undefined | SabrangIndia News Related to Human Rights Mon, 27 May 2019 10:29:44 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2.2 https://sabrangindia.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Favicon_0.png undefined | SabrangIndia 32 32 Saudi feminist is still being tortured in jail a year after arrest https://sabrangindia.in/saudi-feminist-still-being-tortured-jail-year-after-arrest/ Mon, 27 May 2019 10:29:44 +0000 http://localhost/sabrangv4/2019/05/27/saudi-feminist-still-being-tortured-jail-year-after-arrest/ Loujain al-Hathloul has been held in solitary confinement and faced abuse, including electric shocks, flogging and threats of sexual violence. The Saudi government has resisted calls from human rights groups and lawmakers from around the world to release Loujain and the other jailed activists.   It’s been a year since women’s right activist Loujain al-Hathloul […]

The post Saudi feminist is still being tortured in jail a year after arrest appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>
Loujain al-Hathloul has been held in solitary confinement and faced abuse, including electric shocks, flogging and threats of sexual violence. The Saudi government has resisted calls from human rights groups and lawmakers from around the world to release Loujain and the other jailed activists.

Loujain al-Hathloul
 

It’s been a year since women’s right activist Loujain al-Hathloul was detained and jailed in Saudi Arabia for leading a movement to lift the kingdom’s ban on female drivers and overhaul its male “guardianship” system. Despite international outcry, she’s been imprisoned ever since. During that time, her family says, she’s been held in solitary confinement and faced abuse, including electric shocks, flogging and threats of sexual violence. The Saudi government has resisted calls from human rights groups and lawmakers from around the world to release Loujain and the other jailed activists.
 
Saud al-Qahtani, the infamous former adviser to Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, visited Hathloul in detention to oversee her torture, according to Walid, her brother.
 
“He sat in on one of the sessions. He told her: ‘I’ll kill you, cut you into pieces, throw you in the sewer system. But before that, I’ll rape you,’” Walid said.
 
Hathloul remains more concerned about the fate of women outside the prison walls than herself, said her brother in a report by The Guardian.
 
“Even when she was in jail, although she didn’t witness women being allowed to drive in Saudi Arabia, she kept asking me how women there were feeling, whether they were enjoying their right to drive,” Walid said. “She was thinking about them even though she was in jail, and it wasn’t a time to think about others.
 
It’s not hard to guess why Hathloul is still behind bars. Her family, including brother Walid and sister Lina, have been outspoken on her behalf, including about the torture she says she endured: waterboarding, beatings, electric shocks and sexual harassment.

“They are saying, because you guys are speaking out, Loujain is not going to be released,” says Walid al-Hathloul. It’s a way of ensuring that other families remain silent about arrests and mistreatment of activists.
 
Thanks to such tactics, Saudi activists and human rights groups have been unable to determine how many political detentions have occurred since MBS came to power.
 
Including religious opponents of the regime and members of the royal family, the total could number in the thousands, says Safa al-Ahmad, a filmmaker who has documented Saudi repression in an article by The Washington Post.
 
According to accounts shared by her siblings, Loujain was kidnapped from the streets of Dubai by government officials, forced into an airplane and flown back to Saudi Arabia against her will. There she was held, first in an apartment in a secret location, later in a state prison.
 
“These are the things my brave, resilient sister has endured in prison,” Lina recently told an audience at the Women in the World’s New York summit. “She has been beaten until her thighs were black with bruises, subject to whippings and waterboarding, tormented with electric shocks, threatened with rape and murder.”
 
The refusal of her brothers and sisters to keep Loujain’s plight secret, as they had been instructed, make uncomfortable publicity for a nation working on an international media makeover.
 
“In the past year, Saudi Arabia has been rightfully proud of the leaps forward it has made in terms of women’s liberties; the first female ambassador has been appointed, women’s sport has lost its stigma and the infamous female driving ban has fallen. But what does all this mean, if the very people who campaigned peacefully for such rights are denied their own freedom?” Nicola Sutcliff, an international journalist, wrote.
 
There has been relief for some in the past few weeks; approximately seven of the jailed activists have been released ‘temporarily’ pending the results of their ongoing trials. But of Loujain in such headlines, there has been no sign.
 
The date of her last hearing was cancelled abruptly without explanation. Since then, there have been no updates on her case, and no news of when proceedings might be resumed.
 
Loujain has recently been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize. At the time of her arrest she was training to work as a sociologist, “In the hope of taking part in the change that is happening in my country as a researcher and a consultant,” she told Sutcliff.
 

The post Saudi feminist is still being tortured in jail a year after arrest appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>
In UP’s Hindutva Hotbed, Young Hardliners Look Beyond 2019 https://sabrangindia.in/ups-hindutva-hotbed-young-hardliners-look-beyond-2019/ Thu, 11 Apr 2019 06:32:42 +0000 http://localhost/sabrangv4/2019/04/11/ups-hindutva-hotbed-young-hardliners-look-beyond-2019/ Muzaffarnagar, Kairana (Uttar Pradesh): “Look, this election isn’t really about voting for your MP. It’s about bringing Prime Minister Modi back again.” That was former Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) union minister of state Sanjeev Balyan addressing an election gather of 100, mostly men, in their white dhotis and pagris (turbans) in a square in Naghori […]

The post In UP’s Hindutva Hotbed, Young Hardliners Look Beyond 2019 appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>
Muzaffarnagar, Kairana (Uttar Pradesh): “Look, this election isn’t really about voting for your MP. It’s about bringing Prime Minister Modi back again.”

That was former Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) union minister of state Sanjeev Balyan addressing an election gather of 100, mostly men, in their white dhotis and pagris (turbans) in a square in Naghori village here in western Uttar Pradesh. He made no mention of the September 2013 riots that got him political fame, as 62 people–42 Muslim, 20 Hindu–were murdered. A former PhD in veterinary sciences, Balyan firmly cast his lot with the Hindus.

The polarisation that Balyan, 46, had effected did its job last time, so he made Modi his primary sales pitch. Many BJP leaders believed that the communal riots in Muzaffarnagar, with Balyan at its epicentre turned the tide for the party in UP,  delivering it 73 of 80 seats, its best performance in India’s electorally most important state.

More than 50,000–most Muslims–fled their homes and had to move to the neighbouring town of Shamli in the neighbouring district of Kairana. Balyan was charged with disobeying curfew orders, using criminal force to deter public servants from doing their jobs and wrongful restraint. He is still fighting these cases in court. But the polarisation between Hindu and Muslim in Muzaffarnagar gained him victory over his nearest rival from the BSP by a margin of 400,000 votes.


Balyan was rewarded and made union minister of state for agriculture. Two years later in 2016, his portfolio was changed to water resources and a year later, he was dropped from the union cabinet altogether.

Despite his patchy track record and the cases he is still fighting, the BJP calculated that, perhaps, Balyan would be able to consolidate Hindu votes yet again and named him the candidate from Muzaffarnagar constituency.

After the rally in Naghori village, Balyan sat in the drawing room of one of his supporters, before a table of cashew nuts and savouries, and talked plainly about  what happened during the Muzaffarngar riots.

First, as someone fighting cases in court, he was cautious.

Pehli baat toh meri party ka usmey koi role nahi tha. I want to clarify first of all that my party had absolutely no role to play in those riots,” he said.

What about the role he played in the riots? Balyan was quick to reply.

Ab bhi koi aisi sthithi aayegi toh mai abh bhi khada rahoonga. If circumstances like those arise again, I will stand up and do my bit again,” he said, referring to local attitudes. “Mai us kshetra se hoon jahan eenth ka jawaab paththar se kiya jaata hai. Where I come from, we believe in giving an eye for an eye.”

That a parliamentarian and former union minister was making a statement admitting to violence and ignoring the law was not an aberration. It is the fulcrum around which politics in Muzaffarnagar moves, as UP chief minister Yogi Adityanath confirmed during an election speech in the district on April 8, 2019. “It was Sanjeev Balyan who was fighting for you and even went to jail,” said Adityanath.
Balyan and Adityanath’s approach is connected with the economic distress of the region and the consequent availability of young men.

Foot-soldiers are available
Before the 2014 election, said a local BJP leader, requesting anonymity, violence was stoked to win votes. In August 2013, a local fight erupted between Jats and Muslims over the alleged sexual assault of a Muslim girl.

It spiralled after two young Jat men were killed by Muslims–seven were convicted in February 2019–and a Muslim killed by Hindu Jats. But the state stepped in and imposed a curfew. At this point, Balyan, a local Jat leader at the time, played a key role as a self-styled “protector of Jat pride”.

In defiance of the curfew, he and other BJP leaders from the area called for a Jat mahapanchayat or a grand council of Jats on the September 7, 2013. Slogans were shouted at this public gathering of Jats from across western UP and Haryana: “Muslims have only two sthans (places), Pakistan or kabristan (the graveyard).

The disregard for the law, said political scientist and UP watcher Sudha Pai, who has spent much of her professional life studying UP’s communal and caste politics, comes from a historical downward spiral of UP’s economy and Muzaffarnagar within it. “The bottomline,” said Pai is “a total breakdown” of law and order, which is true for not just the BJP but other parties in the state.

