On Friday night around 8:30 PM, Acharya, accompanied by BJP leaders and supporters, marched to the Jama Masjid from an ‘Akrosh Sabha’ held at Badi Chaupar. The protesters raised slogans such as ‘Jai Shri Ram’ and ‘Pakistan Murdabad,’ and displayed saffron flags and torches. Allegedly, some individuals entered the mosque premises, pasted posters reading ‘Pakistan Murdabad,’ and raised offensive slogans. Eyewitnesses reported that Acharya entered the mosque wearing shoes, a gesture considered highly disrespectful in Islamic tradition.

The protest led to heightened communal tensions, with a large number of people gathering to protest against the MLA’s actions.

According to reports, Congress MLAs Rafiq Khan and Amin Kagzi, along with Police Commissioner Biju George Joseph, arrived at the scene to control the situation. Despite their efforts, the unrest continued to simmer.

जयपुर: BJP विधायक बालमुकुंद आचार्य ने भीड़ के साथ जामा मस्जिद की सीढ़ियों पर आकर लगाए ‘जय श्री राम’ के नारे, मस्जिद कमेटी ने ज़ारी किया वीडियो.#BalmukundAcharya #BJP #Jaipur pic.twitter.com/DkEhO31Ycu

— Journo Mirror (@JournoMirror) April 26, 2025

After controversy, BJP MLA issued apology, urged for stay united against terrorism

In the face of mounting backlash, Acharya issued a video statement on Saturday, April 26, 2025, expressing regret over the incident. He stated, “If anyone’s sentiments were hurt due to the posters or my words, I sincerely apologise. It was never my intention to hurt any community or religion. At this time, unity among all of us is very important.” He emphasised that India functions according to the Constitution, where every citizen has the right to respect their religious sentiments.

भाजपा विधायक बालमुकुंद आचार्य ने मुस्लिम समुदाय से मांगी माफ़ी ,जयपुर की जामा मस्जिद की सीड़ियों पर चढ़कर नारा लगाने का था मामला मुस्लिम समुदाय ने की है विधायक को गिरफ़्तार करने की मांग, FIR भी दर्ज मस्जिद के नायब सदर ने कहा- माहौल ख़राब करने का प्रयास कर रहा है विधायक pic.twitter.com/p9Rbsy1mQb

— Millat Times (@Millat_Times) April 26, 2025

Acharya further appealed for calm, urging people to stay united and support Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s efforts to combat terrorism and respond strongly to Pakistan. However, his apology did little to quell the growing discontent among the Muslim community and political opponents.

Moreover, BJP MLA Balmukund Acharya has also called for an end to the speculation surrounding a proposed bandh in Jaipur. In a message posted from his official X handle, he wrote that, “Many rumours are being spread about a Jaipur bandh tomorrow. I want to make it very clear — there should be no bandh.”

जयपुरवासियों से मेरा निवेदन…

कल जयपुर बंद को लेकर कई अफवाहें फैलाई जा रही हैं। मैं आप सबसे साफ़ शब्दों में कहना चाहता हूँ — कोई बंद न करें।

आपका जो स्नेह और विश्वास मुझे मिला है, वह मेरे लिए गौरव की बात है। लेकिन मैं नहीं चाहता कि आप अपने व्यापार का नुकसान करें।
हमें काम पर… pic.twitter.com/sp6OviQyXr

— Swami Balmukundacharya (Modi Ka Parivar) (@BMacharyaBJP) April 26, 2025

Expressing gratitude for the public’s support, Acharya further added, “The love and trust I have received from you is a matter of great pride for me. However, I do not want you to harm your businesses. We must continue our work, keep the markets open, and remain united.”

FIR filed against MLA for hurting religious sentiments

After the incident, the Jama Masjid Committee lodged a complaint against Acharya, leading to the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) under several sections of the Indian Penal Code. The charges included sections 298 (Injuring or defiling a place of worship), 300, (Disturbing religious assembly), 302 (Uttering words with intent to wound religious feelings) and 351(3) (Criminal intimidation).

BJP MLA Balmukund Acharya booked for protesting outside mosque in Jaipur

Read @ANI Story | https://t.co/zcs4xWlpYa#BalmukundAcharya #Jaipur #Protest pic.twitter.com/vSfwCK9RiY

— ANI Digital (@ani_digital) April 26, 2025

The police investigation was transferred to the CID-Crime Branch, the nodal agency for probing cases involving public representatives. As communal tensions spread across the city, a heavy police force was deployed at the Jama Masjid to maintain law and order. Nearly all shops in the market were closed, and the police conducted a flag march on the main road of Johari Bazaar. Contingents of the Rajasthan Armed Constabulary (RAC) and Special Task Force (STF) were also deployed in sensitive areas of the state capital.

Members of the Muslim community staged a counter-protest near Badi Chaupad

The incident sparked widespread outrage among the Muslim community. After evening prayers, a crowd of restive youths gathered outside the mosque in Johari Bazaar, raising slogans demanding Acharya’s immediate arrest. The police used mild force to disperse the crowd, but the situation remained tense.

In response, members of the Muslim community staged a counter-protest near Badi Chaupad, adjacent to Jaipur’s famous landmark, the Hawa Mahal. They raised slogans and displayed posters of their own. A brief altercation between the two groups followed, leading to the registration of an FIR against Acharya at Manak Chowk police station. The FIR accused him of inciting religious sentiments and disrupting social harmony.

The Indian Express reported that, MLA Rafiq Khan said, “We have no objection to slogans like ‘Pakistan Murdabad’ or ‘Terrorism Murdabad.’ We too oppose terrorism. But the BJP MLA deliberately tried to provoke religious sentiments under the pretext of the protest.”

Muslim leaders hold press meet over Jama Masjid incident

Following the incident, a press conference was held on Saturday (April 26) at the Jama Masjid in Johari Bazaar, Jaipur, prominent Muslim leaders were present at the meet, including MLAs Amin Kagzi and Rafiq Khan, Rajasthan Waqf Board Chairman Khan U Khan Budhawali, and Jamaat-e-Islami Hind’s state president Mohammad Najimuddin.

State president of Jamaat-e-Islami Hind, Mohammad Najimuddin, began by condemning the terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Kashmir. However, he also levelled serious allegations against MLA Balmukund Acharya, claiming that Acharya and his supporters raised provocative and objectionable slogans both inside and outside the mosque during Friday prayers—a time considered highly sacred in Islam, as per a report in the Dainik Bhaskar.

Community leaders give administration a two-day ultimatum

Najimuddin revealed that the Police Commissioner had assured them of action. However, he added that the community had issued an ultimatum to the administration—demanding action against Acharya by April 27 or 28. He stated that they would meet the Police Commissioner again on April 29, and if no concrete steps were taken, a mass agitation would be launched.

“What kind of MLA behaves like this?” he asked, alleging that Acharya does nothing but provoke religious sentiments. “A person like him does not deserve to remain an elected representative,” Najimuddin asserted, as reported

No Muslim supports Pakistan, we will always chant ‘Pakistan Murdabad’: Congress MLA Amin Kagzi

According to the Dainik Bhaskar, local Congress MLA Amin Kagzi addressed another emerging narrative—accusations that Muslims objected to the anti-Pakistan slogans. Kagzi firmly dispelled these rumours, stated that, “There is a misconception being spread about the ‘Pakistan Murdabad’ slogans raised outside the mosque. Neither I, nor the Muslim community here, have any sympathy for Pakistan. We will always chant ‘Pakistan Murdabad’ when the situation demands it.”

He went on to accuse Acharya of forcefully entering the mosque, putting up posters, and creating a disruptive atmosphere. Kagzi said Muslim leaders had already met with the Police Commissioner and given the administration a two-day deadline to act on the community’s demands.

 “Pakistan Murdabad Then, Now and Forever”, said MLA Rafiq Khan

Echoing similar sentiments, MLA Rafiq Khan stated that the entire country is grieving the tragedy that unfolded in Pahalgam. Referring to the recent all-party meeting, he said that all parties agreed to support the government in responding to the attack—so why, he asked, was Acharya trying to politicise the issue?

“Pakistan Murdabad was, is, and always will be our slogan,” Khan declared. “Today, we are standing with posters that say ‘Pakistan Murdabad’ right inside the mosque. We are not upset about the posters. What we condemn is the act of entering a mosque during prayer and shouting slogans. That was disrespectful” he said, reported Bhaskar

He alleged that Acharya was deliberately trying to disrupt communal peace in the city, adding that the BJP MLA has repeatedly violated the law, yet no action has been taken against him. Khan warned that the community would take to the streets if no action was taken within the next two days.

What lies ahead: peace or protest?

The situation in Jaipur remains tense. Muslim leaders have so far shown restraint, opting for legal routes and official communication with law enforcement. But the community’s patience seems to be wearing thin. With deadlines issued and the promise of protests looming large, it remains to be seen whether the administration will act against Balmukund Acharya—or risk further communal unrest in Rajasthan’s capital.

Political fallout: BJP leadership distances itself

The controversy drew criticism from within the BJP as well. According to reports, Chief Minister Bhajanlal Sharma and senior party leaders were unhappy with Acharya’s actions, especially given the sensitive environment. State BJP President Madan Rathore reportedly called Acharya to express his disapproval. Following the conversation, Acharya assured the leadership that he would exercise greater caution in the future and avoid similar incidents.

