Cordelia Cruise Drug Case | SabrangIndia News Related to Human Rights Thu, 28 Oct 2021 12:56:51 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2.2 https://sabrangindia.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Favicon_0.png Cordelia Cruise Drug Case | SabrangIndia 32 32 Cordelia Cruise drugs case: Bombay HC grants bail to Aryan Khan https://sabrangindia.in/cordelia-cruise-drugs-case-bombay-hc-grants-bail-aryan-khan/ Thu, 28 Oct 2021 12:56:51 +0000 http://localhost/sabrangv4/2021/10/28/cordelia-cruise-drugs-case-bombay-hc-grants-bail-aryan-khan/ Court also grants bail to Arbaaz Merchant and Munmun Dhamecha; operative part of order to be pronounced tomorrow

The post Cordelia Cruise drugs case: Bombay HC grants bail to Aryan Khan appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>
Bombay HCImage Courtesy:keralakaumudi.com

The Bombay High Court has granted bail to Aryan Khan, son of movie star Shahrukh Khan in connection with the drug bust aboard the cruise ship Cordelia. A single-judge bench of Justice Nitin Sambre also granted bail to his co-accused Arbaaz Merchant and Munmun Dhamecha. The trio is likely to be released tomorrow after the operative part of the order detailing terms of bail is likely to be pronounced.

As we have reported previously, the cruise ship Cordelia, was supposed to set sail from Mumbai to Goa at 4 P.M on Saturday, October 2, 2021 and passengers had been asked to reach by 2:30 P.M. After receiving a tip off, officers of the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) posed as passengers and conducted a raid.

Aryan Khan and co-accused Arbaaz Merchant reached the spot and crossed the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) check point at around 3 P.M. It is noteworthy that Aryan Khan was intercepted at the terminal even before he could board the ship. He was interrogated and searched by the NCB officials. Though no drugs were found on Khan, 6 grams of charas were allegedly found on Merchant. Khan’s phone was confiscated, and NCB officers then took him to the NCB office where he was detained till an FIR was registered the following day. He was arrested under Sections 8(c), 20(b), 27, 28, 29 and 35 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act.

Meanwhile, the ship was prevented from setting sail while NCB officials raided and searched it for drugs. The raid lasted till 2 A.M on October 3. Eventually they seized 13 grams of cocaine, 5 grams of mephedrone MD, 21 grams of charas and 22 MDMA pills that were recovered from three spots: two rooms and the ship’s lobby. Subsequently as many as 20 people were arrested in connection with the case including Munmun Dhmecha and employees of an event management company.

Khan was arrested on October 3 and remanded to NCB custody till October 7. Thereafter he was remanded to judicial custody and was lodged at Arthur Road Jail. A special NDPS court rejected Khan’s bail plea, prompting him to move High Court.

Bar and Bench reports that on Thursday, October 28, Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh, representing the NCB, submitted before the High High Court, that the case against the accused is not for consumption but for ‘conscious possession and plan to consume’. He further submitted that the total quantity of drugs recovered was a “commercial quantity”. The NCB has relied on Whatsapp chats between Aryan and his friends to claim that they had planned to consume the drugs while on the cruise. The NCB opposed grant of bail to Khan saying he was an influential person and could tamper with evidence if released on bail.

Meanwhile, on October 26, Mukul Rohatgi, appearing for Khan, had argued that Khan cannot be held liable as the drugs were not recovered on his person, but from within the shoes of Arbaaz Merchant. He also submitted that the Whatsapp chats were from 2018 and had nothing to do with the case. Meanwhile, Arbaaz Merchant’s lawyer Senior Advocate Amit Desai shot down the NCB’s attempt to use the “umbrella charge of conspiracy”, something the trio wasn’t charged with at the time of their arrest. He also argued that even if the charge of “personal consumption” sits against his client, the maximum punishment is for one year and in such a case bail is the norm, and arrest is the exception in line with the Arnesh Kumar judgment. Munmun Dhamecha’s lawyer argued that no drugs were recovered from her person, and rolling paper was recovered from Somiya, who along with Baldev was among the people who were present in the same room with Dhamecha at the time of the raid. However, Somiya and Baldev were allowed to go!

