The government, which had accused Wangchuk of inciting the violence through “provocative statements,” issued the cancellation order on September 25, 2025. The order details several financial and procedural violations, culminating in the immediate termination of the NGO’s ability to receive foreign funds.

The action followed a Show Cause Notice issued to SECMOL on August 20, 2025, to which the association replied on September 19. After examining the NGO’s response, the ministry concluded that multiple violations were established.

Ministry findings on financial irregularities and improper disclosure of funds

The MHA order outlines specific instances of financial mismanagement and non-compliance with the FCRA.

The ministry pointed to a sum of Rs. 3.5 lakh deposited by Sonam Wangchuk into SECMOL’s FCRA account during the 2021-22 financial year, terming it a violation of Section 17 of the Act.

SECMOL, in its defence, stated the amount was Rs. 3,35,000 and represented the “sale proceeds of the old bus procured on 14.07.2015 out of FCRA’s fund only.” The organisation argued that proceeds from assets bought with foreign funds must be deposited back into the FCRA account.

However, the ministry found this reply to be “not tenable.” The order states that while the amount was declared in the annual returns as a “foreign Donation” from Sonam Wangchuk, the credit entry was not found in the FCRA bank account. The ministry concluded, “It seems that the amount has been received in cash in violation of section 17 of the Act which is not properly disclosed by the association in its reply.”

It further noted that the failure to reflect this transaction in the FCRA account also violates Section 18 of the Act.

MHA cancels the FCRA license of Activist Sonam Wangchuk’s NGO. pic.twitter.com/OKK6NlShlo

— Press Trust of India (@PTI_News) September 25, 2025

Mixing local and foreign funds

Another violation cited was the deposit of Rs. 54,600 in local funds into the FCRA account during 2020-21 by three individuals. SECMOL admitted the error, explaining that the money came from volunteers for their food and accommodation and was “mistakenly transferred into our FCRA account instead of the local account,” despite clear instructions on its website. The MHA order noted,

“As admitted by the association, local fund were credited into FCRA account in violation of section 17 of the Act.”

Ministry alleges misuse of funds for ‘Sovereignty’ study; NGO clarifies donation was for ‘Food Security’ awareness.

Perhaps the most serious violation detailed in the order relates to a grant of ₹4,93,205 received from a Swedish donor, Framtidsjorden, during the 2021-22 financial year.

SECMOL clarified that the funds were for an educational program to create awareness among youth on issues like migration, climate change, food security, and “Sovereignty.”

The organisation in its reply stated that “we received Rs. 4,93,205/- from Framtidsjorden for educational program for youth under FE project for creating awareness among youth on issues such migration, climate change, global warming, food security and Sovereignty and organic farming through different workshops and trainings. The funds were utilised strictly in line with the organisation’s objectives and for the specifics purposes for which they were allocated. Hence, all these activities were educational and there was no violation.”

Page 3 of the Ministry Order dated September 25, 2025

The ministry seized on this specific point in its findings. The order states that the association admitted the donation was for a study on the “Sovereignty of the country” and that the funds were used in line with the donor’s objectives. The ministry unequivocally concluded that this activity was illegal, stating,

“The Foreign Contribution cannot be accepted for study on Sovereignty of the nation. This act of the association is against the national interest of the Country in violation of section 12(4)(f)(i) of the Act.”

Concluding its findings, the MHA stated that in view of the violations, the competent authority was cancelling SECMOL’s FCRA registration with immediate effect.

Background: unrest and protests in Leh

The cancellation comes in the immediate aftermath of significant unrest in Leh. On September 24, a large protest, primarily led by youth, turned violent. The demonstration was organised in solidarity with Sonam Wangchuk, who had been on a hunger strike to press for longstanding demands, including statehood for Ladakh and its inclusion under the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution for safeguarding land, culture, and employment.

Protestors reportedly vandalised property and torched vehicles, leading to clashes with security forces who responded with tear gas and firing. However, people died and dozens were injured in the violence. The central government claimed the “mob was incited by Shri Sonam Wangchuk through his provocative statements,” an allegation Wangchuk has denied, stating he has always appealed for peace.

Following the violence, the local administration-imposed restrictions on public gatherings and internet services. The next round of talks between Ladakhi representatives and the MHA is scheduled for October 6.

Related

Ladakh’s fight for autonomy: Sonam Wangchuk leads foot march to Delhi

Crushing voices: The detention of Sonam Wangchuk and supporters at Ladakh Bhawan

Delhi Chalo padyatra: Sonam Wangchuk begins indefinite fast at Ladakh Bhawan

The post Centre cancels FCRA licence of Sonam Wangchuk’s NGO, cites violations including study on ‘sovereignty’ appeared first on SabrangIndia.

The fast concluded after Union Home Ministry officials, led by Prashant Lokhande, Joint Secretary for Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, delivered a letter to Wangchuk. This letter confirmed that the high-powered committee (HPC) on Ladakh, headed by Nityanand Rai, Minister of State for Home Affairs, would meet on December 3, 2024, to restart talks. Lokhande personally handed Wangchuk a glass of juice to mark the end of the fast. Wangchuk, alongside other Ladakhi activists, accepted the gesture, signalling the temporary resolution of their immediate demand for the resumption of dialogue.