Previous controversies: a pattern of provocative actions

This incident is not the first time Acharya has found himself at the centre of controversy. Earlier, he had campaigned against the consumption of meat, the use of loudspeakers by mosques, and the wearing of hijabs by girls in schools. He also demanded the removal of Bangladeshi and Rohingya refugees from Jaipur. These actions have drawn criticism from various quarters, with opponents accusing him of stoking communal tensions for political gain.

In one notable incident, Acharya was accused of trespassing and inappropriate behaviour at a Shia religious site in Jaipur’s Bada Badanpura area. Community leaders urged swift action, citing threats to communal harmony and complaints about police inaction as troubling factors.

The road ahead: nurturing communal harmony

The events of May 2 have laid bare the fragility of communal relations in Jaipur. Though Acharya’s apology may have been intended to calm tensions, the strain it placed on inter-community trust is hard to ignore. While the courts will eventually determine legal accountability, the deeper task lies in mending the city’s social fabric.

Leaders from both Hindu and Muslim communities have stepped forward, calling for honest dialogue, mutual respect, and a reaffirmation of shared values. They remind us that India’s strength lies in its commitment to unity in diversity, and that upholding constitutional ideals must remain a common purpose.

The protest outside the Jama Masjid—and everything that followed—highlights how easily words and actions can shape, and sometimes shake, the delicate balance of communal life. Political leaders, in particular, must tread carefully, knowing their influence carries real weight in such moments.

As Jaipur looks to move forward, the path must be one of listening, empathy, and rebuilding trust—step by step, neighbour by neighbour.

Related:

Rajasthan: Newly elected BJP MLA from Hawa Mahal constituency, Bal Mukund Acharya launches assault on minority-run meat food stalls

Hindu Extremist Groups Target Meat Shops in Multiple Indian Cities

The post BJP MLA Balmukund Acharya apologises amid uproar over Mosque protest in Jaipur appeared first on SabrangIndia.

The Case in Brief: From suspension to the Supreme Court

Ramadas K.S., a first-generation learner from a Dalit family in Kerala, first joined TISS in 2015 to pursue a Master’s in Media and Cultural Studies. In 2021, he enrolled in the integrated MPhil-PhD programme in Development Studies. His academic record earned him a National Fellowship for Scheduled Caste candidates in 2023, awarded by the Union Ministry of Social Justice following his successful performance in the UGC-NET examination.

In April 2024, Dalit PhD scholar Ramdas was suspended for two years by the Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS), sparking widespread concern about academic freedom and political expression on Indian campuses. The disciplinary action was triggered by his participation in a protest against the BJP government and the National Education Policy during a Parliament March in Delhi, organised under the banner of the Progressive Students’ Forum–TISS (PSF–TISS). The institute claimed that by using the name “TISS” in posters and slogans, Ramdas had given the impression that the institute endorsed the protest, thereby bringing it into disrepute.

The institute also cited past instances of activism, including an overnight protest outside the TISS Director’s residence and a social media post encouraging students to watch Ram Ke Naam, a documentary critical of Hindutva politics. According to TISS, this pattern of “repetitive misconduct” and prioritising political activity over academics justified the suspension. Ramdas, who was on a scholarship from the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, also had his fellowship withheld.

In May 2024, Ramdas challenged the suspension before the Bombay High Court, arguing that it violated his fundamental rights, particularly his freedom of expression and association. However, in a verdict delivered in March 2025, the High Court upheld the suspension, stating that while Ramdas had a right to his political views, he had crossed the line by linking those views with the institute’s name. The judgment has since raised alarm among student groups and civil society over its implications for dissent in academic spaces. Pursuant to the judgment delivered by the High Court, Ramdas had moved the Supreme Court.

Detailed analysis of the Bombay HC order may be read here.

Before the Supreme Court: Arguments and considerations

At the Supreme Court, the petitioner was represented by Senior Advocate and Former Chief Justice of Orissa High Court Dr. S. Muralidhar, who pressed for immediate relief and reinstatement. As per LiveLaw, the counsel had argued that the disciplinary proceedings lacked fairness and transparency, and that the two-year suspension imposed on a student nearing the completion of his PhD would irreparably harm his academic career. It was submitted that a student’s future should not be sacrificed for alleged procedural lapses, especially when adequate time had passed and there had been no recurrence of misconduct.

On the other side, Advocate Mr. Rajeev K. Pandey represented TISS. According to the report of LiveLaw, the institute maintained that it had acted within its rights, asserting that the Code of Conduct was binding on all students, and that institutional autonomy in disciplinary matters should be respected by the courts. TISS did not appear to offer any concessions during the hearing, nor did it appear inclined to revoke the suspension voluntarily.

Supreme Court’s Reasoning: Pragmatism over prolonged punishment

The Supreme Court Bench, comprising Justices Dipankar Datta and Manmohan, took a notably restrained and equitable approach. In its brief but effective order, the Court consciously chose not to delve into the factual or legal merits of the suspension or the underlying allegations. Instead, it focused on the broader question of what justice required at this stage.

Acknowledging that more than a year had passed since the suspension order, the Court observed that “interest of justice would be best served if the said order does not continue to operate any longer.” This key observation, reported by LiveLaw, reflects a pragmatic judicial philosophy: once sufficient time has elapsed, and where the balance of convenience shifts in favour of a student’s rehabilitation, the punitive aspect of suspension should not be allowed to frustrate academic aspirations.

The Bench further noted that their intervention was being made without expressing any opinion on the original suspension decision or on the validity of the High Court’s ruling. This hands-off approach allowed the Court to grant relief without undermining the autonomy of the educational institution or setting a precedent of judicial overreach in disciplinary matters.

“Without examining the claims and counter-claims on merits, we feel that TISS having suspended the petitioner on 18th April, 2024 and lapsing of more than a year since then, interest of justice would be best served if the order of suspension is not continued further and he be permitted to pursue the PhD course in TISS” the Court stated in its order.

The complete order may be viewed here.

Final directions of the court

Accordingly, the Supreme Court issued the following directions:

1. The suspension order dated 18 April 2024 was set aside prospectively, i.e., it would no longer remain in operation from the date of the Supreme Court’s order.
2. Ramadas was permitted to resume his PhD course at TISS with immediate effect.
3. He was directed to “faithfully observe the Code of Conduct” of the institution during the remainder of his academic tenure.
4. The institute was granted liberty to take appropriate action should there be any further breach of conduct in the future.

Why this order matters

This ruling is important on multiple counts. First, it signals the judiciary’s role in protecting students from unnecessarily harsh and extended disciplinary actions that could cause disproportionate harm. The Supreme Court chose not to scrutinise the conduct allegations or institutional procedures in depth. Instead, it applied a time-sensitive, equity-based lens, recognising that the ultimate objective of educational discipline must be reformative—not vindictive.

Second, the case shows a subtle but important rebalancing of power between students and universities. While the Court did not curtail the institution’s authority to impose discipline or to revisit misconduct in the future, it sent a clear message: institutional autonomy cannot become a shield for actions that deny students the opportunity to complete their education, particularly when the situation is remediable and the student expresses a willingness to comply with norms.

Third, the decision upholds a compassionate and constructive vision of higher education. It recognises that students are not beyond redemption and that access to education is a fundamental pathway for growth, especially in a public institution like TISS, known for its role in nurturing social science scholarship and public service.

Reactions and significance of the verdict

The Supreme Court’s intervention has been widely hailed by student and rights-based organisations as a critical reaffirmation of campus democracy and educational equity. The Dalit Shoshan Mukti Manch (DSMM) and Jati Ant Sangharsh Samiti-Maharashtra (JASS) welcomed the verdict as a corrective to the “arbitrary” and “discriminatory” action of the TISS administration.

In a joint statement, they described the verdict as a “victory for student rights” and a strong message in favour of protecting the rights of students from marginalised communities who voice dissent against state policies. “Denying education to students is not merely a personal setback—it’s a fundamental rights issue,” they asserted.

As per a report of The Wire, Ramadas echoed this sentiment in a heartfelt Facebook post following the verdict, stating:

“On the 366th day of legal proceedings since approaching the High Court, I am officially a student again – from today – at the very institution that denied me education 380 days ago. This fight was never just about one student. It was about the fundamental rights of many and the soul of campus democracy.”

“Surviving in a city like Mumbai without access to education and financial support is not easy, but challenging the suspension was the only way forward. I’m happy that I can now return to my studies,” he told EdexLive.

He also expressed solidarity with student struggles at other universities including Jamia Millia Islamia, Jadavpur University, and Ambedkar University Delhi.

Ramadas acknowledged the significance of this solidarity, “I’m grateful for the support I received from the student community, including those at TISS and various student organisations across India. Human rights activists, writers, journalists, and others in civil society all stood in solidarity with me. It meant a lot.”

However, he also emphasised the darker side of his battle. “I cannot forget the cyberbullying and slander campaigns that took place, and the threats I received in different languages. I hope this ends now,” he added, while speaking to EdexLive.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s order in Ramadas KS’s case is an instructive example of judicial pragmatism and humaneness. Without interfering with the autonomy of academic institutions or opening a floodgate for challenges to disciplinary actions, the Court crafted a path that allowed a student to return to his studies without formally ruling on the merits of the dispute.

In a time when student rights and institutional discipline often find themselves in conflict, this judgment reminds us that the pursuit of justice sometimes lies not in prolonged legal battles, but in timely, balanced, and forward-looking solutions.

