years after Assam’s final National Register of Citizens (NRC) was published, the Union government has informed the Supreme Court that the process of issuing rejection slips to nearly 1.9 million people excluded from the register has not even begun. The disclosure exposes a prolonged administrative impasse over a process that was meant to establish a formal record of citizenship claims and provide those excluded with a route to challenge the decision.

According to Hindustan Times, the Registrar General of India (RGI), in an affidavit dated September 28, informed a bench of Justices P.S. Narasimha and Alok Aradhe that the state NRC coordinator had yet to begin issuing rejection slips. The RGI attributed the delay to the fact that the NRC data had not been shared with its office, as the security framework required for the data was still being prepared.

The affidavit filed by the RGI in Assam State Jamiat Ulama v. Union of India, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 839 of 2026, confirms that the process remains incomplete despite repeated directions and correspondence between the concerned authorities.

“Enactment of the security regime for NRC data by the state coordinator is under progress and hence data has not been shared with the Registrar General of India,” the affidavit states. It further explains that the RGI can formally notify the final NRC only after receiving the data from the state coordinator.

The immediate consequence is that people excluded from the final list remain without the rejection slips intended to facilitate their appeals before Foreigners Tribunals. The delay is particularly significant because the Supreme Court had directed the state NRC coordinator as far back as May 8, 2018, to develop a mechanism for issuing these documents.

Supreme Court directive remains unimplemented

The Supreme Court’s May 8, 2018, order required the state NRC coordinator to develop a system through which those excluded from the final register could obtain rejection slips and pursue appeals before Foreigners Tribunals. The document is intended to communicate the outcome of the NRC process and facilitate a challenge to exclusion. The RGI’s latest affidavit records that, despite subsequent directions and administrative discussions, the state coordinator has not commenced the process.

The affidavit traces the delay through a series of official communications. At a meeting chaired by the Union Home Secretary on February 22, 2020, it was decided that rejection slips in cases where the results were considered correct should be issued immediately, with March 31, 2020, set as the deadline. Cases involving discrepancies between the results recorded in physical records and those entered into the computer system were to be referred to the concerned Deputy Commissioners for clarification. On November 5, 2020, the RGI wrote to the state coordinator, asking that the issuance of rejection slips be completed in accordance with the applicable standard operating procedures, guidelines and Supreme Court directions. The process, however, remained uninitiated.

The state coordinator had earlier informed the RGI, through a letter dated October 8, 2020, that rejection slips could be issued only after the RGI formally notified the final NRC. The coordinator also stated that the security framework for the NRC data was under preparation and that the data had therefore not been transferred to the RGI.

This has left the process caught between two administrative requirements: the RGI says it cannot notify the final NRC without the data, while the state coordinator has maintained that rejection slips cannot be issued until that notification takes place. The result is that the Supreme Court-mandated mechanism for enabling excluded people to challenge their exclusion has remained stalled for years.

Security framework for NRC data still pending

The delay is linked to the Supreme Court’s August 13, 2019, direction that the NRC data be protected through a security regime comparable to the safeguards governing Aadhaar data. The court had directed that the lists of inclusions and exclusions be made available to the state government, the Union government and the RGI only after the prescribed safeguards were put in place. According to the RGI’s affidavit, the state coordinator is still working on implementing this framework. Until the data is shared, the RGI says it cannot formally notify the final register.

The affidavit thus places the responsibility for the continuing delay within an unresolved administrative process involving data security, transfer of records and formal notification. It does not, however, alter the practical consequence for those excluded: the rejection slips have not been issued, and the appeal mechanism envisaged by the court has not been operationalised through this step.

The prolonged delay raises serious questions about the effectiveness of a citizenship verification exercise when the administrative steps necessary to communicate its outcome and facilitate legal challenges remain incomplete years after publication.

Nearly 19.07 lakh people excluded from the final NRC

The NRC update was notified by the Union government in December 2013 and undertaken in accordance with Section 14A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, and the Citizenship Rules, 2003. Rule 4A and the Schedule appended to the Rules prescribe the framework for preparing the NRC in Assam. The exercise was conducted against the backdrop of the Assam Accord, which established March 24, 1971, as the relevant cut-off date for determining the citizenship claims of persons who migrated to Assam from the territory that is now Bangladesh, subject to the applicable legal provisions.