(Details of Sonam Wangchuk’s fast may be read here, here and here) 

A renewed hope for meaningful dialogue

Wangchuk, addressing the press through a live stream on his YouTube channel, expressed cautious optimism. “Our main appeal has been resolved,” he said, referring to the renewal of talks that had been stalled for months. “I hope both sides engage in these discussions with solidarity and good faith, aiming for outcomes that benefit not just Ladakh but the entire nation.”

ON 16th DAY TODAY OUR FAST ENDED
As Joint Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs brought me the notification for resumption of talks between Ladakhi leaders & Government of India.
I hope the talks will be held in mutual trust & will result in a happy ending for all &
I will not have… pic.twitter.com/4BUrhXJWYc

— Sonam Wangchuk (@Wangchuk66) October 21, 2024

Other leaders from the Ladakh Apex Body (LAB) and the Kargil Democratic Alliance (KDA), who had been fasting alongside Wangchuk, shared his sentiment. Sajjad Kargili, a member of the KDA and the 17-member HPC, noted that their primary demand was the resumption of meaningful talks on Ladakh’s development. “We hope the leadership will hold crucial discussions on our four demands. The date has been set, and we look forward to participating in these talks,” Kargili said.

Leaders like Tsering Dorjay Lakruk, co-chairman of LAB, echoed these hopes, expressing gratitude to those who supported their movement. “It was a true display of unity in diversity in India,” Wangchuk added, acknowledging the solidarity shown by students, NGOs, and citizens across the country. The fast, though arduous, symbolised a collective desire for Ladakh’s future to be shaped by its people.

Looking forward, cautiously optimistic

Though relieved that their primary demand had been met, the Ladakhi leaders made it clear that the journey is far from over. Chering Dorjay Lakruk, president of the Ladakh Buddhist Association (LBA), emphasised that while talks would resume, their demands were yet to be fully addressed. “We hope that these talks will lead to a meaningful solution,” he said, stressing the importance of sustained and sincere dialogue with the Union government.

Ladakh’s MP Mohmad Haneefa also voiced his hope that the government would take their concerns seriously and work towards a lasting resolution. The fast, he noted, had become necessary after months of silence from the government following the Lok Sabha elections.

As the Ladakhi delegation prepares to return home, Wangchuk expressed hope that such drastic measures would not be required again. “I hope this is the last time we need to fast for our demands,” he said. Though they leave with their “main appeal fulfilled,” the Ladakhi people remain cautious, hoping that the upcoming talks in December will bring tangible outcomes for Ladakh and the preservation of its fragile environment.

Widespread solidarity for Sonam Wangchuk’s cause

On October 20, climate activist Sonam Wangchuk received a powerful show of support when Jagadguru Shankaracharya visited his protest site at Martyrs Park in Leh. The visit marked the 15th day of Wangchuk’s indefinite fast, which he had undertaken along with 20 fellow Ladakhis to press for the implementation of the sixth schedule in Ladakh. Wangchuk shared his gratitude via social media, stating, “From villages bordering China and Pakistan to the city of Leh, people observed a fast in solidarity. In Delhi, hundreds came to join us, only to be forcibly detained and bundled into buses.” The Shankaracharya’s visit further underscored the growing national support for Ladakh’s struggle.

15th DAY ON SALT & WATER
On the 15th day of fast Jagadguru Shankaracharya ji visited the anshan place at martyrs park in Leh to support the movement.
Villages in Ladakh observed fast from those bordering China & Pakistan to the city of Leh.
In Delhi 100s of people came to join… pic.twitter.com/4C52OfzchO

— Sonam Wangchuk (@Wangchuk66) October 20, 2024

Two days earlier, on October 18, the National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM) had also expressed solidarity with the Ladakhi people’s demand to be included in the sixth schedule of the Constitution. The NAPM, which represents progressive organisations and movements across India, urged the Union government to fulfil its promise of meaningful dialogue with Ladakhi leaders. The alliance warned that the ecological and cultural fabric of the Himalayas is at risk due to “destructive development.” In a statement, NAPM expressed shock that Wangchuk and his supporters had been forced to launch another indefinite fast after previous assurances from the government were left unfulfilled.

NAPM activists, including prominent figures like Prafulla Samantara—who led a historic 12-year legal battle to protect Indigenous land rights—stood in solidarity with the Ladakhi cause. Through a video message, Samantara and other activists vowed to fast from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. in support of Wangchuk.

Embed video shared by ma’am on whatsapp

Activists such as Medha Patkar, Arundhati Dhuru, Suniti S R, Neelam Ahluwalia, and others also lent their voices to the movement, calling on Indian citizens to rally behind Ladakh’s demands. NAPM emphasised the need for the government to engage in peaceful dialogue with Ladakh’s people, respecting their constitutional rights and their call to preserve both Ladakh’s natural beauty and its Indigenous communities.

Statement from NAPM –

“We also appeal to all Indian citizens, who support decentralised development planning and employment opportunities for locals – a demand being raised all across India, to support the demands of the people of Ladakh,”https://t.co/prWMe4rZGW

— NAPM India (@napmindia) October 11, 2024

In addition to national organisations, regional groups have also shown their support. On October 14, Friends of Ladakh-Bengaluru organised a one-day fast at Freedom Park to back Wangchuk’s mission. The group echoed his call for Ladakh to be included in the sixth schedule, which would grant Ladakhis greater control over their resources and ensure sustainable development. This wasn’t the first time Wangchuk had taken such a stand—in March, he completed a 21-day climate fast in Ladakh to remind the Union government of its promise to protect the region’s fragile ecosystem and empower its people.

