Adityanath | SabrangIndia News Related to Human Rights Mon, 29 Jul 2019 06:26:09 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2.2 https://sabrangindia.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Favicon_0.png Adityanath | SabrangIndia 32 32 5 Years After FB Post on Modi, UP Man Arrested And Charged With Sedition https://sabrangindia.in/5-years-after-fb-post-modi-man-arrested-and-charged-sedition/ Mon, 29 Jul 2019 06:26:09 +0000 http://localhost/sabrangv4/2019/07/29/5-years-after-fb-post-modi-man-arrested-and-charged-sedition/ Since Adityanath government took over in 2017, about 150 sedition cases have been reported from across the state. Image Courtesy: PTI   New Delhi: Five years after a man from Meerut in Uttar Pradesh posted a morphed photo of Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Facebook, he was arrested by the police and charged with sedition […]

The post 5 Years After FB Post on Modi, UP Man Arrested And Charged With Sedition appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>
Since Adityanath government took over in 2017, about 150 sedition cases have been reported from across the state.

Narendra Modi
Image Courtesy: PTI
 

New Delhi: Five years after a man from Meerut in Uttar Pradesh posted a morphed photo of Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Facebook, he was arrested by the police and charged with sedition on Thursday.

This is not the first case where a person has been arrested under the sedition law in Uttar Pradesh. Ever since the Adityanath-led Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government came to power in UP in March 2017, at least 150 cases of sedition have been reported across the state and half-a-dozen persons arrested in Saharanpur, Meerut, Gautam Buddh Nagar, Varanasi, Pratapgarh, Ballia, Bahraich, Basti and Ghaziabad.

In most of these cases, the ‘crime’ is the same — sharing “offensive’, “objectionable”, “inflammatory” and “defamatory” content on social media, including criticisim of late prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, or ridiculing Modi, Adityanath or Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh chief Mohan Bhagwat.  

According to media reports, Faham Azim Siddiqui, a native of Incholi village of Meerut district, was arrested on Thursday under the Information Technology Act, 2000 and Section 124 A (sedition) of Indian Penal Code (IPC). He was arrested on the basis of a complaint filed by one Pankaj Bhardwaj who alleged that a morphed picture of PM Modi was shared on social media. 

“Police have arrested a man for sharing objectionable posts on PM Modi. The accused had shared objectionable posts on Prime Minister Narendra Modi. He has been sent to jail under the IT Act. He also has a criminal record. A case against the individual has been registered under the IT Act and IPC Section 124 A, which includes activities against the government. But we can only take action under 124 A after due approval from the government,” Meerut Superintendent of Police (Rural) Avinash Pandey was quoted as saying by local media.

Meanwhile, Muhammad Albab, a relative of Siddiqui’s, rubbished the police allegations. He told Newsclick, “Faham has not shared anything objectionable against PM Modi in recent times. It is an old case of 2014. He had shared a picture of Modi with objectionable content on Facebook in 2014 but Meerut police arrested him on Thursday after five years,” alleging that Siddiqui was arrested due to “huge pressure” on police by few local BJP leaders.

On the UP police’s claim that Siddiqui also had a criminal background, Albab said: “Ten years ago, he had some fight with his neighbours and he shot a person with his father’s gun, but that matter was sorted out few years later. He was arrested for his alleged inflammatory Facebook post which he did not share since 2014.”

PAST CASES 

Earlier, a 19-year-old youth in Shahjahanpur district was slapped with sedition charges, arrested and sent to jail for allegedly posting ‘anti-national content’ on his Facebook wall. In a similar case, at least 14 students of Aligarh Muslim University were charged with sedition after some students and a TV channel crew had an altercation over reports of a visit by AIMIM lawmaker Asaduddin Owaisi. 

Brijesh Yadav, who hails from Ballia district, and was booked under the sedition law last year, told Newsclick, “I was booked under sedition for sharing a picture of Prime Minister Narendra Modi after 52 days of demonetisation. Modi had said during demonetisation he will give us India of our dreams and if someone faces problems due to demonetisation, he can choose a “chauraha” (crossroad) where people can punish him for triggering a chaotic situation in the country. After 52 days of distress due to notebandi, leaving over a hundred people dead, I shared a picture of Modi, questioning him about his promise. I was booked under sedition law. When the Adityanath government came to power, the case was re-opened on May 27, 2018, and I was arrested and sent to jail for 22 days.”

He said “the matter is sub-judice and I am out on bail, but every month I visit the local court for hearing, which is painful for me.” He added that the judge had told that sedition law was no, applicable in this case and indicated that the case would soon be withdrawn. But the ruling BJP is harassing me despite the then District Magistrate of Ballia assuring me that no case of sedition will me made against me.”