Related:

Revoke suspension of Dalit scholar, Ramadas: TISS action condemned

Dissent Under Siege: Police action, suspensions, and the shrinking democratic space at TISS

2025 NCERT Textbooks: Mughals, Delhi Sultanate out; ‘sacred geography’, Maha Kumbh in

The post “Let the Suspension Not Continue Further”: Supreme Court allows Dalit scholar to resume PhD at TISS appeared first on SabrangIndia.

Himanshi, a PhD scholar from Gurugram, addressed reporters with a quiet dignity that belied the enormity of her loss. “I just want the nation to pray for him. Wherever he is, I hope he is healthy and happy,” she said, her voice trembling yet resolute. In the face of communal fault-lines that such tragedies often deepen, Himanshi was unwavering in her message: “We don’t want people going against Muslims or Kashmiris. We want peace and only peace. Of course, we want justice.”

#WATCH | Karnal | “…We don’t want people going against Muslims or Kashmiris. We want peace and only peace. Of course, we want justice,” says Himanshi, wife of Indian Navy Lieutenant Vinay Narwal, who was killed in the Pahalgam terror attack. pic.twitter.com/LaOpBVe7z2

— ANI (@ANI) May 1, 2025

Karnal, Haryana: On the birthday of the late Indian Navy Lieutenant Vinay Narwal, who was killed in the Pahalgam terror attack, his wife Himanshi says, “I just want the entire nation to pray for him, that wherever he is, he remains healthy and happy…” pic.twitter.com/8MdugaqmOg

— IANS (@ians_india) May 1, 2025

Her words came during a moving blood donation camp held in Karnal, Haryana—Lieutenant Narwal’s hometown—on his birth anniversary. The camp was organised by the Karnal-based National Integrated Forum of Artists and Activists (NIFAA) to honour his memory. As blood was donated to save lives, the symbolism was not lost on the gathering: while terrorists spilled the blood of innocents, citizens came together to give theirs to sustain life.

Narwal’s mother and Himanshi broke down during the tributes, surrounded by family, friends, Navy officers, and mourners. Among those present was BJP MLA Jagmohan Anand, who joined in paying respects to the young officer whose life was cut tragically short. In their speeches, many described Lieutenant Narwal as a spirited and devoted officer whose memory would endure in the hearts of those he served.

Just six days before the attack, Vinay and Himanshi had tied the knot in what was described as a union of two closely bonded families. They had planned a honeymoon in Switzerland, but visa delays led them to Pahalgam—a decision that changed everything. In a video that circulated widely after the attack, Himanshi is seen at the crime scene, distraught, describing how a man approached them, asked her husband if he was Muslim, and upon hearing “no,” shot him point blank. “I was eating bhel puri… and he just shot him,” she said through sobs.

Lieutenant Narwal’s colleagues remembered him as cheerful, courageous, and deeply committed to his duty. As per a report of Times of India, his sister Shristi, just 21, lit his funeral pyre on Wednesday in Karnal, surrounded by thousands of mourners chanting “Bharat ka veer amar rahe” and “Pakistan Murdabad.” Navy personnel fired a gun salute as the nation bid farewell to one of its bravest. The TOI report provided that speaking to Haryana CM Nayab Singh Saini at the funeral, Shristi voiced her anguish: “He was alive for some time, but no one came to help him. I want them [the terrorists] dead.”

Yet even in the shadow of such pain, it was Himanshi’s refusal to give in to hate that stood out. She could have spoken the language of vengeance, the kind so often heard in the aftermath of terror. But instead, she chose to uphold the values her husband lived and died for—peace, justice, and unity. Her appeal was not just for justice in the legal sense, but for the moral integrity of a nation that must not let violence divide it further.

As per the Hindustan Times, NIFAA chairperson Pritpal Singh Pannu perhaps captured the spirit of the day best when he said, “A young officer with his whole life ahead was lost to terrorism. Soldiers shed blood to protect us, but today, we shed our blood to save lives. That is our tribute.”

No act can undo the pain. No tribute can replace the future stolen from a newlywed couple dreaming of their life together. But in choosing to stand for peace amid heartbreak, Himanshi Narwal reminded the country of what courage truly looks like.

Related:

Lalita Ramdas hails Himanshi Narwal’s stoic courage in open letter

Pahalgam: Tripura Police Face Allegations of Bias Amid Arrests for Social Media Posts

Echoes of Hate: Online anti-Muslim hate spreads against Muslim businesses and workers after Pahalgam attack

Pahalgam attack sparks nationwide turmoil, Kashmiri students face a chilling wave of hate across India

A Tranquil Paradise Shattered: The Pahalgam terror attack

The post In Grief, She Chose Peace: Himanshi Narwal appeals for communal harmony on slain Lt Vinay Narwal’s birthday appeared first on SabrangIndia.

However, the arrest failed to pacify public outrage. By Wednesday night (April 30), around 9:30 PM, a group of men gathered near the market area where the accused had an office and began targeting businesses owned by members of the Muslim community. Videos later circulated on social media showed shops being vandalised, staffers slapped, and stones hurled at a nearby mosque. Several shops and eateries were damaged, and incidents of assault were reported. Though police intervened to de-escalate the situation, their response was widely seen as inadequate.

Right-wing outrage targets Muslim businesses in retaliatory fury

Fuelled by the accusation against the elderly Muslim man, Hindu nationalist organisations swiftly mobilised, broadening their focus from the individual to the entire Muslim community in Nainital. These groups, often operating under the banner of protecting Hindu interests, engaged in a campaign of collective punishment. Their actions extended beyond mere condemnation of the alleged crime, manifesting in direct attacks on Muslim-owned businesses and the physical assault of Muslim individuals.

Despite the prompt arrest of the accused and the completion of the minor’s medical examination – steps indicating the legal process was underway – these right-wing outfits continued their aggressive actions. Their demands often included handing over the accused to their custody, bypassing the judicial system entirely, and further inflamed the communal tensions by propagating a narrative of collective guilt and demanding discriminatory actions against the Muslim population of Nainital

Public reaction escalates into mob violence

The violence on Wednesday night appeared to be part of a broader, emotionally charged backlash. Despite assurances from law enforcement that the accused had been arrested and was facing severe charges, a large crowd moved through the central town area, launching coordinated attacks. Most of the affected establishments belonged to Muslims, heightening communal tensions. Shopkeepers and local residents described the scene as chaotic, with shutters broken, staff beaten, and customers fleeing. Among the worst affected was Monish Jalal, a restaurant owner in Gadi Padaw, who condemned the assault on his livelihood, saying, “We want justice for the girl, but what connection do we have with the accused?” reported the Times of India.

Others, like Bimla Devi, a senior resident running a family tea stall since the British era, described the damage to her stall as “complete destruction.” Both expressed dismay at the lack of timely police action and called for justice — both for the victim and for innocent business owners caught in the crossfire, as reported

Against the tide: Hindu woman stands up for Muslim community

In a striking display of moral courage amidst the rising communal frenzy, a Hindu woman emerged as an unexpected beacon of reason. As a rally of Hindu nationalist supporters marched through Nainital, their chants laced with anti-Muslim slogans in response to the alleged sexual assault, she bravely stepped forward to confront them. Her act was a powerful testament to shared humanity, as she challenged the very premise of their collective blame and the injustice of targeting the entire Muslim community for the alleged actions of one individual. Undeterred by the charged atmosphere and the potential for backlash, she directly rebuked the mob for their indiscriminate attacks on innocent Muslim shopkeepers, emphasising their lack of connection to the alleged crime.

Furthermore, she vocally condemned the abusive and derogatory language employed during the rally.

BJP leader threatened Muslim food vendors

In a video that quickly circulated on social media, BJP leader Vipin Pandey openly threatened to Muslim food vendors, insisting that their shop names must explicitly reflect their Muslim identity. Pandey warned that if the vendors failed to comply within a day, they would face physical assault. The remarks have drawn sharp criticism from various quarters, with many calling them inflammatory and divisive.

Civil society groups and political opponents have condemned the threat as a blatant attempt to stoke communal tensions and marginalise minority communities.

Meanwhile, local authorities have yet to take official action, prompting concerns over law enforcement’s response to hate speech and intimidation.

Political and community demands mount

The unrest prompted swift political and administrative responses. A group of residents submitted a memorandum to Kumaon Commissioner Deepak Rawat, making wide-ranging demands. These included a comprehensive verification of all “outsiders,” especially those belonging to the minority community working as tenants, daily wage earners, or small business owners. They also demanded the seizure of the accused’s property as a deterrent, an inquiry into property acquisitions by individuals from the minority community in commercial areas, and the establishment of a monitoring committee to oversee regional activity.

The memorandum also called for prioritising employment opportunities for local youth, and for Nainital to be declared a “sensitive cultural zone,” complete with special policy safeguards to preserve the town’s heritage and demography.

Administrative response: crackdown on encroachments and security measures

District Magistrate Vandana took immediate administrative action by appointing magistrates to sensitive locations, including the market and mosque premises. She instructed the Nainital District Development Authority to resume its anti-encroachment drive and ordered the completion of pending hearings on illegal constructions within 15 days. On Thursday, authorities carried out marking operations at multiple locations in the city, issuing 150 challans — 100 by the Municipal Council and 50 by the Development Authority — for unauthorised structures, encroachments on public infrastructure, and unapproved construction, according to the Indian Express.