“Coupled with the lack of development, this has meant that there are a large number of men without jobs available as foot soldiers,” said Pai, the author of Everyday Communalism, published in 2018.

When the farm sector and local industry dwindled, politics shifted to carving out caste and community based vote banks, which are easier to tap, said Pai. But this time, there are concerns beyond communal polarisation–sugarcane, for instance.

The politics of sugarcane
Muzaffarnagar district is primarily an agricultural zone: 26.02% of the workforce are cultivators and the remaining 78.03% agricultural labour, according to the Muzaffarnagar district census handbook of 2011.

This is sugarcane country and the state accounts for 43% of India’s sugarcane cultivation, according to the UP sugarcane and cane development department. Muzaffarnagar is UP’s sugarcane epicentre, but the sugar mills currently owe farmers over Rs 11,000 crore, according to government data, referred to in a 2018 parliament question, an issue that appears to be the leading local political problem.  

The UP government’s cane development study outlines the problem: on average, a sugarcane farmer needs to make 53 trips every year to sugar mills for various reasons, including price inquiries and when she or he is likely to be paid.

This tedium has economic and political implications, as growing protests by cane farmers in the last few years indicate.  

In addition, sugar mills face the same predicament that manufacturing units across UP do. Of 31 states and union territories, UP has the lowest percentage of electrified villages, the second-lowest per person consumption of power. About half of rural UP still awaits electricity, according to 2017 government data.

Balyan and the cane failure
It was perhaps to address the sugarcane concerns of many of Balyan’s 653,391 voters that he was made union minister of state for agriculture and food processing. That did not alter the predicament of sugarcane farmers, who sell their produce to mills and are not being paid the arrears the mills owe them.

Balyan admitted as much: “Maine bahut shor machaya apni party me apni sarkaar me. 14 din ka payment sunischit nahi kara paya. Yeh fact hai. I raised a storm in my party, in the government repeatedly, saying sugarcane farmers must be paid their dues within 14 days of the delivery of cane to mills (as is the law). But I wasn’t able to deliver on that. This is a fact.”

It was also a fact that Balyan was moved within two years from the agriculture ministry to water resources, and a year after that, he resigned from the union cabinet.

A veteran BJP party leader from the region, who did not want to be named, summed up what he thought of the region’s persistent under-development and the continued faith his party has displayed in Balyan for 2019: “Western UP me inki prayog-shala ban chuki hai. Sanjeev Balyan ka uday yahin se hua hai – Hinduvaad se. Western UP has been turned into a factory of Hindu hate, and that is what Sanjeev Balyan owes his political origin to.”

Without Hindu-Muslim issues, the lack of development would make voters put their faith on caste and community-based politics, the pattern in UP over the last two decades. The proportion of Muslims in Muzaffarnagar is 41.3%.  In 2014, Balyan defeated the Muslim candidate from the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP), Kadir Rana, a man who was also accused of stoking violence in the Muzaffarnagar riots. In the previous elections in 2009, Rana had won this seat. If Muslims voted en-bloc, then the violence in 2013 prompted various Hindu castes to consolidate around Balyan.

This time however, with no new polarisation to fall back on, Balyan admitted it was going to be “difficult”, especially with a formidable opponent in Jat leader Ajit Singh, founder of the Rashtriya Lok Dal. So, the battle for Hindu votes will be a Jat vs Jat contest.

Balyan hoped his past efforts to consolidate Hindu votes around a projected fear of Muslims would tide him over. As he left the rally, his supporter, Nirantar Singh emphasised the idea. “We don’t want the Talibanis back here,” he said referring to the SP and BSP alliance that many of Balyan’s supporters see as supporting Muslims and, therefore, Balyan the protector of Hindus.

A new generation of hate miners

Whether or not Balyan wins the seat again, it is clear that the template for Hindu politics in Muzaffarnagar district has been set and the next generation of political aspirants are copying this formula.

This was apparent in a town like Shamli, the place where Muslims displaced from the violence of 2013 re-located. The ramshackle town is 28% Muslim, double the national average of 14.3%, has potholed roads, patchy electricity and a near-absent drainage system in most residential areas.

In a such crowded shanty called Kaka Nagar lives 25-year old Bajrang Dal activist Vivek Premi. Up a flight of stairs in a living room flanked by two diwans, a large hairy rat paced the room as Premi spoke of his modus operandi as a Hindutva activist leading a cow protection group, a love-Jihad group, a temple-protection group and overall full-time career as a Hindu vigilante.

If Balyan is hoping to cash in on communal politics in this election, Premi is building a Hindutva base for the next generation. As part of the long term vision of the Sangh Parivar, a collective of Hindutva institutions that includes the intellectual arm – the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), the World  Hindu Council or Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) and the muscular, trishul wielding arm, the Bajrang Dal. Once the ground work is done, the political wing, the BJP, cashes in on the catchment of Hindu consolidation. Balayan’s politics is the immediate. Premi’s–as he acknowledged–is long term.

Premi comes from a trading family. His father owns a jewellery store in the Shamli market. His grandfather was a freedom fighter. “Working for the country” is a sort of inheritance, said Premi, eyes shining.

He came by his nationalism at a Bajrang Dal training camp that he first attended when he was twelve. “I went there because of the physical training and exercise,” Premi said. “And then I was informed about the state of the nation.”

Jis prakaar Islamic aatankvaad desh ke andar badh raha hai, kabhi love jihad ke naam pe kabhi land jihad ke naam pe. Roz kitni gauein ki hatya kari. Islamic terror is growing across the country, sometimes in the name of love jihad (holy war) at other times as a land (grab) jihad. So many cows are slaughtered every day,” said Premi.  

From this generalised indoctrination Premi said he was motivated to be part of specific campaigns, such as the 2013 Sangh Parivar campaign against India’s Congress led  government, the United Progressive Alliance (UPA); including a belief that it was breaking the Ram Setu, or Adam’s bridge, a rocky link to Sri Lanka, used–as mythology says–by Lord Rama.

Premi went around Shamli displaying what he said were stones from the Ram Setu and talked about what he had heard – that the UPA, led by the Congress party, intended to break the Ram Setu. This work gave him recognition in the Sangh and he was gradually given the official responsibility of indoctrinating students from schools and colleges across all of western UP.  

“Of course, I can’t get official permission from the school principal to talk to kids,” Premi said. “But as soon as it’s chutti time (when school gets over), the gates are open. I stand outside and introduce myself and two or three students gather around. And I tell the about the state of the nation and the need for this kind of nationalism.”

Premi’s work also includes spear-heading a cow-protection group. Shamli district is divided into six WhatsApp groups, by geography, by Premi and his followers, who have turned car mechanics and chai stall owners into Dal informers.

This is how it works.

As soon as an informer spots a truck carrying cows on the highway, they alert Premi or one of his team mates. The WhatsApp groups alert the nearest Dal member and a team gets on to the road to stop the truck–illegally because they have no legal authority. They can identify a lactating cow from a non-lactating one.

They also ask the truck driver to display his permit. If he doesn’t have one, they call the police and hand him over. The fact that this vigilante force works like a parallel administration and has become an integral part of the politics of Shamli does not surprise anyone any more.

Premi said “cow thieves” needed “to be taught a lesson” and that he has on occasion beaten up a few Muslim offenders to set an example.

“I did use a belt to beat up a man who stole calves. At the time “doosrey vicharon ki sarkar thi – there was a government with a different ideology then,” said Premi. “A government that allowed Muslims to get away with their lawlessness,” he added. “Toh woh gussa tha – that filled me with anger.”  

2-3 chamdi udhad jayegi to phir samajh me aa jayega kit u gau hatya karega toh yeh parinaam hoga. When 2 or 3 miscreants are skinned alive, then they will know not to kill cows,” Premi said, grinning, his face full of pride.

On another occasion, this vigilantism was used to prevent a Hindu girl from dating a Muslim man. When asked if it occurred to him that this is not a crime, Premi stammered over his words. “Errrr haan,” he said. “Lekin samaaj ke vyawastha ke khilaaf hai aur hum uske virodh me hain. It’s against our social norms and so we are firmly against it.”

Premi is not an isolated vigilante in Shamli. As the BJP insider previously quoted explained, there is a connection between Balyan’s political rise, the faith the BJP has shown in him despite an arguably poor performance in two ministries and the politics of Premi.

Political scientist Pai, whose book explains the Hindu vigilante phenomenon, said that this time around, the predicament of this Jat-dominanted belt is more complex than 2014.

In 1992, buoyed by the movement to build a Ram temple at Ayodhya and the destruction of the Babri Masjid, the Jats voted predominantly for the BJP.

“By and large, the Jats of Muzaffarnagar may not mind being anti-Muslim, but they are not that comfortable with the destruction of a place of worship,” said Pai. “Also, Muslims work as labour on farmland owned by Jats. So when things return to normal (unlike the Babri demolition or the Muzaffarnagar riots), they will ultimately have to decide what they are going to do.”    

Regardless of who wins, Pai said, there is a long-term template of communalism that has now been set in this part of India’s most populous state. However, much depends on which way the votes go this time.

“If the mahagathbandhan (the grand coalition) or the SP-BSP alliance wins, that template could get buried,” said Pai. “A new normal may get created. But if Modi wins, it will make UP more communal. That’s why UP is so significant this time. It’s the mother of all battles.”

