While the ‘crackdown’ by the Assam police and largescale arrests, ostensibly to check the ‘evil of child marriage has been welcomed by glee and gloat(s), the Gauhati High Court on February 15 granted anticipatory bail to several accused in several different (bit related) matters where they have been booked under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 r/w the POCSO Act, while observing that these are not cases which require custodial interrogation. An overwhelming number of those targeted in the recent crackdown are Muslim males.

Strong oral Observations by the bench

As reported in media portals, beginning with LiveLaw, the bench of Justice Suman Shyam remarked verbally that if marriage occurs in contravention of the law, the law will and must take its own course. Such incidents (of contravention of emancipatory laws over retrograde social practices) have occurred throughout history. The Judge elaborated stating that the appropriate court(s) will assess whether or not immediate custodial interrogation is warranted. At present, he stressed, this court (the high court) believes that these are not matters for interrogation in custody, and the accused are simply required to appear and record their statements. The bench went on to say that these are not NDPS, smuggling, or stolen property matters where custodial interrogation may be warranted.

In response to this, when the counsel for the state of Assam argued that these are serious matters, Justice Suman Shyam remarked that the charge of POCSO can be added to anything. He enquired of the counsel for the state as to what the charge of POCSO was doing here in child marriage related cases? Reprimanding the state counsel, the bench added that merely because the charge of POCSO is added, does not mean judges will not see through what the motive of the charge. He also made it clear that the bench was not acquitting anyone here, and that no one is preventing the state from probing. Soon after this hearing, when another similar matter came up before the Court, the Court sought the view of an advocate sitting in the courtroom who agreed with the opinion of the bench.

The bench opined that “these are not matters for custodial interrogation. The state should proceed as per law, file a charge sheet; if they are convicted, then they will be convicted. This (state action) is causing havoc in the private lives of people, there are children, other family members and old people (affected)”.

Child marriage, according to Justice Shyam, is a dreadful concept, but said that the Court will weigh in when the time comes. The Court further stated that the main issue at this time is whether they (the accused) should be arrested and thrown in jail.

In another case with similar charges was heard by the Court, the bench asked the state why Section 376 IPC was added to the case. He inquired whether there was any rape accusation in the case that necessitated the addition of the aforementioned section. Justice Shyam reviewed the case record and remarked that “weird allegations” were made in the case. The accused was given anticipatory bail as a result of this.

Bail orders by the bench

Consequent to these oral remarks, on February 14, the bench of Justice Suman Shyam gave four anticipatory bail orders and one regular bail order. In the case of Lutfor Ali and 3 Ors vs. the state of Assam, registered under sections 9/10 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, the four applicants had approached the Gauhati HC by filing applications seeking anticipatory bail, under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The bench allowed the four accused to go on pre-arrest bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000/- each with one local surety.

The judgement can be read here.

In another similar matter of Ashad Ali @ Asad Ali and 2 Ors vs. the state of Assam, who had been arrested under section 363/366/376(2)(n) IPC read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act and Section 9 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, the three accused were granted anticipatory bail by the bench on furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000/- each with one local surety each.

The judgement can be read here.

A similar order was also pronounced by the same bench in the case of Samsul Haque vs state of Assam, wherein the case was registered under Section 376(3) IPC read with Sections 9/10/11(1) of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006, read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012. The bench has ordered for issuance of pre-arrest bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000/- with one local surety.

The judgement can be read here.

In all the above mentioned cases, those “accused” have been required by the bench to appear before the Investigating Officer within two weeks for recording his statement.

