Muniza Khan | SabrangIndia

Government a threat to Indian legacy, education, jobs: Gandhian institute taken over, residents evicted, bulldozer to follow

sabrang — Wed, 26 Jul 2023 05:24:12 +0000

On July 22, another legacy of India’s history met with an unfortunate end, and soon, every evidence of its existence will be erased. On Saturday, the Sarva Seva Sangh (SSS), a well-known Gandhian institute that serves as the central office of its various branches all over India, was sealed by the Uttar Pradesh Administration. In an unexpected move, the district officials of Varanasi arrived at the centre around 7 in the morning with over 500 police men with guns, including Rapid Action Force. With the help of some 200 laborers, the police forcibly entered each house in the 12.5 acre campus and removed its residents’ belongings. Thousands of books published by the Sarvodaya publications have been thrown out by the police that now remain lying in the open air wet in the rain. People evicted, with whatever things they could carry, have moved out to their acquaintances.

The said Gandhian institute in Varanasi housed and ran the Kasturba Balvadi School, leaving over 100 poor school children aged 3 to 12 suddenly facing a threat to their education. The SSS conducts a kindergarten school giving free education for the poor children around. When the children arrived for the morning classes on July 22, they found their class room locked by the police.

The Varanasi unit has about 50 members, mostly elderly Gandhians who pay a membership fee and are associated with the Sangh’s work. Some of them taught at its school. The Sangh’s employees too were left jobless and homeless when the police asked them to immediately vacate the premises, where they had lived and worked for 10 to 30 years.

Saturday’s police action came after the railways pasted demolition notices on all the Sangh’s offices on June 27, days after the local administration declared that the land belonged to the railways. The Northern Railways served a notice to the people living in the Sarva Sewa Sangh and alleged that they had encroached upon the land of Northern Railways, adjacent to GT Road, at the northern end of Kashi railway station here.

“All encroachers are informed that in the series of District Magistrate, Varanasi’s, letter dated June 26, the process of demolition of illegal constructions made by Sarva Sewa Sangh on the land of Northern Railways will begin. Therefore, all the encroachers are informed to vacate the railway land immediately,” said the notice.

It is further essential to note that the Special Leave Petition moved by the Akhil Bharat Sarva Seva Sangh against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court, refusing any relief to the petitioners, was dismissed by the Supreme Court on July 17, 2023. Both the Allahabad High Court and the Supreme Court had refused to intervene and directed the Sangh to approach the district court. The district court was supposed to hear the matter on July 21, but the same was postponed to July 28. As provided by a local activist to SabrangIndia, the petitioners waited till 5 pm on July 21 in the court, but the judge did not come. The activist alleges that since the petitioners wanted to urge for urgent hearing of the case, and owning to the pressure that judge must have gotten from the government, the judge chose to not come and postpone the hearing. Unsurprisingly, the railway administration acted before the hearing while the matter remains sub-judice.

“The government wants to erase every symbol of Gandhi”- Residents of the institute

The Sangh has vehemently denied the charges of any encroachment of the railway land, rather stating that the government wants to demolish all the Sangh’s ten buildings on the ground that the institute stands on 14 acres of encroached-on railway land. They further allege a ploy by the Narendra Modi government to “erase every symbol of Gandhi”, as reported by The Telegraph.

The Sangh further provides that it has all the necessary documents to prove that the land was bought from the railways in 1960 through the efforts of Vinoba Bhave, and with the involvement of then President Rajendra Prasad.

Vallabhacharya Pandey, a Gadhian and national convenor of Asha Trust, termed it unfortunate that the government tries to destroy the 63-year-old national heritage that was the workplace of Vinoba and Jay Prakash Narayan, MattersIndia reported. He further said that even if the government destroys the property, it will never be able to destroy Gandhi, Vinoba and Jayaprakash Narayan from the hearts of Indians.

“The school (a registered one) was meant for rag-pickers and the children of boatmen, to whom we imparted non-formal education. This included basic knowledge of science, the arts, music, and life,” Arvind Singh Kushwaha, secretary of the Varanasi unit of the Sangh, headquartered in Sewagram, Maharashtra, told The Telegraph.

