The Gujarat government has moved the High Court seeking removal of stay imposed by the court on section 5 of the Gujarat Freedom of Religion (Amendment) Act, 2021. Section 5 of the Act penalises persons who have abetted the crime of forceful conversion.

At the August 19 hearing of a petition challenging the validity of the Act, Bench of Chief Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Biren Vaishnav had stayed the operation of Sections 3, 4, 4A to 4C, 5, 6, and 6A of the Act. The Chief Justice had said, “After recording the preliminary submissions and arguments advanced, we have directed as follows. We are therefore of the opinion that pending further hearing, the rigours of Section 3, 4, 4A to 4C, 5, 6, and 6A shall not operate merely because the marriage is solemnised by a person of one religion with another, without force or by allurement or by fraudulent means and such marriages cannot be termed as marriages for the purposes of unlawful conversion.”

Now the state government is seeking a rectification of this order stating that section 5 has nothing to do with marriage. Advocate General Kamal Trivedi, appearing for the state submitted before the bench, “My Lords have recorded my argument, I said that per se marriage cannot be prohibited…Section 5 has nothing to do with it…It talks about whoever wants to convert have to take permission, and people have been taking permission since 2003”.

He submitted that section 5 does not use the word “marriage” and it deals with permission from the District Magistrate for conversion, either before or after marriage, or even in cases without marriage. Section 5 of the law mandates that religious priests must take prior permission from the district magistrate for converting any person from one religion to another.

The bench has granted permission to hear the case once the petitioners’ counsels are informed about it.

At the first hearing itself the bench was displeased with some provisions of the Act. “Either you say if there is marriage by force or fraudulent means and then there is conversion, then of course, it is not right, fair enough. But if you say only because of marriage, someone converts and so it is an offence (it is not correct),” the bench had said.

At the August 19 hearing, the AG had requested the Bench to clarify their position in circumstances where an interfaith marriage does result in forceful conversion, and to state that the sections should then apply. To this, the Chief Justice said, “You have to have a basic argument that its forceful conversion, either there is force or allurement….that’s all that we have said!” The court clarified that something “basic” has to be there to show that there is force or fraud or allurement in the inter-faith marriage. In the absence of this, the amended law would not apply.

On August 17, the government had argued that interfaith marriage is not prohibited under the Gujarat Freedom of Religion (Amendment) Act, 2021, however, using it as a tool or instrument for effecting forceful conversion is not allowed. The original Act of 2003 prohibited conversion by force or allurement, however the 2021 amendment makes “conversion by marriage” an offence which is one of the many common threads between the anti-conversion laws passed in Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh as well.

In related news, Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP), SabrangIndia’s sister organisation, has also approached the Supreme Court challenging the anti-conversion laws passed by the governments of Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh, citing issues like privacy, dignity and autonomy of women, equality and secularism.

Related:

Anti-conversion law will not apply to inter-faith marriages unless there is force, fraud, allurement: Gujarat HC
Gujarat Assembly passes Freedom of Religion Amendment Bill, 2021
Gujarat’s anti-conversion law reflective of a patriarchal and prejudiced mindset: Fr. Cedric Prakash

The post Guj gov’t seeks removal of stay on operation of sec 5 of anti-conversion law appeared first on SabrangIndia.

A bench of Chief Justice J S Khehar and Justices N V Ramana and D Y Chandrachud issued notice to the state government.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal appearing for the petitioner said that the officer was granted bail, reinstated, promoted and rewarded despite being an accused in a murder case.

He said a couple of days back he was given three months extension.

The bench said notice has been issued and he should wait for the response.

The Appointments Committee of the Cabinet of the central government had granted the three-month extension to Pandey, who was supposed to retire on January 31.

Pandey was heading the state crime branch when Ishrat, a 19-year-old Mumbra-based girl, Javed Shaikh alias Pranesh Pillai, Amjadali Akbarali Rana and Zeeshan Johar were killed in an encounter with police on the outskirts of Ahmedabad on June 15, 2004. Gujarat police had alleged that they had terror links.

An SIT constituted by the high court to investigate the case had concluded that it was a fake encounter, following which the HC transferred the case to CBI.

After being released on bail, Pandey was taken back into service in February 2015 and was made the Director of the state Anti Corruption Bureau.

On April 16 last year, Pandey was appointed as the in-charge DGP of Gujarat following unexpected transfer of incumbent P C Thakur to Delhi.
 

The post SC seeks response from Guj govt on extension to DGP PP Pandey appeared first on SabrangIndia.