The bench also passed an order granting bail in the matter of Sajahan Ali @ Shahjahan Ali vs the State Of Assam, wherein a man had been in custody since February 4, 2023 with regards to a case registered under Sections 9/10/11 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 read with Sections 6/17 of the POCSO Act, 2012. The counsel for the applicant submitted that as per the FIR, the marriage took place in the year 2021. However, none of the family members of the alleged victim girl has been arrested. He further submitted that the applicant is merely a Moulana in a Madrassa and not a Kazi or Sub-Kazi nor has he been named in the ejahar. In the said case, the bench observed that is no allegation has been made against the applicant in the FIR and that the allegation is basically against the husband and the family members. Thus, holding further custodial interrogation unnecessary in regards to the facts and circumstances of the case, the bench granted bail to the applicant on furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000/- with one local surety.

The order can be read here.

Is the POCSO act applicable here?

Offences committed prior to November 14, 2012 cannot be covered under the POCSO Act, as retrospective application of the law, amended in 2019 (original Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act passed in 2012) has been struck down by the Supreme Court.

In 2019, the Protection of Children from Sexual Offenses Act of 2012 was amended. The penalty for sexual assault has been enhanced from a minimum of 20 years, extending up to the death penalty for the accused. The amendment included a provision for capital punishment. It was proposed by the government that the amended laws should be given retrospective effect even though they are prospective in character. Their stated objective behind the same was that such severe punishment would convey a message to society, and people would be less likely to commit crimes against minors.

However, the Supreme Court had struck down any retrospective application of the POCSO Act amendment by remarking that no retrospective effect can be provided when the punishment is to be administered prospectively and logically. To bolster its case, the court had cited Article 20(1) of the Indian Constitution, which aims to safeguard the interests of the individual, and prevent conviction and sentence under an ex post facto law. In other words, a person cannot be punished with a sentence more than what he would have been subjected to for an act done before the act was passed.

As a result, in the case of State of Telangana vs Polepaka Praveen, the Supreme Court had denied the state’s special leave petition seeking the death penalty to the accused. The Supreme Court refused to grant the death penalty to the defendant who had committed rape and murder of a nine-year-old child in Telangana just two months before Parliament amended the POCSO Act. The Supreme Court had held that retrospective effect to the statute cannot be granted.

Is this actually a ‘crackdown on child marriage’?

The Assam government justified its decision based on the National Family Health Survey (NHFS)- V report, which ironically did not position the state as the worst ‘offender’ in the child marriages index.

According to the NFHS-V, for the year 2019-21, 23.3% of women aged between 20-24 years, married before the age of 18. According to the survey, West Bengal, Bihar, and Tripura lead the state-wise list of child weddings, with more than 40% of women aged 20-24 marrying while they were under the age of 18. Six other states and union territories had higher rates than the national average, with two, Jharkhand and Assam, having rates higher than 30% (Assam reported 31.8%).

Besides, according to NFHS data, the national incidence of child marriage has decreased dramatically from 47% in 2005-06 to 27% in 2015-16. The declining trend was continuing in the most recent NFHS-V (2019-21), which revealed that nearly one in every five women, or 23.3%, married before the age of 18.

While it has previously been stated that the rate of child marriage in Assam remains higher than the national average, the manner in which this issue is being showcased and sensationalised to gain attention demonstrates that the Assam government is simply using this issue to further deprive the men of the Muslim community of their rights. Child marriage is not a community-specific tradition but is undoubtedly, often inter-twined with the bleak socio-economic reality in many locations, something which cannot be erased in a fortnight. 

Incidentally it is not only Muslims who indulge in child marriage. The practice of child marriage is well-documented in Rajasthan during the Hindu festival of Akshay Tritiya. In response to this, in September 2021, the Rajasthan State Assembly had passed the bill to amend a 2009 Act [Rajasthan Compulsory Registration of Marriages Act] which provides for mandatory registration of marriages, including child marriage. Section 8 of this said amended bill had permitted that if the bride has not completed 18 years of age and/or the groom has not completed 21 years of age, then their parents or their guardians have the duty to submit the memorandum for registration of the marriage.

The Rajasthan Government had justified the said decision by stating that it is more essential to get the child marriages to be registered so that young children can be protected. Through this, they wanted to ensure that if someone is married off as a child, then, when they become adults and have children, and if there is property or legacy of the parents or grandparents, then there shouldn’t be an obstruction. In October, following an outcry that it would encourage child marriage, the Congress government in Rajasthan had decided to recall this piece of legislation. 