Additionally, a notice was served to the accused, stating that his property was illegal and granting him three days to present his case before further legal action. Police presence was bolstered in sensitive zones, especially around religious sites, ahead of Friday prayers. The district also increased surveillance and verification of taxis, rental services, and roadside vendors to ensure tourist safety amid the turmoil.

Strikes, closures, and tourist disruption

According to reports, the violence and growing unrest had immediate consequences for daily life in Nainital. Schools remained shut on Thursday, and traders in the town centre observed a strike, partly enforced by local right-wing organisations. Amandeep Singh, general secretary of the Nainital Vyapar Mandal, said the strike symbolised collective anger at the crime, while also noting that food arrangements were made for stranded tourists. Police checkpoints were established along major roads, and tourists reported a curfew-like atmosphere, with most shops and restaurants closed.

“The tourism business has been severely affected,” said Nainital Hotel Association President Digvijay Singh Bisht, as Indian Express reported.

Local lawyers boycott case, demand inquiry into Nainital’s changing demographics

The case also resonated within the legal community. In a strong display of protest, district court lawyers unanimously decided to withdraw legal representation from the accused. Advocate Daya Joshi stated that the local bar had also requested an investigation into the recent influx of residents in Nainital. “No lawyer from our bar council will represent this man.”

Similarly, as the Indian Express reported that Protesters have demanded strict punishment for the accused, including the confiscation of their property. They also called for thorough verification drives targeting outsiders—particularly tenants and temporary workers from a specific community—and the identification and deportation of any foreign nationals residing illegally.

Muslim organisations submitted a memorandum to DGP

Simultaneously, Muslim organisations reacted strongly to the targeted violence. In a memorandum to DGP Deepam Seth in Dehradun, they condemned both the heinous crime against the minor and the subsequent attacks on innocent community members. “We too want justice for the girl,” said Naeem Qureshi, president of the Muslim Seva Sangathan. “But the collective punishment of unrelated individuals through violence and arson is unacceptable” as reported in the Times of India.

Uttarakhand High Court takes suo moto action

Taking cognizance of the volatile situation, the Uttarakhand High Court initiated suo moto proceedings. During the hearing, government counsel J.S. Virk informed the bench that heightened security measures were in place, including vehicle checks at key entry points into Nainital — Haldwani, Bhavali, and Kaladhungi. The court, comprising Justices Manoj Kumar Tiwari and Vivek Bharti Sharma, directed authorities to maintain strict law and order, prohibit large gatherings, and monitor social media to prevent misinformation and incitement.

As reported, the bench emphasised the importance of sustained patrolling to ensure that similar unrest does not spread or recur in other sensitive regions like Haldwani. It also called on citizens to cooperate with the administration to restore peace and communal harmony.

Related:

Uttarakhand High Court orders security, condemns hate speech over Uttarkashi Mosque

Stop using politics of hate to hide failure to protect women and their rights: Open Letter to Uttarakhand Govt

Religious hate finds a stage at Dehradun Press Club, event on “how to save women from jihadis” organised

The post Nainital on communal edge after 75-year-old Muslim man booked for alleged rape of minor girl appeared first on SabrangIndia.

Somnath Suryawanshi, a 35-year-old aspirant who had travelled from Pune to Parbhani to appear for a law entrance examination, was among the 50 individuals detained by the Parbhani police on December 11 and 12, 2024, in connection with the violence that erupted after the desecration of a replica of the Constitution on December 10. Suryawanshi was allegedly picked up by the police on December 11. He died four days later, on December 15, while in judicial custody. According to police accounts, he collapsed due to shock from multiple injuries and was taken to a government hospital after complaining of chest pain inside the Parbhani district central prison.

However, a magisterial inquiry concluded on March 20, 2025, had clearly held the police responsible for Suryawanshi’s custodial death. In response, the Maharashtra State Human Rights Commission had issued notices to top state officials, including the Chief Secretary, Additional Chief Secretary (Home), Additional Director General of Police (CID – Crime), and the Deputy Superintendent of Police of Parbhani, seeking comprehensive reports.

Representing the petitioner Vijayabai Vyankat Suryawanshi, the deceased’s mother, advocate Prakash Ambedkar, assisted by advocates Sandesh More and Hitendra Gandhi, strongly argued for immediate registration of an FIR against the police officers allegedly responsible. The petitioner further demanded the constitution of a court-monitored Special Investigation Team (SIT) to ensure an independent and impartial probe into the custodial death. Advocate Gandhi questioned the credibility of a police-led inquiry in a case where the police are themselves accused, asserting that continuing the current investigation would only further erode public trust in the system.

Drawing parallels with the precedent set in the 2023 Badlapur custodial death case, where the Bombay High Court had ordered an SIT to probe the custodial killing of Akshay Shinde—an accused in a sexual assault case allegedly killed in a staged encounter—advocate Gandhi urged the court to issue similar directions in Suryawanshi’s case. In the Badlapur matter, Justices Revati Mohite Dere and Neela Gokhale had ordered an SIT led by Joint Commissioner of Police (Crime), Mumbai, Lakhmi Gautam, and allowed him to form his own team, led by a Deputy Commissioner of Police, with officers from any department of his choosing.

During Tuesday’s proceedings, public prosecutor A.B. Girase, representing the Maharashtra government, informed the court that the state intends to file an affidavit in response to the concerns raised.

The court’s restraint order, along with its strong observations, underscores a growing judicial intolerance toward the mishandling of custodial death investigations. It also signals a potential shift towards stricter judicial oversight in such cases. If the court accedes to the petitioner’s demand for an SIT and guidelines for handling custodial deaths, the outcome of this case could have far-reaching consequences for accountability mechanisms in police custody cases across the state.

Related:

Magistrate probe indicts Parbhani police in Somnath Suryawanshi custodial death: MSHRC

Parbhani police under scrutiny: Fact-finding report exposes allegations of brutality, illegality, and constitutional violations

Massive all-party march in Parbhani demands justice for Dalit youth’s custodial death

Special Report: ‘They came like monkeys; they came like Nazis.’ Ambedkari Bastis in Parbhani face the traumas of police brutality

The post Biased and Preconceived: Bombay HC criticises police inquiry into Parbhani custodial death of Somnath Suryawanshi appeared first on SabrangIndia.

What an example..
Hope the sarkar will issue a strong message now to stop the shameful acts of hate, vengeance and petty retribution.

Himanshi

My name is Lalita Ramdas

I am a Navy daughter and a Navy Wife
My father and my Husband were both Chiefs of the Naval Staff….the first and the thirteenth,!

This is a personal tribute from possibly one of the oldest Navy daughters/wives alive today ….to the newest and youngest among the special fraternity of Naval Wives.

I am so proud of you as I watch the clip of your words to the press, over and over again. Your extraordinary strength, composure and conviction when you speak out against hate and targeting of Muslims and Kashmiris after the horrific killing of so many innocent men in Pahalgam on the 22nd is truly remarkable! And so badly needed in our times
“We only want peace”, you said, and of course rightly, “we want justice too”.

You are the perfect Fauji wife Himanshi, true to the spirit of the service, the constitution and to our secular values.

You are clearly a woman who knows her mind, and there could not have been a more courageous partner of a Navy man like Vinay.

You have echoed the thoughts and feelings of every thinking citizen of this country..
And we should all take your message of love and compassion far and wide.

Thank you Himanshi

I wrote you a letter just two days ago, which I sent c/o the CNS sectt.
Hope you get it.

And since they kindly sent me your address I will be mailing you my letter directly to Karnal..

Lalita
Himanshi Zindabad!
Nari Shakthi Zindabad
Bhartiya Nao Sena Zindabad
Jai Hind – Jai Jagat
.

https://www.threads.com/@zoo_bear_/post/DJG0cA3yCek?xmt=AQGzDVH4yZrWa-Puwqf17C-H8LizxrI69Pl59fY7WIel_g

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/16P9achuRj/

The post Lalita Ramdas hails Himanshi Narwal’s stoic courage in open letter appeared first on SabrangIndia.

Ram  and  Hanuman  in  Bengali  popular  psyche

To  come  down  to  brass  tacks,  Ram  and  Hanuman  had  always  been  butts  of  ridicule  in  Bengali  popular  sayings.  To  quote  one  –  “Kala  khelo  jato  bandor,  rajya  pelo  Ramchandar”  (Ram  acquired  the  throne  due  to  the  banana-chewing  monkeys) .   The  followers  of  Ram  are  looked  down  upon  as  exploiters  and  humbugs,  as  the  following  saying  indicates:  “ Ram  nam  mukhey,  chhuri  rekhey bukey”  (They  swear  by  the  name  of  Ram,  while  threatening  us  with  a  dagger  at  our  chests).  (Re:  Sushil  Kumar  Dey:  Bangla  Prabad).