Kalam, a native of Kunda Tehisl of Pratapgarh district, was also booked under sedition. He told Newsclick, “I was booked under the sedition law for a Facebook post in which I had expressed my disagreement over the Adityanath government renaming the Mughalsarai railway station to Deen Dayal Upadhyay. I questioned Upadhyay’s contribution towards the nation. One month after the post, I was arrested by the police despite the fact that the case was sorted out by the then SHO, and was sent to the jail for 14 days.” He said the irony was that the complaint was filed by someone who is not even from my district but is from Jaunpur.

POLITICAL USE OF LAW

This is not the first time the sedition law is being invoked against social media posts, even though the Supreme Court has stated that this amounts to misuse of the law.

Many experts and lawyers believe that sedition cases, especially against minorities, are being used as political tool and weapon to threaten anyone who speaks his/her mind or questions the government.

Newsclick approached lawyer Amit Shrivastava to understand why such a draconian was being used. He said: “Sedition was introduced by the British colonial rulers and was meant to suppress the voice of the Indian people. Since Independence, every government is using this draconian law for its political benefit. In several cases of sedition, the police do not have enough evidence. Yet people are being sent to jail just because they criticised the Adityanath government and its policies on social media platforms.”

Earlier, Newsclick had reported that the UP police had slapped sedition cases on some Muslim youth who aired their criticism of former Vajpayee’s alleged role in the Babri Masjid demolition.

Zakir Ali Tyagi, who hails from Muzaffarnagar, was also booked under the sedition law and sent to jail for 40 days over a social media post against Adityanath. “I was arrested on April 2, 2017 from my home. My crime was that I raised my voice against the government and for this I spent more than 42 days in prison on charges of sedition, cheating (420 IPC) and Section 66 of the IT Act. The case is still pending in court and charges are yet to be framed,” he told Newsclick.

Incidentally, the Narendra Modi-led central government, which is on a spree to do away with archaic laws, has clarified its stand on the sedition law asserting that there was no proposal to scrap this contentious British-era law.

Courtesy: News Click

The post 5 Years After FB Post on Modi, UP Man Arrested And Charged With Sedition appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>
 Modi appears Petty and Churlish as He snubs Trudeau  https://sabrangindia.in/modi-appears-petty-and-churlish-he-snubs-trudeau/ Mon, 19 Feb 2018 11:58:51 +0000 http://localhost/sabrangv4/2018/02/19/modi-appears-petty-and-churlish-he-snubs-trudeau/ Image Courtesy: Reuters                                                                                            The Trudeaus at the Taj For a […]

The post  Modi appears Petty and Churlish as He snubs Trudeau  appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>
Image Courtesy: Reuters                                                                                            The Trudeaus at the Taj

For a man whose PR strategy is one of the most carefully crafted among world leaders, Narendra Modi scored a self goal when he acted in a manner unbecoming of a nation’s Prime Minister. In a move that is being touted and even hailed by Modi supporters as a ‘royal snub’, not only did Modi fail to receive Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau at the airport, he also failed to either host a grand banquet in Turdeau’s honour or accompany him on any official visits. 

 
Modi also did not tweet about Trudeau’s visit even once. This only goes on to show Modi in poor light as he appears petty, churlish and un-statemanlike. Previous international dignitaries like Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netenyahu have had the red carpet rolled out for them and lavish feasts thrown in their honour. Giving Trudeau the cold shoulder is rather ridiculous, given how he is vising India at Modi’s invitation.
 
External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj was also conspicuous by her absence at Trudeau’s welcome. She also did not tweet anything about the Trudeau visit. Welcoming was left to junior ministers and diplomats. Speculation is ripe that the ‘snub’ might have to do with Canada’s alleged support for Khalistanis, an allegation that holds little water. The Khalistani connection does not stick as merely having Sikh Canadians in one’s cabinet does not make one a Khalistani sympathiser.
 
But none of this has put a dimmer on Trudeau’s now famous exuberance. He was seen beaming with his wife and three children as they visited the Taj Mahal in Agra, the Akshardham Temple in Gujarat and an elephant sanctuary in Mathura. 