Related:

Cordelia Cruise Drug Case: Mumbai lawyer files complaint with Police Commissioner
Social media calls out soft coverage of massive drug seizure at Adani port at Mundra
Mundra Adani Port: NDPS court orders probe into heroin seizure

The post Cordelia Cruise drugs case: Bombay HC grants bail to Aryan Khan appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>
Cordelia Cruise Drug Case: Mumbai lawyer files complaint with Police Commissioner https://sabrangindia.in/cordelia-cruise-drug-case-mumbai-lawyer-files-complaint-police-commissioner/ Thu, 14 Oct 2021 04:22:35 +0000 http://localhost/sabrangv4/2021/10/14/cordelia-cruise-drug-case-mumbai-lawyer-files-complaint-police-commissioner/ Complaint draws attention to suspicious behaviour of five people including a “private detective” and a BJP member who “took custody” of movie star Shahrukh Khan’s son Aryan Khan who is a key accused in the case despite no drugs being recovered from him

The post Cordelia Cruise Drug Case: Mumbai lawyer files complaint with Police Commissioner appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>
Aryan Khan

Advocate Kanishk Jayant, a Mumbai-based lawyer has in a written complaint to Police Commissioner Hemant Nagrale raised serious concerns about the suspicious role of five people in connection with the high-profile Cordelia Cruise drug bust case where superstar Shahrukh Khan’s son Aryan is one of the key accused.

Even as a Mumbai Sessions Court started hearing Aryan Khan’s bail plea on October 12, a good 10 days after the incident, Adv Jayant has drawn attention to the role of five people: KP Gosavi, Manish Bhanushali, Amir Furniturewala, Prateek Gaba and Rushab Sachdeva. In his letter, he has requested that an FIR be filed against them for extortion.

Brief background of the case

The cruise ship was supposed to set sail from Mumbai to Goa at 4 P.M on Saturday, October 2, 2021 and passengers had been asked to reach by 2:30 P.M. After receiving a tip off, officers of the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) posed as passengers and conducted a raid.

Aryan Khan and co-accused Arbaaz Merchant reached the spot and crossed the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) check point at around 3 P.M. It is noteworthy that Aryan Khan was intercepted at the terminal even before he could board the ship. He was interrogated and searched by the NCB officials. Though no drugs were found on Khan, 6 grams of charas were allegedly found on Merchant. Khan’s phone was confiscated, and NCB officers then took him to the NCB office where he was detained till an FIR was registered the following day. He was arrested under Sections 8(c), 20(b), 27, 28, 29 and 35 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act.

Meanwhile, the ship was prevented from setting sail while NCB officials raided and searched it for drugs. The raid lasted till 2 A.M on October 3. Eventually they seized 13 grams of cocaine, 5 grams of mephedrone MD, 21 grams of charas and 22 MDMA pills that were recovered from three spots: two rooms and the ship’s lobby. Subsequently as many as 20 people were arrested in connection with the case including employees of an event management company.

A private detective, a BJP leader and a viral selfie

What is utterly inexplicable about the case is how KP Gosavi and Manish Bhanushali, who were neither officers of the NCB nor Mumbai Police, were the people to take physical custody of Khan and Merchant at the terminal.

A selfie of Gosavi with Aryan Khan went viral on social media, prompting the question – in what capacity was he allowed to be in close proximity of a key accused in a high-profile drug case.

 

 

While Gosavi claims to be a private detective, is said to be a member of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Interestingly, the NCB issued a statement claiming Gosavi and Bhanushali were independent witnesses. Deputy Director General of the NCB Gyaneshwar Singh told mediapersons that there were a total of nine such independent witnesses and their presence was required at the scene of the raid. However, none of these witnesses were known to the NCB prior to the raid.

Subsequently, it was unearthed that Gosavi is wanted by the Pune Police in connection with a 2018 case for cheating two youths. He reportedly took money from them after promising them jobs. The Indian Express reported that he was “named as an accused in at least four cases of cheating, including one at Andheri police station in Mumbai in 2007, two at Kapurbawdi police station in Thane in 2015 and 2016, and one at Faraskhana police station in Pune in 2018.”

Ever since the story of the raid and subsequent detentions broke, Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) leader Nawab Malik has been pointing out how Gosavi and Bhanushali kept popping up at the NCB as well.