According to the RGI’s affidavit, applications were received between May and August 2015. A total of approximately 68.27 lakh applications covering 3.30 crore people were submitted, accompanied by around 6.6 crore documents intended to establish eligibility for inclusion.

Applicants were required to furnish documentary evidence linking themselves or their ancestors to the prescribed legacy records, including the 1951 NRC or electoral rolls up to midnight on March 24, 1971, along with other admissible documents. Where necessary, officials undertook further verification, including inquiries concerning the authenticity of documents and the linkage between applicants and their ancestors.

The complete draft NRC was published on July 30, 2018. Those whose names were missing could submit claims for inclusion, while objections could also be filed against entries. The RGI’s affidavit records that 36,26,630 people filed claims for inclusion and that 1,87,633 objections were received by December 31, 2018.

Following the disposal of claims and objections, the supplementary lists were published on August 31, 2019. The final exercise found 3,11,21,004 people eligible for inclusion, while 19,06,657 people were left out, including those who had not submitted claims.

The exclusion of nearly 19.07 lakh people did not, in itself, eliminate their right to pursue the legal remedies contemplated under the NRC framework. Those dissatisfied with the outcome were entitled to challenge the decision before Foreigners Tribunals. The absence of rejection slips, however, has left the process without the formal documentation intended to enable such challenges.

Separate Supreme Court challenge over NRC identity cards

The dispute over rejection slips forms part of a broader set of proceedings concerning the incomplete implementation of the Assam NRC. In a separate matter, All Assam Minorities Students Union v. Union of India, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1030 of 2025, the petitioners have challenged the failure of the authorities to issue National Identity Cards to people whose names were included in the final NRC published in August 2019.

The petitions have been brought by organisations including the All Assam Minorities Students Union (AAMSU), Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind and the Assam Sankhyalaghu Sangram Parishad. They seek implementation of the legal and administrative steps that, according to them, remain outstanding despite the publication of the register.

The petitioners rely on Section 14A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which provides for the registration of citizens and the issuance of national identity cards, and Rule 13 of the Citizenship Rules, 2003, concerning the issuance of National Identity Cards to citizens whose particulars are entered in the National Register of Indian Citizens.

They have also sought the issuance of rejection slips to those excluded from the NRC and the initiation of the corresponding appeal process under Paragraph 8 of the Schedule to Rule 4A of the Citizenship Rules, 2003.

The petitioners contend that the failure to issue identity cards to those included and rejection slips to those excluded has left the NRC exercise incomplete. Their case raises questions concerning the implementation of the statutory framework and the constitutional guarantees under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution, which protect equality before the law and the right to life and personal liberty, respectively.

The distinction between the two categories is important. People included in the NRC are seeking the identity cards contemplated under the statutory framework, while those excluded are seeking rejection slips that would enable them to challenge the outcome. Both issues concern outstanding steps following the publication of the final register, but they involve separate legal and administrative requirements.

The RGI’s affidavit in the proceedings brought by Assam State Jamiat Ulama also states that the question of issuing NRC identity cards to those included in the final list is pending before the Supreme Court in separate proceedings.

Re-verification plea adds another layer to the dispute

The NRC proceedings are further complicated by a separate plea filed by Hitesh Dev Sarma, the former state NRC coordinator, seeking a complete, comprehensive and time-bound re-verification of the draft and supplementary NRC lists. According to the RGI’s affidavit, Sarma filed an interlocutory application on May 14, 2021, in the proceedings in Assam Public Works v. Union of India, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 274 of 2009, seeking re-verification of the NRC.

The affidavit also refers to a separate petition, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 740 of 2025, filed by Sarma on July 24, 2025, seeking comprehensive and time-bound re-verification on the ground of alleged inaccuracies in the NRC lists. The RGI has noted that the Supreme Court disposed of the original proceedings in W.P. (C) No. 274 of 2009, along with pending applications, through its order dated October 17, 2024. The affidavit also refers to the Supreme Court’s decision upholding the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which establishes the special framework for citizenship in Assam under the Assam Accord.

These proceedings form part of the continuing legal contest over the NRC’s preparation, accuracy and implementation. The outstanding questions surrounding re-verification, identity cards and rejection slips must nevertheless be distinguished: a demand to re-examine the register is not the same as the immediate issue of enabling people already excluded to pursue the remedy contemplated under the existing framework.

