Delhi Police Commissioner | SabrangIndia News Related to Human Rights Wed, 28 Jul 2021 13:06:07 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2.2 https://sabrangindia.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Favicon_0.png Delhi Police Commissioner | SabrangIndia 32 32 All eyes on Rakesh Asthana, the new Delhi Police Commissioner https://sabrangindia.in/all-eyes-rakesh-asthana-new-delhi-police-commissioner/ Wed, 28 Jul 2021 13:06:07 +0000 http://localhost/sabrangv4/2021/07/28/all-eyes-rakesh-asthana-new-delhi-police-commissioner/ Law and order in Delhi is top priority as Independence Day nears, farmers protests continue, neighbouring states prepare for Assembly elections 2022

The post All eyes on Rakesh Asthana, the new Delhi Police Commissioner appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>
Delhi Police CommissionerImage Courtesy:yespunjab.com

The Delhi Police led by its Commissioner, comes under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA). Last week, Delhi Lieutenant Governor Anil Baijal also empowered the Delhi police commissioner under National Security Act (NSA). This empowers the commissioner to order preventive detention of any individual if he feels that the person poses a threat to national security, and law and order.

This order will be in place till October 18, 2021. The order is now active as Independence Day draws close, the Parliament’s Monsoon session at a time farmers protesting against the Centre’s three agriculture laws have been holding ‘Kisan Sansad’ at central Delhi’s Jantar Mantar. 

On Wednesday, July 27, Rakesh Asthana took charge as the new Delhi Police Commissioner. His appointment was announced the evening before, and according to multiple news reports, he has been handpicked for the job. The 1984-batch IPS officer, was due to retire on July 31, however, his service tenure has now been extended for one more year, or till further orders. Prime Minister Narendra Modi-led Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC), had also approved the “inter-cadre deputation from Gujarat to AGMUT cadre”. 

Asthana was serving as the Director General of the Border Security Force (BSF), when he was appointed to lead the Delhi Police. He had also served as the Special Director of the Central Bureau of Investigation. 

What is different about this appointment?

It is rare that an IPS officer from a state cadre, in this case Gujarat, is specially moved to the Arunachal Pradesh-Goa-Mizoram and Union Territory (AGMUT) cadre to facilitate his appointment as police chief of the National Capital Territory of Delhi. Delhi is a Union Territory that also has an elected government led by a Chief Minister. However, on April 27 2021, Government of India had notified the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Act, 2021. This Act gives more authority to the Lieutenant Governor (LG) of Delhi over the elected government in the city. Simply put, Delhi’s LG Anil Baijal is THE government in the Union territory now.

According to the legislation, the opinion of the LG “shall be obtained” before taking any executive action on decisions of the Council of Ministers of the Delhi government. And with the Delhi LG granting powers to the commissioner of Delhi Police under the NSA, it is clear that the ‘power centres’ as it were has been re-established. Asthana’s appointment as CP has been done after a “relaxation of Rule 16 (1) of the All India Services (death-cum-retirement benefits) Rules, 1958 as a special case in public interest.”  According to news reports, B G Krishnan, Deputy Secretary,  Home Ministry issued a notification that stated, “The approval of the appointment committee of the Cabinet has been conveyed, dated July 27, 2021, for the Inter Cadre deputation of Rakesh Asthana, from Gujarat cadre to AGMUT Cadre and extending his service initially for a period of one year beyond the date of his superannuation on July 31,2021, or until further orders, whichever is earlier, in relaxation of Rule 16 (1) of the All India Services (death-cum-retirement benefits) rules, 1958 as a special case in public interest. In pursuance of the said approval, Asthana is hereby appointed as Commissioner of Police, Delhi, with effect from the date of taking over charge up to July 31, 2022 or until further orders, whichever is earlier. This issues with the approval of the competent authority.” 

What is happening in Delhi in the next few months?

The Monsoon Session of the Parliament is underway, a few kilometers away around 200 farmers associated with the Samyukta Kisan Morcha (SKM) are conducting a ‘Kisan Sansad’, or farmers Parliament. This is for the first time since they began their protest on Delhi’s borders in November 2020 that they have been allowed to gather in the city centre, so close to Parliament. The Kisan Sansad has been peaceful, and is being conducted under a heavy security cover, at Jantar Mantar.