It is essential to note that among the employees who are now left homeless and jobless were subeditors, clerks, supervisors, caretakers, guards, and cooks who worked in the Sangh’s offices that included a publication division and a library. “The employees too belonged to poor families; so, we had given them quarters here,” Kushwaha further said.

Elaborating on their future plans, Kushwaha stated that” The school management plans to file a case asking the government to take care of the children’s education. The employees will file a separate case arguing they cannot be rendered jobless all of a sudden.”

Meera Chaudhary, who taught at the Kasturba Balvadi School, said: “These 100-odd children’s future is a matter of great concern. We can’t let them go back to their past lives.”

She added: “We had divided them into junior, middle and senior levels according to their age and taught them almost everything that could make them better human beings.”

The children, if they wanted, could later join a board-affiliated school and take board exams, The Telegraph provided.

Arbitrary arrests followed, arrested charged with abetment and unlawful assmebly

In addition to evicting those who were on a 63-day satyagraha to protest against the attempt to demolish the premises, the police also arrested eight of them. As per media reports, the police had arrested Ram Dhiraj, aged 70, head of the Sangh’s Varanasi unit. Additionally, Chandan Pal, aged 78, who is head of the Sangh in Sewagam and had come from Kolkata to participate in the satyagraha was also arrested along with four other Sangh members. The four arrested were: Ram Dheeraj, SSS’s state president, Arvind Anjum, editor cum publisher of Sarvodaya Prakashan, Nandlal Master, coordinator of Lok Samiti, Jeetendra Yadav and Ishwar Chand, a veteran Gandhian activist.

Those arrested have been charged with abetment of an unspecified offence and unlawful assembly. As provided by the Telegraph, all those arrested have been remanded in 14 days’ jail custody.

An anonymous Sangh member also told the Telegraph that “Initially, the police picked up eight Sangh members because they were on a dharna at the institute gate and were interrupting the police. Later, four were released and two others picked up because the police considered them potential troublemakers. The local intelligence unit is looking for two or three more members of the Sangh to arrest them so that we don’t file court cases regarding the schoolchildren and the employees.”

The Sangh member further said that “After their medical examination, the police had asked all of them on Saturday night to go home but they replied that the only place they would like to go back to was the Sangh compound, where they lived. Finally, the police sent them to jail.”

Sushil Kumar, aged 70, a Gandhian from Bihar who was associated with Jayaprakash Narayan and has been camping in Varanasi to join the Sangh’s protests against the demolition plan, said Varanasi had witnessed a march by citizens on Sunday against the government action.

“Over 100 people marched from Shastri Ghat to Ambedkar’s statue and handed a memorandum to the local administration, asking it to return the property to the Sangh and act against the officials who have been lying to the court, saying there was no valid (land) sale deed,” Kumar told The Telegraph.

Ram Dhiraj, head of the Sangh in Varanasi, told the Telegraph that “The railways has forged documents to dislodge us from here and hand over the land to the (central government’s) Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts, which is run these days by RSS members.”

CPI MP Viswam writes to PM Modi seeking stay on the demolition of Sarva Sewa Sangh

As provided by The Statesman, CPI Rajya Sabha MP, Binoy Viswam, addressed a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi on the decision by the Varanasi administration to demolish the Sarva Sewa Sangh, urging him to stand in solidarity with the people of Varanasi and stop the bulldozing of the Sangh. It is important to note that the Sangh members had previously purported that Prime Minister Modi, the local MP, had during a Varanasi visit early this month ignored a plea from the Sangh for a meeting to present its case.

In the said letter addressed to PM Modi, MP Viswam stated, “I write this letter to convey distressing developments from your own Lok Sabha constituency which you have not taken note of. The Varanasi administration is demolishing the campus of the Sarva Sewa Sangh in Varanasi and several followers of Mahatma Gandhi, leaders of political parties, academicians and civil society activists were arrested for protesting this move. The administration wishes to demolish the seven decades old campus which houses a publishing house, a library, a free preschool, a Khadi Bhandar and a statue of Mahatma Gandhi to build a guest house in its place.”