Supreme Court adjourns matter to November 6

The Supreme Court has adjourned the matter concerning the rejection slips to November 6 after the Assam government sought additional time to file its response, Hindustan Times reported. The proceedings arise from petitions by Assam State Jamiat Ulama, AAMSU and Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind, among others, seeking the issuance of rejection slips to people excluded from the NRC and identity cards for those included.

The immediate question before the court is not merely whether the NRC data can be formally notified, but how the outstanding steps required to give effect to the register will be completed. The RGI’s affidavit confirms that the rejection-slip process has yet to begin, while the security framework required before the transfer of data remains under preparation.

The delay has persisted despite the Supreme Court’s directions, administrative discussions and the RGI’s own communication to the state coordinator in November 2020. For the nearly 19.07 lakh people excluded from the final list, the absence of rejection slips continues to obstruct access to the mechanism intended to challenge their exclusion.

Seven years after the final NRC was published, the register remains caught in an unresolved administrative and legal process. Until the data is transferred, the final NRC formally notified and rejection slips issued, the exercise will continue to leave a fundamental question unanswered for those excluded: how can they effectively challenge a decision when the document intended to facilitate that challenge has not been issued?

 

Related:

When Belonging Must Be Proved: Assam’s Kashem Ali wins long citizenship battle

Assam citizens’ forum demands scrapping of SIR, completion of pending NRC process; police block protesters at Guwahati Press Club

CJP helps secure Ajabha Khatun’s release after 772 days in Assam’s Matia detention camp

Census 2027: When a population count starts asking for more than just numbers

Assam citizens’ forum demands scrapping of SIR, completion of pending NRC process; police block protesters at Guwahati Press Club

Supreme Court halts deportation of woman declared foreigner, issues notice to union and NRC coordinator

CJP EXCLUSIVE: How the Union of India took a giant step towards both NPR & NRC in 2015 without informed consent

 

The post Assam NRC: Seven years after 19 lakh people were excluded, rejection slips remain a non-starter appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]> UP CEO apologises for minority remark on official X handle, but who is responsible? https://sabrangindia.in/up-ceo-apologises-for-minority-remark-on-official-x-handle-but-who-is-responsible/ Wed, 28 Oct 2026 12:22:10 +0000 https://sabrangindia.in/?p=49850 After discrepancies in Uttar Pradesh’s electoral rolls prompted AAP leaders to question the Election Commission, the state’s Chief Electoral Officer posted a remark invoking caste and religion, following criticism, the handle apologised for its language, who was responsible for the post, what action has been taken, and why is it still online?

The post UP CEO apologises for minority remark on official X handle, but who is responsible? appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]> The controversy began after discrepancies and mismatches were flagged in Uttar Pradesh’s electoral rolls. Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) MP Sanjay Singh shared a video of party leader Rajesh Yadav questioning the Election Commission of India (ECI) over an unusual name appearing in the voter list.

In his post on X, Singh endorsed Yadav’s question to Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar: “Why did Ram kill only a ‘Yadav’? Why did Ram not kill a Singh, Pathak, Asthana, Sharma, Rai or Bisht? Is your computer deeply casteist? Are you running the agenda of a political party?”

The post questioned how the name had appeared in the electoral roll and whether the discrepancy reflected a problem with the system. Singh described Yadav’s question as justified.

UP CEO’s post introduces a communal reference

In response to the controversy surrounding the name, the official X handle (@ceoup) of the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO), Uttar Pradesh, acknowledged that an error had occurred in the electoral roll for a recent Legislative Council election. However, the post went beyond the error itself and referred to both caste and religion.

The post stated that the name “Ram ne Sharma ko maara” (Ram killed Sharma) was an unusual entry in the electoral roll. It said that computers and software were not casteist and acknowledged that a mistake had been made, adding that the error had not discriminated based on caste.

It then said that “the authorities were fortunate that Ram had not killed a person from a minority community; otherwise, they would have been accused of being communal as well as casteist”.

The remark drew criticism because it introduced a reference to a minority community into a discussion about an electoral roll error. The post was published through the official handle of the state’s chief electoral officer, prompting questions about the language used by an election authority.

CEO says Election Commission has issued instructions

The post spread across social media and drew criticism for the communal reference made from the official handle. The remarks also came amid allegations of targeted deletion of Muslim voters from electoral rolls.