Related:

Delhi Chalo padyatra: Sonam Wangchuk begins indefinite fast at Ladakh Bhawan

Why is Ladakh Protesting?

Fulfill Promises Made To People Of Ladakh: Sonam Wangchuk In Fresh Appeal To Modi

The post A victory for Ladakh’s voices: Sonam Wangchuk and Ladakhi activists break 16-day fast as union government agrees to renew talks on demands appeared first on SabrangIndia.

 A peaceful protest met with force

The protests outside Ladakh Bhawan were part of a larger movement led by Wangchuk, who began an indefinite hunger strike on October 6. His primary demand is the inclusion of Ladakh in the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution of India, which would grant the region constitutional safeguards similar to those afforded to tribal areas in the north-eastern states of Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, and Mizoram. These provisions establish autonomous councils with legislative, judicial, executive, and financial powers, giving these regions control over their own affairs and protecting their cultural identities.

Despite the peaceful nature of the demonstration being led by Wangchuk, the Delhi Police detained Wangchuk and about 20 to 25 protesters, including women, who had come to express solidarity with the cause. Pursuant to the detention, the Delhi police, which comes under the control of the union home minister, cited the absence of permission to protest outside Ladakh Bhawan, emphasising that the application to hold a protest at Jantar Mantar was still under consideration. By 11 a.m. on Sunday morning, approximately 100 supporters had gathered at the protest site. However, the police began blocking roads and making detentions around 10:30 a.m., effectively stifling the gathering. The protesters, who maintained that they were not raising slogans but merely sitting peacefully, were forcefully removed and taken to various police stations.

 Article 19 of the Constitution under blatant attack

This state action against Wangchuk and his supporters is not just an isolated event—it strikes at the heart of Article 19 of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees citizens the fundamental rights to freedom of speech, expression, and peaceful assembly. The police’s justification for their actions was the imposition of Section 163 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023, a law often used to prevent large gatherings and maintain public order. However, the overuse of Section 163of the BNSS, which is the equivalent of Section 144 of the CrPC, especially in situations where no immediate threat to law and order exists, raises serious concerns about the state’s willingness to uphold democratic rights.

In his public statements, Wangchuk expressed his deep disappointment in the state’s actions, calling it “a sad day for democracy.” He rightly pointed out that Section163 of the BNSS, in its original intent, is meant to be a temporary measure invoked only in exceptional situations. Its permanent imposition in New Delhi’s district, as reported by Wangchuk, is contrary to the democratic spirit of the country and a clear violation of the rights guaranteed under Article 19.

Wangchuk’s protest, which had been a silent fast to “Save Ladakh, Save Himalayas,” was not only a call for statehood and special constitutional protections for Ladakh but also a broader critique of the government’s failure to engage constructively with marginalised communities. The imposition of force against non-violent demonstrators represents an alarming trend in India, where peaceful protests are increasingly met with state-sanctioned repression.

The push for Ladakh’s inclusion in the Sixth Schedule

At the core of Wangchuk’s protest is the demand for Ladakh’s inclusion in the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution. This inclusion would grant the regions indigenous and tribal communities’ greater autonomy over their land, resources, and cultural identity. Following the abrogation of Article 370, Ladakh has been left in a vulnerable position, and the local population fears the loss of their traditional rights. Wangchuk, along with the Leh Apex Body and the Kargil Democratic Alliance, has been advocating for statehood, the establishment of a public service commission for Ladakh, and separate Lok Sabha seats for Leh and Kargil districts.

The group’s demands are not new—they have been persistently pushing for these changes ever since Ladakh was carved out as a Union Territory in 2019. Wangchuk’s march from Leh to Delhi, which culminated in the current protest, is an attempt to draw the attention of top leaders, including Prime Minister Narendra Modi, to these critical issues. However, instead of engaging in dialogue, the government’s response has been to suppress the movement through detentions and legal manoeuvres. (Detailed reports may be read here and here)

 A pattern of state overreach

The detainment of Wangchuk and his supporters on October 13 was not their first encounter with the police. On September 30, while marching to Delhi from Leh, the group was detained at the Singhu border by the Delhi Police and only released on the night of October 2. This repeated use of force against peaceful demonstrators is emblematic of a larger pattern of state overreach. In a democracy, peaceful dissent is a vital component of governance, but the state’s response in these instances appears to be aimed at stifling the voices of those who challenge its authority.

The Delhi High Court is now involved, with the Leh Apex Body filing a petition seeking permission for the protesters to hold a peaceful demonstration at Jantar Mantar. The court has ordered responses from the Delhi Police and the government by October 16, with a hearing scheduled for October 22. This legal battle will serve as a litmus test for the judiciary’s role in safeguarding democratic freedoms.

The erosion of democratic values

Wangchuk’s hunger strike and the protest outside Ladakh Bhawan highlight the deepening crisis in Indian democracy. The increasing use of legal provisions like Section 163 of the BNSS to stifle dissent, the detainment of peaceful protesters, and the state’s refusal to engage with legitimate demands all point to a dangerous erosion of democratic values. The right to peaceful assembly and free expression is at the core of any democratic society. When the state repeatedly undermines these rights, it signals a move towards authoritarianism, where dissent is treated as a threat rather than a vital component of governance.

