While the Court did not stay the investigation, it directed the police that if they intend to question Kamra, they must do so in Chennai, where Kamra currently resides. Notably, as per the report of LiveLaw, the Court also clarified that if a chargesheet is filed during the pendency of Kamra’s quashing plea, the trial court shall not proceed against him until the High Court has decided the matter. The order made permanent the interim protection that had been granted to Kamra earlier on April 16.

During the hearing, Senior Advocate Navroz Seervai, representing Kamra, argued that the FIR was a direct attack on the comedian’s constitutional right to free speech, guaranteed under Article 19 (1) (a) of the Constitution. As per the report of Bar and Bench, he maintained that the impugned remarks were part of a larger political satire, a form of commentary that has long been protected in democratic societies. According to Seervai, the term gaddar was used in reference to the 2022 split in the Shiv Sena, when Eknath Shinde and a group of MLAs broke away from the Uddhav Thackeray-led faction and aligned.

Court’s key rulings and procedural safeguards

• Kamra shall not be arrested in connection with the FIR during the pendency of his petition.
• The Mumbai Police is permitted to continue the investigation but must question Kamra only in Chennai, his current place of residence.
• If the police file a chargesheet, the trial court must not initiate proceedings against Kamra until the High Court rules on the quashing petition.
• The police’s notice was issued under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNSS), which does not require arrest. The court recorded this intention of non-arrest in its order.
• Should new material arise, the police may approach the court for further directions.

Arguments presented by Kamra’s counsel

1. Freedom of Speech under Article 19

Senior Advocate Navroz Seervai, representing Kamra, firmly asserted that the content of Kamra’s comedy act falls squarely within the ambit of the right to free speech and expression protected under Article 19 (1) (a) of the Constitution. He maintained that the performance was satirical in nature, dealt with public political events, and did not fall within the permissible restrictions under Article 19(2).

As per LiveLaw, referring to several judgments of the Supreme Court, including Imran Pratapgarhi v. State of Gujarat, Seervai argued that censorious actions against artists amount to chilling effects and suppress free speech through fear of prosecution. He emphasised that this case was emblematic of the State’s misuse of legal processes, allegedly at the behest of a political party, to intimidate a comedian and send a broader message to dissenting artists.

2. Misuse of police machinery and procedural flaws

Seervai questioned the haste with which the FIR was filed. He pointed out that the complainant, Shiv Sena MLA Murji Patel, reportedly viewed the clip at 9:30 pm on March 23, filed a complaint at 10:45 pm, and an FIR was registered by 11:52 pm on the same night. Summons were issued the following day. As per Bar and Bench, Seervai contended that the FIR process was mechanically executed without due application of mind.

Additionally, he argued that Section 356(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which relates to defamation, was incorrectly invoked since the person allegedly defamed—Eknath Shinde—had not filed the complaint himself.

3. Lack of grounds for Section 353 (1) (b) BNS

The charge under Section 353(1)(b) BNS, which concerns attempts to create fear or alarm leading to offences against the State or public tranquillity, was also challenged. Seervai maintained that Kamra’s act was a factual and satirical account of political developments in Maharashtra, notably the 2022 split in the Shiv Sena and the subsequent change in government. He argued that satire should not be judged at face value and must be assessed from the standpoint of a rational, strong-minded observer.

4. Death threats and intimidation

Highlighting the threats Kamra has received from political workers, Seervai accused the police of harassment by insisting on Kamra’s physical presence despite his willingness to cooperate via video conferencing. He described the police’s approach as a “witch hunt”, citing that audience members and the show’s production team were called for questioning over 60 times.

State Government’s submissions

1. Distinction between humour and malicious targeting

The State’s counsel contended that Kamra’s remarks were not protected by Article 19(1)(a) because they constituted a cognisable offence. According to the State, the content of Kamra’s act crossed the line from satirical critique to “malicious targeting” of an individual. The counsel argued that public figures also possess a right to dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution, and that Kamra’s performance lowered Deputy CM Shinde’s dignity by targeting his appearance and political conduct.

The State rejected the comparison to politicians using similar language, stating that the absence of prior prosecution did not bar lawful action in Kamra’s case.

2. Section 353(2) and political community

The State also argued that Kamra’s clip promoted public mischief under Section 353(2) BNS. The counsel alleged that it contained false information and fostered ill-will. Notably, the State interpreted “community” to include political parties with large followings and common ideology, implying that Kamra’s remarks could foment hostility between political groups.

3. On threats and police conduct

While the State claimed responsibility for Kamra’s safety, it pointed out that Kamra had not filed any formal complaint about the threats. The High Court, however, acknowledged Kamra’s communications indicating fear for his safety and asked the police if his statement could be recorded in Chennai with the assistance of the local police.

When the State argued for liberty to arrest in future if new material emerged, the court responded that the notice under Section 35(3) BNSS already recorded the police’s current intent not to arrest and that the State could not now deny this position.

Background of the case

Kunal Kamra, who is currently residing in Tamil Nadu, had previously secured interim anticipatory bail from the Madras High Court, extended until April 17. The case stems from a Zero FIR initially filed under Sections 353 (1) (b), 353(2), and 356 (2) of the BNS at the behest of Shiv Sena MLA Murji Patel, who claimed that Kamra’s reference to a “traitor” was directed at Eknath Shinde. Although Shinde’s name was not explicitly mentioned in the performance, the MLA alleged that the remarks were clearly intended against him in the context of the Shiv Sena split.

The show, titled Naya Bharat, reportedly covered a range of political and social issues, including commentary on political opportunism, the power of India’s billionaire class, and gender inequality. Following the controversy, Shiv Sena workers vandalised Mumbai’s Habitat Studio, where Kamra had performed. Twelve individuals were arrested in connection with the violence and later released on bail. Kamra maintains that he has been facing death threats ever since.

Kamra subsequently received multiple threats and moved the Madras High Court—since he currently resides in Tamil Nadu—seeking interim anticipatory bail. On April 7, 2025, the Madras High Court extended his interim protection from arrest until April 17. Thereafter, Kamra approached the Bombay High Court seeking quashing of the FIR.