Congress leader Supriya Shrinate questioned who was operating the official handle, writing that the authorities had little credibility left and that the account itself was undermining whatever remained.

Link:

Responding to her criticism, the CEO Uttar Pradesh handle stated that the “Instructions have been issued by the Election Commission of India to use measured language in every matter and limit communication to facts without unnecessary comments.”

The response did not clarify who had drafted or approved the original post, whether the officials responsible had been identified, or whether any action had been taken. At this stage, the handle had not issued an apology.

CEO Uttar Pradesh apologises after criticism

Following the criticism, the CEO Uttar Pradesh handle issued an apology, acknowledging that the language, tone and sharpness of the earlier post were not in keeping with the communication expected from an official account.

The statement said that the anger caused by the remarks had been noted and offered a sincere apology to those who were shocked and upset. It also said that future communication would be restrained and formal.

However, the apology did not clarify who had drafted or approved the original post, whether the officials responsible had been identified, or whether any action had been taken against them.

The original post also remained available on the official handle, with no public explanation for why it had not been removed.

Who is responsible for the post?

The apology and the assurance of more formal communication leave several questions unanswered. Who manages the CEO Uttar Pradesh’s official X handle? Who drafted and authorised the post referring to caste and a minority community? Has the Election Commission identified those responsible, and has any action been taken?

The authorities have also not publicly explained why the original post remains online despite the apology and the criticism it attracted.

The controversy began with questions about discrepancies in the electoral roll. It then shifted to the language used by the state’s chief electoral officer’s official handle. While the apology acknowledged that the post did not meet the standards expected of an official account, it did not address responsibility for its publication.

Will the Election Commission clarify who was responsible for the post and what action, if any, has been taken? Until then, the questions surrounding the official handle remain unanswered.

Related:

SIR Karnataka: Six major ‘conspiracies’ exposed in the final electoral roll

EXCLUSIVE – SIR: The total disenfranchisement of the Indian Voter is 16 crores, not 13.60 Crores?

ECI affidavit says SIR decisions were unanimous, but questions over two commissioners’ objections remain

UP CEO orders voter roll audit after SIR glitches exposed: Can the 2027 election be fair without public scrutiny?

 

 

The post UP CEO apologises for minority remark on official X handle, but who is responsible? appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]> Karnataka’s final SIR roll delete electorate by nearly 1 crore; Bengaluru loses over 43 lakh names https://sabrangindia.in/karnatakas-final-sir-roll-delete-electorate-by-nearly-1-crore-bengaluru-loses-over-43-lakh-names/ Wed, 28 Oct 2026 11:03:48 +0000 https://sabrangindia.in/?p=49847 Karnataka’s final SIR roll published on October 27, lists 4.55 crore voters, down from 5.54 crore before the SIR, the draft roll deleted 1.08 crore names, while the final net deletion stands at 99.32 lakh, Bengaluru alone saw over 43 lakh names removed

The post Karnataka’s final SIR roll delete electorate by nearly 1 crore; Bengaluru loses over 43 lakh names appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]> The Election Commission published Karnataka’s final electoral roll-on October 27, 2026, following the Special Intensive Revision (SIR). The state had 5,54,32,314 voters before the revision. The draft roll, published on August 24, listed 4,46,35,975 voters after 1,07,96,339 names were removed. The final roll now has 4,55,00,011 voters, a net reduction of 99,32,303 (nearly one crore) from the pre-SIR figure.

Final roll adds 8.19 lakh voters to the draft list

The final roll records a net increase of around 8.19 lakh voters compared with the draft list. However, the overall figures do not show how many people whose names were removed at the draft stage were subsequently included in the final roll. They also do not provide a separate count of young and first-time voters added during the revision.

The constituency-wise final electoral rolls are available on the website of the Karnataka Chief Electoral Officer (CEO).

Link: https://voters.eci.gov.in/download-eroll?stateCode=S10

Over 43 lakh names removed in Bengaluru

Bengaluru’s electorate fell from around 1.03 crore voters before the SIR to 59.08 lakh in the final roll, a reduction of more than 43 lakh names. The city had also recorded the highest number of deletions at the draft stage.