Wangchuk’s statement that the detentions were not only “sad for us but sad for democracy” underscores the gravity of the situation. By silencing those who peacefully express their concerns, the state is effectively turning its back on the very constitutional principles it is meant to uphold. Instead of finalising a meeting with Wangchuk and hearing the citizens of India out regarding their demands, the union government is focussing on trampling their constitutional rights.

The detention of Sonam Wangchuk and his supporters is more than just an isolated event—it is a symptom of a broader problem in India’s democratic framework. The struggle for Ladakh’s inclusion in the Sixth Schedule, the demand for statehood, and the protection of tribal rights are all legitimate issues that deserve attention, not suppression. As India continues to navigate its complex political landscape, it must remember that the true strength of its democracy lies in its ability to tolerate, respect, and engage with dissent. When the state instead resorts to detentions and force, it is not just choking individual rights but on the very foundations of democracy itself.

Related:

Delhi Chalo padyatra: Sonam Wangchuk begins indefinite fast at Ladakh Bhawan

When the state turns rogue even protests dry up, Salutes & Apologies Professor Saibaba!

Major need for reform in information commissions: RTI report card on the performance, 2023-24

“Hungry Cannot Wait”: SC sets final deadline for Ration Cards to Migrant Workers

Assam detention camps tighten rules, leaving families struggling to visit loved ones detained in Matia transit camp

The post Crushing voices: The detention of Sonam Wangchuk and supporters at Ladakh Bhawan appeared first on SabrangIndia.

Undeterred, Wangchuk and around other protesters started their fast at Ladakh Bhawan, singing protest songs and raising slogans like “Bharat Mata Ki Jai” and “Save Ladakh, Save Himalaya”. This move follows Wangchuk’s “Delhi Chalo Padayatra,” a month-long march from Leh advocating for statehood, a public service commission, and separate Lok Sabha seats for Leh and Kargil districts.

After the Delhi police denied permission to the Sonam Wangchuk and his co-protesters’ request to hold demonstration/Anshan at Jantar Mantar, New Delhi on October 5, 2024.

Sharing a copy of the letter sent by Delhi Police, Wangchuk, in a post on X (formerly Twitter) said “finally this morning we got this rejection letter for the officially designated place for protests. If Jantar Mantar is not allowed then please tell us which place is allowed. We want to abide by all laws and still express our grievance in a peaceful way. Why is it so difficult to follow the path of Gandhi in his own country. There must be a way.”

ANOTHER REJECTION ANOTHER FRUSTRATION
Finally this morning we got this rejection letter for the officially designated place for protests.
If Jantar Mantar is not allowed then please tell us which place is allowed. We want to abide by all laws and still express our grievance in a… pic.twitter.com/FLnyCdA7KI

— Sonam Wangchuk (@Wangchuk66) October 6, 2024

Delhi Police rejected climate activist Sonam Wangchuk’s request to protest at Jantar Mantar, citing non-compliance with guidelines set by the Supreme Court in 2018. The guidelines require a 10-day notice period for protest applications, which wasn’t met. Additionally, Delhi Police noted that the planned demonstration lacked a specific timeframe, making it an open-ended, prolonged event, which isn’t permitted under existing laws and guidelines.

Delhi Police mentioned in its rejection order dated October 5, that the request was not in according with the guidelines framed in compliance of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India’s order dated 23.07.2018 in W.P. (C) No. 1153 of 2017 and other connected Civil Appeals No. 862, 863 and 864 of 2018. Delhi Police pointed out that the “applications for holding any protest/demonstration at Jantar Mantar shall be move at least 10 days prior to the planned event’s date.”

Notably, Delhi Police also said that planned-demonstration lack timeframe and the request of the protesters could not be acceded to, as this Anshan is going to be prolonged one. Delhi Police added that “there is no provision under the extent laws, rules and guidelines under which permission can be granted for any kind of ‘anshan’, let alone an open ended, without timeframe, mass event, as discernible from the application.”

However, on Saturday, a majority of the protesters returned to Ladakh while the remaining stayed back to join Wangchuk for the fast at Ladakh Bhawan.

Wangchuk on hunger strike at Ladakh Bhawan

Following the same, while citing frustration over not being granted an audience with India’s top leadership and permission to hold anshan at Jantar Mantar, on October 6, Wangchuk and around 18 people sat close to the gate of Ladakh Bhawan, singing the Hindi version of ‘We Shall Overcome’, and raised slogans such as ‘Bharat Mata Ki Jai”, “Jai Ladakh ” and “Save Ladakh, Save Himalaya”

Despite being denied permission and virtually detained at Ladakh Bhawan, Wangchuk and 18 around others, including 75-year-olds and women, began their hunger strike at Ladakh Bhawan following the rejection from Delhi Police. Their 1,000 km, 32-day march from Leh to Delhi showcases unwavering resolve.

Wangchuk writes on X that “So after trying everything possible to find a legitimate place for our anshan fast in New Delhi, we have finally decided to start our fast here at Ladakh Bhavan New Delhi where I was virtually detained for the last 4 days. Among us we have 75-year-olds, women and men who walked for 32 days from Leh to Delhi… roughly 1,000 km.”