Related:

Comedian Kunal Kamra faces state-sponsored intimidation over satirical remarks on Deputy CM Eknath Shinde

For us to be truly free & independent, both media & judiciary need one another: (Justice) S Muralidhar

Arresting dissent: Punjab Government’s U-turn on farmer protests, protest site bulldozed, farmer leaders detained

Shielded by Power? How Prashant Koratkar’s remains un-arrested, even after making derogatory comments against Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj

“It’s not Aurangzeb’s grave, but a plot to uproot Shivaji Maharaj’s valour!”

The post Bombay High Court grants permanent protection from arrest to Kunal Kamra in FIR over ‘Gaddar’ remark appeared first on SabrangIndia.

While the Valley remains steeped in grief, the ripple effects of the attack have reached far beyond Jammu and Kashmir, causing a fresh wave of anxiety and hostility towards Kashmiri students studying across India. Reports of targeted harassment and violence have surfaced, prompting urgent responses from community organisations and political leaders alike.

Advisory Issued by the Jammu and Kashmir Students Association (JKSA)

In light of rising tensions and threats following the attack, the Jammu and Kashmir Students Association (JKSA) has issued an urgent advisory to all Kashmiri students pursuing education across various Indian states. The association appealed for restraint, advising students to remain indoors unless absolutely necessary, refrain from engaging in political discussions, and avoid posting sensitive content online.

Nasir Khuehami, National Convenor of JKSA, emphasised the volatile nature of the current environment. “We appeal to all Kashmiri students to maintain calm, avoid political debates or provocative content on social media, and not venture out unnecessarily,” he said through his social media account. The association also provided helpline numbers and has activated a dedicated response team to support students in distress and coordinate with local authorities where needed.

Pahalgam Bloodshed | J&K Students Association Issues Helpline & Advisory for Kashmiri Students

In the wake of the tragic Pahalgam attack that claimed over 28 innocent lives, the J&K Students Association (JKSA) has issued a safety advisory for Kashmiri students across India.

We… pic.twitter.com/Wf5acUieKA

— Nasir Khuehami (ناصر کہویہامی) (@NasirKhuehami) April 23, 2025

Ummar Jamal, the National President of JKSA, condemned the terror attack unequivocally, calling it a “cowardly and inhumane act.” As per report of Rising Kashmir, Jamal reiterated that terrorism has no religion or justification and must be countered with unity and resolve. Expressing solidarity with the victims’ families, the association urged students to focus on their safety and academics, warning against being misled by those seeking to exploit the tragedy for political purposes.

Wave of Harassment against Kashmiri Students

In the immediate aftermath of the Pahalgam attack, JKSA reported a disturbing spike in harassment, abuse, and violence targeted at Kashmiri students in several Indian states, including Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, and Punjab.

• Uttarakhand (Dehradun): Around 20 Kashmiri students fled to Jolly Grant Airport after being threatened by members of the Hindu Raksha Dal. The group circulated videos threatening students with violence if they did not leave by a set deadline. Later, it was provided by Khuehami that an FIR has been registered against the members of the Hindu Raksha Dal, and arrests will follow shortly.

Uttrakhand:

I have spoken to the DGP of Uttarakhand, Deepam Seth Ji, regarding the open threats issued by members of the Hindu Raksha Dal to Kashmiri students, including an ultimatum asking them to vacate the state. I’ve been told FIR has been registered and arrests will follow…

— Nasir Khuehami (ناصر کہویہامی) (@NasirKhuehami) April 24, 2025

Lalit Sharma of Hindu Raksha Dal has ordered Kashmiri Muslims to leave Uttarakhand by tomorrow. He claims that their ‘teams’ will go on rounds from tomorrow and deal with any Kashmiri Muslim in their own way. This comes a day after the #pahalgamattack pic.twitter.com/F75WrdRV3n

— Amil Bhatnagar (@AmilwithanL) April 23, 2025

• Himachal Pradesh (Arni University, Kathghar and Kangra): Kashmiri students were assaulted in their hostel rooms by individuals who forcibly entered, broke doors, and physically attacked them while hurling communal slurs and branding them as terrorists.

Now Himachal Pradesh.

The situation is turning grim and deeply concerning. We have received frantic distress calls from Kashmiri students from Arni University, Kathghar (Indora), in Kangra, Himachal Pradesh who are being harassed, abused, and physically attacked by right-wing…

— Nasir Khuehami (ناصر کہویہامی) (@NasirKhuehami) April 23, 2025

• Punjab (Universal Group of Institutions, Derabassi, Chandigarh): Students were beaten up by a group of unidentified locals who stormed the hostel premises late at night armed with sharp weapons. One student suffered serious injuries; others were left shaken.

7th Incident:

Recieved Distress Calls from Universal Group of Institutions, Derabassi, Chandigarh, where Kashmiri students were brutally attacked inside the hostel premises during the night. Students said that, local individuals and other students forcefully entered the hostel… pic.twitter.com/QDf1iYjMlk

— Nasir Khuehami (ناصر کہویہامی) (@NasirKhuehami) April 24, 2025

• Uttar Pradesh (Prayagraj): Reports emerged of students being asked to vacate accommodations by landlords and being forced to leave due to threats from local groups and police inaction.

Received multiple distress calls from Kashmiri students and youth in Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh. Landlords are asking them to vacate immediately, citing security concerns. Some have already left under pressure. This is alarming. Prayagraj is a sensitive region, and there are…

— Nasir Khuehami (ناصر کہویہامی) (@NasirKhuehami) April 23, 2025

• Noida (Amity University): As per The New Indian Express, a Kashmiri student was allegedly beaten severely on campus grounds. The matter has been brought to the attention of JKSA, which is in touch with university officials.
• Written threats to institutions (Dehradun): The Hindu Raksha Dal issued letters and warnings to various colleges, demanding the expulsion of Kashmiri Muslim students and threatening consequences if their demands weren’t met.

5th Incident: Now in Dehradun.

Hindu Raksha Dal and other Right Wing Elements has issued written threats to several colleges in Dehradun Uttrakhand, demanding the expulsion of Kashmiri Muslim students and setting a chilling ultimatum of 10 AM tomorrow. Just now, Around 20…

— Nasir Khuehami (ناصر کہویہامی) (@NasirKhuehami) April 23, 2025

• Social media threats: Viral videos have surfaced showing fringe groups inciting violence against Kashmiris, with direct calls for assault, eviction, and boycott—contributing to a climate of fear.

Political leaders and civil society react

The severity of the situation has prompted appeals from political leaders and civil society groups. Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah confirmed that the state government is in touch with counterparts in other states to ensure the safety of Kashmiri students. “I’ve requested my counterpart Chief Ministers to take extra care,” he said in a post on X (formerly Twitter).