The MP further stated in the letter that the Sarva Sewa Sangh was founded back in 1948 by luminaries like Acharya Vinoba Bhave, Dr Rajendra Prasad, Kaka Kalelkar and Jayaprakash Narayan to unite “all constructive workers engaged in different fields in the country to achieve Swaraj based on the philosophy of Sarvodaya”, as dreamt by Gandhi.

He further reminded PM Modi about his statement that “the Gandhian ideals of peace and harmony reverberate globally and give strength to millions” while unveiling a bust of Mahatma Gandhi in Hiroshima. Regarding this, MP Viswam said, “Looking at the destruction of an organization which is committed to spreading the same Gandhian ideals, it seems that you remember Gandhi ji only on foreign trips while dismantling his work and thoughts at home,” as per the Statesman.

A long legal battle- eviction even as case remains sub-judice

The demolition drive is based on a notice given by the Railways saying that SSS stands on railway land encroached by the Gandhians. A legal battle has been going on for the past few months on the ownership of the land.

In June, the Northern Railways had pasted a notice on the premises asking the Society to vacate the 12.9-acre plot as the structures were to be demolished. The demolition was initially scheduled to take place on June 30, 2023, but was delayed as the society approached the Allahabad High Court and pursuantly Supreme Court, but got no relief from both the courts.

During both the hearings, the Railway officials vehemently argued that the 12.9-acre plot near Rajghat belonged to them, while the Sangh claimed that it was purchased by the Society from the Union of India by means of three registered sale deeds in 1960, 1961 and 1970.

A brief recent timeline:

On May 15, 2023, the Varanasi District Commissioner Kaushal Raj Sharma sent an SDM with the police to inform that the Gandhi Vidya Sansthan is being given to the Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts, an autonomous institution under the Ministry of Culture, which works as a centre for research in the field of the arts.
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court. On May 16, the matter was disposed of by the Allahabad HC, which directed the Varanasi DM to verify the land records of the Sarv Seva Sangh. The court also asked the Sangh to move a civil court to decide the title of the land. Notably, the petitioners also filed a case before the Civil Judge, Varanasi seeking declaration of title and permanent injunction amongst other reliefs, in respect of the very same properties.
On June 26, 2023, the District Magistrate held that the petitioners have completely failed to prove their ownership over the properties as the genuineness of the concerned sale deeds could not be confirmed by authentic evidence.
On July 3, 2023, the aforementioned decision of the DM was challenged before a division bench of the High Court. The said bench of the High Court had declined to grant any relief to the petitioners by observing that their suit is pending in a Civil Court. They further stated that if they are aggrieved by the demolition notice which has been issued against them in the meantime by the Railway Authorities, they can move injunction application in the pending suit.
On the same day, the petitioners moved to the Supreme Court through filing an SLP assailing the legality of the judgment given by the divisive bench of the High Court.

The decision of the Supreme Court:

Senior Advocate Prashant Bhushan, representing the Sangh, had argued that the petitioners had acquired the properties through registered sale deeds several decades earlier, rendering the view taken by the District Magistrate on title as unwarranted.

It was also argued by Adv Bhushan that the District Magistrate had no authority to decide on the title of any property. Further, Bhushan submitted that the Railways had issued the demolition notice immediately after the adverse declaration of the DM, deprived the petitioners from availing legal remedies.

On the other hand, the Railways argued that the petitioners have failed to produce any of the registered sale deeds on the basis of which they claim title over the concerned land. It was also provided by the respondents that the civil suit is pending without any progress in the Court, and that challenged the High Court’s direction directing the District Magistrate to determine the ownership of the property has been raised.

The bench of the Supreme Court, comprising Justices Hrishikesh Roy and Pankaj Mithal, dismissed the SLP filed by the petitioners. The bench stated that the issues to be looked into in the said case can only be through a suit, which is already been filed. In view of this, the bench dismissed the case.