Link:

PADYATRIS ON FAST AT LADAKH BHAVAN
So after trying everything possible to find a legitimate place for our anshan fast in New Delhi, we have finally decided to start our fast here at Ladakh Bhavan New Delhi where I was virtually detained for the last 4 days. Among us we have 75… pic.twitter.com/FeB2phQ2e5

— Sonam Wangchuk (@Wangchuk66) October 6, 2024

Hindustan Times reported how, Wangchuk took to X on Saturday night and said that his team was looking for a place to protest all day but couldn’t find one. He also said that when they broke their fast at Rajghat, they were assured of an appointment with the top leadership within two days but it did not happen, forcing him to start the indefinite fast again.

The march’s objectives and demands

The Leh Apex Body and the Kargil Democratic Alliance are championing a four-point agenda to safeguard Ladakh’s interests. Key Demands include Statehood for Ladakh, seeking greater self-governance, Constitutional Protections under the Sixth Schedule, to preserve tribal and cultural rights, Public Service Commission, for streamlined recruitment and administration, and Separate Lok Sabha Seats, for enhanced representation of Leh and Kargil. This agenda is central to the ongoing padyatra, a peaceful protest march from Leh to Delhi, led by climate activist Sonam Wangchuk, emphasizing Ladakh’s unique needs and aspirations. The marchers aim to secure a better future for Ladakh, addressing concerns around autonomy, environmental protection, and cultural preservation.

Related:

SG Mehta declares in Delhi High Court that Sonam Wangchuk has been freed from detention, media reports suggest police control endures

Ladakh’s fight for autonomy: Sonam Wangchuk leads foot march to Delhi

March to border, relay fast on climate change and demands for Ladhakh to continue as climate activist Sonam Wangchuk ends hunger strike after 21 days

The post Delhi Chalo padyatra: Sonam Wangchuk begins indefinite fast at Ladakh Bhawan appeared first on SabrangIndia.

SG Mehta explained that the prohibitory order, initially enacted on September 30, was no longer applicable due to changing circumstances. He noted that around 120 individuals from Ladakh, including Wangchuk, had been detained by police at the Delhi border while marching to the capital to demand constitutional protections under the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution. However, as per a report of The Hindu, Sonam Wangchuk’s movements continued to be restricted by police and security agencies.

Background:

A petition had been filed before the Delhi High Court seeking release of climate activist Sonam Wangchuk and others, who were detained at Delhi’s Singhu border on the night of September 30, 2024. In a questionable late-night operation, before either he or other activists could enter the national capital, Delhi Police detained them. The foot march was scheduled to end at Rajghat on Gandhi Jayanti to mark the birth anniversary of the father of the nation on October 2. The petition filed for their release was mentioned before the bench of Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela by advocate Vikram Hegde on October 1, 2024. However, an urgent hearing of the plea was declined.  (A detailed report may be read here)

Court proceedings on detention and prohibitory order

During the court hearing, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta informed the bench that the prohibitory order issued on September 30 had been withdrawn due to changed circumstances. He stated, “The (prohibitory) order which was passed on September 30 now stands withdrawn in view of changed circumstances as they exist now. So far as persons who were allegedly detained, it was not detention in that sense, but they are also out.” He added that the detained individuals had visited Rajghat for about two hours, where they submitted a memorandum that was accepted by the Ministry of Home Affairs.

The court subsequently closed the proceedings on petitions filed by social activist Azad, who had been working closely with Wangchuk, and lawyer Mustafa Haji, the legal advisor to the Leh Apex Body, after their representatives confirmed the release of the detained individuals.

However, Advocate Prashant Bhushan, representing another petitioner, contended that some individuals still wished to gather at Jantar Mantar to raise awareness but were under restraint. He asserted that Wangchuk was “not totally free,” stating, “According to our information, he is not totally free. They are not allowing Sonam Wangchuk to meet his other associates. They are kept in different places. Sonam Wangchuk has been taken apparently to Ladakh Bhawan and others are kept in Ambedkar Bhawan… There are still some restrictions. Let Mr. Sonam Wangchuk be produced in court.”

In response to Bhushan’s claims, Justice Manmohan questioned the need to summon someone already declared free, emphasising the Solicitor General’s prior statement confirming their release. SG Mehta objected to the assertion made by Bhushan, labelling it a “false statement.” He added, “This petitioner is an advocate practicing in Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh, and one of the persons marching with the group. Somebody in Himachal says as per my information they are not free and those who are with him say everyone is free. They want to keep the pot boiling.”

Bhushan indicated that he would file an affidavit to support his claims and requested the court to postpone the hearing until Friday. The court responded that if the Solicitor General’s statement was found to be false, they would take appropriate action. Furthermore, Bhushan argued that the prohibitory order violated Supreme Court decisions, asserting that individuals could not be detained for more than 48 hours without legal justification.

Mehta clarified that the prohibitory order had been officially withdrawn on the night of October 2. Initially, the order issued by the Delhi Police had directed the imposition of Section 163 (formerly Section 144 of the CrPC) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) 2023 across New Delhi, North and Central districts, and at police stations bordering other states from September 30 to October 5.

It is to be noted that as per a report in The Hindu, Sonam Wangchuk’s movements continued to be restricted by police and security agencies. On Thursday, October 3, 2024, The Hindu had reported that around 5 p.m., security personnel in plain clothes stopped Wangchuk from leaving the Ladakh Bhavan. A significant police presence was deployed outside the government guest house, with barricades placed at the entrance.

Detention as the response for march for Constitutional safeguards?