Muzaffarnagar appears to be the barometer of that battle.

(Laul is an independent journalist and film-maker and the author of `The Anatomy of Hate,’ published by Westland/Context in December 2018.)

This is the second of a six-part series exploring the Hindu vote in UP. You can read the first part here.

Courtesy: India Spend

The post In UP’s Hindutva Hotbed, Young Hardliners Look Beyond 2019 appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>
Hindutva’s Poisoned Fruit and the World Hindu Congress https://sabrangindia.in/hindutvas-poisoned-fruit-and-world-hindu-congress/ Tue, 25 Sep 2018 05:01:39 +0000 http://localhost/sabrangv4/2018/09/25/hindutvas-poisoned-fruit-and-world-hindu-congress/ In early September 2018, I spent four days in the Chicago, Illinois region in order to protest the World Hindu Congress (WHC). Here’s why. On September 6, I participated in a panel at the University of Chicago which formed to “Stop Hindu Fascism.” On September 7, I was honored to be invited to join a […]

The post Hindutva’s Poisoned Fruit and the World Hindu Congress appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>
In early September 2018, I spent four days in the Chicago, Illinois region in order to protest the World Hindu Congress (WHC). Here’s why.
On September 6, I participated in a panel at the University of Chicago which formed to “Stop Hindu Fascism.” On September 7, I was honored to be invited to join a delegation which visited U.S. Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi’s office to register protest against his participation in the Congress. From September 8th to 9th, I joined hundreds of South Asians in protests outside the conference.

On the final day, speaking at the protest, I said, “I am here to day to raise my voice in resistance against the World Hindu Congress 2018 in Chicago. I am not here today to oppose Hinduism. I am not anti-Hindu. I love Hindus, and I am here today because I love Hindus.” I explained that the WHC was organized by the Vishwa Hindu Parishad and featured as its keynote the Supreme Leader of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). The previous day, as I spoke, I described the RSS as “the neck that turns the head” of India’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

If the WHC were merely a benign religious event, I would not have spent even a passing moment thinking about it, let alone protesting it.

However, to quote Representative Tulsi Gabbard — the first Hindu elected to U.S. Congress — it was a “partisan Indian political event.” Neither was the WHC merely a benign political event. It was, rather, a platform for modern India’s most extreme sociopolitical figures and organizations to propagate their supremacist ideology, Hindutva, which is a form of religious nationalism.

It has been said that, as a citizen of a country, one should never accept the premise of “my nation, right or wrong.” Such an attitude has been compared to saying, “my mother, drunk or sober.” In other words, unconditional support for every action of a loved one is disastrous. Consider, for instance, whether loyal and patriotic German citizens, during the rise of Hitler, should have embraced an attitude of “my nation can do no wrong.”

It has also been said that dissent is the highest form of patriotism. True patriots love their country so much that they’re willing to raise their voices — even when it’s unpopular or dangerous — when their country goes the wrong direction. A related concept is the proverb, “The wounds of a friend are more trustworthy than kisses of an enemy.” In other words, true friends offer insight, help us to recognize blind spots in our lives, and give good guidance about where we may be making mistakes.

On that note, the Republic of India is considered to be a good friend and close ally of the United States of America. If India and America are truly friends, then the responsibility of America — of its government as well as of its citizens — is to talk with India about human rights. Not trade. Not military joint exercises. Human rights. And, because of the position of influence held by the RSS and the VHP within the BJP regime, it is necessary to speak about both of them when one speaks about human rights.

So, speaking as a friend of India, I want to discuss how the WHC in Chicago brought to the surface some of the most troubling, persistent, and unresolved issues in modern Indian sociopolitics. Notably, the organizers of and keynote speakers at the WHC are closely linked to India’s ruling BJP, its supremacist ideology, and past and present atrocities committed under the banner of that ideology.

The Vishwa Hindu Parishad (or VHP) organized the conference. Keynote speakers included Mohan Bhagwat and Dattatreya Hosabale of the RSS. The U.S. Government, in its CIA World Factbook, listed both entities as “political pressure groups,” specifically labeling the VHP as a “militant religious organization” and the RSS as a “nationalist organization.”

The VHP and RSS are the two most prominent groups belonging to the religious nationalist “Sangh Parivar” (Family of Organizations). According to the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), “Sangh Parivar entities aggressively press for governmental policies to promote a Hindu nationalist agenda, and adhere in varying degrees to an ideology of Hindutva, which holds non-Hindus as foreign to India.” Amnesty International corroborates this assessment, reporting, “Hindutva is the political ideology of an exclusively Hindu nation. This ideology has been advanced with increasing vigour… by organizations of the Sangh Parivar.”

Furthermore, the founder of WHC, Swami Vigyananand, has blatantly endorsed the goal of making India “an exclusively Hindu nation,” declaring, “We shall set up in Bharat a Hindu State, which will be our nation-state.”

To understand the call for a Hindu State and the underlying ideology of Hindutva, how it is connected to the RSS, VHP, and BJP, and the consequences it has had for the people of South Asia, we need to return to the beginning.

Hindutva: Savarkar and Golwalkar
The term “Hindutva” was coined in 1923 by V.D. Savarkar, who developed the concept into a formal ideology. The ideology was institutionalized in 1925 with the founding of the RSS. The second, longest-serving, and most influential “Sarsanghchalak” (Supreme Leader) of the RSS was M.S. Golwalkar — the RSS refers to him as “Guruji” (respected teacher). Pictures of both men are routinely displayed on stage at Sangh Parivar events.

What did these two men teach?
The core of V.D. Savarkar’s ideology was that the Indian subcontinent is, always has been, and must remain a nation of Hindus — and that the Republic of India should, consequently, be a “Hindu State.”

“We Hindus must have a country of our own,” wrote Savarkar. “Truly Hindus are and cannot but be the mainstay of our Indian State.” He insisted that anyone living in India is, de facto, a Hindu — that is, that being Indian meant being Hindu. He wrote, “If you call it an Indian Nation it is merely an English synonym for the Hindu nation to us Hindus, Hindusthan and India mean one and the same thing. We are Indians because we are Hindus and vice versa.” Additionally, he identified being Hindu as the essence of true patriotism. Speaking of Hindus, he stated, “Indian Patriotism to them was but a synonym of Hindu Patriotism.”

Moreover, Savarkar argued that non-Hindus have no place in the country, writing: “India must be a Hindu land, reserved for the Hindus.” Making no apologies for the communalism of his ideology, he instead embraced and celebrated it, declaring, “We are communalists par excellence and glory in being the most devoted Hindu communalists which to us means being the truest and the most equitable Indian Nationalists!” In his goal to achieve an homogenous, monocultural, and communal polity, he declared, “Our politics henceforth will be purely Hindu politics fashioned and tested in Hindu terms only, in such wise as will help the consolidation, freedom, and life-growth of our Hindu Nation.”

He insisted, therefore, that Hindus should vote only for Hindus, but definitely not for the “race traitor” sort of Hindu. As he wrote, “Make it quite clear that you as Hindus are not going to vote for any such seasonal Hindu but only for a Hindu who is born, and bred, and means to continue to be true to his Hindu race.” This was, as he freely admitted, religious nationalism. He urged citizens to “vote only for a confirmed and merited Hindu Nationalist.” It was, he argued, every Hindu’s “easy duty for his race” to “vote for a Hindu Nationalist.” To do otherwise, he warned, was “to commit a cultural and political and racial suicide.”

Because he openly endorsed communalism, religious nationalism, and establishment of a Hindu nation for Hindu people, Savarkar believed any other communities which call for equal rights within the same territory are a threat to his concept of independent India. Thus, as Savarkar put pen to paper, he took aim, first and foremost, against the Indian subcontinent’s largest religious minority.

“The Mohammedans are likely to prove dangerous to our Hindu Nation,” he wrote. He argued they are incapable of being loyal or patriotic citizens, saying, “The Moslems remained Moslems first, Moslems last, and Indians never.” Suggesting that neither Muslims nor Christians can be integrated into Indian society because “their love is divided,” he asserted, “They must, to a man, set their Holy-land above their Fatherland in their love and allegiance.” Both communities are foreigners, he argued, writing, “Their names and their outlook smack of foreign origin.”

Focusing on Muslims, Savarkar offered recommendations for how the so-called “Hindu Race” ought to treat the Muslim population. “So far as the Moslem minority is concerned, I have already dealt with it at length,” he wrote. “In short, we must watch it in all its actions with the greatest distrust possible.”

Proposing a “final solution” for the alleged “Muslim problem,” he contrasted them with Germany’s Jewish community, arguing, “The Indian Muslims are on the whole more inclined to identify themselves and their interest with Muslims outside India than Hindus who live next door, like the Jews in Germany.” Finally, having built up Islam in India as a sinister threat, he warned, “If we Hindus in India grow stronger, in time these Muslims… will have to play the part of German-Jews.”