The J&K government is in touch with the governments of the states where these reports are originating from. I’m also in touch with my counterpart Chief Ministers in these states & have requested they take extra care. https://t.co/oMTx06o08Y

— Omar Abdullah (@OmarAbdullah) April 24, 2025

People’s Democratic Party (PDP) president Mehbooba Mufti also expressed deep concern. In a statement, she said she had spoken with Union Home Minister Amit Shah, offering condolences for the victims of the attack while urging his immediate intervention to protect Kashmiris facing threats in various parts of the country. She condemned the role of extremist elements in inciting hate and stressed the need for the Centre to act decisively.

Spoke with Home Minister @AmitShah ji to extend my deepest condolences & also express solidarity with bereaved families of the Pahalgam terror attack. We stand with the nation in this hour of mourning. Also requested him to intervene in the wake of certain elements openly…

— Mehbooba Mufti (@MehboobaMufti) April 24, 2025

Sajad Lone, President of the People’s Conference, echoed these sentiments, calling on the Union Government to protect the lives and dignity of Kashmiri students. “They are being bullied, beaten, and evicted.” he stated.

There have been many incidents across the country wherein Kashmiri students are being harassed, beaten up, bullied and even asked to vacate their residential premises.
I request the union government to please ensure the safety of Kashmiri students.

— Sajad Lone (@sajadlone) April 24, 2025

A targeted campaign of hate

JKSA convenor Nasir Khuehami strongly criticised the coordinated nature of these incidents. “This is not just about security. It is a calculated, targeted campaign of hate and vilification against students from a specific region and identity,” he said

I have spoken to the office of the Leader of Opposition, @RahulGandhi Ji, regarding the growing incidents of harassment, intimidation, and threat calls targeting Kashmiri students across the country. LoP has expressed deep concern over these disturbing developments and assured…

— Nasir Khuehami (ناصر کہویہامی) (@NasirKhuehami) April 24, 2025

With at least seven major incidents of violence or harassment reported since the Pahalgam massacre, the situation remains deeply alarming. The JKSA continues to monitor developments closely, provide support to those affected, and appeal to national and state authorities for immediate action.

Conclusion: Urging unity, not vengeance

In the face of tragedy, the JKSA as well as the politicians of Jammu and Kashmir have consistently called for calm, compassion, and community support. It has reiterated that violence cannot be met with hate and scapegoating. As the country mourns the victims of the Pahalgam attack, there is an urgent need for national unity—not only against terror, but against the communal rhetoric that threatens to unravel social harmony.

For now, the focus remains on ensuring the safety and well-being of vulnerable students. Helpline numbers are operational, and support networks are being strengthened. But unless state authorities act swiftly and decisively, the consequences of unchecked bigotry could spiral further, exacerbating the very divisions that terrorists seek to exploit.

Related:

A Tranquil Paradise Shattered: The Pahalgam terror attack

SC leads the nation’s legal fraternity as it unites in grief & outrage over Pahalgam terror attack

Muslims in Kashmir & across India strongly condemn Pahalgam terror attack

Indian Muslims, others, condemn the heinous massacre of tourists near Pahalgam, Kashmir

The post Pahalgam attack sparks nationwide turmoil, Kashmiri students face a chilling wave of hate across India appeared first on SabrangIndia.

According to reports from the Superintendent of Police, the attack took place around 9:00 am on April 22, when most villagers were away in their fields for cultivation work. Taking advantage of their absence, unknown assailants set multiple homes ablaze, triggering panic and displacement in the already fragile region. In response, Kamjong District Magistrate Rangnamei Rang Peter invoked Section 163(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, to issue emergency prohibitory orders.

The curfew prohibits the movement of all persons outside their homes and bars any activity that could disturb peace and public order in the affected areas. Only personnel involved in essential services and law enforcement have been exempted. Anyone wishing to organise processions for weddings, funerals, or religious or cultural events within the restricted zones must obtain prior written permission from the District Magistrate or the Superintendent of Police. To ensure on-ground implementation and oversight, Hungyo Yurreikan, Sub-Divisional Collector of Sahamphung, has been appointed Executive Magistrate for the affected village jurisdictions, as per a report of India Today NE.

The incident has been widely condemned by tribal civil society groups. In a joint statement, five Kuki-Zo-Hmar organisations, including the Kuki Inpi Manipur (KIM), denounced the attack as a targeted assault on innocent Kuki civilians. “These heinous acts of arson have devastated lives, destroyed homes, and terrorised a community already grappling with ethnic tension and insecurity,” the statement read, as per The Tribune.

The organisations described the attack as part of a disturbing pattern of systemic violence, displacement, and discrimination against the Kuki-Zo people. They criticised the Government of India for its continued failure to uphold constitutional duties and protect vulnerable communities in the state. “It is deeply alarming that such acts of terror persist under the government’s watch, at a time when the region demands urgent, just, and sensitive intervention,” they said, the report of YesPunjab said.

In addition to condemning the violence, the tribal bodies called for the immediate rehabilitation of affected families and the deployment of neutral and adequate security forces in Gampal and Haiyang to ensure safety and deter further attacks. As of now, no group has claimed responsibility, and an investigation into the incident is ongoing. With tensions running high and the threat of escalation looming, residents have been urged to remain indoors and extend full cooperation to security personnel patrolling the area.

Related:

Manipur: In a First Under Prez Rule, ‘Tactical Retreat’ by Meiteis

Manipur tensions escalate over free movement policy: Kuki-Zo resistance and government crackdown

Manipur Chief Minister N Biren Singh resigns amid political turmoil and ethnic unrest

Supreme Court seeks forensic report on audio recordings alleging Manipur CM’s role in ethnic violence

The post Curfew imposed in Kamjong District after arson attack destroys Kuki homes in Gampal and Haiyang appeared first on SabrangIndia.

A resolution passed unanimously by the Full Court expressed deep sorrow, stating that the “diabolical act of mindless violence” had shaken the collective conscience of the nation. It further read, “The Supreme Court of India pays its respectful tribute to the innocent lives brutally and prematurely lost. Our heartfelt condolences go to the bereaved families. We pray for the swift recovery of those injured.”