Activist Wangchuk had led a march of approximately 150 people from Ladakh on September 1, advocating for constitutional protections for the region. He and his delegation were detained by Delhi Police upon arriving at the Delhi-Haryana border in Singhu on September 30. The march aimed to culminate on October 2 at Rajghat, coinciding with Mahatma Gandhi’s birth anniversary, where a sit-in was planned at Jantar Mantar.

However, the planned sit-in protest could not take place as the union had imposed prohibitory orders in Delhi, which were removed after October 2 had passed and the participants had been detained. After being held for nearly 40 hours, Mr. Wangchuk and other delegation members were escorted to Rajghat on October 2 under heavy police presence.

Ladakh Member of Parliament Mohmad Haneefa told The Hindu that he himself was detained for a day when he tried to reach the Singhu border to support the protesters from Kargil. He sought clarification from the government, emphasising that he was merely assisting his constituents as an elected representative. He has received assurances from the Union Government regarding a forthcoming meeting with either the Prime Minister or the Home Minister.

In reaction to the police’s actions, Rahul Gandhi criticised the government’s handling of the situation on X (formerly Twitter). He stated that the “Chakravyuh” would be broken, much like during the farmers’ protests, and that the government would ultimately have to heed Ladakh’s demands. He condemned the detention of elderly citizens, labelling it “unacceptable” for peacefully marching for their environmental and constitutional rights.

What do the citizens demand?

Since the withdrawal of Jammu and Kashmir’s special status under Article 370 in 2019, and the bifurcation of the region into two Union Territories, Ladakh has witnessed numerous protests. The Leh Apex Body and the Kargil Democratic Alliance, two influential civil society organisations in the region, are demanding statehood, inclusion in the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution. The sixth Schedule to the Constitution provides for implementation of specific measures to have an autonomous administration in tribal areas to protect the rights and identity of locals. At present, it is applicable only to Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram in northeast India. Few months ago, Wangchuk had been on a prolonged hunger strike to press for his demands which also include environmental protection in Ladakh. Last month, Wangchuk and others began the foot march to national capital.

The protesters participating in the March are calling for the resumption of talks through the high-powered committee (HPC), led by Minister of State for Home Nityanand Rai, which was formed in January 2023 to address local grievances. The committee last convened in March 2024, shortly before the general elections.

Related:

Ladakh’s fight for autonomy: Sonam Wangchuk leads foot march to Delhi

Fulfill Promises Made To People Of Ladakh: Sonam Wangchuk In Fresh Appeal To Modi

March to border, relay fast on climate change and demands for Ladhakh to continue as climate activist Sonam Wangchuk ends hunger strike after 21 days

The post SG Mehta declares in Delhi High Court that Sonam Wangchuk has been freed from detention, media reports suggest police control endures appeared first on SabrangIndia.

The sixth Schedule to the Constitution provides for implementation of specific measures to have an autonomous administration in tribal areas to protect the rights and identity of locals. At present, it is applicable only to Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram in northeast India. Few months ago,  Wangchuk had been on a prolonged hunger strike to press for his demands which also include environmental protection in Ladakh. Last month, Wangchuk and others began the foot march to national capital.

In a questionable late night operation, before either he and other activists could enter the national capital, Delhi Police detained them. The foot march was scheduled to end at Rajghat on Gandhi Jayanti to mark the birth anniversary of the father of the nation on October 2.

Late last night, at 10.30 a.m. here is what Sonam Wangchuk said on X (formerly twitter):

I AM BEING DETAINED…
along with 150 padyatris
at Delhi Border, by a police force of 100s some say 1,000.
Many elderly men & women in their 80s and few dozen Army veterans…
Our fate is unknown.
We were on a most peaceful march to Bapu’s Samadhi… in the largest democracy… pic.twitter.com/iPZOJE5uuM

— Sonam Wangchuk (@Wangchuk66) September 30, 2024

“I am being detained..along with 150 padyatris at Delhi Border, by a police force of 100s, some say 1,000. Many elderly men and women in their 80s and some Army veterans…Our fate is unknown. We were on a most peaceful march to Bapuy’s Samadhi..in the largest democracy in the world, the mother of democracy…Hey Ram.”

Echoing Gandhi’s last words as he was felled by the bullets of assassin Nathuram Godse, Wangchuk’s arrest has drawn widespread condemnation on social media. The legacy print media have played it down, however.

The petition for their release was mentioned before the Bench of Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela by advocate Vikram Hegde. However, an urgent hearing of the plea was declined. It is now likely to come up for hearing on October 3.

Apart from seeking the release of Wangchuk and others, the plea has also sought directions for permitting the activists to enter Delhi “for the purpose of raising their demands peacefully”.

“Permit the group of persons, including senior citizens, led by Mr Sonam Wangchuk to assemble peacefully in a designated area,” the plea states.

The advocate who filed it is Mustafa Haji, who has stated that he has been closely involved with the movement for environmental protection and democratic representation in Ladakh. “A group of about 150 persons started on a foot march (pad yatra) from Leh to Delhi on 01.09.2024. The purpose of their march is to make a representation to the Union Government in Delhi on the occasion of Gandhi Jayanti, inter alia seeking environmental protection, sixth schedule status for Ladakh, Statehood and greater democratic representation,” the plea states.

Incidentally, as news of the peaceful march picked up on social media the Delhi police was quick to act, repressing freedoms. The prohibitory order issued by Delhi Police on September 30 against assembly of five or more persons has also been challenged in the plea.