The full order can be read here:

Download PDF

Background of the Institute:

According to the website of the Sarva Seva Sangh, it was started after a meeting in Sevagram, Wardha in March, 1948. The meeting was attended by India’s first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and first President Dr. Rajendra Prasad. It was also attended by prominent leaders Vinobaji, Kishorilalji Mashruwala, J C Kumarappa, Acharya Kakasaheb Kalelkar, Shrikrishnadasji Jaju, Aryanayakam Couple, Jayaprakash Narayan. “…Sarva Seva Sangh came into existence in April, 1948 after merging five constructive organisations e.g., Akhil Bharat Charkha Sangh, Akhil Bharat Gram Udyod Sangh, Akhil Bharat Go Seva Sangh, Hindustani Talimi Sangh & Mahrogi Sava Mandal,” says the website.

On the property concerned, there is a publication house – Sarva Seva Sangh Prakashan – a preschool where children from the socio-economically weaker sections are taught without any fees, a guest house, a library with hundreds of books, a meeting hall, a Gandhi Arogya Kendra (a naturopathy centre), a youth training centre, a khadi bhandaar and a statue of the Mahatma Gandhi.

Sarva Seva Sangh Prakashan, the publishing wing of Sarva Seva Sangh, was established in 1955 during Vinoba Bhave’s Bhoodan movement. As per the organisations’ website, Bhave recognised the need for the publication of Sarvodaya Literature to spread Mahatma Gandhi’s message while he was travelling in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh.

“Varanasi was considered an ideal place for publication for this purpose. Late Shri Jamnalal Jain came to Varanasi from Wardha in 1955. Thus Sarva Seva Sangh Prakashan came into existence,” the website says.

It adds: “It was 1958-59, a piece of Railway land behind Kashi Railways station and near river Ganges and GT Road came into the notice of Radhakrishna Bajaj. This piece of land was purchased from Railways in 1960-61 and 70. Late Lal Bahadur Shastri was closely associated with Sarva Seva Sangh, played in key role in it. Later on the building was constructed.”

Ganga and Varuna, in Rajghat on the northern end of Varanasi city, was founded in 1960 by Jay Prakash Narayan with the help of President Rajendra Prasad, Vinoba Bhave, Lal Bahadur Shastri and Jagjivan Ram to propagate Gandhian teachings. Shastri, the then Railway minister, arranged for the sale of Railway property to this institute. Ramdheeraj, the president of Sarva Seva Sangh, Rajghat, Varanasi, told ABP Live that that the said was established in 1960 to “understand the sociological impact of the movement”.

134 houses razed, two mosques next: “Bulldozer Justice” continues

More than 5,000 teaching & 15,000 non-teaching posts kept vacant: Education Ministry

Nearly 272 crores spent by the govt. on litigation over the last five financial years: Lok Sabha

Bombay HC: 2 weeks stay on order restraining offering of Namaz at an 800-year-old Jumma Masjid

The post Government a threat to Indian legacy, education, jobs: Gandhian institute taken over, residents evicted, bulldozer to follow appeared first on SabrangIndia.

Hijab Ban: Identity politics or body policing?

Tue, 22 Feb 2022 04:16:41 +0000

The hijab continues to drape news discussions, and the issue of hijab versus saffron debate has now fuelled communal acts of discrimination and confrontation in different states of India. As it evolves and seems to gain a life of its own, the issue needs to be examined minutely. Is the Hindutva right-wing in collusion with the Islamist right-wing? Is the discussion being fuelled by a united, conservative patriarchy across religions? Is any one asking the Muslim women what they want to wear? It is identity politics or body policing that is at play. While many news anchors and channels continue encouraging loud arguments from studio panels, students on ground continue losing precious study hours.

It is thus crucial to lower the volume and engage in a real conversation, to examine the issue, its evolution and impact. One such conversation was organised recently by Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP) where co-founder, activist, educationist and journalist Teesta Setalvad and social scientist and activist Dr. Muniza Khan, discussed the issue in depth. While Setalvad has a long track record as a journalist and human rights activist, Dr. Khan’s research and Ph.D in 1990s was on the Socio Legal Status of Muslim Women in the context of the Shah Bano Case and divorces in the Muslim community, thus giving them both a unique perspective.