Savarkar’s ideology of Hindutva didn’t just bear a passing resemblance to the supremacist Aryanism propagated by the Nazis. Identifying India as an “Aryan nation,” he drew direct parallels between his proposed Hindu nation and the Nazi regime. In March 1939, days before the Nazis occupied Czechoslovakia and months before they sparked the Second World War by invading Poland, Savarkar praised Hitler’s embrace of Aryanism, declaring,

“Germany’s solemn idea of the revival of the Aryan culture, the glorification of the Swastika, her patronage of Vedic learning, and the ardent championship of the tradition of Indo-Germanic civilization are welcomed by the religious and sensible Hindus of India with a jubilant hope…. I think that Germany’s crusade against the enemies of Aryan culture will bring all the Aryan nations of the world to their senses and awaken the Indian Hindus for the restoration of their lost glory.”

That is Savarkar, who coined the term “Hindutva” in 1923. Perhaps nothing would have come of it if he had been merely a random blowhard. Many people in many generations have written and propagated virulent doctrines of supremacy. It doesn’t always take root. In this case, however, the ideology of Hindutva was institutionalized in the form of the RSS, which flourished and expanded into a group that, today, virtually controls the government of India.

The RSS was founded in 1925 as a uniformed, paramilitary group. It grew throughout the 1930s with direct inspiration from the youth organizations of Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany — the blackshirts and brownshirts, respectively. It adopted its own distinctive uniform: white shirt and khaki shorts (later replaced by brown trousers). It adopted a similar fascist salute. Today, it has an estimated 6 million members, including the Prime Minister of India.

M.S. Golwalkar, who served as Supreme Leader of the RSS from 1940 to 1973, also co-founded the VHP in 1964. His two books refined Hindutva and provided an ideological basis for its institutionalization.

In 2006, the RSS officially disowned Golwalkar’s first book — We or Our Nationhood Defined — but affirmed that his second book — Bunch of Thoughts — is central to RSS ideology. Indian attorney A.G. Noorani suggests that disowning the first book was merely an attempt at obfuscation, arguing, “So brutally candid is We or Our Nationhood Defined that a desperate attempt was made by the RSS to distance itself from it.” Because both of these books complement each other and actually reflect virtually identical ideology, I have interwoven quotations from them in illustrating what he thought, taught, and practiced.

Like Savarkar, Golwalkar claimed that the only true members of the Indian nation are those who belong to “the Hindu Race with its Hindu Religion, Hindu Culture, and Hindu Language.” He insisted, “We are all born as Hindus.” No one but Hindus hold a birthright to India, he said, stating, “Only the Hindu has been living here as the child of this soil.” He believed that non-Hindus are “foreign” to India and must be subsumed by the “Hindu race,” declaring,

“The foreign races in Hindustan must either adopt the Hindu culture and language, must learn to respect and hold in reverence Hindu religion, must entertain no idea but those of the glorification of the Hindu race and culture, i.e., of the Hindu nation and must lose their separate existence to merge in the Hindu race, or may stay in the country, wholly subordinated to the Hindu Nation, claiming nothing, deserving no privileges, far less any preferential treatment — not even citizen’s rights. There is, at least should be, no other course for them to adopt.”

Speaking about Muslims, he said that keeping Islamic names was a sign of having “mentally merged themselves with the aggressors.” Thus, he claimed that converting to Islam might even make a person a traitor to the nation. “It is not merely a case of change of faith, but a change even in national identity,” he wrote. “What else is it, if not treason, to join the camp of the enemy leaving their mother-nation in the lurch?” Converting from Hinduism to any other faith was “dangerous to the security of the nation and the country” because, he argued, “Conversion of Hindus into other religions is nothing but making them succumb to divided loyalty in place of having undivided and absolute loyalty to the nation.”

Specifically identifying both Christians and Muslims as members of the so-called “foreign races,” he stated, “Muslims and Christians here should give up their present foreign mental complexion and merge in the common stream of our national life.” Describing communities of Indian Christians and Muslims as victims of “foreign domination,” he said, “It is our duty to call these our forlorn brothers, suffering under religious slavery for centuries, back to their ancestral home.” Nor should one stop at having “achieved unity of Hindus, Muslims, Christians, and all others on the political and economic plane” but rather “fuse them all in the Hindu way of life.”

Moreover, he favorably compared the racial goals of the RSS to those of the Nazis, writing, “The ancient Race spirit, which prompted the Germanic tribes to over-run the whole of Europe, has re-risen in modern Germany…. Even so with us: our Race spirit has once again roused itself.” He claimed that “the Semitic concept of religion bred intolerance” and said “the first Semitic religion was Judaism — an intolerant faith.” Praising the Nazi policy towards the Jews, he wrote,

“To keep up the purity of the race and its culture, Germany shocked the world by her purging the country of the Semitic races — the Jews. Race pride at its highest has been manifested here. Germany has also shown how well-nigh impossible it is for races and cultures, having differences going to the root, to be assimilated into one united whole, a good lesson for us in Hindustan to learn and profit by.”

Comparing ancient Germany to Nazi Germany, he used it as an illustration for how every nation is supposedly bound, from eon to eon, by the “common aspirations” of a single race. It is, therefore, necessary to welcome the awakening of “Race Consciousness.” Because of this, he believed, each race “must tread the road into which its past traditional way has led it” — doing otherwise would rip apart the fabric of society and endanger its life.

His ultimate goal was the end of separate identities, differences, individualities, distinctions, and variances. Perceiving diversities as inimical to a healthy nation, he instead advocated the uniformity of all society. His method for achieving this was to “mould” men into a disciplined collective “wherein each one feels that he has a higher duty to the nation and that his personal and family wants can wait.”

He considered concerns about the nature of government — democratic or not — as irrelevant. “We did not bother much about the external form of the government but concentrated upon the moulding of man as the chief guiding factor in all our systems,” he said. National health was not obtained by instituting peaceful, democratic systems but rather incorporating every individual with the nation into a uniform entity. An entity for preserving “ideal Hindu Manhood.” Detailing his vision required “untiring, silent endeavor” over a great many years, he proclaimed,

“The ultimate vision of our work, which has been the living inspiration for all our organizational efforts, is a perfectly organized state of our society wherein each individual has been moulded into a model of ideal Hindu manhood and made into a living limb of the corporate personality of society.”

The Fruit of Hindutva: Reports by International Bodies
So what is the fruit produced by the Hindutva tree? From the seeds sown by Savarkar, what harvest has been reaped? After Golwalkar’s pivotal leadership of the RSS and founding of the VHP, did these outfits whither or flourish? Having introduce the ideological basis, what is the present status? Where has the Hindutva worldview guided India?

Over the past 20 years, various governmental and non-governmental organizations have repeatedly warned that Sangh Parivar entities perpetrate acts of violence against India’s religious minorities. Much could be added about various terrorist acts which are linked to Sangh groups. Similarly, a great deal could be said about legislation passed to implement the Hindutva agenda. Even more could be said about routine, daily acts of violence. Instead, let’s focus for the moment only on the reports by objective, third-party governmental and non-governmental bodies.

In 1997, the United Nations reported on “the existence of Hindu extremism, encountered in varying degrees within ultra-nationalist political parties or parties attracted by ultra-nationalism (RSS, VHP and BJP).” Furthermore, the UN warned that “mention must… be made of the activities of the extremist Hindu parties, which are attempting to undermine the communal and religious harmony which exists in India by the political exploitation of religion.”

In 1999, Amnesty International reported, “Violence against religious minorities, mainly Christians, is escalating throughout India…. Attacks have been carried out directly by, or in connivance with, right-wing Hindu groups with links to the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party, including the VHP.” Meanwhile, Human Rights Watch reported, “Organizations most responsible for violence against Christians are the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), the Bajrang Dal, and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh.”

Furthermore, in 1999, Human Rights Watch described the VHP’s involvement in violence against Muslims and their religious sites:
“The most publicized of the VHP’s activities was its campaign to build a temple to the Hindu god Ram at the site of the Babri Masjid, a mosque in the city of Ayodhya in Uttar Pradesh…. On December 6, 1992, the mosque was demolished by members of the VHP, the Bajrang Dal, and RSS-trained cadres. The police did not intervene. The incident sparked violence around the country in which thousands were killed.”

In 2002, Muslims in Gujarat suffered a pogrom which was allegedly state-sponsored — an allegation affirmed by VHP and BJP members who participated in the violence. The U.S. State Department reported, “Mobs in Gujarat… incited and organized by members of the Sangh Parivar, destroyed Muslim businesses and raped Muslim women. The violence resulted in an estimated 2,000 deaths, a majority of them Muslims.”

Corroborating that report, the the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) explained, “International human rights groups have named the VHP, RSS, BJP, and Bajrang Dal as perpetrators of the violence in Gujarat, as well as other acts of violence against non-Hindus.”

Among those international human rights groups were Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. Amnesty reported, “Sangh Parivar members, including BJP, VHP, and Bajrang Dal members were named [by victims and eyewitnesses] as instigators or participants of attacks on the Muslim minority.” Human Rights Watch reported, “The groups most directly responsible for violence against Muslims in Gujarat include the VHP, the Bajrang Dal, the ruling BJP, and the umbrella organization RSS.”

In 2005, the U.S. State Department described the RSS and VHP as “extremist” groups, stating, “Members of the BJP, the RSS, and other affiliated organizations (collectively known as the Sangh Parivar) have been implicated in incidents of violence and discrimination against Christians and Muslims.”