This case in Assam is not about solving an age old social ill of child marriage but is a futile attempt targeting of Muslims corresponding with the elevated levels of an aggressive Hindutva sentiment and weaponisation of the state machinery. This has gone hand in hand with the alarming rise in recent years of social prejudice. As per the latest information provided by the Assam police, almost 2789 people have been arrested in relation to child marriage cases. There have been reports of women being driven to suicides due to this politically and religiously motivated “crackdown.”

While reading the eye catching headlines being published in the newspaper to disguise the real motives of the BJP-run government, it is important for one to ask themselves: who is this “crackdown” protecting? A law which cannot be implemented retrospectively along with the charges of rape are being alleged on the ones that have been arrested in this drive. It is predictable that a case in this matter will not stand in the court. Then why, in a country with high levels of pending of cases in the Supreme Court and the High Court, is this targeting of the minorities and the marginalized ongoing. When few can barely access law?

Unfortunately such blind-sides aggressive actions of the Assam government will, in all likelihood, further push such marriages undercover. When the wife in such a marriage finds herself pregnant, she may even be hesitant to approach hospital to get proper medical care. By these actions, the state government has just succeeded in making the situation worse by instilling fear in the minds of the women. Until now the Muslim community in Assam has been dealing with proving their citizenship, then protecting their homes, now they have to deal with actually protecting their males (husbands) from forcible state action –being confined in jails. For this to happen to sole breadwinners, this is a triple tragedy being unleashed on a beleaguered minority.

Conclusion

The POCSO law has been used (and misused) by government(s) repeatedly in recent times, to target communities according to religious profile. The ongoing debate of whether POCSO overrides personal laws or whether a judge can grant bail to accused on the condition to marry the victim, the POCSO act is serving a purpose other than the purpose it was implemented for. The Himanta Biswas Sarma government of Assam is treating the issue of child marriage as a socio-political strategy invented by fictitious anti- Islamic Jehadi sentiment which has gained acceptance in wider society. By driving the citizens of Assam into temporary jails, and a compliant media the woes of the community have just spiraled.  This does not appear to be any genuine effort to curtail a social ill or get at its root cause.

Related:

Crackdown on child marriage claims four lives, including three women and one child

Families protest arrests as questions mount on child marriage crackdown in Assam

Hate Watch: Himanta Biswas Sarma on ‘Love Jihad’ during the Gujarat poll campaign

Assam: New criteria for government jobs singling out minorities?

Scapegoats and Holy Cows: Crime and Justice Delivery in the Age of Sectarian Nationalism

Bom HC restrains police from depicting Muslims as terrorists in mock drills

Support pours in for hate monger Suresh Chavhanke, calls for violence against Muslims made

Mumbai: BJP leaders attend far right Hindutva rally where calls for economic boycott of Muslims, violence against them are made

The post Will arresting the breadwinner and driving women to suicide help solve the societal evil of child marriage: Guwahati HC grants ABA in cases while questioning motivations of Assam govt appeared first on SabrangIndia.

The government plans to open temporary jails, including the Matia Transit Camp in Goalpara district. However, marginalized communities are terrified throughout the state. Tragically, in Jhaudanga Puber village, Mankachar-South Salmara district, a widow named Khushbu Begum took her own life out of fear of being arrested. Families are protesting the arrests and questioning the crackdown on child marriage in Assam.

Three more lives have been lost as a result of the crackdown on child marriage in Assam. Ayna Bibi, a woman from Ramraikuti village in Dhubri district, committed suicide on February 10. Her two children were married before the age of 18 and she was trying to prevent their arrest. However, when she ran out of options, she became frightened and took her own life. (Source: CJP district and community volunteers)

A tragic incident occurred in Karimganj district, as reported by community volunteers and a local web portal. A two-month-old child died as a result of the action against child marriage by the Assam Government. The incident took place at Krishna Nagar village of Boruwala GP under Ratabari police station of Karimganj district in Assam. The child’s mother carried the infant from home to police station and back on a cold night, and the child ultimately passed away.