“India is known and recognised as a secular State, but the governance by the ruling regime is moving towards majoritarianism. This is affecting the constitutional and state structures – may it be the Election Commission, Judiciary, Parliament thereby hollowing out the democracy, constitutionalism and secularism,” Setalvad contextualised the discussion on the ongoing crisis, that is yet another example of the “downturn of secularism is clearly visible in the State because of the ongoing spreading of hatred by the communal forces”. It is also concerning how various organisations recognising human rights or the rights of minority communities or the rights of women feel that the right of choice has been misinterpreted by the religious patriarchal system.

Responding to the lead question, “Do you feel that whatever is happening in Karnataka is an attack on Muslim way of life?” Dr. Khan said the hijab ban in Karnataka was a sample of “complete interference of the governing or the ruling parties which has increased from 2014 in order to control the minority community and their rights” as this will serve a “political agenda of inciting the feeling of hatred and communal violence as the way hatred is being spread.” She recalled that this too was not new and that such incidents also took place during the time of the Shah Bano case, and recalled her research where she observed that members of the Muslim community were progressive, and many women didn’t wear headscarfs or hijabs, however after the Shah Bano case in it became an issue of identity and terms like “Islam khatre mei hai” were heard on soon after the Babri Masjid- Ramjanambhoomi dispute put Ayodhya on the political map.

What has now begun from Karnataka, according to Khan, has been “intentionally raised at this time in order to polarise votes,” and its ripple effect is also being seen in Uttar Pradesh especially in areas such as Jaunpur, Azamgarh, Gazipur, and Varanasi. “The intention of the right-wing was to polarise votes and take up these issues and to hide the major issues of concern such as employment, inflation etc,” she stated as a resident of Uttar Pradesh who is aware of the on ground realities as Assembly elections are now underway in UP.

Setalvad also addressed the need to understand the concept of “naqab, burqa, hijab and parda” as the controversy began in the state run schools of Karnataka where many Muslims girls have in the past worn salwar kameez as the uniform and a scarf matching with colour of uniform and attended classes. However, an order was passed by the government disallowing the students to attend classes wearing hijab. It is crucial to note the timing and the requirement of such an order and that “uniformity is not equality inside the classrooms”.

“Our Constitution itself recognises diversity and pluralism and if at all in a diverse country like India if uniformity is forced fully imposed than majority will bring status quo,” said Setalvad, adding that there needs to be the concept of “positive secularism” at play indeed and that the “State is distinct from all religion but the society respects all the religions.” She recalled a South African Judgement allowing a Hindu girl to wear a nose ring in school as cultural practice that was cited before Karnataka High Court.

According to Dr. Khan, when she was in school it was “mandatory for girl students to tie their hair in two plaits and come to school” those who disobeyed were made to stand outside the class. However those days the parents didn’t raise any issues not were there feminist groups and this no nobody questioned the “rule”. She recalled that in her college there were nuns who used to come in their own religious clothes and it was respected and was never made into a controversial issue. The same college rules didn’t allow girls to wear jeans, only salwar kameez was allowed and on Saturday only sarees were allowed. “These were the things to maintain the discipline of the college,” she recalled. However Dr. Khan said that today the issue is that of “a right and a choice the right wing group is inciting it otherwise these are not serious issues. They are able to do this because their people are in power.” She also explained the negative impact it had had on Muslim women.

According to Dr Khan, the question of naqab, burqa or hijab was explained in the Quran sharif and she quoted, “Chapter 23 verse 30 instructs men to observe modesty say to the believing men that they restrain their eyes and guard their private parts, that is purer to them. Chapter 23 verse 31: and tell the believing women to lower their gaze and guard their chastity, and not to reveal their adornments except what normally appears.”