In 2007, U.S. Ambassador to India David Mulford warned that the Indian government cannot control “fundamentalist organizations such as the RSS and the VHP” and noted that “the traditional muscle power of the BJP has always been the RSS.” Also in 2007, Human Rights Watch warned, “Right-wing Hindu organizations such as the VHP and the Bajrang Dal have been promoting anti-Christian propaganda in Orissa [Odisha].”

In 2008, Christians in Odisha suffered a pogrom which — as in the case of Gujarat — was allegedly state-sponsored (or at least involved organization by elected officials). The USCIRF reported,

“At least 40 individuals were killed, although some Christian groups report more; thousands of church properties and homes were destroyed; at least 20,000 fled their homes to government-run relief camps; and approximately 40,000 were driven into hiding in jungles, the majority of whom were Christian…. In March 2009, the BJP nominated one of the main individuals accused in the anti-Christian violence for an assembly seat in the general elections. Despite remaining imprisoned for the duration of the elections, he won the seat. Also in March 2009, Orissa’s ruling party, the Biju Janata Dal (BJD), ended its 11-year coalition with the BJP, a decision fueled in part by the BJD’s repudiation of the BJP’s Hindu nationalist agenda, and the alleged support of some state BJP officials for the VHP, the Sangh Parivar entity implicated in riots.”

Also in 2008, Amnesty reported on “renewed attacks by supporters of Hindu nationalist organizations, including VHP and Bajrang Dal, against the Christian minorities and their places of worship in Kandhamal district in Orissa.”

In 2014, Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi was elected as Prime Minister of India. Speaking in 2013, Modi declared, “My identity is of a Hindutvawadi.” In 2015, Indian Home Minister Rajnath Singh — who is in charge of all internal security for the country — declared, “I want to clarify to everyone that I am an RSS swayamsevak [member] and the Prime Minister is also an RSS swayamsevak [member].” In 2016, The Hindustan Times reported that “more than a third of the 66 members in the council of ministers… had an RSS background.”

In 2017, BJP President Amit Shah attended a “crucial coordination meeting with various Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh outfits” before working with Modi to expand the council of ministers. In May 2018, reported scroll.in, “Bharatiya Janata Party leaders, including party President Amit Shah, and six cabinet ministers met the leadership of the RSS… to discuss government programmes and policies.” In June 2018, reported The Asian Age, “Prime Minister Narendra Modi held a crucial meeting with the RSS and BJP brass, which also included BJP president Amit Shah and senior Cabinet ministers, to discuss key electoral issues.”

Meanwhile, the VHP and RSS continue to be implicated in violence against India’s minorities.

In 2018, for instance, Human Rights Watch reported: “An affiliate organization of the BJP, the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, announced plans to recruit 5,000 ‘religious soldiers’ to ‘control cow smuggling and love jihad.’ So-called love jihad, according to Hindu groups, is a conspiracy among Muslim men to marry Hindu women and convert them to Islam.” Summarizing the general situation, also in 2018, the USCIRF reported:
“Conditions for religious minorities have deteriorated over the last decade due to a multifaceted campaign by Hindu nationalist groups like Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh… and Vishwa Hindu Parishad to alienate non-Hindus or lower-caste Hindus. The victims of this campaign include Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists… as well as Dalit[s] …. These groups face challenges ranging from acts of violence or intimidation, to the loss of political power, to increasing feelings of disenfranchisement and ‘otherness.’”

Conclusion
With the BJP in power, and the RSS and its affiliates extending ideological influence while their foot-soldiers perpetrate acts of violence, the future looks bleak for Indian minorities.

After Charlottesville violence in Virginia seized the attention of the nation, many Americans were compelled to recognize that there are still deeply troubling issues with which we have not fully grappled. However, although the organizers were emboldened, resistance against them and their ideology of white nationalism put them on notice that ideologies of supremacy and actions targeting minorities will not be tolerated. In the USA, the right thing to do is and always will be to stand up and speak out against the KKK.

The RSS is India’s version of the KKK — except instead of hoods they wear khakis (now brown pants), and instead of operating in secret they openly parade through villages, towns, and cities in columns. The agenda of Hindu supremacy is practically indistinguishable from white nationalism. The only real difference is that Hindutva preaches that Hindus instead of Whites should be at the top of the tower. Unfortunately, the RSS has gained far more ground in India than the KKK has in the United States. The KKK is a fringe, generally despised organization while the RSS is the neck that turns the head of India’s BJP regime.

The World Hindu Congress was not a gathering to promote Hinduism but rather a conclave of the Sangh Parivar. It served as an attempt to internationalize Hindutva.

The main speakers at the World Hindu Congress openly endorsed the ideology of Hindutva. Various other speakers were embroiled in controversy. One called critics of the RSS “cockroaches,” employing genocidal rhetoric which was used in Rwanda to stage a genocide. The founder, Swami Viygananand, called for issuing of trishuls — a weapon used against Muslims in Gujarat and Christians in Odisha.

Posters at the event spoke about the ideology. One VHP poster featured Golwalkar’s picture. Another poster created by a VHP Executive Board Member warned that, because “normative theological and cultural practices are breaking down,” there are “emerging threats for Hindus” which are, foremost, “the Islamic takeover” and “the Christian takeover.” Membership booths invited people to enroll in the VHP as well as the Hindu Swayamsevak Sangh (HSS), which is the international wing of the RSS.

Participating in the VHP-organized conference and speaking alongside RSS leaders — or alongside the leaders of the HSS — qualifies as aiding and abetting systemic violations of humanitarian values of inclusion, diversity, and tolerance. It is an endorsement of Savarkar and Golwalkar’s ideology of supremacism. It is certainly anti-American, as it encourages violations of the foundational American values of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. More importantly, it is anti-human.

Pieter Friedrich is a South Asian Affairs Analyst who resides in California. He is the co-author of Captivating the Simple-Hearted: A Struggle for Human Dignity in the Indian Subcontinent.

Courtesy: https://countercurrents.org

The post Hindutva’s Poisoned Fruit and the World Hindu Congress appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>
Delay in Investigations: What Are the CBI, CID and SIT up to? https://sabrangindia.in/delay-investigations-what-are-cbi-cid-and-sit/ Mon, 03 Sep 2018 05:44:56 +0000 http://localhost/sabrangv4/2018/09/03/delay-investigations-what-are-cbi-cid-and-sit/ On the one hand, the role of SS and its affiliates in the attacks on rationalists is coming to light, and on the other hand, the investigations in all the four cases is getting complicated. Image Courtesy: The Indian Express   The Karnataka Special Investigation Team (SIT) investigating the political assassination of Gauri Lankesh has […]

The post Delay in Investigations: What Are the CBI, CID and SIT up to? appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>
On the one hand, the role of SS and its affiliates in the attacks on rationalists is coming to light, and on the other hand, the investigations in all the four cases is getting complicated.
Image Courtesy: The Indian Express
 

The Karnataka Special Investigation Team (SIT) investigating the political assassination of Gauri Lankesh has said that the leadership of Hindu rightwing outfit Sanatan Sanstha (SS) was aware of the activities of its “footsoldiers” in the killing of some rationalists. An SIT official speaking to The New Indian Express has said, “The leadership of Goa-headquartered Sanatan Sanstha was aware of the activities of its footsoldiers and lower rung cadre. We cannot subscribe to this statement that the leadership was not aware of it. They definitely knew about these plots.” Chetan Rajhans, the spokesperson of SS, in a press conference last week had denied all the allegations, and had claimed that the arrested were not its members. As the SIT official noted, all those who are arrested so far are linked to SS or its affiliates. Thus, Rajhans’ claims are illogical and as a senior journalist Urmilesh points out, is a tactic of the right wing to escape the crisis situation, by distancing themselves from the crisis.

On the one hand, the role of SS and its affiliates in the attacks on rationalists is coming to light, and on the other hand, the investigations in all the four cases is getting complicated. The political assassinations of Dr. Narendra Dabholkar and Govind Pansare are being investigated by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and SIT of Maharashtra respectively. Criminal Investigation Department (CID) of Karnataka and Karnataka SIT are investigating the cases of M M Kalburgi and Lankesh respectively. The four cases are being handled by three different investigative agencies in two different states.

Except for the investigation by the Karnataka SIT in the case of Lankesh, none of the other investigations have yielded any result. The investigations in Dabholkar’s case, the CBI had claimed, had reached a deadlock. However following the investigations of the SIT in the Lankesh’s case and fresh arrests made by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) in the case of possession of explosives, proved the CBI wrong. The arrests made in the case of Lankesh and the information shared by the SIT has given a new direction to the investigative agencies in Maharashtra. Sachin Andure, along with Sharad Kalaskar, both arrested by the ATS, have confessed to have shot Dabholkar on August 20, 2013, while Virendra Tawade, who was the first suspect in the case, and is out on bail, had have planned the whole conspiracy, ATS has found. Even though this is not and should not be the end of the investigation, it is relieving to finally see the investigation moving forward after five long years.

As Megha Pansare, the daughter-in-law of Pansare has told Newsclick, there has been no progress so far in his case. Samir Gaikwad of Sanatan Sanstha (SS), who was arrested in September 2015, was granted bail by a Kolhapur court in June 2017, and Srikanth Pangarkar an ex-Shiv Sena corporator was detained in relation to Pansare’s case. Apart from these two, there have been no arrests. The CID has got no major leads in Kalburgi’s case either.