Across Karnataka, election officials issued 43,82,824 notices to voters categorised as having “no mapping” with the earlier electoral roll or having “logical discrepancies” in their details. The first category covered voters whose details could not be matched with the earlier roll, while the second covered entries flagged for discrepancies. Hearings on these notices were completed before the final roll was published, according to report on the CEO’s figures.

The reduction in Bengaluru accounts for a substantial share of the overall fall in the state’s electorate. However, the final figures do not establish how many voters removed from the draft list were subsequently included in the final roll.

Over 10 lakh applications received for voter inclusion

Form 6 is used to apply for inclusion in the electoral roll. Between June 16 and October 26, Karnataka received 10,62,336 Form 6 applications, according to figures reported by The Hindu. Of these, 83,806 had been rejected for reasons including applicants already being registered elsewhere, failure to submit documents and other grounds.

The CEO’s office said instructions had been issued to District Electoral Officers (DEOs) to contact applicants whose forms were rejected and include their names if they could be reached and found eligible.

During the claims and objections period, which ended on September 23, more than 7.87 lakh Form 6 applications had been received. Of these, 7.08 lakh were accepted, 76,231 rejected and 3,193 remained pending at the stage covered by the earlier report. The later figures reflect further processing of applications.

The final roll includes more than 6.83 lakh voters aged 18–19 and over 3.92 lakh voters aged above 85. It lists 2,25,83,107 male voters, 2,29,14,063 female voters and 2,841 third-gender voters.

Form 7 applications and allegations over voter deletions

The publication of the final roll follows questions over Form 7 applications, which are used to object to the inclusion of a name or seek its deletion from the electoral roll.

Notably, 61,509 Form 7 applications seeking deletions were filed in the names of election officials, without any reason being mentioned for the proposed deletions. The report said more than 53,000 such applications were filed in the final week of the notice-disposal period. By October 22, a total of 2,28,917 Form 7 applications had reportedly been received during the SIR process.

Officials said that the forms had been generated by software for people marked as ineligible among those issued notices over logical discrepancies or the inability to map their details to the 2002 electoral rolls. The reported absence of reasons in the applications has raised questions about how the deletion requests were generated and processed.

Karnataka Chief Minister D.K. Shivakumar had alleged that pre-filled Form 7 applications were being supplied by unidentified agencies and that BJP workers had submitted large numbers of applications seeking voter deletions. He cited 14,000 applications in Vijayapura City, 3,244 in Bhalki, 10,000 in Narasimharaja and 6,250 in Mudigere.

Shivakumar said the Election Commission of India (ECI) should identify those responsible and initiate criminal proceedings. He also said the state government was examining legal options, had asked the Chief Secretary to obtain the relevant data and that FIRs had been registered. He alleged that many of the affected voters belonged to minority, Dalit and backward-class communities. These are allegations made by the Chief Minister.

Kharge alleges ‘Vote Chori’ and questions protection for CEC

Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge accused the Election Commission of irregularities in the electoral rolls, alleging that disclosures about the SIR process were exposing what he called “Vote Chori”.

In a post on X, he accused Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah of trying to suppress the public movement against the alleged irregularities and questioned why they were protecting Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. Kharge said the INDIA bloc would continue its democratic struggle to protect every citizen’s vote and the Constitution.

Karnataka CEO denies bulk Form 7 filings, says applications were generated for ‘ineligible’ electors

Responding to Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge’s criticism of the Election Commission over the SIR process, the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) of Karnataka clarified on X that election officials had not filed bulk Form 7 applications. The clarification was issued during a press conference on October 27, in connection with the publication of the final electoral roll.

The CEO said Form 7 applications had been generated for electors marked as “ineligible” during SIR hearings. In such cases, the reason for deletion was recorded as “Others”, while the applicant details appeared as ERO/AERO, depending on the login used to generate the form. The CEO further maintained that no bulk Form 7 applications had been received without a reason for deletion being specified in the application.

Related:

EXCLUSIVE – SIR: The total disenfranchisement of the Indian Voter is 16 crores, not 13.60 Crores?

UP voter lists: Software manipulates Voter’s names, Pilibhit investigation finds 10,470 irregular entries

Who controls access to voter records? ECINet audit raises fresh questions

Vote for Democracy seeks answers from ECI and TCS on ECI’s electoral database access and security

 

The post Karnataka’s final SIR roll delete electorate by nearly 1 crore; Bengaluru loses over 43 lakh names appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>