Supreme Court condemns the terrorist attack in Pahalgam. pic.twitter.com/MRMSo8MCzX

— Live Law (@LiveLawIndia) April 23, 2025

The resolution also remarked on the symbolic nature of the attack, targeting tourists who were simply enjoying the natural beauty of Kashmir, and emphasised that it stood as a stark reminder of the brutality that terrorism entails. As a mark of solidarity, the Judges, lawyers, and Registry staff observed a two-minute silence at 2 pm today.

Supreme Court to observe two minutes’ silence to pay tribute to the victims of the Pahalgam terror attack. pic.twitter.com/dYuNv3cRBK

— Live Law (@LiveLawIndia) April 23, 2025

Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA) stands in solidarity

Joining the chorus of condemnation, the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA) also passed a resolution decrying the attack. The Association expressed solidarity with the victims and the people of Jammu & Kashmir, stating, “It is our earnest prayer that peace, unity, and harmony prevail, so that our nation continues to progress in strength and brotherhood.”

Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association passes resolution condemning the heinous terrorist attack at Pahalgam. pic.twitter.com/f6ptbfKjRH

— Live Law (@LiveLawIndia) April 23, 2025

To honour the victims, nearly 300 advocates gathered at the Supreme Court lawns wearing white ribbons. The assembly served as both a solemn tribute and a symbolic act of unity against terror.

Lawyers gather in #SupremeCourtofIndia lawns to condemn #PahalgamTerroristAttack pic.twitter.com/yMm1G7djQ0

— Bar and Bench (@barandbench) April 23, 2025

Jammu and Kashmir legal fraternity calls for mourning and protest

In a significant gesture of protest and mourning, the Jammu & Kashmir High Court Bar Association (JKHCBA), Srinagar, strongly condemned the terrorist assault, calling it a “cowardly and barbaric attack” on innocent civilians and tourists. The Association announced a complete shutdown of judicial work across the High Court at Srinagar and all subordinate courts and tribunals on April 23.

Advocate Waseem Gul, President of JKHCBA, spoke to the Tribune and expressed profound sorrow and described the incident as an “unforgivable act of violence” that had no place in a civilised society. He stated, “We denounce this brutal assault on innocent lives, which seeks to disrupt the peace and harmony of Jammu and Kashmir. The legal fraternity stands united in condemning this barbarity.”

The Jammu wing of the Jammu & Kashmir High Court Bar Association also announced a complete suspension of court work on April 23 in solidarity with the victims. Bar President K. Nirmal Kotwal released a statement affirming the Association’s support: “We express our deepest condolences to the families of the deceased and wish a speedy recovery for the injured.”

In a rare and powerful display of unity, political parties, civil society organisations, traders, and transport unions across Jammu called for a Jammu Bandh. The Chamber of Commerce & Industry and transport unions pledged full support, leading to a complete shutdown of public transport and commercial establishments across the region as a mark of protest and mourning.

Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court requests advocates, officials at Srinagar Bench to assemble at court for observing two minutes silence to pay tribute to victims of Pahalgam terror attack. pic.twitter.com/D5In9azEyk

— Bar and Bench (@barandbench) April 23, 2025

Bar Associations Of Jammu & Srinagar To Observe Bandh In Protest Against Pahalgam Terror Attack#Pahalgamhttps://t.co/RqTn9zXZN5

— Live Law (@LiveLawIndia) April 23, 2025

Delhi High Court Bar Association reacts with protest and solidarity

As per LiveLaw, Echoing sentiments from the legal fraternity nationwide, the Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA) issued a strong statement condemning the attack as a “dastardly and cowardly act” that deliberately targeted innocent lives. DHCBA President and senior advocate N Hariharan, in a press release, described the attack as a direct challenge to the unity and sovereignty of India.

As a gesture of protest and solidarity, ANI reported that members of the DHCBA wore black ribbons on their arms during court proceedings.

Wider legal fraternity unites in condemnation

Across the Union Territory, various bar associations joined in expressing outrage. The Kashmir Jurists Bar Association attributed the attack to Pakistan-sponsored elements, labelling it an “inhuman assault on peaceful civilians.” They urged authorities to take firm action and adopt robust security measures to safeguard the lives of civilians in the future.

Adding its voice to the growing chorus, the Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association issued a statement strongly condemning the Pahalgam killings. In their message, the Association said, “We urge the Government of India to take swift and the severest possible action to identify, apprehend, and prosecute the perpetrators.”

Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association condemns #Pahalgam killings.

“We urge the Government of India to take swift and the severest possible action to identify, apprehend, and prosecute the perpetrators.” pic.twitter.com/rQwLILXCZn

— Bar and Bench (@barandbench) April 23, 2025

The Pahalgam terror attack has not only left a trail of destruction but has also triggered a profound and united response from India’s legal fraternity. From the Supreme Court to regional bar associations, legal institutions across the country have spoken in one voice—condemning the attack, mourning the victims, and calling for swift justice. Their solidarity underscores a shared commitment to peace, the rule of law, and the values of humanity that terrorism seeks to undermine.

Other reports on the Pahalgam terror attack may be read here and here,

Related:

Muslims in Kashmir & across India strongly condemn Pahalgam terror attack

Indian Muslims, others, condemn the heinous massacre of tourists near Pahalgam, Kashmir

The post SC leads the nation’s legal fraternity as it unites in grief & outrage over Pahalgam terror attack appeared first on SabrangIndia.

“This attack on the Supreme Court, as an institution, and qua the Chief Justice of India Mr Justice Sanjiv Khanna, as an individual, is unacceptable and must be dealt with in accordance with the law,” the statement added.

The association urged the attorney general to take action against Dubey. Already an advocate on record Anans Tanvir has approached the SC with a plea to launch contempt proceedings to which a division bench of the court, led by Justice Gavai asked the advocate to seek the Attorney General (AG). The hearing on this is listed for next week as there has been no response from the AG.

Under the 1971 Contempt of Courts Act, an individual can file a contempt petition in the Supreme Court only with approval from the attorney general or the solicitor general, it has been reported.

In his letter to the SC, Tanvir had argued that contempt proceedings should be initiated against Dubey for his “grossly scandalous” and “misleading” pronouncements on the CJI that were aimed at “lowering the dignity and authority of the Court.”

The SCBA in its resolution has stated that “this attack on the Supreme Court as an institution and qua the Chief Justice of India, Mr Justice Sanjiv Khanna as an individual is unacceptable and must be dealt with in accordance with law.”