In   Bengali  colloquial  slang,  the  name  Ram  is  often  used  in  a  derisive  and  derogatory  sense   –  like  the  term   Ram-chhagal  (a  goat  named  Ram)  to  describe  a  fat  goat.  It  is  also  used  as  a  suffix  in  terms  like  Boka-Ram  (a  foolish  Ram)  to  dismiss  someone  as  an  idiot.   The  trend  of  demystification  of  Ram  in  Bengal  reached  its  height  when  the  Bengali  poet  Madhusudan  Dutta  in  the  mid-nineteenth  century  composed  the  iconoclastic  epic  poem  Meghnad Badh  Kavya,  where  he  paid  homage  to  Ravana’s  son  Meghnad  (known  also  as  Indrajit)  who  more  than  once  defeated  Ram  and  Lakshman  in  the  battlefield  as  described  in  Valmiki’s  Ramayana.  In  his  poem,  Madhusudan  denounced  Lakshman  for  resorting  to  the  devious  mode  of  killing  Meghnad  by  sneaking  into  Nikumbhila,  the  prayer  hall  where  Meghnad  was  engaged  in  praying.  Taking  advantage  of  his  unarmed  state,  Lakshman  murdered  him.  Explaining  his  decision  to  valorize  Meghnad,  Madhusudan  in  a  letter  to  his  friend  Rajnarayan  Basu  wrote:  “I  despise  Ram  and  his  rabble,  but  the  idea  of  Ravana  elevates  and  kindles  my  imagination;  he  was  a  grand  fellow.”  (January  25,  1824).

Despite  this  tradition,   this  year,   a  Bengali  BJP  leader  managed  to  organize  a  Ram  Navami  procession  in  Kolkata  by  recruiting  the  local  unemployed  youth  –  promising  them  jobs  if  they  bring  BJP  to  power.  He  allured  them  by  repeating  Modi’s  slogan  of  `double-engine’,   meaning                 the  engine  in  the  states  can  only  function  if  they  are  aligned  to  the  central  engine  in  Delhi  run  by  the  BJP.

Homogenizing  the  diverse  Hindu  people  under  the  hegemony  of   Ram 

The  centralizing  authoritarian  Modi  government,  which  is  running  into  conflict  with  Opposition  ruled  states,  and  threatening  the  spirit  of  federalism  that  is  embedded  in  our  Constitution,  is  trying  to  justify  its  misdeeds  by  invoking  the  name  of  Ram,  playing  on  the  religious  sentiments  of  the  majority  Hindu  population.  After  attempting  to  impose  Hindi  as  a  national  language  all over  India  and  crush  linguistic  diversities,  the  Modi  government  is  now  trying  to  project  the  Hindu  god  Ram  as  a  national  icon  in  the  name  of  unifying  all  Indians  under  the  umbrella  of  nationalism.  Anyone  refusing  to  worship  Ram  and  join  Ram  Navami  processions  will  be  hauled  up  for  blasphemy.

Yet,  in  the  southern  states,  people  treat  Ram  and  Sita  and  worship  them  in  different  ways  that  are  in  stark  contrast  with  the  practices  followed  in  the  Hindu-Hindi  heartland.  The  Ramayana  that  the  Tamilians  read is  the  version  by  Kampan,   the  12^th  century  author  of  Iramavataram,  which  in  certain  sections  vastly  differ  from  Valmiki’s narrative, and puts  Sita  on  a  higher  pedestal.   Similarly,  Telegu-speaking  women  in  Andhra  Pradesh  and  Telangana  have  invented  a  Ramayana  of  their  own  by  composing  and  singing  songs  that  domesticate  the  travails  of  Sita  in  terms  of  their  own  diurnal  experiences.  In  Kerala,  the  Rama  story  is  visualized  through  puppet  plays,  which  reduce  the  size  of  the  monumental  epic  characters  to  that  of  dolls  to  be  manipulated  by  the  puppeteers  from  behind  the  scenes.  (Re:  Many  Ramayanas.  The  Diversity  of a  Narrative  Tradition in  South  Asia.  Ed. Paula  Richman.  OUP.  New  Delhi.  1992)

Given  these  diverse  interpretations  of  Ramayana, and  the  different  understanding  of  Ram  and  Sita   in  popular  perception,  varying  from  one  region  to  another,  the  Modi  government’s  attempt  to  impose  Ram  as  a  hegemonizing  icon  on  all  Hindus  cannot  work.  Further,  his  determination  to    elevate  Ram  as  a  Hindi-speaking  god  is  alienating  the  Hindus  of  the  southern  states.  Their  chief  ministers  are  protesting  against  the  infliction  of   Hindi  on  their  official  correspondence.

Positioning  Ram  and  Hanuman  against  Muslims,  depicted  as  present  followers  of  Ravana.

The  state-sponsored  elevation  of  Ram  through  ceremonies  like  Ram  Navami  are  aimed  at  unifying  these  diverse  and  often  mutually  conflicting  sections  of  the  Hindu  population.  But  such  ceremonies  are  also  becoming  tools  in  the  hands  of  the  Hindu  fanatical  outfits  like  Vishva  Hindu  Parishad  and  Bajrang Dal  who  deliberately  organize  demonstrations in  front  of  mosques,  shouting  slogans   insulting  the   Muslim worshippers  there.  Shops  run  by  Muslims  are  being  forcibly  closed down  by  the  goons  of  these  outfits  during  Hindu  religious  festivals.  Muslim  pedestrians  are  being  harassed  by  these  goons  who  force  them  to  shout  `Jai  Shri  Ram.’

Defending  the  weaponization  of  Ram  Navami  by  the  Sangh  Parivar,  a  BJP  leader  from  West  Bengal, Dilip  Ghosh  while  recently  addressing  a public  rally  in  the  North  24-Parganas  district  there  proudly  claimed:  “Ten  years  ago,  people  didn’t  know  what  Ram  Navami  processions  were.  Today,  such  processions  are  being  held  in  every  locality  because  Hindus  have  realized  they  need  to  unite.”  He  then  advised  Hindus  to  keep weapons  at  home  for  self- protection.  (Re:  Times  of  India.  April  18,  2025).   By  admitting  that  ten  years  ago  Bengalis  didn’t  know  what  Ram  Navami  processions  were,  he  acknowledges  that  it  is  a  newly  imported  festival  under  the  auspices  of  the  BJP.  Not  satisfied  with  imposing  Ram  Navami  as  a  national  ceremony  on  all  the  diverse  sections  of  our   people,  the  Sangh  Parivar  is  now  demanding  that  privilege  for  Ram’s  army  general,  the  monkey-god  Hanuman.  Hanuman  Jayanti  was  celebrated  on  a  massive  scale  this  year  in  BJP-ruled  states,  where  the  governments  spent  money  from  their  exchequer  to  subsidize  these  celebrations.  It  is  necessary  to  remind  our  people  that  this  money  is  being  diverted  from   the    taxes  that  they  pay  which are  accumulated  in  the  exchequer.  Do  all  the  tax-payers,  coming  from  different  religious  denominations,   want  their  taxes  to  subsidize  the  religious  ceremonies  of  a  single  community,  the  majoritarian  Hindus  ?

Agitation  against  the  Waqf (Amendment)  Act  –  considered  as  Na-pak  by  Muslims

The  enactment  of  the  Waqf  (Amendment)  Act  has  become  the  proverbial  last  straw  on  the  camel’s  back.  The  Muslim  community  could  not  bear  it  any  more  and  they  have  come  out  in  the  legislature  as  well  as  in the  streets  to  voice  their  protest.  The  Act  is  a  controversial  piece  of  legislation.  Some Muslim  organizations  have  expressed  apprehensions  that  it  would  curb  the    Waqf  board’s  power  to  distribute  charity, and  its  control  over  its  properties.   Some  other  Muslim  groups  have  reserved  their  opinions.

The  opposition  to  the  Act  took  a  violent  communal  shape  in  the  Murshidabad  district  of  the  Trinamul-ruled  state  of  West  Bengal.  Islamist  fanatical  groups  (Muslim  counterparts  of  the  Hindu  fanatical  Bajrang  Dal  and  Vishwa  Hindu  Parishad)  attacked  Hindu  homes  and  killed  a  father  and  son  duo.  They  alleged  that  stones  were  thrown  on  their  anti-Waqft  demonstration  by  this  Hindu  family.  A   Muslim  man  has  been  accused  and arrested  in  this  connection.  At  around  the  same  time,  a  Muslim  youth  was  killed  by  police  bullets.  There  are  unconfirmed  reports  that  Islamic  terrorists  from  Bangladesh  have  infiltrated  into  Bengal  after  the  present  Yunus-led  caretaker  government  (which  is  anti-India  and  has  lifted  ban  on  Islamic  fundamentalist  organizations  and  allowed  them  to  cross  over  to  Bengal  to  create  unrest). Yet,  if  we  go  back  to  the  past  in  Bengal,  there  had  always  been  a  general  public  recognition  and  grateful  acknowledgment  by  Hindus  also,  of  Muslim  owners  transferring  their  lands  and  properties  to  the  Waqf  board  for  charitable  purposes.   We  come  across  an  old  Bengali  document  signed  by  one  Habibullah  Bahar       who “Waqf  koriya  Islamer  sebaye  bilaya  diyachhilen”  (donated  his  property  in  the  name  of  Waqf).  (Re:  Byaboharik  Bangla  Abhidhan.  Bangla  Academy.  Dhaka.  1992)

The post Ram and Hanuman Vs Ravana of anti-waqf (amendment act) agitation appeared first on SabrangIndia.