The post  Modi appears Petty and Churlish as He snubs Trudeau  appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>
HC Allows Plea to Challenge Yogi Adityanath Prosecution: Allahabad https://sabrangindia.in/hc-allows-plea-challenge-yogi-adityanath-prosecution-allahabad/ Tue, 01 Aug 2017 03:25:21 +0000 http://localhost/sabrangv4/2017/08/01/hc-allows-plea-challenge-yogi-adityanath-prosecution-allahabad/ Image Courtesy: PTI Allahabad: The Allahabad High Court on July 31 allowed an application seeking permission to challenge the Uttar Pradesh government’s refusal to grant sanction to prosecute Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath in a decade-old communal riots case. The matter arose in a 2007 related matter where Gorakhpur citizen {ervez Parvaaz had sought to get an […]

The post HC Allows Plea to Challenge Yogi Adityanath Prosecution: Allahabad appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>

Image Courtesy: PTI

Allahabad: The Allahabad High Court on July 31 allowed an application seeking permission to challenge the Uttar Pradesh government’s refusal to grant sanction to prosecute Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath in a decade-old communal riots case. The matter arose in a 2007 related matter where Gorakhpur citizen {ervez Parvaaz had sought to get an FIR registered against Adityanath on allegations of inciting mob violence against the minorities. The Allahabad High Court had upheld the plea and thereafter the Supreme Court had, in 2012 (the SC Order may be read here), endorsed the decision of the Allahabad HC.

A division bench comprising justices Krishna Murari and Akhilesh Chandra Sharma on July 31 allowed the amendment application of Parvez Parwaz and Asad Hayat, who had moved the court seeking a CBI inquiry into the Gorakhpur communal riots of 2007.

Also read: Sabrangindia Exclusive: No Judge However Powerful Can be Judge of His Own Cause

The HC also  fixed August 9 as the next date of hearing, while directing the state government to file its counter-affidavit on the plea. The petitioners’ counsel, S.F.A Naqvi, explained, “We had submitted that we should be allowed to challenge the government’s decision to refuse sanction since one of the accused in the case is heading the state government.” Parwaz is also the complainant in the FIR lodged in connection with the Gorakhpur riots, while Hayat is one of the witnesses in the case.

Besides Yogi, the then Gorakhpur Mayor Anju Chaudhary and local MLA Radha Mohan Das Agrawal have also been named as accused in the case.

Background:
The story begins in 2007, 27 January when prior to a Muharram procession, at a “Warning Meeting”, Adityananth and other members of the Hindu Vahini and the elected officials of the Bharatiya  Janata Party (BJP) were creating an intra-community polarisation through their speeches. A local citizen and social activist, Parvez Parvaaz passing by heard the speech of Adityanath when he said,

“..if the blood of one Hindu be shed then they will not register any FIR with the administration against the bloodshed of one Hindu in the times to come, instead they will get ten persons (Muslims) killed. If damage is done to the shops and properties of Hindus, they would indulge in similar activities towards the Muslims. Anything can be done to save the glory of indus and all should prepare for a fight. Amongst others, it was also stated in the complaint as under: ‘we will not allow lifting of Tazia anywhere in the Gorakhpur City and the Gorakhpur District and we will also celebrate our Holi with these Tazias. He stated that we will have to take harsh steps for the welfare of Hindus and we do not want that the generations to come remember us with bad names. He stated  that I do not understand that we will be ready to take up those names, therefore, be ready to fight your final battle.
 
Adityanath was, shamefully a Member of Parliament when he uttered these words. He further said that
“once you stand up then you see that Gorakhpur will remain peaceful for many years. If the administration does not take revenge of the murder of the Trader’s son, then we will take ourselves, we will ourselves take revenge of that murder. Member of Parliament Yogi Aditya Nath, in his speech, termed the administration as worthless and eunuch and the incidents as Government sponsored terrorism and challenging the democratic Government he stated that they will destroy the law and order and will take law in their own hands.”
 
Related Articles:
1. UP Govt Protects Its Own: Adityanath can’t be tried in 2007 Gorakhpur riots case, Allahabad HC told
2.
UP Chief Sec Summoned with Records of Gorakhpur Violence where CM Adityanath Named as Accused
 

The post HC Allows Plea to Challenge Yogi Adityanath Prosecution: Allahabad appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>
Supreme Court Judgement on Yogi Adityanath, December 13, 2012 https://sabrangindia.in/supreme-court-judgement-yogi-adityanath-december-13-2012/ Wed, 03 May 2017 06:00:29 +0000 http://localhost/sabrangv4/2017/05/03/supreme-court-judgement-yogi-adityanath-december-13-2012/ The Supreme Court of India on December 13, 2012 Confirmed the Order of the Allahabd Bench of the High Court Directing that an FIR could be lodged against Yogi Adityanath and Others.

The post Supreme Court Judgement on Yogi Adityanath, December 13, 2012 appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>
The Supreme Court of India on December 13, 2012 Confirmed the Order of the Allahabd Bench of the High Court Directing that an FIR could be lodged against Yogi Adityanath and Others.

The post Supreme Court Judgement on Yogi Adityanath, December 13, 2012 appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>