The resolution may be read here.

Besides the bar association, the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association on Tuesday passed a resolution condemning Dubey’s remarks, Live Law reported.

“Such remarks are not only factually baseless and deeply irresponsible, but they also amount to a direct and unwarranted attack on the independence, dignity, and majesty of our country’s highest constitutional court,” the resolution was quoted as saying.

The Advocates-on-Record Association added that Dubey’s statements were “defamatory in nature and seek to lower the judiciary’s authority in the eyes of the public”.

The resolution emphasised the importance of judicial independence in a democracy and stated that while disagreements with the court’s decisions are acceptable, they must be expressed respectfully and within legal bounds.

The association also urged public representatives to “exercise restraint, uphold constitutional values, and respect the dignity of the judiciary”.

The post SCBA demands contempt action against BJP MP for remarks about CJI Sanjiv Khanna appeared first on SabrangIndia.

The attack in #Pahalgam was strongly condemned from several mosques across #JammuAndKashmir.

Imams called the killing of tourists inhuman and against the teachings of Islam. They prayed for the victims and demanded justice.#PahalgamTerroristAttack #PahalgamTerrorAttack pic.twitter.com/ktWmnUBxqt

— Hate Detector (@HateDetectors) April 23, 2025

This immediate reaction –news came in by 3 p.m. Tuesday, April 22— of the Muslim community in the Rajouri district in Jammu and Kashmir opening doors of mosques to accommodate the tourists from different parts stranded due to closure of Jammu following the attack.

As immediate humanitarian assistance, the Pahalgam Anantnag Tourist Stand Association President extends support, offering blood and cash assistance to needy tourists.

Pahalgam Anantnag Tourist Stand Association President extends support, offering blood and cash assistance to needy tourists. #PahalgamAttack #TouristSupport #Kashmir #kashmirattack #Pahalgam pic.twitter.com/iL6cv8Zjxo

— Kashmir Outlook (@kashmiroutlook1) April 22, 2025

Locals also held a candlelight vigil late evening Tuesday expressing their anger, distress and condemnation of the senseless killings

Pahalgam Attack: Locals Hold Candlelight March pic.twitter.com/a1yAJB550K

— Kashmir Life (@KashmirLife) April 22, 2025

This is our teaching of Islam unlike you all who always celebrated our misery. Muslim of Pahalgam protesting the terror attack

This is our teaching of Islam unlike you all who always celebrated our misery.
Muslim of Pahalgam protesting. #PahalgamTerrorAttack
pic.twitter.com/EwXNBsWYKa

— Adv Rukhsana Sayed (@Umm_e_meerann) April 22, 2025

Here are more visuals of the people of Pahalgam condemning terror attack.

Kashmiri media

April 23, dawn, and several prominent newspapers in Kashmir on Wednesday printed their front pages black to protest the brutal terrorist attack that left 26 people, mostly tourists, dead in the Pahalgam hill resort the previous day. The striking act of protest by the newspapers, each bearing powerful headlines in white or red, was a powerful public display of solidarity and grief, symbolising the collective sorrow felt by the residents and the media over the inhuman act. Editorials too were unequivocal, read here.

Besides, on April 23, all of the Valley was shut down completely in grief and condemnation. This followed a call by business and travel trade bodies across the Valley that made the announcement within hours of receiving news of the attack. They announced a complete shutdown on Wednesday to condemn the attack. This has been described as one of the deadliest attacks on civilians in recent years, sending shockwaves through the region and sparking national outrage. The shutdown had been jointly called by the Chamber of Commerce and Industries Kashmir (CCIK), Jammu and Kashmir Hoteliers Club (JKHC), All Travel Associations, transporters, restaurant owners, and various civil society organizations.

Indian Muslims, religious and others condemn Pahalgam attack

By Wednesday afternoon, over a dozen religious leaders and other organisations had condemned the attack.

Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP) and Indian Muslims for Secular Democracy (IMSD) among others have also strongly condemned the heinous terrorist targeting of tourists near Pahalgam in the Kashmir valley, killing 26 innocents and injuring several others on April 22. “We join all fellow Indians in offering our heartfelt condolences to the family and friends of the deceased. And call upon the central and state governments to ensure urgent and adequate compensation for the loss of precious lives and proper treatment of the injured.” The rest of the statement from civil society may be read here.

Syed Sadatullah Husaini, President, Jamaat-e-Islami Hind has strongly condemned the deadly terror attack that took place in Pahalgam, South Kashmir, on Tuesday.” The loss of innocent lives, including foreign tourists, is deeply heart-breaking. My thoughts and prayers are with the victims and their grieving families, his public statement read, adding, “There can be no justification for such a barbaric act. It is completely inhuman and deserves absolute and unequivocal condemnation. Those responsible must be brought to justice and given the harshest punishment.”

I strongly condemn the deadly terror attack that took place in Pahalgam, South Kashmir, on Tuesday. The loss of innocent lives, including foreign tourists, is deeply heartbreaking. My thoughts and prayers are with the victims and their grieving families.

There can be no… pic.twitter.com/lokdbK92gN

— Jamaat-e-Islami Hind (@JIHMarkaz) April 22, 2025

Bengaluru, Karnataka: The Jama Masjid Imam, Maulana Maqsood Iimran Rashadi says, “… This was a cowardly attack. I don’t understand what they (attackers) want to prove by doing such acts. This is Hindustan and we love Hindustan… We strongly condemn this terrorist attack on tourists, and strongly appeal to the government to punish these terrorists in such a way that no other terrorist dares to attack like this. They (terrorists) should be hanged in public… Islam does not allow such acts…”

#WATCHB | #PahalgamTerrorAttack | Bengaluru, Karnataka | Jama Masjid Imam, Maulana Maqsood Iimran Rashadi says, “… This was a cowardly attack. I don’t understand what they (attackers) want to prove by doing such acts. This is Hindustan and we love Hindustan… We strongly… pic.twitter.com/Gpsig3BvwH

— ANI (@ANI) April 23, 2025

“I strongly Condom Pahalgam Terror Attack, said Maulana Sayed Moinuddin Ashraf (Moin Miyan) President All India Sunni Jamiatul Olama.”