According to the complaint, Chetan Patel delivered a public speech on April 23, between 7:30 and 8:00 pm at Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Chowk, a prominent location in Alibaug, District Raigad. The speech followed the tragic terrorist attack in Pahalgam on April 22, 2025, in which several innocent Indians lost their lives. Despite the Muslim community in Alibaug publicly condemning the attack, Patel’s speech reportedly vilified the Muslim community as a whole. In his address, Patel allegedly denounced those who advocated for communal harmony, labelling them “so-called secular bugs,” and called upon Hindus to economically boycott Muslims by refusing to conduct business with them or purchase goods from them.

The complaint asserts that Patel’s speech was not an isolated act but part of a larger attempt to foment hatred and enmity between religious communities. A video clip of the speech was recorded and subsequently circulated on social media platforms, including WhatsApp and Facebook, further amplifying its divisive content. Notably, the clip was uploaded by Suhas Ghanekar on the Facebook group “Me Alibagkar,” thereby extending the reach of Patel’s message and allegedly inciting communal disharmony.

SabrangIndia has a copy of the complaint. In light of these actions, the complainants have sought the registration of a case under several provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), specifically Sections 196 (offence promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion), 353 (statements that could incite mutiny, disregard of duty, or public fear, potentially leading to violence), and Section 3(5) (common intention or constructive liability in criminal cases). The complaint emphasises that both Patel and Ghanekar have played active roles in creating an atmosphere of distrust and hostility, thus endangering the social fabric of the region.

This complaint reflects growing concerns over hate speech and its dissemination via both physical and digital platforms, particularly in the aftermath of traumatic national events. The deliberate targeting of a minority religious community despite its public condemnation of violence raises serious questions about the motivations behind such inflammatory rhetoric. It also highlights the role of social media in rapidly spreading hate, thereby posing new challenges for law enforcement agencies tasked with maintaining communal harmony.

Details of the speech made by Chetan Patel

Chetan Patel, the Raigad district president of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), delivered a deeply troubling speech during a gathering in Raigad, Alibaug. In his address, Patel called for the social and economic boycott of Muslims, labelled secular-minded individuals as “worms” who must be crushed, and encouraged the use of violence and public humiliation against those advocating communal harmony. Referring to the situation as a “dharma yudh” (religious war), he invoked dangerous communal imagery, urging Hindus to tighten economic controls and sever ties with minorities. His statements not only vilified an entire community but also encouraged vigilantism and collective punishment, striking at the very foundations of India’s constitutional commitment to secularism and equality.

Transcript of the violent derogatory speech:

“In Alibaug, the town of ‘dead’ Hindus, to see so many of you gathered, I feel happy. Every time, instead of acting, we sit at home and curse some Salim, Maqdoom, or whoever, blaming them. Don’t blame them. Spot and single out the ‘secular worms’ among us, in our society, in your society — get them, crush them.”

“These are the people who have taken on the mantle (the vakalatnama) and constantly say, “All Muslims are not like this,” and so on. Catch hold of them and ask them: who gave you this vakalatnama? If we want this to end, we must first crush these ‘secular worms’ among us. Single them out. Socially boycott them. If they are making these arguments anywhere, slap them, fling cow dung on them. This has to stop. Until this stops, such incidents will continue happening.”

“Most critically, cut off their economic lifeline. This started during the Nagpur riots. Things in Nagpur are hawa tight (they have been taught a lesson). It has started in Nashik too. I know that in Alibaug squeezing them economically is tougher, but we must try and crush them economically.”

“Every rupee you spend on their business will be used against you. No one was asked over there whether you are Agri, Mali, or of any particular caste. They were simply asked to read the kalma, their pants were stripped, and then they were shot dead. They attacked only Hindus. Make them feel ashamed.”

“From tomorrow itself, when you are purchasing anything, at least practice an economic boycott. (Claps from five or six people.) Ask the names of those you are buying from. Until this starts, every month we will be meeting here for a shradhanjali (condolence meeting).”

“If we want to escape this cycle, economic boycott is the way. Every path has its method — not every person needs to brandish a sword. This should not be announced publicly, but it must sometimes be said. All of you assembled here — spread this message to your neighbours.”

“Purchasers too: look at whom you are buying from. If he is giving it for two rupees less, why can’t you? Start this. Tighten their economic strings. Squeeze them. Start now.”

“Cursing PM Modi or any Prime Minister or Home Minister every morning is not enough. This is a dharma yudh (religious war). Understand the 350-year-old history. Stand united, or else we will be chopped like potatoes and onions!”

“Forget brotherhood and harmony. A person who is not a brother to his own cousin sister, how can he be a brother to you?”

“Be ready for war. Economic boycott is the only way.” (Claps; around 15 onlookers present.)

Following the circulation of the video on social media, several concerned citizens raised complaints against Patel, highlighting the incendiary and divisive nature of his remarks. In response to mounting backlash, Patel issued a video apology, attempting to limit the scope of his comments by claiming they were directed solely at those supporting terrorism and foreign forces. He further stated that his intention was to preserve communal harmony in Alibaug. However, his original speech remains deeply problematic: it normalised hate speech, promoted unlawful actions like economic boycotts and violence, and severely undermined efforts to foster peace and unity. Even the subsequent apology fails to meaningfully address the dangerous consequences of the original call to action, which risked legitimising discrimination and communal violence in an already volatile environment.

Transcript of the apology:

“Namaskar. Jai Shri Ram. A video of mine has gone viral on social media. In order to prevent any misuse or misunderstanding, I wish to clarify that my words and opinions were not directed against any patriotic Indian citizen. They were aimed solely at those who, directly or indirectly, support the heinous act that took place in Pahalgam on April 22. My words were against those forces — from Pakistan, Bangladesh, or individuals associated with them — who should not be economically empowered. In my peaceful Alibaug, nothing should happen to disturb political, communal, or inter-religious harmony. It is with this intent that I am issuing this second video statement. If any Indian citizen’s religious sentiments have been hurt by my previous statement, I sincerely apologise. Jai Hind.”

Detailed piece about other such attempts including Alibaug may be read here.

Related:            

Echoes of Hate: Online anti-Muslim hate spreads against Muslim businesses and workers after Pahalgam attack

Pahalgam attack sparks nationwide turmoil, Kashmiri students face a chilling wave of hate across India

SC leads the nation’s legal fraternity as it unites in grief & outrage over Pahalgam terror attack

The post Complaint filed against VHP’s Chetan Jagdish Patel for inflammatory speech in Alibaug appeared first on SabrangIndia.

The effect of this orchestrated online hate campaign is multi-faceted and deeply damaging. Socially, it fosters an environment of fear and distrust, further polarising communities and entrenching existing prejudices. The constant barrage of hateful content online normalises discrimination and can incite real-world violence and ostracisation. This digital propaganda effectively weaponises social media, turning it into a platform for disseminating prejudice and enacting a form of collective punishment due to stereotypes.

In Dombivli, protesters called for economic boycott of Muslim vendors

While a protest was organised in Dombivli city of Thane district ostensibly to condemn the Pahalgam terror attack, disturbing elements within the gathering have surfaced, raising serious concerns about the underlying motivations and potential for communal incitement. A video from the event reveals a man addressing the assembled crowd, and instead of solely focusing on denouncing terrorism, he openly called for the economic boycott of non-Hindus within the area. This inflammatory rhetoric specifically targeted the livelihoods of fruit sellers and local vendors, effectively painting an entire community with the brush of suspicion and demanding their economic marginalisation.

This shift in focus from condemning a specific act of violence to targeting an entire religious demographic for economic strangulation is deeply alarming. It highlights how events intended to express national solidarity and condemnation of terrorism can be hijacked by individuals seeking to propagate divisive agendas and incite discriminatory practices against minority communities, turning grief and anger into tools for economic coercion and social exclusion within the local sphere of Dombivali.

The insidious nature of online hate lies in its ability to spread rapidly and anonymously, leaving a lasting scar on the social fabric and hindering any prospects of reconciliation and understanding.

Nine BJP workers booked for ‘abusing, assaulting’ Muslim hawkers in Dadar

Similarly, Mumbai police have registered a case against nine BJP workers, including Akshata Tendulkar, president of Mahim Assembly, for allegedly abusing and assaulting Muslim hawkers in the Dadar market area, following a complaint filed by hawker Saurabh Mishra. The case is being handled by the Shivaji Park police.

The Indian Express reported that the incident happened on Thursday evening. Tendulkar and his eight associates reached Dadar market area opposite Rangoli store and allegedly asked hawkers if they were Muslims, the complaint read. Mishra added that they assaulted one of the Muslim workers who work under him.

“They asked my worker Sofiyan Shahid Ali his name and then abused and assaulted him. When Ali ran away from the place, they chased him and again assaulted him,” Mishra said

In a separate account, Tendulkar, speaking to a news channel, defended the group’s actions by asserting they were pressing for police intervention against alleged Bangladeshi nationals using forged Indian documents. He claimed that their repeated complaints about illegal immigrants selling produce in the area had been consistently ignored by law enforcement.

“We had requested police to take action against those Bangladeshi nationals who have created fake Indian documents and were selling fruits and vegetables as hawkers. We and local residents were angry over the matter. Local residents were asking us what the BMC and police are doing? On Thursday we had gone on a round to check where all Muslim people works and what (solution) can be done” Tendulkar said, reported the Indian Express.