However, recently Bharatiya Kisan Union (BKU) spokesperson Rakesh Tikait has said that the farmers may hold a tractor rally on Independence Day. According to news reports, Tikait said this in Jind, Haryana where the farmers have reportedly expressed their inets of holding such an event. 

The announcement may have upped the ante in Delhi too, where security is at its most strict around national events such as Independence Day. On January 26, 2021, unprecedented chaos was witnessed in the city, and confrontation between Delhi Police, and volatile groups ensued. In May Delhi Police crime branch named 16 suspects in the charge sheet filed on the Republic Day violence allegedly by a section of anti farm law protesters. According to media reports the Delhi Police has charged that the violence was  “a deep-rooted, well-orchestrated conspiracy.” 

As the new commissioner all eyes will now be on Rakesh Asthana’s handling of the farmers’ protest in the months to come. Law and order in Delhi may also be seen as also crucial and sensitive as the states around the national capital are preparing for Assembly elections in 2022.  

Why is his name familiar in Delhi? 

In October 2018, there was a ‘CBI Vs CBI’ confrontation between Asthana the special director and Alok Verma the director of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). Allegations ranging from ‘misusing CBI resources for serving the agenda of powerful political masters to corruption and bribery, to orchestrating a cover-up of investigations’ flew thick. 

In 2019, the Delhi High Court had refused to quash the FIR in the bribery case against Rakesh Asthana, CBI Special Director and Devender Kumar, CBI DySP. The court had directed the CBI to complete the investigation within 10 weeks and file a charge sheet. Verma had registered an FIR against Asthana on October 15, 2018, reported Indian Express. The allegation according to the news report was that “a suspect in the Moin Qureshi case had been forced to pay Rs 2.95 crore to Asthana through two middlemen to water down the case against him”. Asthana was eventually cleared of all charges and the CBI had submitted in the High Court that there was no evidence to support the charges against him. 

Most recently, his name has featured in the list of names revealed by the Pegasus Project investigations. The Wire had reported that, hours after their termination from CBO, “both Asthana’s and Verma’s phone numbers had come under the scanner of the client of the Israeli NSO Group, the creator of the Pegasus spyware”. According to the report another phone number, belonging to senior CBI official A.K. Sharma, was also on the list.

Other career milestones? 

Asthana was  appointed to the post of Director General Bureau of Civil Aviation Security and Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) in 2019. He led the NCB when it probed the highly publicised drugs trafficking case that was investigating following  actor Sushant Singh Rajput’s death. According to a report in Hindustan Times Asthana had himself  visited Mumbai to “review investigations”. The NCB had made many arrests in the case including actor Rhea Chakraborty.

Asthana was also the CBI officer who investigated the fodder scam, in which former Bihar chief minister Lalu Yadav was convicted. He was also the head of the Special Investigation Team (SIT) probing the Godhra train arson.  Although a junior IG, Asthana was appointed to the post of IGP of the important Vadodara Range in April 2003. 

After Asthana’s elevation as interim director Central Bureau of Investigation by the PMO (prime minister’s office), on December 6, 2016, a Public-Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed in the Supreme Court on seeking quashing of the same.  

Related:

Delhi Government now means Lieutenant Governor
CBI vs CBI: No relief for Rakesh Asthana as Delhi HC refuses to quash FIR in bribery case
Alok Verma Resigns saying “Natural Justice was Scuttled”
Actor Rhea Chakraborty arrested by NCB, but the TV media trail continues to bay for 

The post All eyes on Rakesh Asthana, the new Delhi Police Commissioner appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>
Serious inaccuracy in police account of those killed in Delhi violence: Brinda Karat https://sabrangindia.in/serious-inaccuracy-police-account-those-killed-delhi-violence-brinda-karat/ Fri, 16 Oct 2020 04:51:52 +0000 http://localhost/sabrangv4/2020/10/16/serious-inaccuracy-police-account-those-killed-delhi-violence-brinda-karat/ The CPI (M) Polit Bureau Member alerts Police Commissioner SN Srivastava about inaccuracies

The post Serious inaccuracy in police account of those killed in Delhi violence: Brinda Karat appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>
Image Courtesy:deccanherald.com

Perhaps Delhi Police needs to take a relook at its list of those killed in the North East Delhi communal violence. According to veteran activist and CPI(M) Polit Bureau Member, Brinda Karat, there is “a serious inaccuracy in the police account of the number of those killed in the communal violence in February in North East Delhi”. She has stated that while the numerous affidavits placed before the courts, and also in the public statements Delhi police officials have said that the number of those killed in the riots is 53. These include those registered as “unknown” earlier but were later identified. However, there may be more.