G. Parameshwar, the Deputy Chief Minister of Karnataka, has said that the Karnataka government is thinking of handing over investigation into the killing of Kalburgi to the Special Investigation Team (SIT), after it completes its probe into the Gauri Lankesh murder case.

Complicated Investigation Ahead
All the arrests made so far are in the cases of Lankesh and possession of explosives. In the former’s case, the Karnataka SIT has arrested 12, and in the latter case, the Maharashtra ATS has arrested five. Further interrogations of those arrested have shown that it is the same set of people involved in all the four political assassinations. The five arrested in the case of explosives are also reportedly involved in the case of assassination. For example, Amol Kale, Amit Baddi and Ganesh Miskin, who were arrested and interrogated by the SIT in the case of Lankesh, are also being named in the case of Kalburgi which is being looked into by the CID. Now, CID which is willing to interrogate all of them, is also wanting to interrogate another arrested by SIT, Rajesh Bangera. This demand by the CID is not being considered by the SIT, as the investigation is still not complete.

There also reportedly exists a tiff between the Maharashtra ATS, SIT and the CBI looking into the cases of Dabholkar and Pansare. Both CBI, an investigative agency under the Centre and Maharashtra SIT were completely inactive in probing the assassinations of Dabholkar and Pansare. One wonders why this delay? If multiple investigative agencies investigating these cases independently is delaying the investigations, the reluctance of the agencies to cooperate with each other is saving the SS and its affiliates. As the agencies and the governments now are aware of a larger conspiracy involving the SS is in place, this delay can turn out to be dangerous.

Courtesy: Newsclick.in
 

The post Delay in Investigations: What Are the CBI, CID and SIT up to? appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>
​​​​​​​Gowri Became The Gowri: Shiva Sundar https://sabrangindia.in/gowri-became-gowri-shiva-sundar/ Sun, 08 Oct 2017 06:17:16 +0000 http://localhost/sabrangv4/2017/10/08/gowri-became-gowri-shiva-sundar/ Gowri wanton wayfarer! ‘father’s favorite peacock feather who refused to come under his wings   Amidst kites that did not fly, horses that did not run you reached your destiny crawling like an ant.   Cool, scarlet honge flower that grew out of giant banyan tree, though abandoned by undependable “words”    you completed the […]

The post ​​​​​​​Gowri Became The Gowri: Shiva Sundar appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>

Gowri

wanton wayfarer!
‘father’s favorite peacock feather
who refused to come under his wings
 
Amidst kites that did not fly,
horses that did not run
you reached your destiny
crawling like an ant.
 
Cool, scarlet honge flower that grew out of
giant banyan tree,
though abandoned by undependable “words”   
you completed the journey through your deeds.
 
 
Neither obsessed with glory
nor infatuated by any sense of achievement
you continue to live an accomplished life even after your death.
 
Outwardly hasty, but slow inside,
 Burning yourself, you purified your innerself
Wiping out the difference between the inner and the outer,
You became , a maha-mane, where everyone had a space
 
You never doused burning truths, with restrained watery words,
nor wraped the naked world with erudite drapery,
refused to label the myths of post-truth as information.
wrote nothing except what you saw, as you saw.
 
Yes,
Some words there, some punctuation here were not needed.
But would it have changed the target of the bullets?
Name a fence sitter killed for following a safe middle path?
Why then Gandhi, the most religious one, was also killed?
 
You loved Love and hated Hate.
You melted, grieved, wept, grew angry, fought…
You became
mother, teacher, word, meaning, purpose…
dusky, red, blue, green, white…
became the spectrum of the rainbow
a hope, a possibility,
a symbol of immortality.
 
You
became Gowri,
defying death                                                                                                            
you became thousands of Gowris.

(Translated by VS Sridhar)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

The post ​​​​​​​Gowri Became The Gowri: Shiva Sundar appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>
Bastar crackdowns warn India what an Emergency could look like in the 21st century https://sabrangindia.in/bastar-crackdowns-warn-india-what-emergency-could-look-21st-century/ Tue, 15 Nov 2016 06:49:11 +0000 http://localhost/sabrangv4/2016/11/15/bastar-crackdowns-warn-india-what-emergency-could-look-21st-century/ While Delhi occasionally has to grapple with the real excesses of state power, such as when the government orders a news channel to go blank, the police state is alive and thriving in Chhattisgarh’s Bastar. The district, which became infamous two decades ago for the significant presence of Maoists, has also become a symbol of […]

The post Bastar crackdowns warn India what an Emergency could look like in the 21st century appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>
While Delhi occasionally has to grapple with the real excesses of state power, such as when the government orders a news channel to go blank, the police state is alive and thriving in Chhattisgarh’s Bastar. The district, which became infamous two decades ago for the significant presence of Maoists, has also become a symbol of Indian state abuse and has been the site of some of the most brazen attempts by the authorities to hound out all dissent.

Bihar

On Monday, the Hindustan Times reported that one of its journalists was threatened by SRP Kalluri, Chhattisgarh’s inspector-general of police, a man who has made clear his willingness to act against anyone questioning his department’s actions. Kalluri told the HT journalist, “If you all do like this, we will not let you visit …you went with my reference to Bastar.”

This is not anomalous behaviour from the man who helped use the police-initiated citizens body, the Samajik Ekta Manch, to drive out any journalist living in the district who might question the police’s actions – including Scroll.in’s Malini Subramanian who faced threats of violence and brick-throwing. This week, Inspector-General Kalluri has made it clear that even those who live outside Bastar will have to toe his line if they want to enter the district to report.

This is even more pertinent because the story the HT journalist was working on concerns another effort to keep people out: the murder case against Delhi University professor Nandini Sundar and others. Sundar was accused of being part of a crowd that had gone to the victim’s village and warned him not to oppose the Maoists. However, the wife of the murdered adivasi in whose name the case has been registered against Sundar has said she did not add these names.

This again is being seen as an effort to keep out all those who might be able to reflect a different viewpoint, and counter the state’s narrative. These attempts gain further import because, as Bastar slowly turns into a blackhole from which no dissenting information can emerge, the chance of state abuse – already a recorded feature in the district – becomes even higher.

The Opposition is set to take up the matter in the upcoming Winter Session of the state assembly. Just days ago, the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party was defending itself against charges of having imposed Emergency following its now-stayed NDTV India ban, insisting that its leaders had to face the brunt of Indira Gandhi’s authoritarian tendencies and would never replicate the same measures.

If the BJP just looked at what’s happening in Bastar though, it would find a district that would fit much more readily into Indira’s Emergency-era India than the progressive nation they claim to dream of.

This article was first published on Scroll.in
 

The post Bastar crackdowns warn India what an Emergency could look like in the 21st century appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>
11 महीने में 17 कॉटन मिलें बंद, ‘मेक इन इंडिया’ को चुनौती https://sabrangindia.in/11-mahainae-maen-17-kaotana-mailaen-banda-maeka-ina-indaiyaa-kao-caunaautai/ Fri, 29 Jul 2016 07:01:54 +0000 http://localhost/sabrangv4/2016/07/29/11-mahainae-maen-17-kaotana-mailaen-banda-maeka-ina-indaiyaa-kao-caunaautai/ ‘मेक इन इंडिया’ और उद्योगों को बढ़ावा देने के तमाम दावों के बावजूद 11 महीनों के दौरान देश में 17 कॉटन मिल्‍स बंद हो गई हैं। ये मिलें नकदी की कमी, घटते मुनाफे और बढ़ती उत्‍पादन लागत से जूझ रही थीं और आखिरकार अपना वजूद बचाने में नाकाम रहीं। यह स्थिति देश के टेक्‍सटाइल सेक्‍टर […]

The post 11 महीने में 17 कॉटन मिलें बंद, ‘मेक इन इंडिया’ को चुनौती appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>
‘मेक इन इंडिया’ और उद्योगों को बढ़ावा देने के तमाम दावों के बावजूद 11 महीनों के दौरान देश में 17 कॉटन मिल्‍स बंद हो गई हैं। ये मिलें नकदी की कमी, घटते मुनाफे और बढ़ती उत्‍पादन लागत से जूझ रही थीं और आखिरकार अपना वजूद बचाने में नाकाम रहीं। यह स्थिति देश के टेक्‍सटाइल सेक्‍टर की चुनौतियों को उजागर करती है।


By CSIRO, CC BY 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=35496321

लोकसभा में सांसद राजू शेेट्टी और प्रो॰ यविन्द्र विश्‍वनाथ गायकवाड़ द्वारा पूछे गए सवाल के जवाब में कपड़ा राज्‍य मंत्री अजय टम्‍टा ने जून, 2016 से मई, 2016 के दौरान देश में 17 सूती/मानव निर्मित फाइबर टेक्‍सटाइल मिलों (गैर-एसएसआई) के बंद होने की जानकारी दी है। टम्‍टा ने बताया कि इन सूती मिलों के बंद होने की प्रमुख वजह पूंजी की कमी, नकदी का अभाव, बढ़ती उत्‍पादन लागत और घटना मुनाफा है।