We Strongly Condom Pahalgam Terror Attack. Said Maulana Sayed Moinuddin Ashraf (Moin Miyan) President All India Sunni Jamiatul Olama. #maulanasayedmoinuddinashraf #moinemillat #MoinMiyan #allindiasunnijamiatulolama #pehalgam pic.twitter.com/IlpEAsKsEH

— MD RASHID (@MDRASHI08328411) April 23, 2025

Also, the Lucknow Eidgah Imam, Maulana Khalid Rasheed Farangi Mahali said in response to the Pahalgam terror attack, “We condemn in the strongest possible words the terrorist attack in Pahalgam. Today, we have organised a special prayer by students at Darul Uloom Firangi Mahal, Lucknow and Shaheen Academy. We demand that the Indian government ensure that the killers are punished severely. We appeal to the people of Pahalgam to maintain peace and communal harmony.”

#WATCH | Lucknow Eidgah Imam, Maulana Khalid Rasheed Farangi Mahali says, “We condemn in the strongest possible words the terrorist attack in Pahalgam. Today, we have organised a special prayers by students at Darul Uloom Firangi Mahal, Lucknow and Shaheen Academy. We demand… pic.twitter.com/PCSUUWPYIV

— ANI (@ANI) April 23, 2025

Other individual condemnations

The cricketer Mohammed Siraj called for terrorists to be punished without mercy: ‘Yeh kaisi ladai hai…,’ he is reported to have said.

The Ahmadiyya Muslim community, India has also expressed its anguish and “offered its deepest sympathies and heartfelt prayers to the victims and their grieving families. In their statement, they said, “Innocent lives lost to senseless violence is a tragedy for all of humanity. Islam strictly forbids all forms of terrorism and compels Muslims to uphold peace, justice, and the sanctity of life. The Holy Qur’an states: “Whosoever killed a person… it shall be as if he had killed all mankind.” (5:33) We stand united with our fellow citizens in this moment of grief and urge the authorities to bring the perpetrators of this inhumane act swiftly to justice. May India remain a land of peace, compassion, and unity for people of all faiths and backgrounds.

We strongly condemn the cowardly and barbaric terrorist attack in Pahalgam.

The Ahmadiyya Muslim Community, India offers its deepest sympathies and heartfelt prayers to the victims and their grieving families. Innocent lives lost to senseless violence is a tragedy for all of… pic.twitter.com/CNqkSvPklb

— Islam in India (@islaminind) April 22, 2025

Related:

Indian Muslims, others, condemn the heinous massacre of tourists near Pahalgam, Kashmir

The post Muslims in Kashmir & across India strongly condemn Pahalgam terror attack appeared first on SabrangIndia.

In a statement issues today representatives of these organisations have said,

“We join all fellow Indians in offering our heartfelt condolences to the family and friends of the deceased. And call upon the central and state governments to ensure urgent and adequate compensation for the loss of precious lives and proper treatment of the injured.

“According to some reports, The Resistance Front (TRF), a shadow group of the banned Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) terror group, has claimed responsibility for the strike.

“We hope that the perpetrators are swiftly apprehended, brought to justice and handed severe punishments.

“IMSD, Bebak Collective, BMMA, CSSS and Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP) have always opposed any targeting of innocent civilians anywhere, irrespective of the cause offered as justification for such savagery.

“The terror attack hits at the heart of the Valley’s tourism centre, Pahalgam, putting a big question mark on claims of “return of normalcy”.

“The latest mass killing raises disturbing questions about the failure of security agencies in ensuring adequate cover in and around Pahalgam, among the obvious targets of terrorist groups.

“We demand a thorough enquiry into such a grievous security lapse, fixing of responsibility and necessary action.

“Meanwhile, in this moment of grief and anguish, we are heartened by the humanity displayed by the average Kashmiri Muslim. On Wednesday (April 23) the entire Valley observed a complete bandh: shopkeepers, traders, transporters. Reports across Kashmir of Mosques opening their doors to assist distraught tourists are pouring in as are reports of open condemnations from the Mosques calling this terror attack an attack on humanity itself.

“Kashmiri newspapers have in their editorials and front pages, editorially and visually conveyed the message that this is a day of mourning for the lives lost. We urge all media, especially the television channels to objectively report the developments and not slide into any provocative coverage

“We call upon all Indians irrespective of religion to emulate the fine example of communal amity displayed by ordinary Kashmiri Muslims.”

Signatories:

Javed Anand, Convenor, IMSD

Hasina Khan, Bebaak Collective

Irfan Engineer, Director, Centre for Study of Society and Secularism (CSSS)

Teesta Setalvad, Citizens for Justice and Peace (CJP)

Zakia Soman, Co-Convenor, Bharatiya Muslim Mahila Andolan (BMMA)

Zeenat Shaukatali, Director General, Wisdom Foundation

Related:

Indians & Kashmiris alike, Muslims strongly condemn Pahalgam terror attack

The post Indian Muslims, others, condemn the heinous massacre of tourists near Pahalgam, Kashmir appeared first on SabrangIndia.

In Sindhudurg, a formal memorandum was submitted to the District Collector by Shri Bhaskar Kasar, representing the coordinated anti-bill movement. Addressed to DM Walawalkar, the memorandum called for the scrapping of the MSPS Act, citing its unconstitutional overreach and misuse of the term ‘public security’ to suppress dissent and target marginalised communities.

In Nanded, members of the Jan Suraksha Vidhayak Virodhi Samiti staged a Satyagraha, sitting in peaceful protest under a banner demanding the immediate withdrawal of the Bill. Community leaders and activists took turns addressing the gathering, warning of the chilling implications of this law for citizens’ rights and democratic discourse.

Symbolic acts of protest also marked the day’s events. In a striking demonstration held in Goregaon (West), protesters staged a dharna to denounce what they called the “insidious intention of the State” in introducing a bill “mischievously titled” as a Jan Suraksha (Public Security) Act. One protester commented that “even canines have understood the threat to democracy,” referencing the presence of a protest dog draped in a sloganed banner—a biting visual critique of the government’s attempt to silence criticism.

At Beed district, part of the Chhatrapati Sambhaji Nagar (Aurangabad) division, a mass sit-in was held outside the Collector’s Office. People’s movements and Left front parties jointly led the action, warning that the Bill aims to usher in an era of “autocratic rule” by robbing citizens of their constitutionally guaranteed freedoms. Placards and speeches throughout the day declared: “Under the guise of Jan Suraksha, they are snatching away our right to speak, to organise, to protest. This is not security—this is suppression.”