Karat has now written to the Delhi Police Commissioner SN Shrivastava on the “inaccuracy” and given an example of one “Sikander” who was killed in the communal riots but whose name has not been included in the list. He died on February 27, 2020, and his inquest papers (quoted in the post mortem report no 435/2020,) state “alleged history of being found in unconscious state below flyover Khajuri chowk on 27/2 at 11.30 am following which the individual was brought to GTB (illegible) where he was declared brought dead.” 

However, according to Karat’s letter the victim was not identified till March19 by his brother Md. Ishfaque. After the identification, Sikander has been identified as a victim, by name, but is still not on the list of those who were killed in the communal violence in Delhi in February 2020. Such omissions deny the family justice, and compensation. It is fair to assume that there may be more such riot victims whose names may have been omitted from the list of the dead.

Brinda Karat has raised the crucial issue with the police chief and written a detailed letter to him on Thursday. The letter was later released to the media by the CPI(M) Central Committee Office.  It may be read here:

The Commissioner of Police

Delhi

Shri S,N,Srivastava ji,

I write to draw your attention to a serious inaccuracy in the police account of the number of those killed in the communal violence in February in north-east Delhi. In various affidavits before the court and in public statements made by the Delhi police officials from time to time the number of those killed has been put at 53. These include those registered earlier as “unknown” but who were later identified by the police.

However one of those killed Sikander s/o Muhammed Mullak (illegible) has not been included in the list. He was killed on 27-2-2020. In his inquest papers (quoted in the post mortem report no 435/2020,) it is stated “ “alleged history of being found in unconscious state below flyover Khajuri chowk on 27/2 at 11.30 am following which the individual was brought to GTB (illegible) where he was declared brought dead..” However he was not identified till March19 by his brother Md. Ishfaque.  After the identification, the original DD as unknown DD 39 A dated 27/2 was registered on 19/3 under the name of Sikander. In other words in police records Sikander has been identified as victim, by name on 19/3.

The postmortem report shows that he died of serious head injuries.

Sikander’s brother Md. Ishfaque has made numerous visits to the Khajuri Khas police station to ask for a copy of the FIR. However he has been told that no FIR has been filed. One of the police personnel reportedly said that “ the compensation will be managed” and his name “adjusted” in the list.

The family has been through terrible trauma. Ishfaque’s shop in Bhajanpura was burnt and looted. His sister’s home in Ghonda was attacked and looted.  And the youngest sibling Sikander was killed. Instead of treating the family with sympathy, the Delhi police by not registering Sikander as a victim has worsened their plight.

This is to request you to immediately intervene to (1) correct the list of numbers of those killed given to the High Court and include the name of Sikander, which makes it 54 killed (2) to give a copy of the FIR to Sikander’s family (3) to take action against those police personnel responsible for the inaccuracy and harassment of the victim’s family.

Yours Sincerely,

Sd/-

Brinda Karat

Related:

Brinda Karat moves Delhi HC, challenges order refusing hate speech FIR against Anurag Thakur, Pravesh Verma 
The ruling is surprising and disappointing: Brinda Karat on Hate Speech Case 
Delhi HC again adjourns petition about police accountability for ‘indiscriminate’ 
Delhi violence: LG order appointing MHA picked officers way to defend the 
Is Delhi Police hiding key information, documents of riot cases?
Brinda Karat files police complaint against IPS Nageswar Rao
Brinda Karat asks Police Commissioner to act against communal activity in Shiv Vihar

 