Related:

Ladakh’s fight for autonomy: Sonam Wangchuk leads foot march to Delhi

Fulfill Promises Made To People Of Ladakh: Sonam Wangchuk In Fresh Appeal To Modi

March to border, relay fast on climate change and demands for Ladhakh to continue as climate activist Sonam Wangchuk ends hunger strike after 21 days

The post Delhi High Court Petition against detention of Ladakh climate activist Sonam Wangchuk appeared first on SabrangIndia.

Wangchuk, who is also part of the Leh-based Apex body that comprises social, religious and political organisations, said they believe in the Gandhian method of Satyagraha in their agitation, which is vital to safeguard the fragile environment of the region and the indigenous character of its population.

“We are followers of (Mahatma) Gandhi’s Satyagraha. We are demanding the fulfilment of the promises made to us by this (BJP) government through its manifestos which led its candidates to win parliamentary polls (in 2019) and hill council polls in Leh (2020),” he told a gathering here.

In November 2023, the Apex Body Leh, a coalition of various social groups, which was formed after  the abrogation of Article 370, had expressed several concerns regarding a newly introduced industrial policy by the regional administration. Now it appears that 4,000 acres has been given to an industrial house in incursive and intrusive measure that could be disastrous for the ecologically fragile region. The Apex Body of Leh has asserted that the policy was crafted without the involvement of local stakeholders and posed threats to the region’s delicate environment.  Following continuous protests, in January 2024 the Union Home Ministry had formed a high-level committee, led by Minister of State Rai, tasked with safeguarding land and employment opportunities for the residents of Ladakh, according to Live Mint. However, despite several rounds of talks, talks have clearly failed.

Historic Fast begins

For 21 days, Sonam Wangchuk, an engineer by profession, led a hunger strike in the highest plateau in India, Ladhakh (most of it is over 3,000 metres that is 9,800 feet). His demand was simple, he wanted administrative autonomy for his region. Yesterday, on March 26, he ended his hunger fast that he and his colleagues undertook out in the open sky at sub-zero (minus 12 degree Centigrade temperatures). The fast will now be held in relay by colleagues and other s groups, and will continue until the demands of citizens’ groups are met.

#SAVELADAKH #SAVEHIMALAYAS
Sonam Wangchuk appeals to the world to live simply,
starts #ClimateFast of 21 days (extendable till death)
Please watch full video in English here:https://t.co/XHkcIdQQ7b#ILiveSimply #MissionLiFE #ClimateActionNow pic.twitter.com/KQi5EMro9X

— Sonam Wangchuk (@Wangchuk66) March 6, 2024

Wangchuk’s announcement on his social media states that the hunger strike will now be taken up by a women’s group. He also stated in his video message, “We are trying to remind and awaken the conscience of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and home minister Amit Shah to safeguard the fragile ecosystems of the Himalayan mountains of Ladakh and the unique indigenous tribal cultures that thrive here. We don’t want to think of Narendra Modi and Amit Shah as just politicians. We would rather like to think of them as statesmen but for that they will have to show some character and far-sightedness.”

END 21st Day OF MY #CLIMATEFAST
I'll be back…
7000 people gathered today.
It was the end of the 1st leg of my fast. Btw 21 days was the longest fast Gandhi ji kept.
From tomorrow women's groups of Ladakh will take it forward with a 10 Days fast, then the youth, then the… pic.twitter.com/pozNiuPvyS

— Sonam Wangchuk (@Wangchuk66) March 26, 2024

Wangchuk’s message was packed with emotion.

“End of 21^st day of my #ClimateFast. I’ll be back.. 7,000 people gathered today. It was the end of the 1^st leg of my fast. Btw 21 days was the longest fast Gandhiji kept. From tomorrow, women’s groups of Ladakh will take it forward with a 10 days fast, then the youth, the the monks, from monasteries…then me again..so on.. The journey has only started. But we still hope n trust we won’t have to do all this. Sooner rather than later a sense of responsible leadership will arise in the PM and HM. (Narendra Modi and Amit Shah).

After his hunger strike of 21 days, Wangchuk is currently  under observation at the Leh hospital.

Good that Sonam Wangchuk has ended his hunger strike for now. We need more people like him.

BTW the relay hunger strike is being carried on by other members in his team. Eventually he will take turns to fast again. pic.twitter.com/P1dbm8PWcg

— Anindita (@hatefreeworldX) March 28, 2024

Actor Prakash Raj, in an act of solidarity and substance, visited the protest site at Ladhakh where Sonam Wangchuk has been fasting out in the open sky at sub-zero temperatures (minus 12 degrees centigrade) with at least 100 other fellow Ladhakis. Raj spent his own birthday, March 26, the day of his visit, birthday with Wangchuk and the protestors.

Its my birthday today .. and i’m celebrating by showing solidarity with ⁦@Wangchuk66⁩ and the people of ladakh who are fighting for us .. our country .. our environment and our future . let’s stand by them #justasking pic.twitter.com/kUUdRakYrD

— Prakash Raj (@prakashraaj) March 26, 2024

Speaking to Sabrang India, the next day, on March 27, Prakash Raj, was emotional and focussed, “This is our fight, our struggle; it is the duty of all Indians to fight for this. I have been in the midst of a very busy theatre festival schedule and the only day free was my birthday. There was no better way to celebrate my birthday then to go to Ladakh and express my deep solidarity with this amazing movement. Mr Sonam Wangchuk and his colleagues were already thinking of re-strategizing the rest of the protest and I had a very small part to play in persuading Sonam to call off his fast after 21 days, and for the women and youngsters to now start a relay fast. We are committed now to ensuring that this very fragile region in Ladakh, Leh, is not given over to rapacious development. Already 4000 acres have been given by the government, which doesn’t even care about the fragile climate, or the history and traditions of the Himalayas. We will continue this fight, and we will take it to the south, where I am from.”