हैरानी की बात तो यह है कि ‘मेक इन इंडिया’ और उद्योगों को बढ़ावा देनेे का दावा कर रही केंद्र सरकार के पास बंद कॉटन मिलों के पुनरूद्धार के लिए वित्‍त और तकनीकी सहायता की कोई योजना नहीं है। यह बात भी कपड़ा राज्‍य मंत्री अजय टम्‍टा ने लोकसभा में दिए अपने जवाब में स्‍वीकार की है।

सांसदों ने यह भी पूछा था कि क्‍या सरकार नए टेक्‍सटाइल/स्पिनिंग मिल्‍स कलस्‍टरों की स्‍थापना करने जा रही है? इसके जवाब में टम्‍टा ने बताया कि सरकार आमतौर पर नई टेक्‍सटाइल यूनिटें स्‍थापित नहीं करती। बल्कि उद्याेेगों और निजी उद्यमियों को बढ़ावा देने वाली नीतियां और माहौल सुनिश्चित करती है।

गौरतलब है कि इस समय देश में 1420 सेती/मानव निर्मित फाइबर टेक्‍सटाइल मिलें हैं। बंद हुईं 17 मिलों में से 6 तमिलनाडु, 3 आंध्र प्रदेश, 3 कर्नाटक और एक-एक तेलंगाना, हरियाणा, महाराष्‍ट्र, राजस्‍थान और उत्तर प्रदेश में हैं। फिलहाल देश में 14 सौ से ज्‍यादा कॉटन या मैन मेड फाइबर टेक्‍सटाइल मिल्स हैं।

जारी रहेगा कपास की कीमतों में तेजी का रुख 

घरेलू उत्‍पादन में कमी के चलते इस साल कपास का भाव करीब 30-35 फीसदी ज्‍यादा हैं। अक्‍टूबर में नई फसल आने तक कपास की कीमतों में तेजी का रुख बने रहने के आसार हैं। हाल ही में केंद्र सरकार ने कॉटन कॉरपोरेशन ऑफ इंडिया को अपना सारा कॉटन स्‍टॉक छोटे व लघु उद्योगों को बेचने के निर्देश दिए थे। इसके बावजूद क्रेडिट एजेंसी इंडिया रेटिंग का मानना है कि नई कपास बाजार में आने तक कीमतों में तेज गिरावट के आसार नहीं हैं।

गौरतलब है कि इस साल कपास की उपज का क्षेत्र कम रहने की आशंका जताई जा रही है। इसके अलावा पंजाब सहित कई क्षेत्रों में सफेद कीट के प्रकोप की वजह से उत्‍पादन में कमी आ सकती है। इस वजह से भी कपास की कीमतों में तेजी रह सकती है।
इंडिया रेटिंग की रिपोर्ट के अनुसार, लगातार दो वर्षों से कमजोर मानसून और कई राज्‍यों में कपास पर कीटों के प्रकोप की वजह से कपास उत्‍पादन गिरा है। वर्ष 2015-16 सीजन में देश का कपास उत्‍पादन 7.4 फीसदी घटकर 352 करोड़ बेल्‍स रहने का अनुमान है। विश्‍व स्‍तर पर भी कपास उत्‍पादन 18 फीसदी गिरने के आसार हैं।

Courtesy: aslibharat.com
 

The post 11 महीने में 17 कॉटन मिलें बंद, ‘मेक इन इंडिया’ को चुनौती appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>
‘मैं जिंदा हूँ और गा रहा हूं.’ – ‘विद्रोही’ https://sabrangindia.in/maain-jaindaa-hauun-aura-gaa-rahaa-hauun-vaidaraohai/ Wed, 09 Dec 2015 09:33:19 +0000 http://localhost/sabrangv4/2015/12/09/maain-jaindaa-hauun-aura-gaa-rahaa-hauun-vaidaraohai/   (जनकवि रमाशंकर 'विद्रोही' को जन संस्कृति मंच की श्रद्धांजलि) कल ८ दिसंबर, २०१५ को शाम ४.३० के करीब जनकवि रमाशंकर 'विद्रोही' ने दिल्ली में अंतिम साँसें लीं. विद्रोही ने अपनों के बीच, आन्दोलन के मोर्चे पर अंतिम साँसे लीं. जैसा वे जिए, वैसा ही मरे. जैसे कोई मध्यकालीन संत शताब्दियाँ पार करके आधुनिक सभ्यता […]

The post ‘मैं जिंदा हूँ और गा रहा हूं.’ – ‘विद्रोही’ appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>

 
(जनकवि रमाशंकर 'विद्रोही' को जन संस्कृति मंच की श्रद्धांजलि)

कल ८ दिसंबर, २०१५ को शाम ४.३० के करीब जनकवि रमाशंकर 'विद्रोही' ने दिल्ली में अंतिम साँसें लीं. विद्रोही ने अपनों के बीच, आन्दोलन के मोर्चे पर अंतिम साँसे लीं. जैसा वे जिए, वैसा ही मरे. जैसे कोई मध्यकालीन संत शताब्दियाँ पार करके आधुनिक सभ्यता के जंगलों में आ निकले, उसकी सारी विडंबनाएं और चोटें झेलते, वैसे ही फक्कड़, मलंग बना फिरे, अपनी मातृभाषा में हमारे आज के समय के सबद और अभंग जोड़ते हमारे बीच से गुज़र जाए. कविता उनकी जीविका नहीं, ज़िंदगी थी और जन-आन्दोलन और मार्क्सवादी जीवन-दृष्टि उसकी सबसे पौष्टिक खुराक. कविता में वे बतियाते हैं, रोते और गाते हैं, खुद को और सबको संबोधित करते है, चिंतन करते हैं, भाषण देते हैं, बौराते हैं, गलियाते हैं, संकल्प लेते हैं. ”कविता क्या है?” जैसे सनातन विषय पर विद्रोही के  विचार देखें-

”कविता क्या है
खेती है
कवि के बेटा-बेटी है
बाप का सूद है,  मां की रोटी है।”
ऐसी कविता और ऐसी ज़िंदगी अक्सर उस सीमान्त पर विचरण करती हैं जहां मौत हाथ मिलाने के फासले पर होती है. जो दुनिया उन्हें मिली, उसमें जीने की 'शर्म की सी शर्त' उन्होंने नामंजूर कर दी. अपनी कविताओं में अलग दुनिया बनाई. उन्होंने अपने भौतिक अस्तित्व की रक्षा के लिए किसी से कोई गुहार नहीं लगाई. अपने लोगों से उनकी अपेक्षा यही थी कि वे अपने कवि को बचाएं –
”…तुम वे सारे लोग मिलकर मुझे बचाओ-
जिसके खून के गारे से
पिरामिड बने, मीनारें बनीं, दीवारें बनीं,
क्योंकि मुझको बचाना उस औरत को बचाना है,
जिसकी लाश मोहनजोदड़ो के तालाब की आखिरी सीढ़ी पर
पड़ी है।
मुझको बचाना उन इंसानों को बचाना है,
जिनकी हड्डियां तालाब में बिखरी पड़ी हैं ।
मुझको बचाना अपने पुरखों को बचाना है,
मुझको बचाना अपने बच्चों को बचाना है,
तुम मुझे बचाओ!
मैं तुम्हारा कवि हूं। ”

और यह कवि बचा रहेगा, उन लोगों के बीच जिन्हें उसने जान से ज़्यादा प्यार किया है और जिनसे उसने खुद को बचाए रखने की उम्मीद की है. विद्रोही में पितृसत्ता-धर्मसत्ता और राजसत्ता के हर छ्द्म, हर पाखण्ड के खिलाफ अपरम्पार गुस्सा, तीखी घृणा है. प्राचीन और समकालीन मिथकों का कविता में रचा उनका पाठ हर उस शोषक , हर उस आततायी को तिलमिला देगा जिसे अपनी बदमाशियों को छिपाने के लिए संस्कृति की पोशाक चाहिए. विद्रोही ने कलजुगहे मजूर की आत्मा में प्रवेश किया और उसकी चाहतों का ऐसा अपूर्व विप्लवी, अछोर संसार रचा  जो पूरी हिन्दी कविता में अनन्य है, जिसे यहाँ मैं पूरा ही उद्धृत कर रहा हूँ- 