 

 

He further alleged Khan was framed by two others who were first arrested and then released in connection with the case:

 

 

And it isn’t just the NCP. Maharashtra Pradesh Congress Committee spokesperson Sachin Sawant too raised a series of pertinent questions tweeting, “How private people are part of NCB raid on a cruise? With what authority? How do we see VP of BJP & a duper taking custody of accused? How their vehicle has “police” written on it? Has NCB outsourced their job?” He further demanded to know, “Was real goal to divert attention from Mundra drug sieze? (sic)”

 

 

Key points in Adv Jayant’s complaint

In his complaint, a copy of which may be viewed in the tweet below, Adv Jayant has asked, “Who has authories (sic) Mr. K.P Gosavi and Mr. Manish Bhanushali to take physical custody of Mr. Aryan Shah Rukh Khan and Mr. Arbaaz Merchant?”

 

 

He further asks, if it was NCB Zonal Director Sameer Wankhede who decided it was okay for Gosavi and Bhanushali to get that close to alleged suspects in the case? Adv Jayant also asked, “Did Mr. K.P Gosavi and Mr. Manish Bhanushali pose as public servants while taking physical custody of Mr. Aryan Shah Rukh Khan and Mr. Arbaaz Merchant?” Finally, he asks why were three other accused – Rishabh Sachdeva, Pratik Gaba and Amir Furniturewala released and if it had anything to do with Sachdeva being related to a BJP member?

Aryan Khan in custody

Khan’s arrest was officially confirmed on October 3. He was produced before Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (ACMM) RK Rajebhosale after 7 P.M along with Arbaaz Merchant and another accused Munmun Dhamecha. They were remanded to one day NCB custody. On October 4, their remand was extended to October 7. However, the NCB’s demand for further custody was rejected on October 7 and Khan was remanded to judicial custody. Though Khan moved ACMM for bail the same day, the hearing was adjourned till the next day to grant NCB time to file a reply. On October 8, ACMM RM Nerlikar rejected Khan’s bail plea on the ground that it was not maintainable. On the same evening Khan moved Sessions Court for bail.

Aryan Khan’s bail hearing in Sessions Court

The matter was heard on October 13 by Special Judge Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS Act), VV Patil. Kahn was represented by Advocates Amit Desai and Satish Maneshinde. Khan’s lawyers argued that no drugs were recovered from his person. Special Public Prosecutors AM Chimalker and Advait Sethna appeared for the NCB.

The NCB submitted its replies, after many instances of delay, in connection with Khan, Merchant and Dhamecha. According to Bar&Bench, the NCB objected to granting Khan bail saying, “Considering the influence that Aryan Khan holds in the society, it is very much possible that he may tamper with evidence and influence other witnesses whom he personally knows. Also the possibility of the applicant fleeing justice cannot be ruled out.”

Advocate Tareq Sayed appeared for Arbaaz Merchant and shot down the NCB’s contention that they had recovered incriminating Whatsapp chats. B&B reported that he submitted, “The entire case is based on mobile phone and the panchnama,” adding, “Prosecution was using WhatsApp chats, but now this panchnama is before you. There is no phone seized as per panchnama. There is no separate panchnama for phones… Hence the entire WhatsApp chats will become inadmissible.”

Hearing will continue on October 14.

Conclusion

Given how in the Mundra Port drug seizure case, the port was operated by the Adanis, a business group will close ties to the ruling regime at the Centre, and in the Cordelia Cruise drug case they key accused is the son of an actor who is routinely accused by right-wing trolls of having “Pakistan connection” only because of his religion, the contention that this targeting of Aryan Khan is a way to deflect attention from the Mundra drug seizure needs further investigation. After all, memories are still fresh of how actor Ria Chakraborty was hauled over the coals by social media and even a section of the TV news media, who practically defamed her in yet another case of trumped-up drug charges.

Related:

Social media calls out soft coverage of massive drug seizure at Adani port at Mundra

Mundra Adani Port: NDPS court orders probe into heroin seizure

Guilty as charged: Investigators, judge, jury and executioners of TV news ‘debates’

Social media hate machine goes into overdrive against Rhea Chakraborty

The post Cordelia Cruise Drug Case: Mumbai lawyer files complaint with Police Commissioner appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>