Love heals.. love empowers. Love inspires.. thank you for all the love n warmth you showered on me .. keep #Ladakh in your prayers and your thoughts #justasking https://t.co/0npHVpZjEY

— Prakash Raj (@prakashraaj) March 27, 2024

Current protests

The protest by several civil society groups has been going on to raise the demand for Ladakh’s statehood and its inclusion into the Sixth Schedule of the Constitution. The Sixth Schedule, under Article 244 of the Constitution, grants constitutional protections to tribal communities and empowers them to establish autonomous development councils. The Sixth Schedule contains provisions related to the administration of tribal areas in Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram through autonomous district councils.  These councils have the authority to enact laws relating to the land, public health, and agriculture.

The protestors have also been demanding the implementation of a job reservation policy within the local administration for Ladakhi residents, and the allocation of parliamentary seats for both the Leh and Kargil districts. The demand for statehood has been raised consistently since the abrogation of Article 370 made Ladakh a union territory on August 5, 2019

“The first phase of the hunger strike will be followed by a chain hunger strike by women, youths, religious leaders and elders. On April 7, we will launch a march to Changthang (in the east of Leh along the border with China) like Gandhi’s Dandi March under the Civil Disobedience Movement,” Wangchuk has now said.

He has told the media (reported in Kashmir Times and Deccan Herald) that the Leh-based Apex body will lead the march to highlight the ground realities of Ladakh. Wangchuk alleged that nomads were losing prime pasture land to huge industrial plants to the south and Chinese encroachments to the north.

“The Changthang grazers, famous for producing Pashmina wool, are being forced to sell their animals because over 20,000 acres of grazing land was taken by industrialists to set up their plants… we do not want solar energy at the cost of our people’s livelihood and dislocation,” he claimed.

“They are taking away our land because there are no safeguards available…,” Wangchuk alleged.

Wangchuk questioned the stance of the union government saying that, if the government has nothing to hide, “We will be allowed to proceed but if they stop us from undertaking the march, we will launch a ‘jail bharo andolan’ which will be followed by a non-cooperation movement.”

Stating that the ruling BJP had gone back on its promises to the people of Ladakh, Wangchuk said the representatives of the Apex Body and the Kargil Democratic Alliance (KDA) were left shocked when the Union home ministry straightway rejected their demands on March 4.

“We are seeking our rights and fulfilment of the promises. Parliamentary polls have been announced and the BJP is again making various guarantees to the people but who is going to buy these promises this time,” he said, expressing hope that the government will reconsider its decision and announce statehood to Ladakh.

The Apex Body and Kargil Democratic Alliance (KDA), separate groupings of various political, social and religious organisations, are jointly spearheading the agitation to demand statehood for Ladakh and its inclusion in the Sixth Schedule, and have held five rounds of talks with the home ministry.

What are the climate issues that the fast is about?

Ladakh, known as one of the “water towers of the world” due to its vast glaciers. These glaciers are witnessing a concerning trend as they are rapidly receding. This poses a severe threat to the water supply of millions of people across India. The melting is happening quickly which is partly attributed to increased pollution. According to reports, this pollution is worsened by the increased militarization of the region. This militarisation has been further intensified by the ongoing military tensions between India and China since 2020. Ladhaki’s farmers have also been plagued by Chinese incursions. According to Wangchuk, the Chinese incursions have taken land that was used by shepherds.

A detailed report in Mongabay, Earth Scientist and glaciologist Shakil Ahmad Romshoo has underscored the far-reaching implications of dwindling glaciers. Romshoo has stated that the communities within the Indus basin, including the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, as well as states such as Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, and portions of Rajasthan, Haryana, along with the Union Territory of Chandigarh, are going to bear the brunt of these consequences.

Covering an extensive area of 3,21,289 square kilometres, which is equal to approximately 9.8% of the nation’s total geographical expanse, this basin hosts crucial rivers including the Jhelum, Chenab, Ravi, Beas, and Satluj. The Indus River system, positioned as the westernmost in the subcontinent, holds a great deal of importance for the region’s ecological balance and sustenance of numerous communities reliant on its waters.

An online petition inviting signatures, “Join #FriendsOfLadakh to safeguard Ladakh’s fragile ecology” has now been started by civil society actions to safeguard democracy in Ladakh.

It can be signed at :

Related:

Agitation Likely To Intensify In Ladakh: KDA Calls For Half-Day Strike In Kargil Today

In The Himalayas, Living The Crisis That The IPCC Report Warns Of

The Village Classroom: Rural Indian Women Can Teach About Climate Resilience, Fight For Survival

Global Risks 2024: misinformation and climate risks some of the biggest challenges of the coming decade

The post March to border, relay fast on climate change and demands for Ladhakh to continue as climate activist Sonam Wangchuk ends hunger strike after 21 days appeared first on SabrangIndia.