The post Serious inaccuracy in police account of those killed in Delhi violence: Brinda Karat appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>
Riot book authors meet Delhi Police Commissioner, file complaint against Bloomsbury and others https://sabrangindia.in/riot-book-authors-meet-delhi-police-commissioner-file-complaint-against-bloomsbury-and/ Thu, 03 Sep 2020 13:51:09 +0000 http://localhost/sabrangv4/2020/09/03/riot-book-authors-meet-delhi-police-commissioner-file-complaint-against-bloomsbury-and/ Authors’ allegations include cheating, breach of trust etc against the publishers, as well as activists, writers and journalists

The post Riot book authors meet Delhi Police Commissioner, file complaint against Bloomsbury and others appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>
Image Courtesy: thewire.in

Authors of upcoming book Delhi Riots 2020: The Untold Story, met Delhi Police Commissioner on Wednesday and handed over complaint against the book’s former publisher Bloomsbury allegeding cheating, breach of trust and invoked multiple sections of the Indian Penal Code. The authors, led by Advocate Monica Arora, met the commissioner in his office at the Police Headquarters and handed over their letter of complaint where they have also named activists, writers and journalists, seeking that they too be investigated under the IPC sections.

The, now Garuda Publisher affiliated authors have alleged that Bloomsbury publishers, who had eventually refused to publish the one-sided book, and the other writers they have named, who are based across the globe, have indulged in “misappropriation of property, illegal receipt and retention of stolen property, criminal intimidation, statements creating and promoting enmity between classes etc.” They have named professor Nandini Sundar, poet Meena Kandasamy, Journalists Arfa Khanum Sherwani, Aatish Tasser, writer William Darymple, and activist Saket Gokhale, as well as news portals The Quint, and Newslaundry.

The matter came to light when poet Meena Kandasamy, tweeted that she had been approached by a journalist to comment on the issue, “Wow….. just learnt this. now coming after us with state machinery.”

 

Journalist Navneet Mishra also confirmed the meeting and posted that the authors “have been very upset over the intimidation and violation of their right of freedom of expression over the past few days since 22.08.2020. They informed the Commissioner of the happenings related to the book ‘Delhi Riots 2020: The Untold Story’.”

 

He even shared these photos of the meeting: 

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/tlq4GtRKZuq1LvyNdmv1T-653vrGqUcBHpt1jkKI-HKY95bebn5P0kjEtyLZh5BNthrO8hIs-phgWYlPIoSe9wLOtGbB6WGUkW5QoWaR3EdwOlof8yS2Vs8c83hufhlMN6p6OaS4

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/8XiFHW1MBLpCWDphCB6GMd4K-XHQWfN8YgFK44VkDSamfX2JM9Um02ulUAVGcOIb1F62-djDVS6kf7eMrFg8FGfmXO2_2dvn04wlQO3fN6UnupjQCncDtbHS8UTazktowBkU0FQ8

This is the purported letter the authors have handed over to the police. It is alleged that the PDF of the book was leaked, and the writers and activists then ‘pressurised’ the publishers to withdraw the book. 

https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/HO1eYJmc98y3psevhYWnsR2SHj8NH40EVpv6SgqHXI68JqEUIVIPGKMJk68iv1NduNQnU8Rp__kd0bU8rxnAJqDHO3MyHQ841c8tSCH9fx07AYYTCQqapDuI-HmpxEZD5YWyKAmP

The book Delhi Riots 2020: The Untold Story, claims to be an ‘expose’ on Delhi’s February 2020 communal riots, and was launched by the authors themselves, six months after the communal violence. The book was ‘launched’ online by the authors themselves because the publishers Bloomsbury India had refused to be associated with the event. Bloomsbury had even accused the authors of using their brand logo at the launch without permission. Later scores of activists, authors, journalists, and readers also raised concerns about the one-sided book. Bloomsbury withdrew the book, and announced that they will no longer be publishing it after the online launch by the authors, and their supporters.

Soon, another publishing house, Garuda Prakashan came forward to publish the title. Garuda is founded by Sankrant Sanu. The Lede, in an article on influencers of trolls, had added him to the list of notables. They have been successful with the acquisition of this title and have claimed massive advance orders for the book.

Related:

Book on Delhi’s communal riots to be printed now with right-wing support
Bloomsbury India withdraws publication of one sided book on Delhi Riots, after outrage

The post Riot book authors meet Delhi Police Commissioner, file complaint against Bloomsbury and others appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>