In Raigad, parallel protests took place both at the District Collector’s Office and the Tehsildar’s Office in Uran.

While Mumbai’s Bandra Collectorate saw a gathering of progressive groups rallying under the slogan: “Awaken, progressive society of Mumbai! Join the protest against the anti-people Maharashtra Public Security Act on April 22nd at 3 PM in front of the Bandra Collector’s Office. Scrap the Jan Suraksha Act. Inquilab Zindabad!”

In Nanded, the Jan Suraksha Vidhayak Virodhi Samiti held a Satyagraha demanding the scrapping of the Maharashtra Public Security Bill 2024. Protesters gathered under a large tent bearing banners that read “Jan Suraksha Vidhayak Radd Karo”, asserting that the law was aimed at silencing dissent and eroding constitutional freedoms.

Speeches were delivered by Comrade Sanjay Nangare (Shiv Sena UBT), Adv. Avinash Magre (Congress), Dr. Amol Phadke (Congress), and Dattatray Funde (Swabhimani Shetkari Sanghatana), all sharply criticising the Bill’s provisions and the threat they pose to democracy. A memorandum was submitted to Tehsildar Prashant Sangade during the demonstration.

Key attendees included Com. Adv. Subhash Lande (CPI), Bhagwanrao Gaikwad, Babanrao Pawar, Dattatray Are, Vaibhav Shinde, Ram Lande, Vishnu Gore, Balasaheb Mhaske, Ashok Najan, Adv. Afroz Shaikh, Babulal Sayyed, Geeta Thorve, Anjali Bhujbal, Mrs. Sable, and others.

In Thane, members of the Bharat Jodo Abhiyan and the Maharashtra State Workers’ Union (Thane district) staged a protest outside the District Collector’s office, decrying the Maharashtra Public Security Bill 2024 as anti-democratic and anti-worker.

The diverse and decentralised nature of these protests reflects the intensity of opposition to the MSPS Bill across Maharashtra.

Critics of the Bill have raised serious constitutional and legal objections. The Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill, 2024 allows the state to declare any organisation “unlawful” for acting against the “security of the state” or “public order”—terms that remain undefined and dangerously vague. The Bill gives sweeping powers to the police, including warrantless searches and seizures, extended pre-trial detention, and immunity from prosecution. It also empowers the government to seize the property of those accused, even before conviction, and criminalises ‘support’ to unlawful organisations in ways that can encompass mere association, speech, or financial transactions.

Legal experts and rights defenders have warned that the legislation mirrors the most repressive features of central laws like the UAPA and the erstwhile TADA, but with weaker procedural safeguards. It also bypasses judicial scrutiny by allowing the executive to set up “Public Security Councils” to take punitive action. These measures, protestors argue, are not about ensuring safety but about consolidating power and shrinking democratic space.

As the protests continue to gather momentum and testimonies of resistance pour in from across the state, the message is clear: the people of Maharashtra are not willing to cede their rights in the name of a security paradigm that criminalises dissent.

Related:

Maharashtra Rises in Protest: State-wide agitation against draconian Maharashtra Public Safety Bill on April 22

Understanding the Maharashtra Special Public Security (MSPS) Bill, 2024 | Threat to Civil Liberties?

CJP sends objections against Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill, 2024, citing grave threats to civil liberties

Press Release: Experts warn, Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill a threat to civil liberties

Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill: Bogey of “urban naxals” invoked to legitimise clamping down of dissent?

The post From Sindhudurg to Mumbai, Maharashtra erupts in protest against repressive public safety bill appeared first on SabrangIndia.

This selective censorship doesn’t just stifle dissenting voices — it shapes the nation’s cultural memory. By muting anti-caste icons, distorting histories of resistance, and erasing portrayals of state brutality, the CBFC is actively curating what stories are allowed to be told, and by extension, what truths can be collectively remembered. What remains is a sanitised cinematic landscape, stripped of its radical edges and emptied of the marginalised voices that once sought to fill its frames.

Phule: When telling the truth becomes ‘too casteist’

Ananth Mahadevan’s Phule, a biopic starring Pratik Gandhi and Patralekhaa, tells the story of Jyotiba and Savitribai Phule — pioneering 19th-century anti-caste reformers who fought Brahminical patriarchy, opened schools for women and Dalits, and laid the foundation for radical social change. The film was timed to release on April 11, 2025, Jyotiba Phule’s birth anniversary, but was postponed to April 25— after the CBFC demanded the removal or alteration of multiple words and lines related to caste and historical oppression.

Among the cuts were references to specific caste groups (“Mahar”, “Mang”), systems (“Manusmriti”), and regimes (“Peshwai”), as well as lines like “3,000 saal purani gulaami” (3,000-year-old slavery), which the CBFC asked to be softened to “kai saal purani hai” (it is ancient). References to Manu, caste, and the ideological roots of the Varna system were deemed “sensitive,” effectively scrubbing the Phules’ own language and political vocabulary from their story.

These interventions came after lobbying from Brahmin organisations such as the Brahmin Federation, led by Anand Dave, who claimed the film unfairly demonised Brahmins and failed to acknowledge those among them who had supported Phule. This is despite the fact that Phule’s writings — including Gulamgiri — explicitly and systematically critiqued Brahminism and caste violence. By censoring casteist realities, the CBFC has not just interfered with a film; it has interfered with a historical reckoning.

As director Mahadevan put it while speaking to Times of India, “We should not sugarcoat history.” He revealed that the film’s script was based on extensive archival research, including Phule’s own writings, government records, and educational archives. He had deliberately chosen not to romanticise or soften the injustices of the time. That the CBFC found the truth too inflammatory speaks volumes.

Political leaders like Jitendra Awhad (NCP-SP) publicly condemned the CBFC’s decision, accusing the board of succumbing to pressure from upper-caste groups. “What is true must be shown,” Awhad stated, warning against the sanitisation of social justice struggles in popular media. The episode reignites long-standing questions: whose history is acceptable to depict on screen? And who gets to decide?

Silencing the struggles of the marginalised

Phule is not the only film to face such erasure. In fact, its very existence is an exception — Hindi cinema has rarely engaged with Dalit-Bahujan histories in a meaningful or centralised way. Earlier Marathi films like Mahatma Phule (1954) and Satyashodhak (2023) have attempted to honour his legacy, but no Hindi-language film with a nationwide release has previously placed Jyotiba or Savitribai at the centre of the frame.