She said that now only women are told “Hijab lo, cover karo, ghar se mat niklo,” but men are not told anything. According to Dr Khan, when she read the Quran to learn about the rights of women in Islam, she found that most of the rights were already recognised in the holy book, but were not in practice and women were never informed about them. An example was found in “the 4th ayat which prohibits women in Islam to forgive or give up the right to meher (a sum set aside in case of a separation)”. Dr. Khan then said that dowry, something that is not a part of Islamic culture, is practiced by manipulating tradition. She gave the example of Madanpur area of Varanasi, where a day prior to marriage the entire dowry is sent to the groom’s house and next day the family claims they are conducting a “simple marriage ceremony”. She also stated about the increasing incidents of dowry deaths and bride burning. She questioned why it was not questioned by Muslim scholars “kaha jata hai ki jalana mana hai vaha par bride burning shuru hai (Translation: They say it a sin to burn, but bride burning is still going on)” and put the onus on the conservative Muslim leadership, often make, who claim that “Islam is in danger” whenever a Muslim woman asserts her right and her freedoms. She called this out as a “patriarchal controversy” to push women back where fundamentalists both Hindutva and Islamists, talk the same way as they do not want women to progress.

It was also crucial to understand the basic concept of hijab which is a scarf that covers neck and head, a burqa is full body coverage so is naqab. Khan recalled meeting a women professor in Bangladesh who never wore a headscarf but when they met again after a decade later in Malaysia the professor was wearing a hijab, “When I asked she said it’s her identity and it should be worn by me as well”

Setalvad recalled how the stay order which was passed by the High Court on February 11, 2022, on the hijab ban issue had its effected the fundamental rights of education of the Muslim girls, “The girls who wore hijabs were physically stopped from going to school, what can be worse in a secular state that on one hand provides the right to education, but on the other…”. She asked, “What should be the attitude of the state here and the attitude of the higher judicial, high Court?” Karnataka’s streets have witnessed a mobilisation from both sides, from the hijab wearing women as well as the right-wing. “There was a study conducted in 2019-2020 which showed that 61% of Indian women were reported covering their head, out of which Muslim women were 89 percent, Sikh women were 86 percent and Hindus are about 59 percent,” Setalvad recalled an analyses published by Hindustan Times.

Dr. Khan added that the “court’s decision was not entirely unbiased” at the moment, adding that there was also a sense of fear instilled in the people that they should not speak up against the judiciary lest they be held in contempt. She asked, “If we can speak against religion why can’t we speak against judgments made on religious issues?” She also made an interesting observation how the hijab was in fact “a status symbol” as it was worn by upper caste/class Muslim women who could afford it. The women belonging to lower income groups or so called lower class would use a simple dupatta to cover their heads. In places like Malaysia she also saw the hijab become a fashion symbol.

She also stated the impact of women being told to wear a hijab that she saw in Mubarakpur when she asked a group of little girls to pose for a photo. “You are not allowed to take photos of us; it is sin. You take photos of boys who are playing in the ground,” was the girls shocking reply. This was an example of how young minds are being embedded with restrictions from childhood by calling it a religious practice. The impact stays long after the girls grow up and even after they enter mainstream professions. “I feel the Quran sharif has given rights that are revolutionary but people do not know them, nor are they informed about them,” said Dr. Khan.

Setalvad expressed concern about the challenges and difficulty for the organisations and people fighting for human rights, feminists, minority rights etc, as the current scenario was also an attack on rights and freedoms given by the Constitution of India. “The Islamophobia we are seeing, the vile hate on social media” are all examples of this, said Setalvad, citing the example of actor Shahrukh Khan being trolled when he attended the funeral of Lata Mangeshkar. “There is also a great responsibility on rights organisations to stand with the Muslim women asserting their right to education and identity so they can navigate this dual reality,” said Setalvad. She recalled the case of Aroosa Parvaiz, who topped the Kashmir board exams but was trolled, for not wearing a hijab and for her liberal views by Islamists, the same way Hindutva trolls do. This showed the similarity of the mindset between these two groups.

Dr. Khan shared her personal experience from 1991 where she was criticised by a Maulvi for having short hair but she retorted that she did not need a certificate of being “Muslim enough” from those people. However, today if a young woman was to say that, Dr. Khan stated that it may be taken in a different way. “It is a matter of human rights of these young girls,” and as many Muslim families were sending their girls to school the challenges were also rising said Khan. “It is a long process and will take time to bring in the change… there is the need of communicating with the girls themselves, fundamentalism and communalism is in both communities,” concluded Dr. Khan.