As per reports from community volunteers and a local web portal, the Ratabari police went to arrest Asish Namasudra for allegedly marrying a girl named Sweety Namasudra who was below 18 years of age. However, in Asish’s absence, the police arrested his father, Digendra Namasudra, who was the main earner for their small family. Sweety, Asish’s wife, couldn’t bear the fact that her father-in-law had been arrested and went to the police station with her two-month-old son. She spent day and night pleading with the police, showing them proof of her age and stating that she was above 18 at the time of her marriage. Unfortunately, this ordeal proved to be too much for the little child and ended up becoming a curse for him.

Although she was able to secure the release of her father-in-law from the police station by providing age proof documents, her son became ill soon after their return home at midnight. Unfortunately, her two-month-old son passed away at around 3 AM that same night. The reason for the child’s death is still unclear, but the family believes it was due to the stress of the situation they had been through. They were unable to take the child to the hospital. The family is in shock. At the time of the arrest, the police did not take notice of the age proof documents provided by the family. According to Digendra Namasudra, “The police did not look at the papers. They said that whether we had the documents or not, we had to go with them. And our son and daughter-in-law also had to come to the police station.”

The grandmother of the deceased is seeking justice for her grandson’s death, saying that money cannot bring him back. She pleaded with the Chief Minister of Assam for justice and expressed her pain by rolling on the floor. Her emotional outburst has raised questions on police proceedings with common people.

According to India Today NE, a 17-year-old girl from Khaspur village in Cachar district, Assam, killed herself after her parents refused to allow her to marry the man she was in love with. Her parents had promised to get them married but later denied due to the crackdown on child marriage. The Assam Chief Minister recently stated that if this generation endures some hardships, future generations will reap the benefits.

Related:

Families protest arrests as questions mount on child marriage crackdown in Assam

Hate Watch: Himanta Biswas Sarma on ‘Love Jihad’ during the Gujarat poll campaign

Assam: New criteria for government jobs singling out minorities?

The post Crackdown on child marriage claims four lives, including three women and one child appeared first on SabrangIndia.

With over 4,004 cases of child marriage registered in Assam, the Assam Police continued with its crackdown in the state for the third day  and arrested about 2,441 till Monday morning.

A few days ago Chief Minister Himant Biswa Sarma had announced that the Assam government will launch a statewide drive against child marriage and will book men marrying girls below 14 years of age under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, and those marrying girls aged 14-18 under Prohibition of Child Marriage Act. 

District wise cases filed

Assam Govt is firm in its resolve to end the menace of child marriage in the state.

So far @assampolice has registered 4,004 cases across the state and more police action is likely in days ahead. Action on the cases will begin starting February 3. I request all to cooperate. pic.twitter.com/JH2GTVLhKJ

— Himanta Biswa Sarma (@himantabiswa) February 2, 2023

Families in many areas of Assam protested the sudden enforcement of measures by the authorities. Many young women with their infants and even pregnant women stood outside police stations for hours, shedding tears as they cried out for the release of their husbands. In some parts of Assam, women gathered in front of the police and media, shouting and pleading, “If our husbands are being taken, then take us too, who will take care of us?”

Muslim women waiting, protesting with kids in tow across police stations across Assam demanding release of their husbands, sons or brothers.

Muslim women waiting, protesting with kids in tow across police stations across #Assam demanding release of their husbands & sons!!

So far, over 2278 people were arrested in last 3 days till Saturday. #AssamPolice said they have a list of almost 8,000 accused!!#ChildMarriage pic.twitter.com/uWl3kMht6a

— Hate Detector ? (@HateDetectors) February 5, 2023

According to information from DVM and community volunteers of the CJP team, family members of those arrested and a large number of villagers protested outside the Tamarhath Police Station in Dhubri District, demanding the release of their loved ones. However, the police used a lathi charge to break up the crowd.