DCP Zone 5 Ganesh Gawde stated that the Shivaji Park police station has registered a case against the nine accused under sections 189(2), 191(2), 115(2), 351(2), and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, as well as sections 37(1) and 135 of the MP Act. He confirmed that the investigation into the matter is currently underway

BJP’s national spokesperson, Shehzad Poonawalla, offered a similar narrative, using the same platform to urge a different kind of boycott. He took to X, stating, “Dear Hindus Jaat ke naam pe batoge, Toh Dharm ke naam pe katoge Telling you this as an Indian Muslim, Jo tumhe jaati me baante – take a pledge to boycott such people forever #PahalgamTerroristAttack.”

Dear Hindus

Jaat ke naam pe batoge
Toh Dharm ke naam pe katoge

Telling you this as an Indian Muslim

Jo tumhe jaati me baante – take a pledge
to boycott such people forever #PahalgamTerroristAttack

— Shehzad Jai Hind (Modi Ka Parivar) (@Shehzad_Ind) April 23, 2025

Muslim worker removed from temple job by right-wing group

In a disturbing manifestation of the heightened communal tensions, a Muslim youth named Shahid reportedly faced the abrupt termination of his employment at a temple. The sole reason cited for his dismissal was his religious identity, with the tragic incident in Pahalgam being used as a pretext. Shahid’s case starkly illustrates the insidious reach of communal prejudice, where an individual’s established work within a place of worship became irrelevant in the face of generalised suspicion directed towards an entire community.

A user while sharing the video of incident, wrote o X that “Hindus are no longer in a mood to tolerate. After #PahalgamTerrorAttack, an economic boycott has begun, removing them from business and labour roles. Finally, Hindus are uniting”

Hindus are no longer in a mood to tolerate. After #PahalgamTerrorAttack, an economic boycott has begun, removing them from business and labour roles.

Finally Hindus are uniting pic.twitter.com/E6CylqrTlj

— Voice of Hindus (@Warlock_Shubh) April 24, 2025

Indore doctor refused to treat a Muslim patient in response to the Pahalgam attack

The ripple effects of the Pahalgam terror attack tragically extended into the realm of healthcare, as evidenced by a deeply concerning incident in Madhya Pradesh’s Indore. Dr. Neha Arora Verma, a medical professional, reportedly refused to treat a Muslim patient, explicitly citing the terror attack as the reason for her denial. The doctor went so far as to share a screenshot of her message, in which she callously informed the Muslim woman, “I’m sorry, we are no longer taking any patients at our centre.”

This act of blatant discrimination, seemingly motivated by collective punishment and prejudice, highlights the dangerous ways in which fear and communal animosity can permeate even essential services like healthcare.

In #MadhyaPradesh‘s #Indore, a doctor refused to treat a #Muslim patient in response to the #PahalgamTerrorAttack.

Dr. Neha Arora Verma shared a screenshot of her message in which she declined to consult a Muslim woman, stating, “I’m sorry, we are no longer taking any patients… pic.twitter.com/H9i2twYiE7

— Hate Detector (@HateDetectors) April 28, 2025

While Dr. Verma subsequently deleted the post, the initial message served as a stark and disturbing illustration of how the aftermath of a terror attack can be shamefully exploited to deny fundamental rights based solely on religious identity, further fracturing the social fabric of the community.

Hate banners surface in Punjabi Bagh calling for economic boycott

Shockingly, hate-filled boycott banners have surfaced in Punjabi Bagh, openly targeting an entire community and inciting economic ostracisation. This blatant display of prejudice, in a public space, sends a chilling message, fostering an atmosphere of fear and distrust. The banners represent more than just isolated incidents; they are a symptom of a larger, more insidious problem.

Adding fuel to the already raging online propaganda advocating for the economic boycott of Muslims in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack, a right-wing organisation identifying as Sanatan Hindu Ekta Vichar Manch amplified this divisive rhetoric on X. Their post explicitly called for a sweeping boycott, urging followers to “Boycott everything from which even one rupee goes to terrorists or has the possibility of going,” before listing a wide array of targets including “Films, Tourism, Hotel business, Street vendors, Shops, Building material, Anything at all.”

हर उस चीज का वहिष्कार करो जिसमें से एक रुपए भी आतंकियों को जाता हो या जाने की संभावना हो
चाहे फिल्म हो
पर्यटन हो
होटल व्यवसाय हो
रेहड़ी पटरी हो
दुकान हो
बिल्डिंग मैटर हो
।
कुछ भी हो #BoycottDotandKey #छलनी_हिंदू_आत्मा#PahalgamTerroristAttack pic.twitter.com/i3HlSaGzNG

— सनातन हिंदू एकता विचार मंच (@SanatnEktaMunch) April 24, 2025

Inflammatory Speech by VHP leader in Alibaug

Chetan Patel, the Raigad district president of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), delivered a deeply troubling speech during a gathering in Raigad, Alibaug. In his address, Patel called for the social and economic boycott of Muslims, labelled secular-minded individuals as “worms” who must be crushed, and encouraged the use of violence and public humiliation against those advocating communal harmony. Referring to the situation as a “dharma yudh” (religious war), he invoked dangerous communal imagery, urging Hindus to tighten economic controls and sever ties with minorities. His statements not only vilified an entire community but also encouraged vigilantism and collective punishment, striking at the very foundations of India’s constitutional commitment to secularism and equality.

Following the circulation of the video on social media, several concerned citizens raised complaints against Patel, highlighting the incendiary and divisive nature of his remarks. In response to mounting backlash, Patel issued a video apology, attempting to limit the scope of his comments by claiming they were directed solely at those supporting terrorism and foreign forces. He further stated that his intention was to preserve communal harmony in Alibaug. However, his original speech remains deeply problematic: it normalised hate speech, promoted unlawful actions like economic boycotts and violence, and severely undermined efforts to foster peace and unity. Even the subsequent apology fails to meaningfully address the dangerous consequences of the original call to action, which risked legitimising discrimination and communal violence in an already volatile environment.

Transcript of the violent derogatory speech:

“In Alibaug, the town of ‘dead’ Hindus, to see so many of you gathered, I feel happy. Every time, instead of acting, we sit at home and curse some Salim, Maqdoom, or whoever, blaming them. Don’t blame them. Spot and single out the ‘secular worms’ among us, in our society, in your society — get them, crush them.”

“These are the people who have taken on the mantle (the vakalatnama) and constantly say, “All Muslims are not like this,” and so on. Catch hold of them and ask them: who gave you this vakalatnama? If we want this to end, we must first crush these ‘secular worms’ among us. Single them out. Socially boycott them. If they are making these arguments anywhere, slap them, fling cow dung on them. This has to stop. Until this stops, such incidents will continue happening.”

“Most critically, cut off their economic lifeline. This started during the Nagpur riots. Things in Nagpur are hawa tight (they have been taught a lesson). It has started in Nashik too. I know that in Alibaug squeezing them economically is tougher, but we must try and crush them economically.”

“Every rupee you spend on their business will be used against you. No one was asked over there whether you are Agri, Mali, or of any particular caste. They were simply asked to read the kalma, their pants were stripped, and then they were shot dead. They attacked only Hindus. Make them feel ashamed.”

“From tomorrow itself, when you are purchasing anything, at least practice an economic boycott. (Claps from five or six people.) Ask the names of those you are buying from. Until this starts, every month we will be meeting here for a shradhanjali (condolence meeting).”

“If we want to escape this cycle, economic boycott is the way. Every path has its method — not every person needs to brandish a sword. This should not be announced publicly, but it must sometimes be said. All of you assembled here — spread this message to your neighbours.”

“Purchasers too: look at whom you are buying from. If he is giving it for two rupees less, why can’t you? Start this. Tighten their economic strings. Squeeze them. Start now.”

“Cursing PM Modi or any Prime Minister or Home Minister every morning is not enough. This is a dharma yudh (religious war). Understand the 350-year-old history. Stand united, or else we will be chopped like potatoes and onions!”

“Forget brotherhood and harmony. A person who is not a brother to his own cousin sister, how can he be a brother to you?”

“Be ready for war. Economic boycott is the only way.” (Claps; around 15 onlookers present.)

Transcript of the apology:

“Namaskar. Jai Shri Ram. A video of mine has gone viral on social media. In order to prevent any misuse or misunderstanding, I wish to clarify that my words and opinions were not directed against any patriotic Indian citizen. They were aimed solely at those who, directly or indirectly, support the heinous act that took place in Pahalgam on April 22. My words were against those forces — from Pakistan, Bangladesh, or individuals associated with them — who should not be economically empowered. In my peaceful Alibaug, nothing should happen to disturb political, communal, or inter-religious harmony. It is with this intent that I am issuing this second video statement. If any Indian citizen’s religious sentiments have been hurt by my previous statement, I sincerely apologise. Jai Hind.”

The digital firestorm following the Pahalgam terror attack has tragically ignited real-world flames of discrimination. Online calls for economic boycotts against Muslim businesses, amplified by right-wing groups and reflected in localised protests like the one in Dombivli, have chillingly materialised into tangible acts of prejudice. The assault on Muslim hawkers in Dadar by BJP workers, explicitly targeting their religious identity, and the discriminatory dismissal of a Muslim youth from his temple job, alongside the denial of medical care to a Muslim patient in Indore, paint a grim picture of collective punishment and eroding social trust.

Related

‘End discriminatory regimes of colonial era,’ SC declares provisions of State Prison Manuals unconstitutional

SC asks States to improve prison conditions, address the issue of overcrowding in prisons in its latest rebuke to States for not following its previous directives effectively

Indian Prison Condition and Monitoring

The post Echoes of Hate: Online anti-Muslim hate spreads against Muslim businesses and workers after Pahalgam attack appeared first on SabrangIndia.