The entire conversion may be viewed here : https://fb.watch/bf4TvD9wCk/

Hate Buster: Times Now anchor questions Malala’s silence on Burqa ban in Norway

Hijab ban: Multiple dimensions

Hijab controversies now hit schools!

How a College Committee make decision on ‘public order’: Petitioners at Hijab Ban hearing

The post Hijab Ban: Identity politics or body policing? appeared first on SabrangIndia.

Threats to Acting Registrar, Gandhi Institute of Studies (GIS), Dr Muniza Rafiq Khan

Mon, 05 Sep 2016 08:11:18 +0000

Even as sustained agitations to revive the Gandhi Institute of Studies(GIS), a prestigious institute in Varanasi have been taking place, a late night, brazen threat to the acting registrar of the institute, Dr Muniza Rafiq Khan have raised eyebrows and much concern. Activists, activists and senior politicians from all over India have written to chief minister, Akhilesh Yadav to not simply ensure her security but also to also rid the institute by illegal occupation by anti-social elements. Among those who have written letters are senior journalists Qamar Naqvi and Teesta Setalvad.

There have been certain worrisome and threatening developments since the dharna and protests have begun. Late on Saturday night (September 3) around 8.30-9 p.m. when the Acting Registrar, Dr Muniza Rafiq Khan returned to her residence, athreatening letter was pasted on the door of her residence ostensibly signed by one Jagdish who has been running allegedly some unauthorised classes on the premises. The SSP and local police have been very cooperative and given Dr Muniza Khan protection but we urge that stringent action is taken and steps to immediately resolve the entire issue. The threat letter may be read here.

There was a sustained dharna at Lucknow to save the Gandhian Institute of Studies in Varanasi had renewed interest in an institute that had been crippled by anti social elements since 2007.

The letter to the chief minister, says, “There have been certain worrisome and threatening developments since the dharna and protests have begun. Late last night around 8.30-9 p.m. when the Acting Registrar, Dr Muniza Rafiq Khan returned to her residence, a threatening letter was pasted on the door of her residence ostensibly signed by one Jagdish who has been running allegedly some unauthorised classes on the premises. The SSP and local police have been very cooperative and given Dr Muniza Khan protection but we urge that stringent action is taken and steps to immediately resolve the entire issue.”

Background
This prestigious institute, an autonomous research Institute, was established by late Jayaprakash Narayan in 1960 as an “attempt to link Gandhian movement with Social
Science.” Among the founding members were Naba Krishna Choudhary, Shankar Rao Dev, Dr. Sampurnanand, etc.

The previous presidents of the Institute have been Shri Shankarrao Deo (1960-63), Shri Nabakrushna Choudhury (1963-74), Dr. Balbhadra Prasad (1974-76), Shri Jayaprakash Narayan (1976-77), Dr. Manmohan Choudhury (1977-78), Shri S.M. Joshi (1978-84), Dr. Bimal Prasad (1984-2000), Dr. Usha Mehta (2000), Dr. Manmohan Choudhury (2000-02) and Acharya Ramamurti since 2002.

The Institute had earned the wrath of former HRD Minister, Mr. M.M. Joshi, when it resisted attempts to accommodate a representative of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) Ms. Kusum Lata Kedia. She however managed to become a member of the Institute faculty.

There after she was even suspended for her questionable activities against the Institute and her colleagues. In August, 2002, Ms. K.L. Kedia was dismissed from her services from the Institute due to non-performance and misbehaviour, by the Board of Management of the Institute.

There have been previous efforts made to restore the institute to a functioning state. However, unfortunately, so far, the Uttar Pradesh government has still not released the 50% matching grant to the Institute nor sanctioned the arrears due for these past years. The staff of the Institute has passed through very difficult times for more than six years and they still receive only 50% of their salaries each month. Yet, due to the prestige it enjoys the Institute has, even now, been able to get major projects from ICSSR, Ministry of H.R.D., the Ministry of Panchayati Raj, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, World Literacy of Canada, etc.

Press Clippings

The post Threats to Acting Registrar, Gandhi Institute of Studies (GIS), Dr Muniza Rafiq Khan appeared first on SabrangIndia.