The CBFC’s actions have the potential to ensure that such legacies remain ghettoised within regional spheres. Its interventions render Phule’s politics legible only in diluted, caste-neutral terms — which is antithetical to the very purpose of their lives’ work. This signals a broader refusal to engage with the intellectual and political lineage of caste annihilation movements. In censoring Phule, India is not just denying a film; it is denying memory.

Punjab ’95: Sanitising the state’s sins

In a similar vein, Punjab ’95 — directed by Honey Trehan and starring Diljit Dosanjh — faced an even more severe gauntlet from the CBFC. The film is a biopic of Jaswant Singh Khalra, the human rights activist who exposed the illegal mass cremation of over 25,000 Sikhs killed in fake encounters during the Punjab insurgency. The CBFC initially demanded 85 cuts, later escalating to nearly 120, including removing references to specific locations, Sikh scriptures, international bodies, and — most damningly — Khalra’s name and the film’s title.

Khalra’s widow, Paramjit Kaur Khalra, had condemned the demands, reminding the public that the film had been made with the family’s full consent. As per Hindustan Times, she had noted, “Hiding Punjab’s truth will benefit no one.” The Shiromani Gurdwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC) also defended the film’s accuracy and called for its unaltered release. The struggle that movies who depict a historical event of India’s past, which might want to be forgotten or ignored, is emblematic of how truth itself is policed.

The politics of what gets censored — and what doesn’t

These censorship decisions are not isolated or apolitical. Films like MSG-2: The Messenger (2015), which portrayed Adivasis as “shaitans” (devils), were allowed to release — and even received enthusiastic endorsement from followers of Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh, despite his criminal convictions. The Kashmir Files (2022) and Kerala Stories (2023), accused of communal polarisation, received tax exemptions and direct political promotion. In stark contrast, films like Haider (2014) and Udta Punjab (2016) faced extensive censorship for exposing state violence or drug abuse.

This contrast underscores a chilling trend: the CBFC functions less as a neutral regulator of public sensibilities, and more as an ideological gatekeeper. Stories that challenge Hindu upper-caste hegemony or question state violence are obstructed; stories that reinforce them are amplified.

Conclusion: Censorship as historical violence

The CBFC’s treatment of Phule and Punjab ’95 reveals a deeper crisis of memory in India. Censorship is not merely about content — it is about control over collective narratives, about what histories are allowed to survive. In rendering caste violence “too sensitive” for public viewing, the state sends a clear message: caste can be discussed, but only within state-sanctioned parameters. Similarly, police brutality and human rights violations can be mentioned — but only if the perpetrator is not the state itself.

At stake is not just artistic freedom but historical truth, democratic debate, and the public’s right to remember. To censor films like Phule and Punjab ’95 is to erase the very people and movements who fought to make India more equal, more just, and more humane. If the truth makes some uncomfortable, that is all the more reason for it to be shown.

Related:

Maharashtra Rises in Protest: State-wide agitation against draconian Maharashtra Public Safety Bill on April 22

Beed to Delhi: Lawyer beaten in Maharashtra, judge threatened in Delhi—what the path for justice means for women practioners in today’s India

Fiction as history and history honestly portrayed: a tale of two films and a documentary

Congress Radio, the power of revolutionary change: Lessons from ‘Ae Watan Mere Watan’, the film

The post Erasing Resistance: How the CBFC is censoring films that challenge caste and state power appeared first on SabrangIndia.

The Vatican said in a statement that that the pope died at 7.35 AM (local time). Pope Francis had the reputation of an outspoken reformer a radical voice from the church. He was the first to occupy the highest position of the Catholic Church from Latin America. The Vatican News noted that in the 12 years of his pontificate, Pope Francis visited as many as 68 countries “giving life to a tireless mission to take the Word of God and the comfort of His love to the whole human family.” Born Jorge Mario Bergoglio, Pope Francis was the son of Italian immigrants in Argentina.

The pope’s last message to the world through his official account on X was to observe Easter. “Christ is risen! These words capture the entire meaning of our existence, for we were not made for death but for life,” he had written. Even during his last full address, the pope, who was known for speaking on the marginalised, had said spoken against violence.

“What a great thirst for death, for killing, we witness each day in the many conflicts raging in different parts of our world! How much violence we see, often even within families, directed at women and children! How much contempt is stirred up at times towards the vulnerable, the marginalized, and migrants!”

Pope Francis was also aware of and spoke against ecological damage done to the earth by humans. In 2015, his letter to Roman Catholic bishops took many Catholics by surprise with its uncompromising conclusions and call for an in-depth transformation of our lifestyles.

Stop the killings in Gaza: Pope Francis

One commentator on X, formerly twitter quoted from his tenure as the pontiff of the Catholic Church. “𝙀𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙮 𝙩𝙞𝙢𝙚 𝙄 𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙨𝙚 𝙙𝙤𝙤𝙧𝙨, 𝙄 𝙖𝙨𝙠 𝙢𝙮𝙨𝙚𝙡𝙛, “𝙒𝙝𝙮 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙢 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙣𝙤𝙩 𝙢𝙚?” – The Pope after his Good Friday visit to Rome’s Regina Coeli jail. An unfailing support for a lasting peace in Gaza, he had publicly commented, and strongly against Israeli bombings:
“Yesterday, children were bombed. This is cruelty. This is not war.”

Against Ecocide: Pope Francis

A piece on Conversation says: “For the “green” pope, the aim was to raise public awareness around the challenges of global warming by creating a relational approach that included God, human beings and the Earth. It was the first time an encyclical had been devoted wholly to ecology.”

2018: Sharp comments on child abuse in the Church

Though long overdue, but Pope Francis’s letter of condemnation and apology regarding the abuse of children by Catholic priests did sent a few ripples of comfort and reckoning.  He conceded that the Church “showed no care for the little ones; we abandoned them”.  He acknowledged the “heart-wrenching pain” of the victims who had been assaulted by the clerical class, and the cries “long ignored, kept quiet or silenced”. Sabrangindia had reported on this: “With shame and repentance,” went the Pope’s grave words, “we acknowledge as an ecclesial community that we were not where we should have been, that we did not act in a timely manner, realizing the magnitude and the gravity of the damage done to so many lives.”

Related:

The Tree of Life affirmed by Pope Francis in Bahrain

The post Pope Francis passes away at 88 appeared first on SabrangIndia.