While the Valley remains steeped in grief, the ripple effects of the attack have reached far beyond Jammu and Kashmir, causing a fresh wave of anxiety and hostility towards Kashmiri students studying across India. Reports of targeted harassment and violence have surfaced, prompting urgent responses from community organisations and political leaders alike.

Advisory Issued by the Jammu and Kashmir Students Association (JKSA)

In light of rising tensions and threats following the attack, the Jammu and Kashmir Students Association (JKSA) has issued an urgent advisory to all Kashmiri students pursuing education across various Indian states. The association appealed for restraint, advising students to remain indoors unless absolutely necessary, refrain from engaging in political discussions, and avoid posting sensitive content online.

Nasir Khuehami, National Convenor of JKSA, emphasised the volatile nature of the current environment. “We appeal to all Kashmiri students to maintain calm, avoid political debates or provocative content on social media, and not venture out unnecessarily,” he said through his social media account. The association also provided helpline numbers and has activated a dedicated response team to support students in distress and coordinate with local authorities where needed.

Pahalgam Bloodshed | J&K Students Association Issues Helpline & Advisory for Kashmiri Students

In the wake of the tragic Pahalgam attack that claimed over 28 innocent lives, the J&K Students Association (JKSA) has issued a safety advisory for Kashmiri students across India.

We… pic.twitter.com/Wf5acUieKA

— Nasir Khuehami (ناصر کہویہامی) (@NasirKhuehami) April 23, 2025

Ummar Jamal, the National President of JKSA, condemned the terror attack unequivocally, calling it a “cowardly and inhumane act.” As per report of Rising Kashmir, Jamal reiterated that terrorism has no religion or justification and must be countered with unity and resolve. Expressing solidarity with the victims’ families, the association urged students to focus on their safety and academics, warning against being misled by those seeking to exploit the tragedy for political purposes.

Wave of Harassment against Kashmiri Students

In the immediate aftermath of the Pahalgam attack, JKSA reported a disturbing spike in harassment, abuse, and violence targeted at Kashmiri students in several Indian states, including Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, and Punjab.

• Uttarakhand (Dehradun): Around 20 Kashmiri students fled to Jolly Grant Airport after being threatened by members of the Hindu Raksha Dal. The group circulated videos threatening students with violence if they did not leave by a set deadline. Later, it was provided by Khuehami that an FIR has been registered against the members of the Hindu Raksha Dal, and arrests will follow shortly.

Uttrakhand:

I have spoken to the DGP of Uttarakhand, Deepam Seth Ji, regarding the open threats issued by members of the Hindu Raksha Dal to Kashmiri students, including an ultimatum asking them to vacate the state. I’ve been told FIR has been registered and arrests will follow…

— Nasir Khuehami (ناصر کہویہامی) (@NasirKhuehami) April 24, 2025

Lalit Sharma of Hindu Raksha Dal has ordered Kashmiri Muslims to leave Uttarakhand by tomorrow. He claims that their ‘teams’ will go on rounds from tomorrow and deal with any Kashmiri Muslim in their own way. This comes a day after the #pahalgamattack pic.twitter.com/F75WrdRV3n

— Amil Bhatnagar (@AmilwithanL) April 23, 2025

• Himachal Pradesh (Arni University, Kathghar and Kangra): Kashmiri students were assaulted in their hostel rooms by individuals who forcibly entered, broke doors, and physically attacked them while hurling communal slurs and branding them as terrorists.

Now Himachal Pradesh.

The situation is turning grim and deeply concerning. We have received frantic distress calls from Kashmiri students from Arni University, Kathghar (Indora), in Kangra, Himachal Pradesh who are being harassed, abused, and physically attacked by right-wing…

— Nasir Khuehami (ناصر کہویہامی) (@NasirKhuehami) April 23, 2025

• Punjab (Universal Group of Institutions, Derabassi, Chandigarh): Students were beaten up by a group of unidentified locals who stormed the hostel premises late at night armed with sharp weapons. One student suffered serious injuries; others were left shaken.

7th Incident:

Recieved Distress Calls from Universal Group of Institutions, Derabassi, Chandigarh, where Kashmiri students were brutally attacked inside the hostel premises during the night. Students said that, local individuals and other students forcefully entered the hostel… pic.twitter.com/QDf1iYjMlk

— Nasir Khuehami (ناصر کہویہامی) (@NasirKhuehami) April 24, 2025

• Uttar Pradesh (Prayagraj): Reports emerged of students being asked to vacate accommodations by landlords and being forced to leave due to threats from local groups and police inaction.

Received multiple distress calls from Kashmiri students and youth in Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh. Landlords are asking them to vacate immediately, citing security concerns. Some have already left under pressure. This is alarming. Prayagraj is a sensitive region, and there are…

— Nasir Khuehami (ناصر کہویہامی) (@NasirKhuehami) April 23, 2025

• Noida (Amity University): As per The New Indian Express, a Kashmiri student was allegedly beaten severely on campus grounds. The matter has been brought to the attention of JKSA, which is in touch with university officials.
• Written threats to institutions (Dehradun): The Hindu Raksha Dal issued letters and warnings to various colleges, demanding the expulsion of Kashmiri Muslim students and threatening consequences if their demands weren’t met.

5th Incident: Now in Dehradun.

Hindu Raksha Dal and other Right Wing Elements has issued written threats to several colleges in Dehradun Uttrakhand, demanding the expulsion of Kashmiri Muslim students and setting a chilling ultimatum of 10 AM tomorrow. Just now, Around 20…

— Nasir Khuehami (ناصر کہویہامی) (@NasirKhuehami) April 23, 2025

• Social media threats: Viral videos have surfaced showing fringe groups inciting violence against Kashmiris, with direct calls for assault, eviction, and boycott—contributing to a climate of fear.

Political leaders and civil society react

The severity of the situation has prompted appeals from political leaders and civil society groups. Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah confirmed that the state government is in touch with counterparts in other states to ensure the safety of Kashmiri students. “I’ve requested my counterpart Chief Ministers to take extra care,” he said in a post on X (formerly Twitter).

The J&K government is in touch with the governments of the states where these reports are originating from. I’m also in touch with my counterpart Chief Ministers in these states & have requested they take extra care. https://t.co/oMTx06o08Y

— Omar Abdullah (@OmarAbdullah) April 24, 2025

People’s Democratic Party (PDP) president Mehbooba Mufti also expressed deep concern. In a statement, she said she had spoken with Union Home Minister Amit Shah, offering condolences for the victims of the attack while urging his immediate intervention to protect Kashmiris facing threats in various parts of the country. She condemned the role of extremist elements in inciting hate and stressed the need for the Centre to act decisively.

Spoke with Home Minister @AmitShah ji to extend my deepest condolences & also express solidarity with bereaved families of the Pahalgam terror attack. We stand with the nation in this hour of mourning. Also requested him to intervene in the wake of certain elements openly…

— Mehbooba Mufti (@MehboobaMufti) April 24, 2025

Sajad Lone, President of the People’s Conference, echoed these sentiments, calling on the Union Government to protect the lives and dignity of Kashmiri students. “They are being bullied, beaten, and evicted.” he stated.

There have been many incidents across the country wherein Kashmiri students are being harassed, beaten up, bullied and even asked to vacate their residential premises.
I request the union government to please ensure the safety of Kashmiri students.

— Sajad Lone (@sajadlone) April 24, 2025

A targeted campaign of hate

JKSA convenor Nasir Khuehami strongly criticised the coordinated nature of these incidents. “This is not just about security. It is a calculated, targeted campaign of hate and vilification against students from a specific region and identity,” he said

I have spoken to the office of the Leader of Opposition, @RahulGandhi Ji, regarding the growing incidents of harassment, intimidation, and threat calls targeting Kashmiri students across the country. LoP has expressed deep concern over these disturbing developments and assured…

— Nasir Khuehami (ناصر کہویہامی) (@NasirKhuehami) April 24, 2025

With at least seven major incidents of violence or harassment reported since the Pahalgam massacre, the situation remains deeply alarming. The JKSA continues to monitor developments closely, provide support to those affected, and appeal to national and state authorities for immediate action.

Conclusion: Urging unity, not vengeance

In the face of tragedy, the JKSA as well as the politicians of Jammu and Kashmir have consistently called for calm, compassion, and community support. It has reiterated that violence cannot be met with hate and scapegoating. As the country mourns the victims of the Pahalgam attack, there is an urgent need for national unity—not only against terror, but against the communal rhetoric that threatens to unravel social harmony.

For now, the focus remains on ensuring the safety and well-being of vulnerable students. Helpline numbers are operational, and support networks are being strengthened. But unless state authorities act swiftly and decisively, the consequences of unchecked bigotry could spiral further, exacerbating the very divisions that terrorists seek to exploit.

Related:

A Tranquil Paradise Shattered: The Pahalgam terror attack

SC leads the nation’s legal fraternity as it unites in grief & outrage over Pahalgam terror attack

Muslims in Kashmir & across India strongly condemn Pahalgam terror attack

Indian Muslims, others, condemn the heinous massacre of tourists near Pahalgam, Kashmir

The post Pahalgam attack sparks nationwide turmoil, Kashmiri students face a chilling wave of hate across India appeared first on SabrangIndia.