It is worth mentioning that various organizations and conscious individuals, including All Assam Minority Students (AAMSU), have been organizing awareness programs against child marriage for several years in Assam.

However, this harsh decision by the government has sparked a strong reaction among the general public and opposition political parties.

Congress leader and MP of Barpeta, Abdul Khaleque, spoke out on Thursday about the situation. He stated, “We are always against child marriage and it should be prevented. We support the government’s stance on this issue. However, the arrest of a couple married for seven years is not acceptable. These couples already have children, and if their parents are taken into custody, who will take care of them? Will the government provide for them or send them to an orphanage?” He also pointed to the Indian Constitution, stating that the current arrests violated the 20th Section of the Constitution. He added, “There is no denying that there was a mistake, but the sudden arrest of couples married for seven years is not the right way to handle it. The people have not given the government the authority to destroy families.”

Sherman Ali Ahmed, MLA of Baghbor LAC, also spoke to the media regarding the child marriage drive in Assam. He stated, “I welcome the step taken by the government, it is a good one.” However, he raised a question, “Himanta Biswa Sarma, I want to request you, this is not a new law, the law has been in place for years. Why did the District Commissioner, Superintendent of Police or other administrators allow child marriages to take place right under their noses? They should also be arrested along with the husbands who are being arrested now. How did they let it happen and now they are making arrests?” He added, “The law has not been passed recently, but the administration only started to act after the CM’s speech. The administration should follow the law, not just act when the CM speaks about it.”

In response to the question of how the families would be taken care of, Sherman Ali said, “It’s not possible to take care of a family by just giving them the Arunadoi Scheme.” The Arunadoi Scheme was launched by the Assam Chief Minister as a direct transfer of funds to beneficiaries. He also urged that they should not be charged under the POCSO (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences) Act. He said, “They should not be charged under POCSO, just keep them in jail for two months and then release them. Our main objective is to curb child marriage, and the message has already been sent to society.”

In a tragic incident at Jhaudanga Puber village in Mankachar-South Salmara district, a widow named Khushbu Begum took her own life out of fear of being arrested. Her husband had passed away during the COVID pandemic and she was left with two children. She had gotten married around 11 years ago. Out of fear, she returned to her parents’ home and expressed her worries. According to reports, she told her father that she couldn’t stay in jail and the following night, one of her children found her lifeless body hanging. This is just one example of the shock and fear among marginalized people throughout Assam.

Local news reports the young woman’s death

Ripun Borah, the president of the Assam state Trinamool Congress, reacted on Twitter saying, “In Mankachar, fearing that her parents will go to jail, a girl has committed suicide. It’s an effect of a whimsical crackdown on the offenders. Pathetic!”

.@mygovassam is grossly misusing Child Marriage Act. There should not be a pick&choose policy to target a particular community.

In Mankachar, fearing that her parents will go to jail, a girl has committed suicide. It’s an effect of whimsical crackdown on the offenders. Pathetic! pic.twitter.com/a2Ps3BlZ06

— Ripun Bora (@ripunbora) February 4, 2023

Coming close on the heels of a controversy over the film ‘Pathan’, Assam’s Chief Minister, Himanta Biswa Sarma, an expert at grabbing headlines, seems now to be giving a definition of ‘illegal husband’. However, the tragedy of the suicide in Mankachar and the widespread fear among the state’s marginalised population highlights the cost of such cold calculations. 

Related:

Hate Watch: Himanta Biswas Sarma on ‘Love Jihad’ during the Gujarat poll campaign

Assam: New criteria for government jobs singling out minorities?

Is the Assam CM’s push for a “two-child policy” a tactic to exclude minorities?

The post Families protest arrests as questions mount on child marriage crackdown in Assam appeared first on SabrangIndia.