” जनि जनिहा मनइया जजीर मांगात
ई कलिजुगहा मजूर पूरी सीर मांगात
बीड़ी-पान मांगात
सिगरेट मांगात
कॉफ़ी-चाय मांगात
कप-प्लेट मांगात
नमकीन मांगात
आमलेट मांगात
कि पसिनवा के बाबू आपन रेट मांगात
ई भरुकवा की जगहा गिलास मांगात
औ पतरवा के बदले थार मांगात
पूरा माल मांगात
मलिकाना मांगात
बाबू हमसे पूछा ता ठकुराना मांगात
दूधे -दहिए के बरे अहिराना मांगात
दुलहिनी के बरे बरसाना मांगात
आलू-भांटा बरे बोड़री के चक मांगात
अंचारे बरे लखनी के बाग मांगात
बिहारै बरे पूरा वृन्दावन मांगात
गोड़ धोवै बरे राजा गंगासागर मांगात
अंचावै बरे पूरा जगन्नाथ मांगात
गंगा-जमुना मांगात  सरस्वती मांगात
तौ सौवै बरे जनक के बगीचा मांगात
दरी मांगै, गद्दा मांगै औ गलीचा मांगात
अपने बिटुआ के अंजोरिया का बच्चा मांगात
और बियाहे बरे राजा अंगरक्खा मांगात
औ बराते बरे बाजा अलगोजा मांगात
न ता धोखी मांगात ऽ ऽ न ता धोखा मांगात
न ता ओझा मांगात ऽ ऽ न ता सोखा मांगात
सोझा-साझा ई मनइया शासन सोझा मांगात
न इनाम मांगात ऽ ऽ न इकराम मांगात
न कउनो भीख मांगात, न अनुदान मांगात
न गऊदान मांगात ऽ ऽ न रतिदान मांगात
ई सड़किया के बीचे खुलेआम मांगात
मांगे बहुतै सकारे, सरे शाम मांगात
आधी रतियौ के मांगे, आपन दाम मांगात
ई तो खाय बरे घोंघवा के खीर मांगात
दुलहिनिया के द्रोपदी के चीर मांगात
औ नचावै बरे बानर महावीर मांगात
न ता साधू मांगात ऽ ऽ न फकीर मांगात
ना ई तोहरी तिरथिया के नीर मांगात
ई अपनी मइया बहिनिया से बीर मांगात
जनि जनिहा मनइया जगीर मांगात
ई कलिजुगहा मजूर पूरी सीर मांगात ऽ ऽ जनि जनिहा मनइया जगीर मांगात

विद्रोही की कविता के हलवाहे, चरवाहे, केवट, कहार, दलित, मजदूर, किसान, औरतें, बच्चे जितना अपनी यातनाओं, उतना ही अपने सपनों के साथ आते हैं. वे तमाम पंडे, पुरोहितों, मुल्ला, मौलवियों, महाजनों, ज़मीदारों, पूंजीपतियों, साम्राज्यवादियों से अपने भविष्य को लेकर ही नहीं लड़ते, बल्कि अपहृत अतीत का भी हिसाब माँगते हैं. विद्रोही की कविताएँ सबसे ज़्यादा यही लोग समझेंगे. विद्रोही हमारे अपवंचित राष्ट्र के  कवि हैं, उन लोगों के  कवि हैं जिन्हें अभी राष्ट्र बनना है. लेकिन विद्रोही के विकट व्यक्तित्व को दुनियाबी व्याकरण से समझना मुश्किल है. जिन्होंने उन्हें दुनिया से बेखबर बाउल गानेवालों की तरह अकेले में डूब कर गाते देखा है, खुद से बातें करते देखा है, भीतर के किसी श्मशान के प्रेतों से लड़ते-झगड़ते देखा है, वे विद्रोही की उस अलग, अगम और निराली दुनिया का सिर्फ बाहरी आभास पा सके हैं जिसमें प्रवेश करना शायद किसी के लिए भी आसान न था.

रमाशंकर यादव 'विद्रोही' का जन्म ३ दिसंबर, १९५७ को ऐरी फिरोजपुर ( जिला सुल्तानपुर) में श्री रामनारायण यादव व श्रीमती करमा देवी के घर हुआ. बचपन में ही शांतिदेवी से विवाह हो गया. शान्ति जी पढ़ती थीं और वे भैंसे चराते थे. गाँव में चर्चा होती कि रमाशंकर की पत्नी उन जैसे अनपढ़ को छोड़ देगी. इसी भय से विद्रोही शिक्षा के प्रति प्रेरित हुए. प्रारम्भिक शिक्षा गाँव के स्कूल में हुई , फिर सरस्वती इंटर कालेज, उमरी से इंटर पास किया और राज डिग्री कालेज, बनवारीपुर, सुलतानपुर से बी.ए. किया. एल.एल. बी. की पढ़ाई धनाभाव के चलते पूरी नहीं कर पाए. नौकरी की, लेकिन नौकरी ज़्यादा दिन उन्हें बांध नहीं पाई. १९८० में दिल्ली के जवाहरलाल नेहरू विश्विद्यालय में हिन्दी से एम. ए. करने आ गए. १९८३ के छात्र आन्दोलन में बढ़ चढ़ कर हिस्सा लेने के चलते कैंपस से निकल दिए गए. १९८५ में उनपर मुक़दमा चला. तबसे उन्होंने आन्दोलन की राह से पीछे पलटकर नहीं देखा. वाम राजनीति और संस्कृतिप्रेमी छात्रों की कई पीढियों ने विद्रोही को उनकी ही शर्तों पर स्वीकार और प्यार किया है और विद्रोही छात्रों के हर न्यायपूर्ण आंदोलन में उनके साथ तख्ती उठाए, नारे लगाते, कविताएं सुनाते, सड़क पर मार्च करते रहे, यहाँ तक कि कल तक जब उन्होंने आखिरी साँसें लीं. जे़ एन. यू. में रहने के  चलते विद्रोही की आवाज़ दिल्ली की सडकों पर, बैरिकेडों और पुलिस पिकेटों के सामने तमाम तरह के लोकतांत्रिक जुलूसों, प्रदर्शनों के समय दशकों तक गूंजती रही है. जन संस्कृति मंच के राष्ट्रीय पार्षद वे २००८ के राष्ट्रीय सम्मलेन में बने जो कवि धूमिल के गाँव खेवली में हुआ था. उसके बाद से दिल्ली के  बाहर भी उत्तर प्रदेश, बिहार, छत्तीसगढ आदि तमाम जगहों पर आयोजनों और आन्दोलनों में बुलाए जाते. विद्रोही कविता लिखते नहीं , कहते थे. उनकी खडी बोली की काफी कवितायेँ मित्रों ने लिपिबद्ध कीं जो 'नयी खेती' संग्रह में छपीं. कचोट इस बात की है कि उनकी ढेरों अवधी रचनाएं रिकार्ड नहीं की जा सकीं. एक स्मृति सदा के लिए खो गयी.   

याद आता है कि गोरख पाण्डेय के गाँव जाते हुए कैसे बच्चों जैसी जिज्ञासा से भरे और उत्फुल्ल थे. आन्दोलनों और प्रतिवाद सभाओं के दौरान कविता सुनाकर बच्चों की तरह उनका खुश होना, उसे अपना एकमात्र तमगा और पुरस्कार बताना याद आता है. याद आता है पटना के गांधी मैदान के निकटवर्ती चौराहे पर उनके कविता-पाठ के दौरान रिक्शेवालों, खोमचेवालों और मजूरों का स्वतःस्फूर्त जुटना और ताली बजाना. विद्रोही जहां जाते, हाथों हाथ लिए जाते. बाहर के लोग भी उन्हें उतना ही प्यार करते जितना उन्हें जे.एन.यू. के छात्रों से हासिल हुआ था. जे. एन.यू. में नबारूण दा के  काव्यपाठ के कार्यक्रम के बारे में सुधीर सुमन ने ११ दिसंबर, २०११ को मुझे विस्तृत मेल लिखा जिसका एक अंश नबारूण और विद्रोही की भेंट के बारे में था. दुर्ग में दोनों की मुलाक़ात हो चुकी थी. सुधीर ने लिखा, " जेएनयू के कार्यक्रम से बाहर निकलते वक्त जिस गर्मजोशी और प्यार से नबारूण दा छात्रों और जनता के प्यारे कवि विद्रोही से गले मिले, वह मेरी चेतना में एक बेहद सुकूनदेह अहसास की तरह दर्ज हो गया, जैसे बेचैन दिल को करार आ गया। पूरे देश में, खासकर हिंदी पट्टी में विद्रोही को जनता प्यार करती है, छात्रों के बीच वे बेहद लोकप्रिय हैं। उन्हें अपने लिए कोई कोई फंड, कोई पुरस्कार, सरकारों की कोई नजरे-इनायत नहीं चाहिए, उनके कवि को किसी साहित्यिक प्रोमोटर की जरूरत नहीं है….. आंदोलनकारियों और सामान्य जनता के बीच वे मशहूर हैं…., मैंने मन ही मन नबारूण दा को सलाम किया कि उन्होंने जनता के कवि को सम्मान दिया.., शायद यही जनता के क्रांतिकारी कवि की असली पहचान है।" आज दोनों हमारे बीच नहीं हैं. क्या सचमुच वे हमारे बीच नहीं हैं? विद्रोही इसे नहीं मानते. यकीन न हो तो उनकी ही एक कविता के इस अंश से आपको तसल्ली हो जाएगी-

"मरने को चे ग्वेरा भी मर गए
और चंद्रशेखर भी
लेकिन वास्तव में कोई नहीं मरा है
सब जिंदा हैं
जब मैं जिंदा हूँ
इस अकाल में
मुझे क्या कम मारा गया है
इस कलिकाल में
अनेकों बार मुझे मारा गया है
अनेकों बार घोषित किया गया है
राष्ट्रीय अखबारों में पत्रिकाओं में
कथाओं में, कहानियों में
कि विद्रोही मर गया।
तो क्या मैं सचमुच मर गया!
नहीं मैं जिंदा हूँ
और गा रहा हूं…… "

( प्रणय कृष्ण, महासचिव, जन संस्कृति मंच द्वारा जारी)

The post ‘मैं जिंदा हूँ और गा रहा हूं.’ – ‘विद्रोही’ appeared first on SabrangIndia.

]]>