Jamia’s Missing Students’ Union: Two decades without elections, and a protest met with rustication

Students on Hunger-striking students allege physical assault and punitive disciplinary action; a seven-member committee has been formed, but the administration yet to commit to restoring elected representation
Image: Ayat Adil) / The Quint

At Jamia Millia Islamia (JMI), a hunger strike demanding the restoration of the university’s students’ union has escalated into a confrontation over student representation, with protesters alleging that they were forcibly removed from the campus by university security personnel and Delhi Police in the early hours of October 17. The alleged eviction was followed by disciplinary action against protesting students, including the rustication of one student for a year and campus bans on others. On October 19, the university announced a seven-member committee to examine students’ grievances and work towards restoring “normalcy” on campus. But with no commitment to restoring the union announced so far, the question remains whether the committee will address the root of the unrest or merely manage its immediate fallout.

 

 

 

The agitation, which began on October 12, has revived a question that has remained unresolved for nearly two decades: who speaks for Jamia’s students? University-wide students’ union elections have not been held since 2006, when the administration discontinued them, citing incidents of violence and disruption on campus. The current protesters argue that departmental subject associations cannot replace an elected university-wide body capable of representing students across academic departments and collectively raising concerns about admissions, hostel facilities, access to campus resources and administrative decisions.

 

 

 

The confrontation has also brought the university’s handling of dissent under scrutiny. While the administration maintains that demonstrations must comply with campus rules and has defended its actions in the name of security and academic functioning, students have alleged physical manhandling during the eviction and questioned the disciplinary measures imposed on them. The issue, therefore, extends beyond the immediate question of whether student union elections will return. It concerns students’ ability to organise, question administrative decisions and seek accountability within an institution that shapes their academic lives.

 

From hunger strike to alleged forcible eviction

The hunger strike began at the university’s designated protest site near Gate No. 18 before moving to Gulistan-i-Ghalib Garden, near Gate No. 7. By the time the agitation intensified, five students had joined the indefinite strike, demanding the restoration of the union and a formal mechanism for collective student representation.

The confrontation escalated in the early hours of October 17, when protesting students alleged that university security personnel and Delhi Police officers forcibly removed them from the site. Students described being dragged, pushed and physically manhandled. The Times of India reported that some students also alleged that women protesters were prevented from entering the campus and were assaulted when they attempted to join the demonstration.

According to Outlook India, students described security personnel dismantling their temporary shelter and alleged physical mistreatment during the October 17 incident. The university’s subsequent public statement announcing the committee did not address these specific allegations.

Rustication and campus bans deepen the dispute

The alleged eviction was followed by disciplinary action against students participating in the agitation. On October 16, the university issued orders rusticating Ebin Basil, a BA LLB student, for one year and imposing six-month campus bans on Mohammad Jasim Khan and another student, according to report by Hindustan Times.

The disciplinary orders reportedly accused the students of participating in unauthorised gatherings, obstructing university personnel and violating campus rules. The university also cited allegations concerning interference with CCTV installation. The students have challenged the disciplinary measures and demanded their withdrawal, alongside an inquiry into the alleged use of force.

What happened to the students’ right to representation?

Jamia discontinued university-wide students’ union elections in 2006. The administration has cited recurring incidents of violence, clashes involving students and teachers, and disruptions to academic activities as reasons for the decision. It has also argued that elected departmental subject associations provide students with alternative channels of representation.

In its October 19 announcement, the university reiterated its intention to seek an amicable resolution to the long-standing impasse. It also referred to the Delhi High Court proceedings that concluded in 2022 without a direction requiring the university to hold union elections. The absence of such a body has become especially contentious amid allegations concerning admissions, hostel facilities, access to libraries and sports infrastructure, and restrictions on student gatherings. As The Indian Express reported on October 17, the protesting students argue that, without an elected university-wide body, they lack a formal platform to raise concerns ranging from basic campus amenities to larger academic and administrative decisions.

Admissions, hostel food and the everyday costs of having no collective voice

The demand for a union is also rooted in the everyday realities of campus life. Students have raised concerns about the admission process, hostel conditions, drinking water, washrooms, access to sports facilities and the use of university spaces for academic and student activities.

In August, students protested over alleged irregularities in spot admissions for the 2026–27 academic session. They questioned the decision to conduct the process offline, following online admissions in previous years, and alleged that some candidates lower on the merit list had secured places while higher-ranked candidates remained on waiting lists. The university rejected the allegations as baseless and maintained that its admission process was transparent.

In September, residents of the Jammu and Kashmir Girls’ Hostel protested over alleged contamination and poor quality of mess food. Students reported finding insects and other foreign objects in meals, including allegations of worms in food and glass shards in vegetables. The university subsequently assured residents that the mess contractor would be removed and that food quality and hygiene would be improved.

A committee is a beginning, not a resolution

In its October 18 report, Hindustan Times reported that the university shut the Dr Zakir Husain Library and the Old Library, citing security concerns amid the escalating protests. The closure added another dimension to an already tense situation, particularly for students who depend on university facilities for their studies.

Students have also alleged restrictions on access to sports facilities and university venues, as well as difficulties obtaining permission for group activities and academic discussions. Some have questioned the location of the designated protest site, arguing that its distance from the administration’s offices makes it harder for their grievances to receive attention.

The seven-member committee announced on October 19 comprises senior faculty members and deans, including the deans of Humanities and Languages, Life Sciences, Social Sciences, Students’ Welfare and Academic Affairs, alongside two other faculty members. The university has said the committee will engage with protesters, examine their demands and report to the Vice-Chancellor.

 

Related:

Books Under Siege: Bengal’s Left bookstalls, the Calcutta High Court’s intervention and the warning from Hitler’s Germany

Seeking justice for Ankita Bhandari, parents detained in pre-dawn crackdown at India Gate

Mumbai Police detain Ambedkarite leaders demanding justice for Sahil Wakode; IIT Bombay refuses to hear delegation

Calcutta High Court says political dissent must not be stifled, directs police to protect CPI(M) bookstall near Durga Puja Pandal

Trending

IN FOCUS

Related Articles

ALL STORIES

ALL STORIES